Why ratings are given
GP practices analysis
What CQC actually marks down, and where quality concentrates by region and key question.
Poorly-rated locations: which key question fails most
- Safe88.4
- Well-led87.4
- Effective77.9
- Responsive50.3
- Caring33
Safe
- Outstanding49
- Good9080
- Requires improvement754
- Inadequate330
- Unrated6427
- Inspected but not rated361
- No published rating660
- Insufficient evidence to rate5
Effective
- Outstanding199
- Good9144
- Requires improvement607
- Inadequate247
- Unrated6427
- Inspected but not rated355
- No published rating674
- Insufficient evidence to rate13
Caring
- Outstanding274
- Good9595
- Requires improvement275
- Inadequate47
- Unrated6427
- Inspected but not rated344
- No published rating689
- Insufficient evidence to rate15
Responsive
- Outstanding485
- Good9071
- Requires improvement504
- Inadequate135
- Unrated6427
- Inspected but not rated349
- No published rating682
- Insufficient evidence to rate13
Well-led
- Outstanding479
- Good8841
- Requires improvement533
- Inadequate354
- Unrated6427
- Inspected but not rated357
- No published rating669
- Insufficient evidence to rate6
AI-derived recurring themes
No data.
By region
- London4224
- North West2534
- South East2495
- West Midlands1844
- East1646
- Yorkshire & Humberside1558
- South West1340
- East Midlands1277