Download full report
02
Care Association Alliance
Building a National Care Service
A Programme for Reform
Paper02Draft

Towards a National
Workforce Settlement

A recognised profession, a national career framework, and a funded settlement for the adult social care workforce in England.
Authors
Melanie Weatherley MBECo-Chair, Care Association Alliance
William WalterLead Author
Damian GreenSenior Policy Adviser
Draft · September 2026
Scroll to begin ↓
The Alliance

The national voice for social care providers.

The Care Association Alliance brings together local and regional care associations from across England, representing thousands of independent and voluntary providers of residential, nursing and home care. Our first paper argued the money. This one argues the people.

10,000+
Independent care providers represented through member associations
Two
Papers in a programme for reform: funding, then workforce
One
Unified voice to Government, Parliament and the Independent Commission
01
The problem

A workforce the size of the NHS, with no profession to belong to.

Adult social care fills around 1.71 million posts across close to 19,000 employers. Few parts of the economy match that scale. Yet it is one of the only workforces of its size with no nationally recognised professional framework, no consistent career ladder, and no shared understanding of what a career in care looks like.

1.71m
Filled posts in adult social care, 2024/25, rising again in 2025/26
Skills for Care
~19,000
Separate employers, 37% of them employing one to four people
Skills for Care
6.2%
Vacancy rate in 2025/26, around three times the wider economy’s
Skills for Care
23.6%
Turnover: the problem is retention, not recruitment
Skills for Care
Fig 1Adult social care vacancy rate by region, 2024/25
0%2%4%6%8%London8.5%East Midlands7.3%East of England7.1%South East7%West Midlands6.6%North West6.5%South West6.4%Yorkshire and the Humber5.6%North East5%
Original CAA analysis of Skills for Care regional workforce data. London’s rate is 70 per cent higher than the North East’s; the North East has 8.3 CQC-registered providers per 1,000 filled posts against 15.4 in the East Midlands. One national model will not fit every region.
02
Pay compression

The sector rewards presence over progression.

We reconstructed the experience premium directly from twelve editions of Skills for Care’s own pay reports rather than take a secondary source on trust. A care worker with five or more years’ experience earned 33p an hour more than a new starter in 2016. Today it is between 6p and 10p.

Fig 2Hourly pay premium for 5+ years’ experience over under 1 year, 2016–2025
0p10p20p30p2016 LEVEL · 33P33pMar 2016Mar 2018Mar 20205pMar 2022Mar 20244pMar 202510pDec 2025
Original CAA reconstruction from Skills for Care, Pay in the Adult Social Care Sector in England, March 2016 to December 2025. The senior-to-care-worker differential fell from around 10 per cent to around 6 per cent over the same period; the premium above the minimum wage fell from 58p to 39p.
0p
Experience premium, 2016
6–10p
Experience premium, 2025
0p
Care worker vs cleaner pay gap, down from £2.70 in 2008
03
The moving boundary

Two-thirds already do clinical work. Almost none are paid for it.

Wound care, catheter and stoma care, PEG feeding, insulin. A 2026 survey by The Care Workers’ Charity found 67.9 per cent of care workers are asked to carry out delegated healthcare activities, and 93 per cent of those have never received additional compensation. Voluntary guiding principles exist. A binding framework, tied to competence and pay, does not.

Fig 3Delegated healthcare, and the recognition gap inside it
63.2%32.1%Asked to perform delegated healthcare activities: 67.9%Not asked: 32.1%Of those asked, 93% have never received additional compensation. Bar = all care workers in England.
Derived from The Care Workers’ Charity, The Care Workers’ View: Delegated Healthcare Activities, March 2026 (358 responses). Medication administration is counted within the survey’s definition; the paper says so and does not estimate a figure without it.
1
Publish the list of what counts as a delegated activity: care workers’ own first ask
2
Attach a verified competence to each, recorded nationally so it travels with the worker
3
Settle accountability and indemnity in a binding framework
4
Recognise it in pay, as a Professional Level under the Fair Pay Agreement
5
Fund it through the contract: delegation that is free to the NHS and unfunded for care is a transfer of risk
The gap
A care worker with five years’ experience now earns a few pence more an hour than someone who started last week. In 2016, the gap was 33p.
0,000
Leavers in a single year
£0.0bn
Upper estimate of the annual replacement bill
0%
Of the workforce already aged 55 or over
HartlepoolMiddlesbroughRedcar and ClevelandStockton-on-TeesDarlingtonHaltonWarringtonBlackburn with DarwenBlackpoolKingston upon Hull, City ofEast Riding of YorkshireNorth East LincolnshireNorth LincolnshireYorkDerbyLeicesterRutlandNottinghamHerefordshire, County ofTelford and WrekinStoke-on-TrentBath and North East SomersetBristol, City ofNorth SomersetSouth GloucestershirePlymouthTorbaySwindonPeterboroughLutonSouthend-on-SeaThurrockMedwayBracknell ForestWest BerkshireReadingSloughWindsor and MaidenheadWokinghamMilton KeynesBrighton and HovePortsmouthSouthamptonIsle of WightCounty DurhamCheshire EastCheshire West and ChesterShropshireCornwallWiltshireBedfordCentral BedfordshireNorthumberlandBournemouth, Christchurch and PooleDorsetBuckinghamshireNorth NorthamptonshireWest NorthamptonshireCumberlandWestmorland and FurnessNorth YorkshireSomersetBoltonBuryManchesterOldhamRochdaleSalfordStockportTamesideTraffordWiganKnowsleyLiverpoolSt. HelensSeftonWirralBarnsleyDoncasterRotherhamSheffieldNewcastle upon TyneNorth TynesideSouth TynesideSunderlandBirminghamCoventryDudleySandwellSolihullWalsallWolverhamptonBradfordCalderdaleKirkleesLeedsWakefieldGatesheadCity of LondonBarking and DagenhamBarnetBexleyBrentBromleyCamdenCroydonEalingEnfieldGreenwichHackneyHammersmith and FulhamHaringeyHarrowHaveringHillingdonHounslowIslingtonKensington and ChelseaKingston upon ThamesLambethLewishamMertonNewhamRedbridgeRichmond upon ThamesSouthwarkSuttonTower HamletsWaltham ForestWandsworthWestminsterCambridgeshireDerbyshireDevonEast SussexEssexGloucestershireHampshireHertfordshireKentLancashireLeicestershireLincolnshireNorfolkNottinghamshireOxfordshireStaffordshireSuffolkSurreyWarwickshireWest SussexWorcestershire
The Care Workforce Mismatch Index

Do the young people and the vacancies sit in the same places?

01 / 05

Both-high score
High on neitherHigh on both
04
Testing our own hypothesis

A result too clean to publish without checking.

Almost a million young people are NEET, and the number crossed one million earlier in 2026 for the first time since 2013. Care has tens of thousands of unfilled posts. Do the two sit in the same places? Across nine regions the answer looked decisive (r = −0.89). Across 149 local authorities the relationship all but disappears, and without London it is indistinguishable from zero. We report the correction, not just the first result.

Fig 4NEET rate vs adult social care vacancy rate, 149 English local authorities
0%4%8%12%0%2%4%6%8%Barking and Dagenham: NEET 3.37%, vacancy 13.79%Barnet: NEET 0.65%, vacancy 7.49%Barnsley: NEET 3.91%, vacancy 4.77%Bath and North East Somerset: NEET 2.27%, vacancy 6.88%Bedford: NEET 1.68%, vacancy 6.49%Bexley: NEET 2.18%, vacancy 10.37%Birmingham: NEET 3.23%, vacancy 4.95%Blackburn with Darwen: NEET 4.69%, vacancy 7.85%Blackpool: NEET 7.62%, vacancy 7.17%Bolton: NEET 3.92%, vacancy 6.46%Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole: NEET 3.93%, vacancy 6.22%Bracknell Forest: NEET 3.47%, vacancy 9.61%Bradford: NEET 2.14%, vacancy 5.37%Brighton and Hove: NEET 4.98%, vacancy 4.96%Bristol, City of: NEET 5.98%, vacancy 7.05%Bromley: NEET 1.68%, vacancy 7.7%Buckinghamshire: NEET 2.45%, vacancy 6.69%Bury: NEET 4.04%, vacancy 7.15%Calderdale: NEET 3.92%, vacancy 4.94%Cambridgeshire: NEET 3.36%, vacancy 7.97%Camden: NEET 1.86%, vacancy 13.51%Central Bedfordshire: NEET 2.64%, vacancy 6.02%Cheshire East: NEET 3.57%, vacancy 6.13%Cheshire West and Chester: NEET 4.2%, vacancy 5.7%City of London: NEET 0.0%, vacancy 5.68%Cornwall and Isles of Scilly: NEET 4.51%, vacancy 8.37%County Durham: NEET 5.05%, vacancy 4.55%Coventry: NEET 3.59%, vacancy 11.17%Croydon: NEET 2.12%, vacancy 11.13%Cumberland: NEET 2.65%, vacancy 11.51%Darlington: NEET 2.08%, vacancy 5.12%Derby: NEET 7.62%, vacancy 7.57%Derbyshire: NEET 3.18%, vacancy 9.19%Devon: NEET 4.1%, vacancy 5.47%Dorset: NEET 4.09%, vacancy 5.51%Dudley: NEET 2.35%, vacancy 4.31%Ealing: NEET 1.01%, vacancy 12.25%East Riding of Yorkshire: NEET 3.45%, vacancy 4.1%East Sussex: NEET 4.92%, vacancy 7.17%Enfield: NEET 1.17%, vacancy 8.69%Essex: NEET 4.25%, vacancy 8.98%Gateshead: NEET 4.37%, vacancy 7.61%Gloucestershire: NEET 3.89%, vacancy 5.51%Greenwich: NEET 2.97%, vacancy 7.04%Hackney: NEET 2.5%, vacancy 6.6%Halton: NEET 5.72%, vacancy 7.6%Hammersmith and Fulham: NEET 1.4%, vacancy 5.93%Hampshire: NEET 3.53%, vacancy 7.69%Haringey: NEET 2.01%, vacancy 5.98%Harrow: NEET 1.3%, vacancy 8.4%Hartlepool: NEET 4.67%, vacancy 1.79%Havering: NEET 2.06%, vacancy 9.26%Herefordshire, County of: NEET 5.16%, vacancy 4.44%Hertfordshire: NEET 2.82%, vacancy 6.81%Hillingdon: NEET 2.52%, vacancy 10.45%Hounslow: NEET 1.72%, vacancy 10.12%Isle of Wight: NEET 3.1%, vacancy 8.55%Islington: NEET 2.62%, vacancy 8.61%Kensington and Chelsea: NEET 3.7%, vacancy 4.54%Kent: NEET 3.85%, vacancy 6.53%Kingston upon Hull, City of: NEET 6.98%, vacancy 3.47%Kingston upon Thames: NEET 0.97%, vacancy 8.03%Kirklees: NEET 2.95%, vacancy 3.66%Knowsley: NEET 5.75%, vacancy 8.02%Lambeth: NEET 2.13%, vacancy 4.05%Lancashire: NEET 3.89%, vacancy 7.14%Leeds: NEET 4.9%, vacancy 6.37%Leicester: NEET 5.76%, vacancy 7.46%Leicestershire: NEET 1.19%, vacancy 5.87%Lewisham: NEET 1.56%, vacancy 5.03%Lincolnshire: NEET 2.12%, vacancy 5.94%Liverpool: NEET 5.89%, vacancy 8.21%Luton: NEET 3.2%, vacancy 11.25%Manchester: NEET 5.26%, vacancy 6.43%Medway: NEET 6.61%, vacancy 5.42%Merton: NEET 1.47%, vacancy 8.66%Middlesbrough: NEET 4.06%, vacancy 3.24%Milton Keynes: NEET 2.96%, vacancy 6.81%Newcastle upon Tyne: NEET 6.95%, vacancy 4.61%Newham: NEET 2.79%, vacancy 7.36%Norfolk: NEET 5.01%, vacancy 6.79%North East Lincolnshire: NEET 6.92%, vacancy 5.65%North Lincolnshire: NEET 1.76%, vacancy 3.25%North Northamptonshire: NEET 2.11%, vacancy 6.41%North Somerset: NEET 2.85%, vacancy 4.74%North Tyneside: NEET 2.72%, vacancy 6.18%North Yorkshire: NEET 1.63%, vacancy 6.85%Northumberland: NEET 4.01%, vacancy 5.2%Nottingham: NEET 3.4%, vacancy 10.91%Nottinghamshire: NEET 1.47%, vacancy 8.06%Oldham: NEET 4.03%, vacancy 3.93%Oxfordshire: NEET 2.73%, vacancy 8.2%Peterborough: NEET 5.36%, vacancy 9.03%Plymouth: NEET 4.69%, vacancy 6.41%Portsmouth: NEET 5.97%, vacancy 4.3%Reading: NEET 3.43%, vacancy 5.66%Redbridge: NEET 2.27%, vacancy 7.38%Redcar and Cleveland: NEET 5.37%, vacancy 6.14%Richmond upon Thames: NEET 1.08%, vacancy 11.81%Rochdale: NEET 4.35%, vacancy 2.12%Rotherham: NEET 4.35%, vacancy 3.21%Rutland: NEET 0.67%, vacancy 9.27%Salford: NEET 5.97%, vacancy 8.5%Sandwell: NEET 1.88%, vacancy 6.65%Sefton: NEET 3.61%, vacancy 7.22%Sheffield: NEET 6.07%, vacancy 4.78%Shropshire: NEET 2.59%, vacancy 5.75%Slough: NEET 3.2%, vacancy 9.2%Solihull: NEET 4.17%, vacancy 4.59%Somerset: NEET 3.76%, vacancy 7.67%South Gloucestershire: NEET 2.68%, vacancy 7.57%South Tyneside: NEET 5.52%, vacancy 4.15%Southampton: NEET 4.93%, vacancy 6.96%Southend-on-Sea: NEET 3.18%, vacancy 7.65%Southwark: NEET 1.12%, vacancy 6.71%St. Helens: NEET 5.75%, vacancy 5.29%Staffordshire: NEET 4.19%, vacancy 9.53%Stockport: NEET 4.19%, vacancy 5.57%Stockton-on-Tees: NEET 7.23%, vacancy 6.24%Stoke-on-Trent: NEET 3.54%, vacancy 6.77%Suffolk: NEET 4.63%, vacancy 6.36%Sunderland: NEET 5.8%, vacancy 5.94%Surrey: NEET 1.97%, vacancy 8.61%Sutton: NEET 1.41%, vacancy 12.98%Swindon: NEET 2.84%, vacancy 8.61%Tameside: NEET 4.55%, vacancy 6.07%Telford and Wrekin: NEET 3.98%, vacancy 10.14%Thurrock: NEET 3.84%, vacancy 5.84%Torbay: NEET 3.66%, vacancy 5.34%Tower Hamlets: NEET 3.07%, vacancy 5.26%Trafford: NEET 2.33%, vacancy 5.28%Wakefield: NEET 3.56%, vacancy 6.82%Walsall: NEET 3.2%, vacancy 11.11%Waltham Forest: NEET 1.02%, vacancy 7.06%Wandsworth: NEET 3.19%, vacancy 5.05%Warrington: NEET 3.52%, vacancy 6.58%Warwickshire: NEET 2.22%, vacancy 4.23%West Northamptonshire: NEET 2.23%, vacancy 5.46%West Sussex: NEET 2.19%, vacancy 6.72%Westminster: NEET 2.92%, vacancy 12.32%Westmorland and Furness: NEET 1.88%, vacancy 7.21%Wigan: NEET 3.75%, vacancy 3.19%Wiltshire: NEET 2.54%, vacancy 7.39%Windsor and Maidenhead: NEET 1.8%, vacancy 3.77%Wirral: NEET 4.61%, vacancy 5.89%Wokingham: NEET 2.58%, vacancy 7.43%Wolverhampton: NEET 2.6%, vacancy 6.07%Worcestershire: NEET 3.88%, vacancy 4.52%York: NEET 1.29%, vacancy 4.71%all 149: r = -0.24ex-London: r = -0.10London boroughRest of EnglandNEET rate, aged 16–17 (%)ASC vacancy rate (%)
DfE participation and NEET data (16–17 cohort) matched to Skills for Care 2024/25 local authority vacancy rates. r = -0.24 across all 149 (p = 0.002); r = -0.10 excluding London’s 32 boroughs (not significant). The 149 authorities carry 107,950 vacant posts between them. Full methodology in Appendix A.2 of the paper.

The right conclusion is not to abandon the idea, but to design it nationally rather than as local geographic targeting: a national care-sector Youth Guarantee pathway within Get Britain Working, built on the CAA’s existing Pathway into Care programme, and an explicit second recruitment pool in midlife career switchers, who already make up over a quarter of the workforce.

05
What we propose

One recognised profession, operating across many employers.

Not a new bureaucracy. Not a single national employer. Not the end of the diversity that makes adult social care what it is. Five components, built on the Skills for Care Care Workforce Pathway that already exists.

01

National Professional Framework

Parity, competency, portability, diversity, progression, professional identity.

02

Nationally recognised Professional Levels

Leading to social work, OT, physiotherapy, nursing and a new Care Technologist role.

03

National Delegated Healthcare Framework

Governance, competence, supervision, accountability, remuneration.

04

Fair Pay Agreement aligned to the Pathway

Funded through commissioning and fee-setting reform; competence, not just a floor.

05

A care-sector Youth Guarantee pathway

National in design, with explicit recognition of midlife career switchers.

To be clear

What this proposal is not.

A new bureaucracy
A single national employer
The end of local and provider diversity
Reopening the care visa route
A register before portability
A fee on workers at current pay
06
The career, as a careers teacher would ask for it

Seven Professional Levels. One rung is being removed.

Government has committed to a social care T Level for first teaching in 2028, and is defunding the Level 4 qualification immediately above it from 1 September 2026. A young person completing the T Level would have no funded route onwards. That is the objection a careers teacher will raise, and the reason a parent will steer their child elsewhere.

01FoundationNew Entrant
02PractitionerCare Worker
03Senior PractitionerSenior Care Worker
04Care TechnologistTechnology Specialist
05Advanced PractitionerDelegated Healthcare Specialist
06Lead PractitionerTeam Leader
07Professional LeaderRegistered Manager

The Level 4 practice qualification, carrying delegated healthcare and Care Technologist specialisms, is the step from doing the work to being accountable for it. Reinstating it costs £9–14 million a year, less than the sector spends in a single week replacing the people who leave.

07
What we are calling for

Ten steps to a recognised profession.

Built on architecture the sector has already started, not a replacement for it.

Tap any recommendation to read it in full
08
What the first steps cost

£61–76 million a year. Recouped by one point off turnover.

Four costed lines, every input published and every step of arithmetic shown in Appendix A.4. The sector loses around 335,000 people a year at a replacement cost of £1.2–2.0 billion. Taking a single percentage point off the turnover rate returns £52–87 million, annually, before counting quality, continuity or the £2.7 billion the NHS spends on delayed discharges.

Fig 5The immediate package, annual cost by line
£0m£10m£20m£30m£40m£50m£9–14mLevel 4 rung£44mQualification fund£5–15mVerification record£3mPrescribing to 1,000Solid = lower bound, tint = upper bound. A phased senior-tier register (£8–17m once open) is sequenced for Phase Three and excluded.
Level 4 at ST0007’s £7,000 band for 1,300–2,000 starts; qualification fund restored from £10m to £53.9m; verification record is a CAA estimate; prescribing extended from 150 to 1,000 nurses at the pilot’s unit cost. Sources and arithmetic in Appendix A.4.
£0m
Upper bound of the package, a year
£0m
Upper return from one point off turnover
£0.0bn
Delayed discharge cost to the NHS, a year
09
Implementation

This year, then ten years, phased and funded.

Five things cannot wait, because in each case a window is closing rather than opening. The rest is sequenced so that portability arrives before accountability, and pay reform arrives with the framework it is meant to reward.

Immediate

This year

  • Reinstate the funded Level 4 rung
  • Restore the qualification fund
  • Adopt the Pathway into Care for NEETs
  • Open the competency verification record
  • Extend independent prescribing
Phase One

Years 1–2

  • Strengthen the Care Workforce Pathway
  • Agree national competencies
  • Develop Professional Levels
  • Publish the delegated healthcare list
  • Formalise the Care Technologist role
  • Fund nurse preceptorship in social care
Phase Two

Years 3–5

  • Align Fair Pay Agreement to the framework
  • Fund it through commissioning reform
  • Add a workforce line to fee models
  • Make delegated healthcare binding
  • Settle accountability and indemnity
Phase Three

Years 5–10

  • Introduce phased registration routes
  • Publish a funded ten-year workforce plan
  • Integrate standards with neighbourhood health
10
What we ask of the Independent Commission

Deferral is not neutrality.

The five immediate items need no commission, no primary legislation and no new institution. They need a decision, and several of them need it within weeks. Three things, though, are exactly what a commission is for.

Tap each ask to read more

This paper is published and submitted to the Commission at publication, not circulated privately in advance. Our arguments should be tested in the open, and Appendix A.4 exists so that the parts built on our own arithmetic can be checked rather than taken on trust.

The call to action

England does not need a single workforce. It needs a single recognised profession.

The mechanism to build one already exists in the Skills for Care Care Workforce Pathway. What has been missing is not evidence, but the decision to complete it. This paper sets out exactly how, and what it costs to start now.

Download the full report (PDF) ↓
Paper Two · Care Association Alliance · Draft, September 2026
About the Alliance

The Care Association Alliance.

The CAA is the national umbrella body for local care associations in England, a member-led organisation with no paid officers. All its functions are carried out by its member associations, which collectively represent over 10,000 independent care providers across every English region.

50+
Local Care Associations
10,000+
Independent Care Providers across England
One
Unified national voice to Government, Parliament and the press

The CAA works locally, regionally and nationally, partnering with government, commissioners and health bodies to advocate for a sustainable, properly funded adult social care system. It is a founding participant in the Care Provider Alliance.

Globe House, Park Lane, Halesowen, B63 2RA  ·  info@caa.care  ·  www.caa.care