Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← All members

Andrea Howell

Connétable for Trinity · Independent

Assistant Minister for Health and Social Services

Andrea Howell

Andrea Howell was first elected to the States Assembly in 2022 as a Deputy for St John, St Lawrence and Trinity. She served on the Planning Committee throughout that term and on the Health and Social Security Panel and the Machinery of Government Review Sub-Committee in 2023–2024, before being appointed Assistant Minister for Health and Social Services in 2024. In 2026 she was elected Connétable of Trinity and continues to hold the office of Assistant Minister for Health and Social Services.

For the 2026–2030 term, Howell campaigned on a platform of parish service and community cohesion in Trinity, combined with continuity in health ministerial work. Her specific commitments include facilitating two additional sheltered homes at Maisons Cabot, delivering a permanent safe road crossing at Trinity School, improving outdoor space and play facilities at the Trinity Youth Centre, and overseeing upgrades to the Parish Hall for better access and office space. She also pledged to keep the parish rate as low as possible, engage young parishioners, support Trinity's fishing, farming, business and charitable communities, and encourage residents to join the Honorary Police.

Howell is a retired dentist and drew on that background, alongside her husband's career as a GP, in explaining her commitment to continuing health ministerial responsibilities alongside her parish duties.

Sources

—

States participation

5

Votes expected

Have your say

Constituent feedback

Reader ratings and comments. Not Andrea Howell’s own response.

Rate Andrea Howell

with

Coverage

Media mentions

Every Jersey media article naming this member, month by month. Accented bars mark coverage spikes — hover or focus any month to see the stories behind it.

1Apr 24Jul 24Oct 24Jan 25Apr 25Jul 25Oct 25Jan 26Apr 26Jul 26Oct 26

Attendance

Turnout in the States Assembly — 2026–2030 Assembly

The States Assembly records a reason against every non-vote, so being ill, off-island, on parental leave or barred by a declared interest can be told apart from simply not turning up. Absences with an accepted reason are removed from both sides of the rate rather than held against the member.

5 votes in 2026–2030 Assembly so far — fewer than the 10 needed before this scorecard will publish a participation rate. The record to date:

  • Voted or abstained4
  • Not present for vote1

Manifesto

Promises, and how they voted — 2026–2030 Assembly

Grouped by policy area. Each promise carries the recorded States Assembly votes that test it, and whether this member voted to deliver — open any vote for the motion and the reasoning. A vote counts against a promise only where it plainly contradicts it; where a member voted against one particular measure but the breach is arguable, the vote is shown and set aside rather than counted. Where no recorded vote bears on a promise, an AI delivery verdict assesses progress against the public record.

Voted to deliverVoted againstAbsent or abstained

Housing & Planning

1 promise · 0 kept

No recorded States Assembly vote bears on this area yet.

  • No recorded votespecific

    Candidate will facilitate the development of two additional sheltered homes at Maisons Cabot.

    “Facilitate the development of two additional sheltered homes at Maisons Cabot, on recently acquired land.”

    HousingParish And Local Government
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Andy Howell was elected as Connétable of Trinity on 7 June 2026 and took office on 12 June 2026, giving her only approximately three and a half months in post by the assessment date. No independent Jersey sources — including the Jersey Evening Post, Bailiwick Express, gov.je, or statesassembly.je — reported any planning application, Parish Assembly vote, or ministerial statement relating to the development of two additional sheltered homes at Les Maisons Cabot since her election. The parish website notes the Parish Office is 'temporarily located at 24 Les Maisons Cabot,' but this reflects no confirmed progress on the specific housing promise. The very short time in office means the absence of progress is not necessarily a criticism, but no publicly verifiable steps toward this commitment have been recorded.

Health & Social Care

2 promises · 0 kept

1recorded vote

1 away

  • No recorded voteaspirational

    Candidate will work to care for elderly residents of Trinity.

    “Care for our elderly Parishioners.”

    Health And CareParish And Local Government
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Andy (Andrea) Howell was elected Connétable of Trinity on 7 June 2026 and took office on 12 June 2026, leaving only around 107 days in post by the assessment date of 27 September 2026. Post-election reporting by the Jersey Evening Post (16 June 2026) identified her stated priorities as protecting the countryside, supporting farmers, and selecting a new rector, with no mention of specific elderly-care initiatives. No independent reporting from the Jersey Evening Post, Bailiwick Express, or Parish of Trinity news pages has identified a new elderly-care programme, policy announcement, or parish initiative attributable to Howell's tenure as Connétable; the parish's pre-existing 'Three in One' senior citizens club continues but predates her term.

  • No side takenaspirational

    Candidate will continue involvement in Health ministerial work to provide continuity if elected.

    “If fortunate to be elected as Connétable, my primary role would be to serve the Parish, but as a retired Dentist and wife of a GP, I would relish the opportunity to carry on in Health, in order to provide continuity and stability, as the job is far from finished.”

    Health And CareGovernance And Constitution

    1 recorded vote tests this promise

    1 away
    • 14 Jul 2026–P.62/2026 — Take no action on the draft States of Jersey (Ministerial Offices) Amendment Order 202- (P.62-2026) — Absent, did not take a side14-31

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The motion to take no action on an amendment to ministerial offices bears on promise 12 because voting Contre (thus allowing the amendment to proceed) is more consistent with maintaining continuity in Health ministerial work; taking no action could disrupt existing ministerial arrangements the candidate wished to continue.

Economy, Tax & Cost of Living

2 promises · 0 kept

No recorded States Assembly vote bears on this area yet.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Candidate will aim to keep the Parish rate as low as possible while maintaining services.

    “Keep the Parish rate as low as possible whilst continuing to deliver effective services.”

    Public FinancesParish And Local Government
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedlow confidence

    Andy (Andrea) Howell was elected Connétable of Trinity on 7 June 2026 and took office from 12 June 2026, leaving only approximately three and a half months in post by the assessment date. A Main Parish Assembly was held on 8 July 2026 — the standard occasion for setting the annual parish rate — but no public record of the rate figure agreed under her chairmanship, nor any independent reporting on whether it was held low, was surfaced by web search. The promise is an ongoing stewardship commitment across the full 2026–2030 term, and the very short window since taking office means there is simply insufficient evidence to confirm delivery; 'outstanding' reflects the absence of verifiable progress rather than any indication of failure.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Candidate will support Trinity's fishing, farming, business and charitable communities.

    “Support our local fishing and farming communities, local businesses and charities.”

    Agriculture And FishingEconomy And Business
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Andy Howell was elected as Connétable of Trinity on 7 June 2026 and sworn in shortly thereafter, giving her only approximately three months in office as of 27 September 2026. While the Jersey Evening Post reported in June 2026 that her stated priorities included "protecting the Trinity countryside, looking after its farmers and keeping it a 'rural, welcoming parish'", and her States Assembly record shows involvement in an amendment to P.54/2026 (Continuation of Rural and Marine Support) — a proposition from the pre-election period — no independent evidence has surfaced of specific parish-level initiatives she has led or delivered to support Trinity's fishing, farming, business or charitable communities since taking office. The timeframe is very short; absence of evidence at this stage does not imply failure, but there is nothing yet to move the verdict beyond the original manifesto promise.

Infrastructure & Environment

1 promise · 0 kept

No recorded States Assembly vote bears on this area yet.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Candidate will work to deliver a permanent and safe road crossing at Trinity School.

    “Collaborate to deliver the best permanent and safe road layout for the crossing at Trinity School.”

    Infrastructure And TransportParish And Local Government
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictIn progressmedium confidence

    A one-year trial scheme at Trinity Primary School on La Route de la Trinité ran from September 2024 to July 2025, narrowing the road and providing improved temporary crossing facilities; a States Assembly written answer dated June 2025 (WQ.375/2025) confirmed the pilot was deemed successful but that the Infrastructure Department was still only 'preparing a design brief for a permanent layout' to be submitted for ministerial approval and incorporated into the forward work programme. Andrea Howell took office as Connétable of Trinity on 12 June 2026 — just over 100 days before the assessment date — and no independent source confirms a permanent scheme has since been approved or built. The promise to 'collaborate' to deliver a permanent crossing aligns with the ongoing process, but physical delivery remains outstanding.

Governance & Public Services

7 promises · 0 kept

No recorded States Assembly vote bears on this area yet.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Candidate will actively engage with young people in the parish to include their perspectives.

    “Engage with young Parishioners to ensure their voices are heard and valued.”

    Parish And Local GovernmentChildren And Families
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Andy (Andrea) Howell was elected as Connétable of Trinity on 7 June 2026 and sworn in on 12 June 2026, beginning a term that runs to June 2030. As of 26 September 2026 — just over three months into office — no independent reporting from the Jersey Evening Post, Bailiwick Express, parishoftrinity.je, or the States Assembly records any specific initiative, event, statement, or programme by Connétable Howell directed at engaging young parishioners. Post-election coverage focused on her priorities of protecting the countryside, supporting farmers, and assisting with the selection of a new rector, with no mention of youth engagement activity. The very short window since taking office means the absence of evidence should not be read as failure; however, no concrete steps toward this promise have been publicly recorded.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Candidate will improve outdoor space and play facilities at Trinity Youth Centre.

    “Enhance the use of outdoor space at the Youth Centre, making it more attractive and accessible for all, with better play facilities for children and young people.”

    Parish And Local GovernmentChildren And FamiliesInfrastructure And Transport
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Andy (Andrea) Howell was elected Connétable of Trinity on 7 June 2026 and sworn in on 12 June 2026, giving her only approximately 15 weeks in office by the assessment date of 27 September 2026. No announcement, parish notice, funding bid, or works programme relating to improvements to outdoor space or play facilities at Trinity Youth Centre was found in any searched source, including the Parish of Trinity website (parishoftrinity.je), the Summer 2026 Trinity Tattler newsletter, or the States Assembly member record. The Trinity Youth Centre's own online presence describes indoor halls and activities but makes no mention of forthcoming outdoor improvements. The very short window since election means this is not evidence of failure, but no traceable progress has yet been recorded.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Candidate will oversee improvements to the Parish Hall to improve access and office space.

    “Oversee agreed improvements to the Parish Hall to provide better access and more office space.”

    Parish And Local GovernmentInfrastructure And Transport
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictIn progressmedium confidence

    The improvements to Trinity Parish Hall — covering better access and an office extension — were formally approved by a parish assembly on 15 April 2026, before Andrea Howell took office as Connétable on 12 June 2026. A budget of up to £550,000 was agreed under her predecessor Philip Le Sueur, with construction expected to begin as early as late June 2026 and take approximately five months. By the time Howell assumed office, the Parish Office had been relocated temporarily, indicating construction was underway; no independent reporting as of September 2026 confirms completion.

  • No recorded votespecific

    Candidate will assist in the process of appointing a new Rector for Trinity.

    “Assist with the appointment of a new Rector.”

    Parish And Local Government
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictIn progressmedium confidence

    Andrea Howell was elected Connétable of Trinity on 7 June 2026, and the Jersey Evening Post reported on 16 June 2026 that her 'immediate responsibilities had included helping to select a new rector,' confirming active engagement with this commitment from the outset of her term. The Parish of Trinity's own website (parishoftrinity.je) was simultaneously prominently carrying a 'New Rector for Trinity' notice alongside its July 2026 parish assembly announcement, indicating the process was publicly under way. No independent source had confirmed the formal appointment and installation of a named new Rector by 27 September 2026.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Candidate will encourage Trinity residents to join the Honorary Police.

    “Encourage Parishioners to join the Honorary Police.”

    Parish And Local GovernmentJustice And Home Affairs
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Andy (Andrea) Howell was elected Connétable of Trinity on 7 June 2026 and took office from 12 June 2026 — only approximately 15 weeks before the assessment date of 27 September 2026. No independent reporting or official source (gov.je, statesassembly.je, Jersey Evening Post, or the Parish of Trinity website) has recorded any specific recruitment drive, public appeal, or outreach initiative by Connétable Howell directed at encouraging parishioners to join the Honorary Police. The Parish of Trinity website continues to carry pre-existing general information about Honorary Police service (last substantively updated before her election), and no new Connétable-led activity is documented. Given the very short time in office, the absence of evidence does not indicate failure, but no verifiable action on this specific promise has yet been recorded.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Candidate will champion and modernise the role of Connétable within Jersey's Parish system.

    “I will champion the role of Connétable in a way that is responsive to modern Island life, as I believe our unique Parish system is what makes Jersey so special.”

    Governance And ConstitutionParish And Local Government
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Andy Howell was elected as Connétable of Trinity on 7 June 2026 and sworn in on 12 June 2026, giving her fewer than four months in office by the assessment date of 1 October 2026. While she has taken up her role — attending States Assembly sittings, raising questions on procurement, proposing committee chairs, assisting with a new rector selection, and maintaining routine parish administration — no specific initiatives, propositions, programmes, or independent reporting have surfaced that demonstrate concrete steps to 'champion and modernise' the Connétable role beyond standard duties. The timeframe is extremely short and the promise is inherently long-term in nature; the absence of visible progress is therefore not surprising but cannot yet be characterised as delivery.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 29 Sept 2026·P.65/2026 (re-issue) — Amendment to Standing Orders - change from Government Plan to Budget (P.65-2026) (Re-issue) — Pour44-0

      Modernising Standing Orders by replacing 'Government Plan' with 'Budget' reflects the kind of institutional modernisation the candidate associates with championing and modernising Jersey's governance structures including the Connétable's role.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Candidate will maintain an open-door policy and represent Trinity parishioners' views in the States Assembly.

    “I will be approachable, have an 'open door policy,' and promise to be kind, listen carefully, and work to enhance Parish life; to find solutions to issues, and to represent the views of Trinity Parishioners in the States Assembly.”

    Parish And Local GovernmentGovernance And Constitution
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictIn progressmedium confidence

    Andy Howell was elected Connétable of Trinity on 7 June 2026 and sworn into the 2026-2030 Assembly on 19 June 2026, with her term formally running from 12 June 2026. In the approximately 100 days since taking office, she has demonstrated early engagement consistent with her promise: she attended a planning appeal hearing in support of residents opposing a 26-home development at Rue du Moulin du Ponterrin near Victoria Village, and the Parish of Trinity website shows regular updates posted under her name from June through August 2026. The commitment is behavioural and ongoing in nature rather than a single deliverable, and the very short window since the Assembly first sat (19 June 2026) means it is too early to make a definitive assessment; no evidence of failure or reversal has emerged.

Voting record

Recent recorded votes

This member's most recent votes in the States Assembly's electronic voting record, regardless of whether they relate to a manifesto promise.

Manifesto · Closed term

Promises, and how they voted — 2022–2026 Assembly

Deputy for St John, St Lawrence and Trinity · Independent. This term has closed — shown here as this member's earlier record, not the live one. A vote counts against a promise only where it plainly contradicts it; an arguable breach is shown and set aside rather than counted.

100%

Kept rate

95%

States participation

10

Promises tracked

94%

of the 892 votes they were expected to cast in 2022–2026 Assembly

  • Voted or abstained844
  • Not present for vote48
Voted to deliverVoted againstAbsent or abstained

Housing & Planning

2 promises · 2 kept

21recorded votes

8 Pour · 11 Contre · 2 away

  • Keptdirectional

    Candidate will pursue subsidised homes for first-time buyers and key workers and promote shared equity schemes.

    “I am committed to making housing more affordable with subsidised homes for first time buyers and key workers, as well as provision for senior citizens. I believe we should encourage shared equity schemes.”

    HousingCost Of Living

    15 recorded votes test this promise

    6 Pour · 7 Contre · 2 away
    • 04 Oct 2022–P.92/2022 — Cost of living crisis – measures affecting Andium Homes rent increases — Abstained, did not take a side16-24

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Measures affecting Andium Homes rent increases bear on affordability for key workers and those seeking subsidised homes.

    • 19 Jul 2023·P.48/2023 — Mortgage repayment assistance. — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach19-24

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Mortgage repayment assistance directly bears on affordability for first-time buyers, which is central to the housing promise.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise focused on subsidised homes and shared equity schemes for first-time buyers and key workers, while mortgage repayment assistance is a related but distinct mechanism, and rejecting this particular scheme does not necessarily contradict a general commitment to housing affordability through other means.

    • 14 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(11).Com. — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 P72 Amendment 11 - AHP scheme — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach1-42

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The AHP (Affordable Housing Programme) scheme amendment directly advances subsidised homes for first-time buyers and key workers.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. While the member promised to support subsidised homes and shared equity schemes, voting against one specific amendment to the Affordable Housing Programme within a broader Government Plan could reflect concerns about the particular mechanism, funding approach, or other bundled details rather than a rejection of the underlying commitment to affordable housing for first-time buyers and key workers.

    • 13 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(19) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): nineteenth amendment. Investment of stamp duty uplift into first time buyer funds — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach12-34

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This amendment directly invests stamp duty uplift revenue into first-time buyer funds, directly advancing the promise to pursue subsidised homes for first-time buyers.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. While the promise commits to subsidised homes and shared equity for first-time buyers, voting against this specific funding mechanism (redirecting stamp duty revenue) does not unambiguously contradict that commitment, as the member could oppose this particular route while still pursuing the general goal through other means.

    • 14 May 2025✓P.29/2025 Amd. — Social Rents Plan to Reduce Rental Stress for Tenants (P.29-2025) Amendment — Pour, voted to deliver32-12

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Social Rents Plan amendment to reduce rental stress for tenants directly advances the promise to pursue subsidised homes for key workers and first-time buyers.

    • 14 May 2025✓P.29/2025 — Social Rental Plan to Reduce Rental Stress for Tenants (P.29-2025) as amended — Pour, voted to deliver34-4

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Social Rental Plan to Reduce Rental Stress for Tenants as amended directly advances affordable housing for those the promise targets.

    • 23 Apr 2025–P.26/2025 — Increase in Assets and Savings Threshold for the Affordable Housing Gateway (P.26-2025) — Abstained, did not take a side7-30

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Increasing the assets and savings threshold for the Affordable Housing Gateway bears directly on access to subsidised homes for first-time buyers.

    • 09 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(31). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-first amendment. Empty Residential Properties, as amended — Pour, voted to deliver41-3

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Addressing empty residential properties can help bring more homes onto the market for first-time buyers and key workers, supporting the housing promise.

    • 11 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(14). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fourteenth amendment. Mortgage Interest Tax Relief — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach13-26

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Reinstating mortgage interest tax relief would provide financial support to first-time buyers and key workers with mortgages, bearing directly on the promise to support home ownership for these groups.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is about subsidised homes and shared equity schemes for first-time buyers and key workers, while this motion concerned reinstating mortgage interest tax relief — a different mechanism in the same broad area of housing affordability — and a member could reasonably oppose this specific measure while still pursuing their stated housing commitments through other means.

    • 11 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(14).Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fourteenth amendment (P.70/2025 Amd.(14)), amendment. Mortgage Interest Tax Relief — Contre, voted to deliver19-21

      Voting Contre delivers this

      This amendment to the mortgage interest tax relief amendment could alter or undermine the first-time buyer support mechanism, so voting against it preserves the original first-time buyer-focused proposal.

    • 26 Jun 2024✓P.37/2024 — Affordable Housing Provision at the Waterfront [P.37-2024] as amended — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Affordable Housing Provision at the Waterfront directly advances the promise to pursue subsidised homes for first-time buyers and key workers.

    • 26 Nov 2024·P.51/2024 Amd.(28).Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): twenty-eighth amendment (P.51/2024 Amd.(28)), amendment. Removal of stamp duty surcharge on second homes — Pour, voted against, not counted as a breach30-14

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Removing the stamp duty surcharge on second homes would reduce the financial disincentive for purchasing investment properties, working against efforts to prioritise first-time buyers in the housing market.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerns subsidised homes and shared equity schemes for first-time buyers and key workers, while the motion concerned removing a stamp duty surcharge on second homes — a related but distinct housing affordability mechanism where a reasonable member could support removal while still genuinely pursuing their stated goals through other means.

    • 09 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(31).Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-first amendment (P.70/2025 Amd.(31)), amendment. Empty Residential Properties — Contre, voted to deliver16-27

      Voting Contre delivers this

      An amendment weakening the empty residential properties measure would reduce its effectiveness in freeing up homes for first-time buyers.

    • 08 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(15). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fifteenth amendment. Removal of 3% Stamp Surcharge — Contre, voted to deliver2-42

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Removing the stamp duty surcharge on buy-to-let and second homes would reduce funds available for first-time buyer support and tilt the market away from owner-occupiers.

    • 09 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(31).Amd.(2). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-first amendment (P.70/2025 Amd.(31)), second amendment. Empty Residential Properties — Pour, voted to deliver40-4

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The second amendment to the empty residential properties motion shapes how that policy works, with the adopted version supporting efforts to bring empty homes into use for buyers.

  • Keptdirectional

    Candidate will push to prioritise brownfield and government-owned sites for housing development.

    “We should use brown field and Government owned sites for housing, in the first instance, to protect our green fields which make Jersey special.”

    HousingPlanning And DevelopmentEnvironment And Climate

    6 recorded votes test this promise

    2 Pour · 4 Contre
    • 16 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(21)(Amd) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): twenty-first amendment (P.97/2022. Amd.(21).) – amendment Play.Com Site [P.97-2022 Amd.(21)Amd.] — Pour, voted to deliver21-24

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Play.com site amendment concerns development of a government-owned brownfield site for housing, directly bearing on the promise to prioritise such sites.

    • 16 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(21) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): twenty-first amendment Gas Place Primary School Site [P.97-2022 Amd.(21)] — Pour, voted to deliver43-1

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Gas Place Primary School Site amendment concerns the use of a government-owned site, directly advancing the promise to prioritise government-owned sites for housing development.

    • 10 Jul 2025✓P.48/2025 — Meanwhile Use of the Former Gas Place Site (P.48-2025) — Contre, voted to deliver6-30

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The Meanwhile Use of the Former Gas Place Site proposition, if adopted, would delay or redirect a government-owned brownfield site away from housing; voting Contre advances the promise to prioritise such sites for housing.

    • 21 Oct 2025✓P.45/2025 — Proposed use of former Jersey Gas site: request for reconsideration (P.45-2025) — Contre, voted to deliver10-31

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The proposition requesting reconsideration of the proposed use of the former Jersey Gas site bears directly on prioritising a government-owned brownfield site for appropriate (potentially housing) development.

    • 09 Jul 2025·P.48/2025 Amd. — Meanwhile Use of the Former Gas Place Stie (P.48/2025) Amendment — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach16-26

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The amendment to Meanwhile Use of the Former Gas Place Site bears on how a government-owned brownfield site is developed, relevant to the promise to prioritise such sites for housing.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is to prioritise brownfield sites for housing, but this motion concerns a "meanwhile use" amendment for the Gas Place site — a procedural or interim-use question rather than a direct vote on whether to develop the site for housing, so voting against it does not plainly contradict the promise without further inference about what the amendment actually proposed.

    • 10 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): amendment. Development Levies — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach15-27

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Development levies on new development can incentivise use of brownfield and government-owned sites by adjusting the economics of greenfield development, directly relating to the promise to prioritise brownfield sites.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerns prioritising brownfield and government-owned sites for housing, while the motion is a budget amendment on development levies — a financial mechanism that may relate to land use incentives but is not a direct vote on whether to prioritise brownfield or government-owned sites, so voting against it does not plainly contradict the promise without inferring a chain of reasoning about how levies affect site selection.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 19 Apr 2023·P.14/2023 — Development Levies - as amended - parts (a) and (b) — Pour40-1

      Development levies could steer development toward brownfield and government-owned sites, indirectly advancing the promise.

Health & Social Care

1 promise · 1 kept

5recorded votes

1 Pour · 4 Contre

  • Keptdirectional

    Candidate will push for current hospital plans to be revisited to ensure they are properly future-proofed.

    “Our future Hospital needs to be properly future-proofed and provide all the services and facilities that we need. Current plans need to be revisited.”

    Health And CareInfrastructure And Transport

    5 recorded votes test this promise

    1 Pour · 4 Contre
    • 13 Dec 2022·P.109/2022 — Our Hospital Project: Reporting — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach15-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Our Hospital Project Reporting proposition directly advances the promise to have hospital plans revisited and properly scrutinised.

      Considered and set aside: this motion does not bear on the promise. The promise concerns revisiting hospital plans to ensure future-proofing, while the motion was about reporting arrangements for the hospital project — a procedural matter that does not directly advance or undermine the substantive planning commitment made in the manifesto.

    • 14 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(20) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): twentieth amendment Hospital funding — Pour, voted to deliver33-12

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Hospital Funding amendment to the Government Plan bears directly on future-proofing the hospital project.

    • 17 Jul 2024·P.43/2024 — New Healthcare Facilities Programme paragraph (a) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach13-30

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The New Healthcare Facilities Programme paragraph (a) vote directly bears on the hospital plans, touching on the promise to revisit hospital planning.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise calls generally for hospital plans to be "revisited" and "future-proofed," but the motion concerns a specific programmatic paragraph within the New Healthcare Facilities Programme, and voting against it could reflect concerns about the particular approach, costs, or details rather than opposition to revisiting or future-proofing the hospital plans themselves.

    • 17 Jul 2024·P.43/2024 — New Healthcare Facilities Programme Paragraph (b) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach15-29

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The New Healthcare Facilities Programme paragraph (b) vote directly bears on the hospital plans, touching on the promise to revisit and future-proof hospital planning.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise calls for hospital plans to be "revisited" and "future-proofed," but the motion concerns a specific programme decision, and voting against it could reflect a judgement that this particular programme still fails to meet future-proofing requirements rather than opposition to revisiting the plans.

    • 28 Nov 2024·P.51/2024 Amd.(6) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028: sixth amendment. New Healthcare Facilities Programme expenditure — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach17-28

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The New Healthcare Facilities Programme expenditure amendment bears on funding and future-proofing of the hospital project.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise calls for hospital plans to be "revisited" and "future-proofed," but voting against a specific budget amendment concerning healthcare facilities expenditure could reflect concerns about the particular funding mechanism, level, or approach rather than opposition to the underlying goal of improving hospital plans.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 09 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(32). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-second amendment. Environment Departmental Funding, Part 2 only — Pour44-1

      Restoring funding to the Environment department, which oversees infrastructure planning, has some connection to ensuring public services including healthcare infrastructure are properly resourced and future-proofed.

Education & Families

2 promises · 2 kept

11recorded votes

4 Pour · 7 Contre

  • Keptaspirational

    Candidate will advocate for lifelong learning and training opportunities for Islanders.

    “Every opportunity for lifelong learning and training opportunities should be afforded to Islanders to keep abreast of latest practices and innovation.”

    Education

    7 recorded votes test this promise

    3 Pour · 4 Contre
    • 07 Feb 2023✓P.116/2022 — Skills Development Fund — Pour, voted to deliver38-3

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Skills Development Fund directly advances lifelong learning and training opportunities for Islanders.

    • 19 Mar 2024✓P.12/2024 — Update of Higher Education Student Funding as amended — Pour, voted to deliver42-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Update of Higher Education Student Funding directly bears on lifelong learning opportunities for Islanders.

    • 11 Jun 2024✓P.28/2024 — Youth Service Statutory Provision as amended — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Youth Service Statutory Provision as amended bears on training and development opportunities for young Islanders.

    • 17 Jul 2024·P.38/2024 — Fully funded education or training for 16-18 year olds paragraph (c) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach17-27

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Fully funded education or training for 16-18 year olds directly advances lifelong learning and training opportunities for Islanders.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a general directional commitment to lifelong learning for Islanders, and voting against one specific funding mechanism for 16–18 year olds does not straightforwardly contradict it, as the member could oppose this particular measure while pursuing the broader goal through other means or on affordability grounds.

    • 17 Jul 2024·P.38/2024 — Fully funded education or training for 16-18 year olds paragraph (a) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach13-31

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Fully funded education or training for 16-18 year olds paragraph (a) directly advances the promise to advocate for learning and training opportunities.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a broad directional commitment to lifelong learning for all Islanders, while the motion concerned one specific funding mechanism for a particular age group (16–18 year olds), so voting against it does not plainly contradict the general promise without inferring that this specific measure was the only or necessary way to honour it.

    • 13 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(20) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): twentieth amendment. Additional funding for education — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach13-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Additional funding for education directly supports lifelong learning and training opportunities for Islanders.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a general directional commitment to lifelong learning and training, while the motion concerns one specific funding amendment to the Government Plan, and voting against a particular budget amendment does not necessarily contradict a broad advocacy commitment, especially when the member may have had concerns about the mechanism, amount, or source of funding.

    • 11 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(26)(re-issue). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): twenty-sixth amendment. Inflation adjustment to apprenticeship grants — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach9-27

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Adjusting apprenticeship grants for inflation directly supports lifelong learning and training opportunities for Islanders by maintaining the real value of apprenticeship funding.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise supports lifelong learning broadly, but voting against one specific inflation-adjustment mechanism for apprenticeship grants does not plainly contradict that general commitment, as the member may have had fiscal or technical objections to this particular amendment while still supporting apprenticeships through other means.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 12 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(18) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): eighteenth amendment. Free GP visits for all full time students — Pour24-20

      Free GP visits for full-time students supports islanders in education, touching indirectly on the promise to advocate for lifelong learning opportunities.

    • 09 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(8). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): eighth amendment. Sport addition to Jersey Premium — Contre11-32

      Adding sport funding to the Jersey Premium scheme for primary schools touches on educational opportunity for young Islanders, connecting loosely to the lifelong learning promise.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerns lifelong learning and training opportunities broadly, while the motion specifically addresses a sport and physical activity funding pilot in primary schools — a sufficiently distinct and specific measure that voting against it does not plainly contradict a general commitment to lifelong learning and training.

  • Keptdirectional

    Candidate will strengthen school-employer links to develop local talent and reduce reliance on inward migration.

    “I will strengthen the links between schools and future employers to support young Island talent and reduce the present overreliance on inward migration and external consultants.”

    EducationPopulation And Migration

    4 recorded votes test this promise

    1 Pour · 3 Contre
    • 07 Feb 2023✓P.116/2022 — Skills Development Fund — Pour, voted to deliver38-3

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Skills Development Fund directly advances developing local talent, which is central to the promise to strengthen school-employer links and reduce reliance on inward migration.

    • 19 Jul 2023✓P.49/2023 — Entitlement to work – reduction in residency requirement. — Contre, voted to deliver11-31

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Reducing residency requirements for entitlement to work would increase reliance on inward migration, working against the promise to reduce such reliance.

    • 11 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(26)(re-issue). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): twenty-sixth amendment. Inflation adjustment to apprenticeship grants — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach9-27

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Adjusting apprenticeship grants for inflation directly supports the development of local talent through employer-linked training, advancing the promise to strengthen school-employer links and reduce reliance on inward migration.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. While apprenticeship grants relate broadly to developing local talent, the promise concerned strengthening school-employer links specifically, and voting against one particular inflation-adjustment mechanism for apprenticeship grants does not straightforwardly contradict that general directional commitment, as the member could oppose this specific funding mechanism while pursuing the promise through other means.

    • 13 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(20) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): twentieth amendment. Additional funding for education — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach13-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Additional education funding supports developing local talent, which is central to the promise to strengthen school-employer links and reduce reliance on inward migration.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerned strengthening school-employer links to develop local talent, while the motion was a specific funding amendment to the Government Plan for education generally, and voting against one particular funding mechanism does not straightforwardly contradict a broad directional commitment to school-employer partnerships.

Economy, Tax & Cost of Living

2 promises · 2 kept

17recorded votes

11 Pour · 5 Contre · 1 away

  • Keptdirectional

    Candidate will work to support local businesses and reduce regulatory burdens.

    “We need to help local businesses to prosper and to reduce red tape.”

    Economy And Business

    6 recorded votes test this promise

    2 Pour · 4 Contre
    • 27 Nov 2024·P.51/2024 Amd.(20) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): twentieth amendment. Jersey Business and Digital Jersey Savings — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach18-27

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This amendment concerned savings from Jersey Business and Digital Jersey; voting Pour to reject those savings would preserve support for local businesses.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to support local businesses and reduce red tape is a general directional commitment, and voting against one specific budget amendment affecting Jersey Business and Digital Jersey funding is not the same as opposing the goal itself, as the member could have had reasons (affordability, alternative approach, broader budget concerns) unrelated to the principle.

    • 15 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(13)(Amd) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): thirteenth amendment (P.97/2022. Amd.(13).) – amendment Enhanced Capital Allowance (P.97/2022 Amd.(13)Amd.) — Pour, voted to deliver42-6

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Enhanced Capital Allowance amendment reduces the tax burden on businesses investing in capital, directly bearing on reducing regulatory/financial burdens on local businesses.

    • 15 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(13) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): thirteenth amendment Enhanced Capital Allowance (P.97/2022 Amd.(13) as amended — Pour, voted to deliver48-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Adopting the Enhanced Capital Allowance amendment supports local businesses by easing their tax burden on capital investment.

    • 14 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(12) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): twelfth amendment Jersey Business — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach3-43

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The motion concerns funding for Jersey Business, which directly supports local businesses; voting Pour would advance the promise to support local businesses.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a general directional commitment to support local businesses and reduce red tape, and voting against one specific amendment relating to Jersey Business funding or governance cannot straightforwardly be equated to opposing the general goal, as the member could have had reasons unrelated to the principle (e.g., disagreeing with the mechanism, funding level, or other bundled elements) while still pursuing the broader promise.

    • 13 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(27) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72-2023) Amendment 27 Jersey Business Revenue Expenditure — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach3-43

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This amendment concerned Jersey Business revenue expenditure; voting Pour would maintain funding that supports local businesses.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a general directional commitment to support local businesses and reduce red tape, while the motion is a specific budget amendment about Jersey Business revenue expenditure, and voting against one particular funding mechanism does not straightforwardly contradict a broad manifesto goal without knowing what the amendment specifically proposed and whether the member had other reasons or alternative routes in mind.

    • 10 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): amendment. Development Levies — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach15-27

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Development levies could represent a regulatory/financial burden on businesses involved in construction and development, and voting on this amendment directly touches on regulatory costs for developers.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to reduce regulatory burdens on local businesses is a general directional commitment, and whether a specific amendment about development levies in the 2026-2029 Budget was the right mechanism to honour that commitment requires an inference about whether such levies constitute "red tape" and whether this particular amendment was the appropriate route.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 19 Apr 2023·P.13/2023 — Regulation of Estate Agents - as amended — Pour42-0

      Regulation of estate agents introduces a new regulatory framework which bears on the promise to reduce regulatory burdens on local businesses, albeit in a specific sector.

    • 11 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(2).Com. — Government Plan P72-2023 Amendment 2 Regtech — Contre11-35

      The Regtech amendment relates to regulatory technology, touching on reducing regulatory burdens for businesses in the financial sector.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a general directional commitment to reduce regulatory burdens, and voting against one specific "Regtech" amendment to a Government Plan does not plainly contradict that goal, since the member could have had reasons unrelated to the principle (e.g. preferring a different mechanism, cost concerns, or doubts about the specific proposal) while still honestly pursuing the broader aim.

    • 09 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(35) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-fifth amendment. Reduction in Public Expenditure — Contre2-40

      Freezing government spending could reduce regulatory and administrative burdens on local businesses by constraining government growth, touching indirectly on the promise to reduce regulatory burdens.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to reduce regulatory burdens and help local businesses does not straightforwardly require freezing overall government spending; a member could reasonably oppose this specific fiscal mechanism while still pursuing the general aim of supporting local businesses through other means.

  • Keptdirectional

    Candidate will support the local farming community, particularly organic farming, for food sustainability.

    “We need to support the local farming community, especially organic farming, for reasons of food sustainability.”

    Agriculture And FishingEnvironment And Climate

    11 recorded votes test this promise

    9 Pour · 1 Contre · 1 away
    • 07 Nov 2023✓P.74/2023 — Increase in revenue expenditure for agriculture and fisheries - as Amended — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Increased revenue expenditure for agriculture and fisheries directly supports the farming community and food sustainability.

    • 13 Dec 2023✓P.72/2023 Amd.(33) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): thirty-third amendment. Increase revenue expenditure for agriculture and fisheries, Part 2 — Pour, voted to deliver35-1

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This amendment directly increases revenue expenditure on agriculture and fisheries, materially advancing the promise to support the local farming community.

    • 10 Sept 2024✓P.41/2024 — Draft Agriculture (Loans) (Jersey) Amendment Regulations 202- Regulations — Pour, voted to deliver40-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Agriculture Loans Regulations directly support the local farming community through targeted financial assistance.

    • 10 Sept 2024✓P.41/2024 — Draft Agriculture (Loans) (Jersey) Amendment Regulations 202- Third Reading — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Third Reading of Agriculture Loans Regulations is a direct vote to enact financial support for the farming community.

    • 10 Sept 2024✓P.41/2024 — Draft Agriculture (Loans) (Jersey) Amendment Regulations 202- - Principles — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Principles vote on Agriculture Loans Regulations directly supports the farming community.

    • 26 Nov 2024✓P.51/2024. Amd.(24).Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): twenty-fourth amendment (P.51/2024 Amd.(24) – amendment. Agricultural Loan Restrictions — Pour, voted to deliver27-18

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Agricultural Loan Restrictions amendment to the Government Plan bears on support for the farming community.

    • 26 Nov 2024–P.51/2024 Amd.(24) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): twenty-fourth amendment. Agricultural Loan restriction - as amended — Abstained, did not take a side18-25

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Agricultural Loan Restriction amendment as amended relates directly to financial support for the farming community.

    • 09 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(30). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirtieth amendment. No Agricultural Loans for Cannabis-based products, as amended — Pour, voted to deliver39-4

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Barring agricultural loans for cannabis-based products relates to the direction of agricultural loan policy and touches on what farming activities are supported, relevant to the farming community promise.

    • 30 Mar 2026✓P.54/2026 Amd. — Continuation of Rural and Marine Support (P.54-2026) - Amendment (P.54-2026 Amd.) as amended — Contre, voted to deliver18-22

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The amendment to Continuation of Rural and Marine Support, if adopted, would alter support for rural farming; voting Contre preserves the original support for the farming community.

    • 30 Mar 2026✓P.54/2026 — Continuation of Rural and Marine Support (P.54-2026) — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Continuation of Rural and Marine Support directly advances the promise to support the farming community for food sustainability.

    • 09 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(30).Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirtieth amendment (P.70/2025 Amd.(30)), amendment. No Agricultural Loans for Cannabis-based products — Pour, voted against, not counted as a breach28-13

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The amendment to the agricultural loans ban could alter how the bar on cannabis-based agricultural loans operates; voting against preserves the original amendment's intent to direct loans toward traditional farming.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerns supporting local farming and organic farming for food sustainability, but this motion specifically concerns agricultural loans for cannabis-based products, which is a distinct and tangential policy question that requires an inferential chain to connect to the general farming-support promise.

Infrastructure & Environment

1 promise · 1 kept

11recorded votes

7 Pour · 4 Contre

  • Keptdirectional

    Candidate will push to combat climate change by promoting renewable energy and sustainable transport.

    “We should be doing all we can to protect against Climate Change, encouraging power from renewable sources (including solar, wind and tide), promoting sustainable transport and reducing our dependence on fossil fuels.”

    Environment And ClimateInfrastructure And Transport

    11 recorded votes test this promise

    7 Pour · 4 Contre
    • 01 Mar 2023✓P.117/2022(Amd) — Establishment of a Climate Council.: (P.117/2022): amendment - Part (a) — Contre, voted to deliver19-27

      Voting Contre delivers this

      This amendment to the Climate Council proposition, if adopted, would weaken or alter the climate body; voting Contre preserves a stronger Climate Council to combat climate change.

    • 01 Mar 2023✓P.117/2022 — Establishment of a Climate Council - as amended — Pour, voted to deliver45-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Establishing a Climate Council directly advances the promise to combat climate change through institutional action.

    • 16 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(6) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): sixth amendment Walking and Cycling routes — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Walking and Cycling Routes amendment to the Government Plan directly advances the promise to promote sustainable transport.

    • 18 Jul 2023·P.17/2023 — La Collette Waste Management Site – Development Plan. As amended — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach39-3

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The La Collette Waste Management Site Development Plan bears on sustainable waste management, which is part of combating climate change.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a broad directional commitment to renewable energy and sustainable transport, and the motion concerns a development plan for a waste management site — the connection between this specific planning decision and the climate promise requires inference about how the site's development relates to renewable energy or fossil fuel reduction, rather than being self-evident.

    • 19 Jul 2023·P.50/2023 — Supplementary Planning Guidance – Parking Strategy. — Pour, voted against, not counted as a breach19-24

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The Supplementary Planning Guidance on Parking Strategy, if rejected, could favour active and sustainable transport over car-centred planning, advancing the promise on sustainable transport.

      Considered and set aside: this motion does not bear on the promise. A parking strategy supplementary planning guidance vote is not directly about renewable energy, sustainable transport promotion, or fossil fuel reduction in any specific enough way to clearly connect it to the promise, and the link between opposing a parking strategy and delivering a climate/transport promise requires significant inferential steps about what the strategy actually contained.

    • 17 Apr 2024✓P.82/2023 — Offshore Wind (P.82-2023): Amendment — Contre, voted to deliver2-41

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The amendment to the Offshore Wind proposition could weaken or alter the offshore wind policy; voting Contre preserves the main offshore wind motion advancing renewable energy.

    • 17 Apr 2024✓P.82/2023 — Offshore Wind — Pour, voted to deliver40-1

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Offshore Wind proposition directly advances the promise to promote renewable energy.

    • 22 Apr 2025✓P.11/2025 — Evidence-based Energy Strategy (P.11-2025) as amended — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      An Evidence-based Energy Strategy directly advances the promise to combat climate change by promoting renewable energy.

    • 22 Oct 2025✓P.54/2025 — Supplementary Planning guidance: parking (P.54-2025) paragraph (a) — Pour, voted to deliver26-11

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Supplementary Planning Guidance on parking as amended bears on sustainable transport planning.

    • 09 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(32). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-second amendment. Environment Departmental Funding, Part 2 only — Pour, voted to deliver44-1

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Restoring £656,000 to the Environment department's budget supports the agency responsible for renewable energy and environmental policy, advancing the promise to combat climate change.

    • 14 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(9) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): ninth amendment. Subsidised Annual Bus Pass — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach17-29

      Voting Pour delivers this

      A subsidised annual bus pass directly promotes sustainable transport, which is an explicit part of the promise to combat climate change through sustainable transport.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. While subsidised bus passes could promote sustainable transport, voting against one specific funding mechanism for bus passes does not clearly contradict a general manifesto commitment to promote sustainable transport, as the member could oppose this particular measure on cost, design, or effectiveness grounds while still pursuing the broader goal.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 12 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(14) — Government Plan P72-2023 Amendment 14 - Waste charges — Contre16-31

      Waste charges can incentivise sustainable behaviour and bear indirectly on climate change commitments.

      Considered and set aside: this motion does not bear on the promise. Waste charges are not directly related to the promise about renewable energy, sustainable transport, or reducing fossil fuel dependence, making this a mis-association between the vote and the manifesto commitment.

Governance & Public Services

2 promises · 1 kept

14recorded votes

8 Pour · 5 Contre · 1 away

  • Keptaspirational

    Candidate will work for an open, transparent and accountable Assembly that makes financially sound decisions.

    “I will listen to Islanders and work collaboratively, acting with integrity to be part of a States Assembly that is open, transparent and accountable; one which makes sensible and financially sound decisions, ensuring that we live within our means and achieve positive outcomes.”

    Governance And ConstitutionPublic Finances

    14 recorded votes test this promise

    8 Pour · 5 Contre · 1 away
    • 24 Nov 2022✓P.107/2022 — States Employment Board – Annual Reporting — Pour, voted to deliver38-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The States Employment Board Annual Reporting motion directly advances transparency and accountability in the Assembly's financial decisions.

    • 01 Mar 2023✓P.7/2023 — Vote of No Confidence – Chair of the Health and Social Security Scrutiny Panel. — Pour, voted to deliver17-15

      Voting Pour delivers this

      A vote of no confidence in the Chair of the Health and Social Security Scrutiny Panel is a direct accountability mechanism within the Assembly.

    • 13 Dec 2022·P.109/2022 — Our Hospital Project: Reporting — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach15-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Our Hospital Project Reporting proposition directly advances transparency and accountability by requiring reporting on a major financially significant project.

      Considered and set aside: this motion does not bear on the promise. The promise is a broad commitment to transparency and financial soundness in the Assembly generally, while the motion concerns a specific reporting mechanism for the hospital project, making the link between the vote and the promise too indirect to constitute a clear breach.

    • 04 Jul 2023✓P.30/2023(Re-issue) — Amendment to Standing Orders – various amendments. — Pour, voted to deliver42-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Amendments to Standing Orders relating to various procedural matters bear on making the Assembly more open and accountable.

    • 18 Jul 2023✓P.47/2023 — Whistleblowing – introduction of legislation. - as amended — Pour, voted to deliver42-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Introduction of whistleblowing legislation supports transparency and accountability within government and public bodies.

    • 17 Oct 2023·P.69/2023 — Reporting of headcount and vacancies - Paragraph (a) as Amended — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach32-12

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Reporting on headcount and vacancies advances transparency in government financial decisions and public sector management.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. While the promise includes commitments to transparency and accountability, voting against one specific reporting mechanism for headcount and vacancies does not plainly contradict those general commitments, as the member could have opposed this particular measure on grounds of detail, format, or alternative reporting approaches while still genuinely pursuing transparency overall.

    • 16 Jan 2024✓P.1/2024 — Vote of No Confidence: Chief Minister. — Pour, voted to deliver27-22

      Voting Pour delivers this

      A vote of no confidence in the Chief Minister is a direct accountability mechanism within the States Assembly.

    • 17 Jan 2024✓P.93/2023 — Amendment to Standing Orders – States Decision Tracker. — Pour, voted to deliver42-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The States Decision Tracker amendment to Standing Orders directly advances accountability and transparency in the Assembly.

    • 28 Nov 2024–P.51/2024 Amd.(3).Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): third amendment (P.51/2024 Amd.(3)), amendment. Statistics Jersey Funding — Absent, did not take a side22-21

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Funding for Statistics Jersey supports the independent statistical capacity needed for transparent, financially sound government decision-making.

    • 11 Dec 2024·P.71/2024 — Reporting on Ministerial activities - move to next item — Pour, voted against, not counted as a breach34-10

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The motion to move to next item on reporting of ministerial activities would reduce transparency; voting Contre (against the move to next item) would advance accountability.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerns general principles of transparency and financial soundness, and voting to move to the next item (a procedural motion) cannot be clearly identified as a breach of those broad commitments without inferring that this specific procedural step was the one necessary means of fulfilling them.

    • 11 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(18). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): eighteenth amendment. Statistics Jersey, Administrative Support Funding — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach18-25

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Funding for Statistics Jersey's administrative support directly enables the production of independent statistics, supporting transparent and evidence-based financial decision-making in the Assembly.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a broad directional commitment to financial soundness and accountability, and voting against one specific amendment on administrative support funding for Statistics Jersey cannot straightforwardly be equated with opposing that general principle, as the member could plausibly judge this particular measure unnecessary or insufficiently justified while still pursuing the broader goal.

    • 11 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(36). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-sixth amendment. Council of Ministers' adjustments to heads of expenditure — Pour, voted to deliver38-4

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Council of Ministers' amendment to reduce net revenue expenditure to balance the Budget directly relates to making financially sound decisions.

    • 28 Nov 2024·P.51/2024 Amd.(12) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): twelfth amendment. Performance Framework — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach14-31

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Performance Framework amendment concerns accountability in government spending decisions within the Government Plan.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise calls for a transparent and accountable Assembly making financially sound decisions, but whether voting against a specific Performance Framework amendment to the 2025–2028 Budget contradicts that general commitment depends on inferences about whether this particular mechanism was the right or necessary means to achieve transparency and accountability, which is not self-evident.

    • 09 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(35) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-fifth amendment. Reduction in Public Expenditure — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach2-40

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Freezing government spending at 2025 levels directly bears on the promise to make financially sound decisions by constraining expenditure growth.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise commits to "financially sound decisions" and "living within our means," but whether freezing government spending at 2025 levels was the right mechanism to fulfil that general commitment involves a policy judgement—a member could reasonably vote against this specific freeze while still pursuing fiscal responsibility through other means.

  • No recorded votespecific

    Candidate promises to represent the needs of all three parishes in the States Assembly.

    “I promise that I will represent the needs of all three Parishes in the States.”

    Parish And Local GovernmentGovernance And Constitution
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictDeliveredhigh confidence

    Andrea (Andy) Howell served the full 2022–2026 Assembly term as Deputy for the three-parish district of St John, St Lawrence and Trinity, taking on roles including membership of the Health and Social Security Scrutiny Panel, the Planning Committee, and from February 2024 as Assistant Minister for Health and Social Services. She demonstrably engaged with constituents across all three parishes throughout the term — including raising a question in the States in September 2025 explicitly on behalf of St Lawrence constituents — and herself reflected in February 2026 that she had been privileged to represent all three parishes over four years. The promise, which was a general commitment to multi-parish representation rather than a specific policy outcome, was substantively fulfilled over the course of the term.

Andrea Howell’s record changes with every States Assembly sitting. Follow us on LinkedIn and we will tell you when it does.

Follow on LinkedIn