Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← All members

Helen Mary Miles

Senator · Independent

Assistant Chief Minister · Minister for Justice and Home Affairs · Executive Member of the Assemblée Parlementaire de la Francophonie (Jersey Branch) Executive Committee

Helen Mary Miles

Helen Mary Miles was first elected to the States Assembly in 2022 as Deputy for St Brelade, serving as Minister for Home Affairs and then Minister for Justice and Home Affairs until 2024, before chairing the Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel from 2024 to 2026. In 2026 she was elected island-wide as a Senator and currently holds office as Assistant Chief Minister and Minister for Justice and Home Affairs.

Campaigning for the 2026–2030 Assembly, Miles focused on cost-of-living pressures, fiscal responsibility, housing, and community safety. Her pledges included reconsidering the flat-rate freight import charge to ease rising prices, uprating the Community Costs, Cold Weather and Christmas Bonuses annually with inflation while expanding Pension Plus, and supporting first-time buyers alongside improvements to the rental market. She also committed to reinstating the full Social Security Fund grant, replenishing the Stabilisation Fund, prioritising front-line health and education services, and delivering the recommendations of the Violence Against Women and Girls Taskforce.

Miles spent more than thirty years in Jersey's public service, working across the States Police, Probation, and Customs and Immigration, and as a Director of Policy. She was a founding member of Autism Jersey and has worked as an academic lecturer.

Sources

—

States participation

5

Votes expected

Have your say

Constituent feedback

Reader ratings and comments. Not Helen Mary Miles’s own response.

Rate Helen Mary Miles

with

Coverage

Media mentions

Every Jersey media article naming this member, month by month. Accented bars mark coverage spikes — hover or focus any month to see the stories behind it.

12345Jun 26Jul 26Aug 26Sep 26Oct 26

What drove the spikes

Attendance

Turnout in the States Assembly — 2026–2030 Assembly

The States Assembly records a reason against every non-vote, so being ill, off-island, on parental leave or barred by a declared interest can be told apart from simply not turning up. Absences with an accepted reason are removed from both sides of the rate rather than held against the member.

5 votes in 2026–2030 Assembly so far — fewer than the 10 needed before this scorecard will publish a participation rate. The record to date:

  • Voted or abstained5

Manifesto

Promises, and how they voted — 2026–2030 Assembly

Grouped by policy area. Each promise carries the recorded States Assembly votes that test it, and whether this member voted to deliver — open any vote for the motion and the reasoning. A vote counts against a promise only where it plainly contradicts it; where a member voted against one particular measure but the breach is arguable, the vote is shown and set aside rather than counted. Where no recorded vote bears on a promise, an AI delivery verdict assesses progress against the public record.

Voted to deliverVoted againstAbsent or abstained

Housing & Planning

1 promise · 0 kept

No recorded States Assembly vote bears on this area yet.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Will support measures to help first-time buyers, family home purchasers and improve the rental market.

    “I will support first-time buyers, those looking to buy a family home, and an improved rental market.”

    Housing
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Senator Miles was elected on 7 June 2026 and the new Assembly first sat on 19 June 2026, giving her fewer than three months in the 2026-2030 term before this assessment date. However, she was appointed Minister for Justice and Home Affairs — not Housing — in the Farnham Council of Ministers confirmed on 30 June 2026, placing her at one remove from the housing brief. No evidence was found of any housing-specific action, proposition, or public statement by Senator Miles in the 2026-2030 term relating to first-time buyers, family homes, or the rental market; the housing portfolio sits with Deputy Malcolm Ferey. The short window means this does not reflect failure, but the promise remains unacted upon within this term.

Health & Social Care

2 promises · 0 kept

No recorded States Assembly vote bears on this area yet.

  • No recorded votespecific

    Will support annual inflation-linked increases to Community Costs, Cold Weather and Christmas Bonuses and expand Pension Plus.

    “We should increase the Community Costs Bonus, Cold Weather Bonus, and Christmas Bonus annually with inflation and support more pensioners through Pension Plus.”

    Social Security And BenefitsCost Of Living
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Senator Miles was elected on 7 June 2026 and was appointed Minister for Justice and Home Affairs, not Social Security, giving her no direct ministerial lever over the Community Costs, Cold Weather or Christmas Bonuses or Pension Plus. As of September 2026 the Community Costs Bonus remained at the same £516.50 flat rate for 2026 as in 2025 with no inflation-linked uplift introduced, and no proposition, amendment or ministerial statement from Senator Miles on these benefits was found in the new Assembly's records. The new Assembly has only sat since 19 June 2026, so a short window partly explains the absence of progress, but no active work traceable to Miles on this specific promise was identified.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Will prioritise improving the delivery of front-line health and education services.

    “We must prioritise improvements to the delivery of front-line services, notably health and education.”

    Health And CareEducation
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedhigh confidence

    Senator Miles was elected on 7 June 2026 and the new Assembly sat from 19 June 2026 — only approximately three months ago. She was appointed Minister for Justice and Home Affairs in the Farnham Council of Ministers, a portfolio unrelated to health or education frontline services; those briefs were assigned to Senator Tom Binet (Health and Social Services) and Deputy Catherine Curtis (Education and Lifelong Learning) respectively. No evidence was found of Senator Miles personally advancing specific initiatives, propositions, or ministerial statements directed at improving frontline health or education delivery in her own right during this early period of the term. The short window since the Assembly first sat means this should not be read as a failure, but no concrete progress on this particular promise is yet on record.

Economy, Tax & Cost of Living

3 promises · 0 kept

1recorded vote

1 Contre

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Will push to reconsider the flat-rate freight import charge to help reduce rising prices.

    “We must reconsider the flat-rate charge for freight imports which has led to rising prices.”

    Cost Of LivingEconomy And Business
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Senator Miles made this promise during her successful 2026 Senatorial campaign, and the new Assembly sat on 19 June 2026 — just under three months before this assessment. Crucially, she was appointed Minister for Justice and Home Affairs in the Farnham Council of Ministers, not Minister for Sustainable Economic Development (Deputy Kirsten Morel), the portfolio that holds direct responsibility for the DFDS concession agreement and freight-pricing structure. No evidence was found of Miles taking any specific action — such as lodging a proposition, making a ministerial statement, or publicly pressing the Economic Development Minister — on the flat-rate freight charge since the new term began. The issue itself remained live and contested throughout 2025-26: an Economic and International Affairs Scrutiny Panel interim report (March 2026) recommended an independent review of the flat-rate system, finding shelf prices had risen by 2% rather than the government's predicted 0.4%, but the government's formal response had not yet been published at the time of the election. No post-election progress attributable to Miles has been reported.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Will work to keep parking charges as low as possible.

    “We must also keep parking charges as low as possible.”

    Cost Of LivingInfrastructure And Transport
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Senator Helen Miles was elected on 7 June 2026 and confirmed as Minister for Justice and Home Affairs on 30 June 2026 — a portfolio with no direct responsibility for parking charges, which fall under the Infrastructure Minister. No evidence was found of any action, statement, proposition, or ministerial initiative by Miles relating to parking charges since the new Assembly sat on 19 June 2026. Jersey's public car-park charges had already risen by 2.8% from 1 January 2026 (before she was elected Senator), and parking policy sits outside her ministerial remit. Given that the Assembly has only been sitting for approximately three months, the absence of action should be read in that context, but no evidence of even early-stage progress on this specific commitment has surfaced.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Will support reinstating the full Social Security Fund grant and replenishing the Stabilisation Fund.

    “I support reinstating the full grant to the Social Security Fund, replenishing the Stabilisation Fund, and returning to a culture of long-term prudence.”

    Public FinancesSocial Security And Benefits

    1 recorded vote tests this promise

    1 Contre
    • 08 Sept 2026·P.63/2026 — Reinstate the States Grant to the Social Security Fund (P.63-2026) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach6-41

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The motion directly proposes reinstating the States Grant to the Social Security Fund, which is the precise commitment made in Promise [4].

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

Infrastructure & Environment

2 promises · 0 kept

No recorded States Assembly vote bears on this area yet.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Will push to improve transport and connectivity links with the Channel Islands, UK and Europe.

    “We must improve our connectivity with the Channel Islands, the UK, and Europe.”

    Infrastructure And TransportEconomy And Business
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedhigh confidence

    Senator Miles was elected on 7 June 2026 and the new Assembly first sat on 19 June 2026; as of 16 September 2026 the term is only approximately 13 weeks old. She was appointed Minister for Justice and Home Affairs — a portfolio that does not encompass transport or external connectivity — with infrastructure sitting under Deputy Jonathan Renouf and external relations under Senator Ian Gorst. No evidence was found of any proposition, ministerial statement, speech, or public initiative by Senator Miles personally directed at improving transport or connectivity links with the Channel Islands, UK or Europe since the new Assembly commenced.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Will work to protect Jersey's environment and coastline.

    “We must also protect our unique environment and coastline, to keep Jersey special.”

    Environment And Climate
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedhigh confidence

    Senator Miles was elected on 7 June 2026 and was confirmed as Minister for Justice and Home Affairs on 30 June 2026 — a role entirely unrelated to environmental or coastline protection, which falls under Senator Mary Le Hegarat as Environment Minister. No propositions, ministerial statements, or other actions by Senator Miles specifically directed at protecting Jersey's environment or coastline have been identified in the roughly three months since the new Assembly sat. The promise was a brief aspirational line in her campaign manifesto and her current ministerial portfolio gives her no direct lever over environmental policy.

Governance & Public Services

3 promises · 0 kept

No recorded States Assembly vote bears on this area yet.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Will pursue a flexible work permit system and policies to retain local talent and improve opportunities for young people.

    “We need to retain and develop local talent, improve opportunities for young people, and make Jersey more affordable. We also need a flexible work permit system to attract people with skills.”

    Population And MigrationEconomy And Business
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictIn progressmedium confidence

    Senator Miles was elected on 7 June 2026 and was appointed Minister for Justice and Home Affairs in the Farnham government by late June 2026, placing her in direct control of the work permit policy portfolio her promise addressed. In her ministerial statement to the Assembly on 29 June 2026 (Bailiwick Express), she outlined intentions including exploring a bespoke Jersey immigration law and extending travel arrangements — early signals consistent with a flexible migration approach. However, with the Assembly only having sat since 19 June 2026, no substantive new legislation or policy on flexible work permits or young people's opportunities specifically attributable to her in the 2026-2030 term had been announced by September 2026; the relevant work permit review under P.57/2026 (adopted March 2026, requiring a report by June 2027) was initiated under the previous Assembly and is now hers to deliver as minister.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Will champion voluntary service and increase charity support through better use of the Dormant Bank Accounts Fund.

    “I will continue to champion honorary and voluntary service. We should increase support for charities by making better use of the Dormant Bank Accounts Fund.”

    Parish And Local GovernmentPublic Finances
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Senator Helen Miles was elected on 7 June 2026 and the 2026-2030 Assembly first sat on 19 June 2026, leaving only approximately three months before this assessment. No independent reporting or official States records from statesassembly.je, gov.je, Bailiwick Express, or any other authoritative Jersey source shows Miles taking specific action — lodging a proposition, making a ministerial statement, or publicly championing the issue in the Assembly — in relation to honorary/voluntary service or the Dormant Bank Accounts Fund since her election. The Jersey Reclaim Fund's £4.5m three-year charity package (2025–2027) was announced and set in motion by the previous government before Miles took her Senatorial seat, so it cannot be attributed to her promise. Given the very short window since the Assembly sat, this reflects the absence of recorded action rather than a judgement of failure.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Will deliver VAWG Taskforce recommendations, protect emergency services funding and promote community cohesion.

    “We must deliver on the recommendations of the Violence Against Women and Girls Taskforce, protect funding for the emergency services, and promote greater community cohesion.”

    Justice And Home AffairsPublic Finances
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictIn progressmedium confidence

    Senator Helen Miles was elected on 7 June 2026 and confirmed as Minister for Justice and Home Affairs in the Farnham 2026–2030 government by late June 2026, placing her in a direct executive role to pursue all three strands of this promise. Prior to her election, as a backbench Deputy on 11 March 2026 she raised funding concerns during passage of the five-law VAWG legislative package (which the Assembly adopted that day), signalling continued personal commitment to VAWG delivery and emergency services resourcing. However, with the new Assembly having sat only since 19 June 2026 — roughly three months — no concrete ministerial outputs (a new Government Plan, a VAWG implementation update, or community cohesion initiative attributable to Miles in the 2026–2030 term) had been publicly reported by 16 September 2026; the short window makes this 'in_progress' rather than 'outstanding'.

Voting record

Recent recorded votes

This member's most recent votes in the States Assembly's electronic voting record, regardless of whether they relate to a manifesto promise.

Manifesto · Closed term

Promises, and how they voted — 2022–2026 Assembly

Deputy for St Brelade · Independent. This term has closed — shown here as this member's earlier record, not the live one. A vote counts against a promise only where it plainly contradicts it; an arguable breach is shown and set aside rather than counted.

82%

Kept rate

99%

States participation

13

Promises tracked

98%

of the 878 votes they were expected to cast in 2022–2026 Assembly

  • Voted or abstained867
  • Not present for vote11

Set aside from the rate · 14

  • Excused attendance14

These 14 ballots are removed from both sides of the rate, not counted as absences. Each is a vote the member either could not cast or was barred from casting. Reasons are the States Assembly’s own, as published in its voting record.

Voted to deliverVoted againstAbsent or abstained

Housing & Planning

2 promises · 1 kept

33recorded votes

14 Pour · 19 Contre

  • Keptdirectional

    Oppose further greenfield or coastline development in St Brelade.

    “There should be no further green field or coastline development in St Brelade. I don't support our Parish becoming a second town.”

    Planning And DevelopmentEnvironment And Climate

    9 recorded votes test this promise

    8 Pour · 1 Contre
    • 29 Nov 2024✓P.51/2024 Amd.(2) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024) – second amendment. West of Island Planning Framework — Pour, voted to deliver40-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The West of Island Planning Framework directly concerns planning in St Brelade's area, bearing on the promise to oppose further greenfield or coastline development there.

    • 07 Feb 2024✓P.5/2024 — The Seaside Café site at Grève de Lecq - acquisition by the public and transfer to the National Trust for Jersey. Part a — Pour, voted to deliver40-2

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Acquiring the Seaside Café site at Grève de Lecq and transferring it to the National Trust directly protects St Brelade's coastline from development, advancing this promise.

    • 07 Feb 2024·P.5/2024 — The Seaside Café site at Grève de Lecq - acquisition by the public and transfer to the National Trust for Jersey. Part b — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach35-7

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part b of the Grève de Lecq Seaside Café acquisition directly protects St Brelade's coastline, advancing the promise to oppose coastline development.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise opposes greenfield/coastline *development*, whereas this motion concerns public acquisition and transfer to the National Trust of an existing café site — a preservation or land-protection measure — so voting against it does not straightforwardly equate to supporting development, and a member could reasonably oppose this specific acquisition mechanism while still opposing coastline development.

    • 07 Feb 2024✓P.5/2024 — The Seaside Café site at Grève de Lecq - acquisition by the public and transfer to the National Trust for Jersey. Part c — Pour, voted to deliver39-2

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part c of the Grève de Lecq Seaside Café acquisition directly protects St Brelade's coastline, advancing the promise to oppose coastline development.

    • 07 Feb 2024✓P.5/2024 — The Seaside Café site at Grève de Lecq - acquisition by the public and transfer to the National Trust for Jersey. Part d — Pour, voted to deliver39-3

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part d of the Grève de Lecq Seaside Café acquisition directly protects St Brelade's coastline, advancing the promise to oppose coastline development.

    • 19 Jul 2023✓P.53/2023 — Negotiation of purchase for the site of the Seaside Café Grève de Lecq. As amended — Pour, voted to deliver32-10

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The vote to negotiate purchase of the Seaside Café site at Grève de Lecq directly protects St Brelade's coastline from development.

    • 19 Jul 2023✓P.53/2023(Amd) — Negotiation of purchase for the site of the Seaside Café, Grève de Lecq (P.53/2023): amendment. — Pour, voted to deliver49-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Amendment to the Grève de Lecq site negotiation bears on protecting the St Brelade coastline from development.

    • 06 Feb 2024✓P.5/2024 Amd. — The seaside café site at Grève De Lecq - acquisition by the public and transfer to the National Trust for Jersey (P.5/2024) – amendment. — Pour, voted to deliver49-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Amendment to the Grève de Lecq acquisition proposal bears on protecting the St Brelade coastline from development.

    • 22 Oct 2025✓P.67/2025 — Les Quennevais Parade and Precinct (P.67-2025) as amended — Pour, voted to deliver38-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Les Quennevais Parade and Precinct directly concerns St Brelade's local environment and development, bearing on the promise to oppose further development in the parish.

  • Mixeddirectional

    Push for affordable housing supply, deposit assistance, shared equity, and a ban on foreign buy-to-lets.

    “To meet the housing crisis, we must ensure a supply of affordable homes in appropriate locations, assistance with paying deposits and shared equity schemes. We should prioritise first-time buyers above those purchasing investment properties, ban foreign buy-to-lets, discourage properties being bought as holiday homes and ensure properties aren't left empty.”

    HousingCost Of Living

    24 recorded votes test this promise

    6 Pour · 18 Contre
    • 04 Oct 2022·P.92/2022 — Cost of living crisis – measures affecting Andium Homes rent increases — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach16-24

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Measures affecting Andium Homes rent increases bear on the promise to push for affordable housing supply and assist housing affordability.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

    • 13 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(2)(Amd) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): second amendment (P.97/2022. Amd.(2).) – amendment Stamp Duty of buy to let investments second homes and holiday homes — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach11-34

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Stamp Duty on buy-to-let investments, second homes and holiday homes directly bears on the promise to ban foreign buy-to-lets and push for affordable housing.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. While the promise includes discouraging buy-to-lets and holiday homes, the specific mechanism here is a Stamp Duty amendment, and a member could reasonably vote against this particular fiscal measure while still pursuing the broader housing goals through other means.

    • 13 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(2) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): second amendment Stamp Duty of buy to let investments second homes and holiday homes (P.97/2022 Amd.(2)) Part 1 — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach16-29

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part 1 of stamp duty on buy-to-let investments and second homes directly relates to the promise to ban foreign buy-to-lets.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. While the promise includes discouraging buy-to-lets and holiday homes, the motion concerned a specific stamp duty mechanism to achieve that, and a member could reasonably oppose this particular fiscal instrument while still genuinely pursuing the broader housing goals through other means.

    • 13 Dec 2022✗P.97/2022(Amd)(2) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): second amendment Stamp Duty of buy to let investments second homes and holiday homes (P.97/2022 Amd.(2)) Part 2 — Contre, voted against delivering2-42

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part 2 of stamp duty on buy-to-let investments and second homes directly relates to the promise to ban foreign buy-to-lets.

    • 15 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(11) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): eleventh amendment Ringfenced Stamp Duty (P.97/2022 Amd.(11)) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach17-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Ring-fenced Stamp Duty for housing bears on the promise to push for affordable housing supply and funding.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

    • 02 May 2023·P.18/2023 — Rent Control Measures [P.18/2023] - as amended - paragraph (a)(i) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach19-23

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Rent Control Measures paragraph (a)(i) bears on the promise to push for affordable housing and housing cost reduction.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

    • 02 May 2023·P.18/2023 — Rent Control Measures [P.18/2023] - as amended - paragraph (a)(ii) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach17-25

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Rent Control Measures paragraph (a)(ii) bears on the promise to push for affordable housing.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

    • 02 May 2023·P.18/2023 — Rent Control Measures [P.18/2023] - as amended - paragraph (a)(iii) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach12-30

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Rent Control Measures paragraph (a)(iii) bears on the promise to push for affordable housing.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

    • 02 May 2023·P.18/2023 — Rent Control Measures [P.18/2023] - as amended - paragraph (b)(i) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach10-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Rent Control Measures paragraph (b)(i) bears on the promise to push for affordable housing.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

    • 02 May 2023·P.18/2023 — Rent Control Measures [P.18/2023] - as amended - paragraph (b)(ii) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach16-26

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Rent Control Measures paragraph (b)(ii) bears on the promise to push for affordable housing.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

    • 19 Jul 2023·P.48/2023 — Mortgage repayment assistance. — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach19-24

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Mortgage repayment assistance directly advances the promise to support deposit assistance and affordable housing for islanders.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise specifically named deposit assistance and shared equity schemes, not mortgage repayment assistance, so voting against mortgage repayment assistance is not a plain contradiction of the named mechanisms, even though both relate to housing affordability.

    • 11 Dec 2023✓P.72/2023 Amd.(22).Amd — Government Plan P72-2023 Amendment 22 Amendment - Abolition of interest relief for landlords — Pour, voted to deliver31-13

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Abolition of interest relief for landlords bears on the promise to discourage buy-to-let investment and push for affordable housing.

    • 11 Dec 2023✓P.72/2023 Amd.(22) — Government Plan P72-2023 Amendment 22 as amended - Abolition of interest relief for landlords — Pour, voted to deliver33-12

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Abolition of interest relief for landlords (as amended) directly bears on the promise to ban foreign buy-to-lets and push for affordable housing.

    • 13 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(19) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): nineteenth amendment. Investment of stamp duty uplift into first time buyer funds — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach12-34

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Investing stamp duty uplift from second homes into first-time buyer funds directly advances the promise to support affordable housing and deposit assistance.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. While the amendment relates to first-time buyer support, which the promise addresses, voting against one specific funding mechanism (redirecting stamp duty revenue) does not clearly contradict a general manifesto commitment to affordable housing and deposit assistance, as the member could have opposed this particular route while pursuing the same goal through other means.

    • 26 Nov 2024✓P.51/2024 Amd.(28) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): twenty-eighth amendment. Removal of stamp duty surcharge on second homes - as amended — Contre, voted to deliver23-24

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Removing the stamp duty surcharge on second homes would reduce the disincentive for buy-to-let, working against the promise to ban foreign buy-to-lets; voting against removal advances the promise.

    • 14 May 2025·P.29/2025 Amd. — Social Rents Plan to Reduce Rental Stress for Tenants (P.29-2025) Amendment — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach32-12

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Social Rents Plan to Reduce Rental Stress for Tenants amendment directly bears on the promise to push for affordable housing and assist islanders with housing costs.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise focuses on affordable housing supply, deposit assistance, shared equity, and foreign buy-to-let bans, while this motion concerns an amendment to a Social Rents Plan—a related but distinct mechanism (social rent levels) where a member could reasonably oppose a specific amendment while still pursuing the broader affordable housing goals promised.

    • 14 May 2025✓P.29/2025 — Social Rental Plan to Reduce Rental Stress for Tenants (P.29-2025) as amended — Pour, voted to deliver34-4

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Social Rental Plan to Reduce Rental Stress for Tenants as amended directly advances the promise to push for affordable housing and reduce housing cost pressures.

    • 23 Apr 2025✓P.26/2025 — Increase in Assets and Savings Threshold for the Affordable Housing Gateway (P.26-2025) — Pour, voted to deliver7-30

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Increasing the assets and savings threshold for the Affordable Housing Gateway bears on the promise to push for affordable housing and deposit assistance.

    • 11 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(14). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fourteenth amendment. Mortgage Interest Tax Relief — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach13-26

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Reinstating mortgage interest tax relief for owner-occupiers could assist first-time buyers and affordable housing access, bearing on the promise to support deposit assistance and housing affordability.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

    • 27 Mar 2026·P.51/2026 — Removal of Interest Tax Relief for Buy-to-Let Mortgages (P.51-2026) — Pour, voted against, not counted as a breach18-21

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Removal of interest tax relief for buy-to-let mortgages directly advances the promise to ban/discourage buy-to-let investment; voting against removal works against the promise, so contre_delivers is reversed - voting pour would advance the promise.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

    • 26 Jun 2024✓P.37/2024 — Affordable Housing Provision at the Waterfront [P.37-2024] as amended — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Affordable Housing Provision at the Waterfront directly advances the promise to push for affordable housing supply.

    • 26 Nov 2024✓P.51/2024 Amd.(28).Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): twenty-eighth amendment (P.51/2024 Amd.(28)), amendment. Removal of stamp duty surcharge on second homes — Contre, voted to deliver30-14

      Voting Contre delivers this

      This amendment to remove the stamp duty surcharge on second homes, if passed, would work against the promise; voting against it advances the promise.

    • 13 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(2) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): second amendment Stamp Duty of buy to let investments second homes and holiday homes (P.97/2022 Amd.(2)) Part 3 — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach2-42

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part 3 of stamp duty on buy-to-let investments and second homes directly relates to the promise to ban foreign buy-to-lets.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. While the member's manifesto included discouraging investment properties and holiday homes, the motion specifically concerned adjusting Stamp Duty rates as the mechanism, and a member could vote against this particular fiscal measure while still honestly pursuing those goals through different means.

    • 08 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(15). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fifteenth amendment. Removal of 3% Stamp Surcharge — Contre, voted to deliver2-42

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Removing the stamp duty surcharge on buy-to-let and second homes works against the promise to ban foreign buy-to-lets; voting against removal advances the promise.

Health & Social Care

2 promises · 2 kept

9recorded votes

6 Pour · 3 Contre

  • Keptspecific

    Support a two-site hospital at Overdale and Gloucester Street and push for rigorous budget oversight.

    “My preference is for a two-site hospital at Overdale and Gloucester Street. Rigorous oversight is needed to keep the hospital project within budget.”

    Health And CarePublic Finances

    6 recorded votes test this promise

    4 Pour · 2 Contre
    • 13 Dec 2022·P.109/2022 — Our Hospital Project: Reporting — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach15-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This vote concerned reporting on the Our Hospital Project, directly bearing on the promise to support a two-site hospital and push for rigorous budget oversight.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise calls for rigorous budget oversight of the hospital project, but a vote on a specific reporting arrangement is a procedural/mechanism question, and the member could reasonably oppose this particular reporting structure while still genuinely supporting rigorous oversight through a different mechanism.

    • 14 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(20) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): twentieth amendment Hospital funding — Pour, voted to deliver33-12

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This amendment concerned hospital funding in the Government Plan, directly bearing on the promise to support the hospital project and push for rigorous budget oversight.

    • 17 Jul 2024·P.43/2024 — New Healthcare Facilities Programme Paragraph (b) — Pour, voted against, not counted as a breach15-29

      Voting Contre delivers this

      This vote on the New Healthcare Facilities Programme paragraph (b) directly bears on the two-site hospital promise; voting against a motion that could undermine or alter the hospital programme advances the promise.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

    • 17 Jul 2024·P.43/2024 — New Healthcare Facilities Programme paragraph (a) — Pour, voted against, not counted as a breach13-30

      Voting Contre delivers this

      This vote on New Healthcare Facilities Programme paragraph (a) directly bears on the hospital project that the promise commits to supporting.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

    • 28 Nov 2024✓P.51/2024 Amd.(6) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028: sixth amendment. New Healthcare Facilities Programme expenditure — Pour, voted to deliver17-28

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This amendment concerned New Healthcare Facilities Programme expenditure in the Budget, directly relating to funding the hospital project the member promised to support.

    • 08 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(13). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirteenth amendment. Fort Regent — Contre, voted to deliver10-34

      Voting Contre delivers this

      This amendment sought to halt the Fort Regent redevelopment unless funded by a GST rise, tangentially touching on prudent budget oversight of major capital projects the member committed to.

  • Keptdirectional

    Support further investment in mental health services.

    “Further investment is required in our mental health services.”

    Health And Care

    3 recorded votes test this promise

    2 Pour · 1 Contre
    • 14 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(16) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): sixteenth amendment Multi-morbidity GP consultations — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach14-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Funding multi-morbidity GP consultations bears on investment in mental health and general health services that the member promised to support.

      Considered and set aside: this motion does not bear on the promise. The motion concerned GP consultation funding for patients with multiple conditions (multi-morbidity), which is a primary care issue distinct from mental health services specifically promised by the member.

    • 25 Jun 2024✓P.40/2024 — Draft Mental Health (Young Offenders) Law (Jersey) Amendment Regulations 202- (P.40-2024) Third Reading — Pour, voted to deliver41-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Draft Mental Health (Young Offenders) Law amendment directly relates to mental health services, advancing the promise to support further investment in mental health.

    • 14 Jun 2023✓P.19/2023 — Health and Community Services Interim Board as amended — Pour, voted to deliver28-16

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Health and Community Services Interim Board bears on governance and investment in health services, including mental health.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 14 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(4) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): fourth amendment HIF Transfers (P.97/2022 Amd.(4)) — Contre31-13

      The Health Insurance Fund transfer amendment concerns health funding broadly, indirectly touching mental health services investment.

      Shown as context only: the link to this promise is too weak to grade.

    • 14 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(30).Amd — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 P72 Amendment 30 as amended - Freeze on Public Health staff appointments — Pour37-10

      A freeze on Public Health staff appointments touches investment in health services broadly, indirectly bearing on mental health staffing.

Education & Families

2 promises · 2 kept

9recorded votes

5 Pour · 1 Contre · 3 away

  • Keptdirectional

    Support the 1001 Critical Days strategy for infant development.

    “I support the 1001 Critical Days strategy to give infants the best start in life.”

    Children And FamiliesHealth And Care

    3 recorded votes test this promise

    2 Pour · 1 away
    • 19 Jul 2023✓P.52/2023 — Financial support for parents of babies needing additional neonatal care. As amended. — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Financial support for parents of babies needing additional neonatal care directly advances the 1001 Critical Days strategy for infant development.

    • 19 Mar 2024–P.2/2024 — Draft Children and Young People Commencement Act — Excused, did not take a side42-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Draft Children and Young People Commencement Act relates to children's rights and services touching the 1001 Critical Days infant development commitment.

    • 12 Dec 2022✓P.72/2023 Amd.(15) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): fifteenth amendment. Income Support (special payments) for carers of children with life-threatening, life-limiting illnesses, or complex healthcare needs. — Pour, voted to deliver49-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Income Support special payments for carers of children with life-threatening illnesses relates to early-years support within the spirit of the 1001 Critical Days strategy.

  • Keptdirectional

    Push for greater secondary school choice, a Higher Education Strategy, and improved university funding support.

    “I believe in greater choice, and opportunities for students to specialise, in our secondary schools. We need a Higher Education Strategy, assistance with university living costs and updated funding arrangements for post-graduate study.”

    EducationCost Of Living

    6 recorded votes test this promise

    3 Pour · 1 Contre · 2 away
    • 19 Mar 2024–P.12/2024 — Update of Higher Education Student Funding as amended — Excused, did not take a side42-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The vote on Update of Higher Education Student Funding directly advances the promise to support improved university funding support.

    • 19 Mar 2024–P.12/2024 Amd. — Update of Higher Education Student Funding (P.12/2024) – amendment - Parts 1 to 6 — Excused, did not take a side33-9

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The amendment on Update of Higher Education Student Funding Parts 1 to 6 directly advances the promise to support improved university funding.

    • 17 Jul 2024✓P.38/2024 — Fully funded education or training for 16-18 year olds paragraph (a) — Pour, voted to deliver13-31

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Fully funded education or training for 16-18 year olds paragraph (a) bears on the promise to support greater secondary school choice and education investment.

    • 17 Jul 2024✓P.38/2024 — Fully funded education or training for 16-18 year olds paragraph (c) — Pour, voted to deliver17-27

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Fully funded education or training for 16-18 year olds paragraph (c) bears on the promise to support education beyond secondary school.

    • 13 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(20) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): twentieth amendment. Additional funding for education — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach13-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Additional funding for education in the Government Plan directly bears on the promise to push for greater education investment and a Higher Education Strategy.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise calls for a Higher Education Strategy and improved university funding support, but the motion is a specific budget amendment for additional education funding whose exact scope and targeting are not detailed, making it impossible to conclude without inference that voting against it directly contradicts the promise rather than reflecting a judgement about the particular funding mechanism or level proposed.

    • 07 Feb 2023✓P.116/2022 — Skills Development Fund — Pour, voted to deliver38-3

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Skills Development Fund vote bears on the promise to support education, training and higher education investment.

Economy, Tax & Cost of Living

1 promise · 1 kept

8recorded votes

7 Contre · 1 away

  • Keptdirectional

    Oppose tax increases and push for reduced public debt and more prudent government spending.

    “Public spending must be focused on the priorities of taxpayers, debt reduced and the culture of prudence and saving re-established. The Government already collects enough tax and must use that money more wisely.”

    Public FinancesTax And Gst

    8 recorded votes test this promise

    7 Contre · 1 away
    • 20 Sept 2022✓P.80/2022(Amd)(4) — Mini-Budget 2022 (P.80/2022): fourth amendment. Replace the 20% standard rate of personal income tax with 25% for all but High Value Residents — Contre, voted to deliver11-34

      Voting Contre delivers this

      This amendment proposed raising the standard rate of personal income tax to 25%, which the member's promise to oppose tax increases would direct them to vote against.

    • 15 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(23) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): twenty-third amendment Removing the Upper Earnings caps — Contre, voted to deliver16-28

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Removing the upper earnings cap on Social Security contributions amounts to a tax increase on higher earners, bearing on the promise to oppose tax increases.

    • 14 Dec 2023✓P.72/2023 Amd.(3) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 P72 Amendment 3 - Removal of earnings cap — Contre, voted to deliver12-33

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Removal of earnings cap in the 2024 Government Plan is a form of tax increase on higher earners, bearing on the promise to oppose tax increases.

    • 10 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(5). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fifth amendment. Upper Earnings Limit, Part 1 (Social Security contributions) — Contre, voted to deliver13-30

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Removing the upper earnings limit on Social Security contributions is a tax increase on high earners, bearing directly on the promise to oppose tax increases.

    • 10 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(5). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fifth amendment. Upper Earnings Limit, Part 2 (Long-Term Care contributions) — Contre, voted to deliver16-28

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Removing the upper earnings limit on Long-Term Care contributions is a tax increase, directly bearing on the promise to oppose tax increases.

    • 26 Jun 2024✓P.35/2024 — Transfer of 2024 Departmental Underspend into the Stabilisation Fund [P.35-2024] — Contre, voted to deliver1-42

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Transferring departmental underspend into the Stabilisation Fund rather than spending it bears on the promise to push for reduced public debt and more prudent government spending.

    • 09 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(35) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-fifth amendment. Reduction in Public Expenditure — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach2-40

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Freezing government spending at 2025 levels directly advances the promise to push for reduced public debt and more prudent government spending.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. While Miles promised prudent spending and opposing tax increases, voting against one specific freeze amendment does not plainly contradict that general commitment, as she could reasonably have judged this particular mechanism inappropriate or preferred a different approach to fiscal discipline.

    • 27 Feb 2024–P.8/2024 (re-issue) — Cabinet Office Expenditure Savings [P.8-2024] — Absent, did not take a side38-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Cabinet Office Expenditure Savings directly advances the promise to push for more prudent government spending.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 20 Sept 2022·P.80/2022(Amd)(6)(Re-issue) — Mini-Budget 2022 (P.80/2022): sixth amendment. New personal tax allowance — Contre9-33

      Introducing a new personal tax allowance could reduce tax burden for some islanders, touching the promise to oppose tax increases, though the mechanism differs.

      Shown as context only: the link to this promise is too weak to grade.

Infrastructure & Environment

1 promise · 1 kept

8recorded votes

5 Pour · 3 Contre

  • Keptdirectional

    Support transition to a greener economy while balancing cost-of-living pressures for islanders.

    “I support sensible moves towards Jersey becoming a greener economy. We must consider the cost of living and financial pressures on Islanders as we move towards carbon neutrality.”

    Environment And ClimateCost Of Living

    8 recorded votes test this promise

    5 Pour · 3 Contre
    • 01 Mar 2023✓P.117/2022 — Establishment of a Climate Council - as amended — Pour, voted to deliver45-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Establishing a Climate Council directly advances transition to a greener economy, which is the core of this promise.

    • 24 Nov 2022·P.100/2022 — Cost of living crisis – Removal of 5% goods and services tax (GST) from food (excluding alcoholic drinks) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach17-28

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Removing GST from food directly addresses cost-of-living pressures for islanders, the balancing element of this promise.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise was about supporting a greener economy while balancing cost-of-living pressures, not a specific commitment to remove GST from food; voting against this particular GST measure could reflect a preference for alternative cost-of-living relief mechanisms rather than a rejection of the promise's general direction.

    • 16 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(6) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): sixth amendment Walking and Cycling routes — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Funding walking and cycling routes supports transition to a greener economy through active and sustainable transport.

    • 17 Apr 2024✓P.82/2023 — Offshore Wind — Pour, voted to deliver40-1

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Voting for Offshore Wind directly advances the greener economy transition promised by the member.

    • 17 Apr 2024✓P.82/2023 — Offshore Wind (P.82-2023): Amendment — Contre, voted to deliver2-41

      Voting Contre delivers this

      An amendment to the Offshore Wind proposition that would narrow or amend it; voting against an amendment that weakens the offshore wind policy advances the greener economy promise.

    • 22 Apr 2025✓P.11/2025 — Evidence-based Energy Strategy (P.11-2025) as amended — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      An evidence-based Energy Strategy directly supports transition to a greener economy, which the member promised to support.

    • 20 Sept 2022✓P.80/2022(Amd)(3) — Mini-Budget 2022 (P.80/2022): third amendment. Community Costs Bonus threshold and deadline — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Widening the Community Costs Bonus income threshold directly addresses cost-of-living pressures for islanders, the balancing element of this promise.

    • 15 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(22) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): twenty-second amendment GST on Sanitary Products — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach24-22

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Removing GST from sanitary products directly reduces cost-of-living pressures for islanders, the balancing element of this promise.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 12 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(14) — Government Plan P72-2023 Amendment 14 - Waste charges — Contre16-31

      Waste charges relate to environmental policy and cost-of-living, touching both elements of the greener economy/cost-of-living balance in the promise.

Governance & Public Services

5 promises · 2 kept

23recorded votes

12 Pour · 11 Contre

  • Keptdirectional

    Support parish youth work and reinstate island-wide community safety programmes.

    “I support focused Parish youth work in partnership with the Honorary and States Police and re-instating island-wide programmes including 'Building a Safer Society' and 'Prison! Me! No Way!'.”

    Justice And Home AffairsChildren And Families

    2 recorded votes test this promise

    1 Pour · 1 Contre
    • 11 Jun 2024✓P.28/2024 — Youth Service Statutory Provision as amended — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Youth Service Statutory Provision vote directly bears on the promise to support parish youth work and reinstate community safety programmes.

    • 11 Jun 2024✓P.28/2024 Amd. — Youth Services Statutory Provision (P.28/2024): amendment — Contre, voted to deliver0-49

      Voting Contre delivers this

      An amendment to the Youth Services Statutory Provision that was rejected; if the amendment would have weakened youth service provision, voting against it advances the promise.

  • No recorded votespecific

    Prioritise local candidates for civil service roles, with off-island appointments only after 12 months if no suitable local candidate is found.

    “Local candidates should be sought for civil service jobs – only if a suitable person can't be appointed or trained within 12 months should off-Island appointments be considered.”

    Public Sector ReformPopulation And Migration
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    No evidence was found that Deputy Miles lodged a proposition, secured a ministerial direction, or otherwise advanced a formal policy requiring local candidates to be prioritised for civil service roles with off-island appointments only considered after 12 months. Miles served as Minister for Justice and Home Affairs (July 2022–January 2024) and then chaired the Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel (February 2024–June 2026), neither of which carries direct responsibility for civil service recruitment policy. The Government's Common Strategic Policy 2024–2026 (P.21/2024) included a broader commitment to 'develop local talent within the civil service,' and the States Employment Board introduced an external recruitment freeze from August 2023, extended to March 2026 — but these were cost-cutting measures, not the specific 12-month local-first sequencing rule Miles had promised, and were not attributable to her.

  • Mixeddirectional

    Support restoring Senators and retaining the Bailiff and Connétables in the States Assembly.

    “I support bringing back Senators and retaining the Bailiff and the Connétables in the States.”

    Governance And Constitution

    19 recorded votes test this promise

    10 Pour · 9 Contre
    • 29 Nov 2023✓P.76/2023 — Reform of the composition of the States Assembly. — Pour, voted to deliver14-30

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Reform of the composition of the States Assembly bears on the promise to support restoring Senators and retaining the Bailiff and Connétables.

    • 17 Jan 2023✓P.108/2022(Amd) — Re-instatement of Senators (P.108/2022): amendment — Pour, voted to deliver22-24

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Amendment to the Re-instatement of Senators proposition bears on the promise to support restoring Senators to the States Assembly.

    • 17 Jan 2023·P.108/2022(Amd)(2) — Re-instatement of Senators (P.108/2022): second amendment - para (a) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach11-34

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Second amendment paragraph (a) to Re-instatement of Senators directly bears on the promise to support restoring Senators.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

    • 17 Jan 2023·P.108/2022(Amd)(2) — Re-instatement of Senators (P.108/2022): second amendment - para (b) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach3-40

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Second amendment paragraph (b) to Re-instatement of Senators directly bears on the promise to support restoring Senators.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

    • 17 Jan 2023·P.108/2022(Amd)(2) — Re-instatement of Senators (P.108/2022): second amendment - para (c) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach12-33

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Second amendment paragraph (c) to Re-instatement of Senators directly bears on the promise to support restoring Senators.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

    • 18 Jan 2023✓P.108/2022 — Re-instatement of Senators (P.108/2022) — Pour, voted to deliver23-24

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The main vote on Re-instatement of Senators is a direct test of the promise to restore Senators to the States Assembly.

    • 19 Mar 2025·P.2/2025 Amd.(2)(re-issue) — Re-instatement of Senators (P.2-2025) Second Amendment — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach19-25

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Second amendment to Re-instatement of Senators 2025 bears on the promise to restore Senators.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

    • 19 Mar 2025✗P.2/2025 Amd.(4) — Paragraph (a) — Contre, voted against delivering8-37

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Paragraph (a) of the Re-instatement of Senators 2025 debate bears on the promise to restore Senators.

    • 19 Mar 2025✗P.2/2025 Amd.(4) — Paragraph (c) — Contre, voted against delivering3-42

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Paragraph (c) of the Re-instatement of Senators 2025 debate bears on the promise to restore Senators.

    • 19 Mar 2025✓P.2/2025 Amd.(5)(re-issue) — Re-instatement of Senators (P.2-2025) Fifth amendment — Pour, voted to deliver22-24

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Fifth amendment to Re-instatement of Senators 2025 bears on the promise to restore Senators.

    • 20 Mar 2025·P.2/2025 Amd.(3). — Re-instatement of Senators (P.2-2025) Third amendment — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach23-24

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Third amendment to Re-instatement of Senators 2025 bears on the promise to restore Senators.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

    • 18 Mar 2025·P.2/2025 Amd.Amd. — Re-instatement of Senators (P.2-2025) Amendment (P.2-2025 Amd.) Amendment — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach6-38

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Amendment to the Re-instatement of Senators 2025 proposition bears on the promise to restore Senators.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

    • 19 Mar 2025·P.2/2025 Amd. — Re-instatement of Senators (P.2-2025) Amendment — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach11-33

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Amendment to Re-instatement of Senators 2025 bears on the promise to support restoring Senators.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

    • 20 Mar 2025✓P.2/2025 — Re-instatement of Senators (P.2-2025) — Pour, voted to deliver25-20

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Re-instatement of Senators vote is a direct test of the promise to restore Senators to the States Assembly.

    • 11 Sept 2025✓P.56/2025 Amd.(4). — Draft Elections (Senators) (Jersey) Amendment Law 202- (P.56-2025) Fourth Amendment — Pour, voted to deliver18-28

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Fourth Amendment to Draft Elections (Senators) Amendment Law bears on the promise to restore Senators, as it concerns the detail of the reinstatement.

    • 11 Sept 2025✓P.56/2025 Amd.(3). — Third Amendment (as amended) — Pour, voted to deliver20-22

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Third Amendment to Draft Elections (Senators) Amendment Law bears on the promise to restore Senators.

    • 11 Sept 2025✓P.56/2025 — Articles — Pour, voted to deliver30-14

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Articles of the Draft Elections (Senators) Amendment Law directly implement restoration of Senators, a core test of this promise.

    • 11 Sept 2025✓P.56/2025 — Third Reading — Pour, voted to deliver28-17

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Third Reading of Draft Elections (Senators) Amendment Law is a direct test of support for restoring Senators.

    • 11 Mar 2026✓P.13/2026 — Bailiff's Consultative Panel - Amendment to Term of Office (P.13-2026) — Pour, voted to deliver42-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Bailiff's Consultative Panel amendment to term of office bears on the promise to retain the Bailiff in the States Assembly.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Advocate for greater use of the 9-month visa and solutions to house seasonal workers.

    “On population, greater use should be made of the 9-month visa. We need solutions to accommodate seasonal staff.”

    Population And MigrationEconomy And Business

    1 recorded vote tests this promise

    1 Contre
    • 19 Jul 2023·P.49/2023 — Entitlement to work – reduction in residency requirement. — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach11-31

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Reducing the residency requirement for entitlement to work bears on the promise to advocate greater use of visa routes and solutions for seasonal workers.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

  • Keptspecific

    Establish a Parish Improvement Project to enhance use of St Brelade's local amenities.

    “If elected, I will seek to establish a Parish Improvement Project to enhance the use of our parish amenities, including Les Quennevais parade and precinct, Communicare, the Elephant Park, Railway Walk, St Aubin and the old Les Quennevais school.”

    Parish And Local GovernmentInfrastructure And Transport

    1 recorded vote tests this promise

    1 Pour
    • 22 Oct 2025✓P.67/2025 — Les Quennevais Parade and Precinct (P.67-2025) as amended — Pour, voted to deliver38-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Les Quennevais Parade and Precinct directly concerns St Brelade's local amenities, bearing on the promise to establish a Parish Improvement Project for local amenities.

Helen Mary Miles’s record changes with every States Assembly sitting. Follow us on LinkedIn and we will tell you when it does.

Follow on LinkedIn