Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
PRE-LAUNCH FEEDBACK PHASE — Public launch: Friday, 18 September 2026
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← All members

Kevin Charles Lewis

Connétable for St Saviour · Independent

Did not return for the 2026–2030 Assembly · role shown is from 2022–2026 Assembly

Kevin Charles Lewis

Kevin Lewis served as Deputy for St Saviour from 2005 until 2022, during which time he held several significant offices. He was Assistant Minister for Transport and Technical Services from 2005 to 2011, then Minister for Transport and Technical Services from 2011 to 2014, before serving on the Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel and the Privileges and Procedures Committee from 2014 to 2017. He then served as Minister for Infrastructure from 2017 to 2022. For his final term he stood successfully for Connétable of St Saviour, a seat he held from 2022 to 2026.

For that 2022 term Lewis campaigned on a broad platform of community welfare, infrastructure and housing. His specific pledges included continuing work on a safer-routes-to-school scheme and improving pedestrian safety and speeding; promoting affordable public transport options; pushing for social housing and affordable homes for first-time buyers while restricting the volume of new building in the parish; protecting pensions and supporting senior citizens in living comfortably and safely; and campaigning for an insurance scheme to prevent elderly residents from being forced to sell their homes to fund care costs.

Lewis also ran the Jersey Film Festival in Howard Davis Park for twenty-five years, raising funds for local charities, and served as a committee member of the Jersey Blind Society.

Sources

98%

States participation

892

Votes expected

Voted or abstained on 98% of the 892 votes they were expected to cast during 2022–2026 Assembly.

Have your say

Constituent feedback

Public commentary and ratings from readers on how Kevin Charles Lewis is doing. This is not Kevin Charles Lewis’s own response.

No comments yet. Be the first to rate this member’s term so far.

Comments open soon. Sign-in for this feature is still being configured.

Coverage

Media mentions

Every Jersey media article naming this member, month by month. Accented bars mark coverage spikes — hover or focus any month to see the stories behind it.

1Jul 22Oct 22Jan 23Apr 23Jul 23Oct 23Jan 24Apr 24Jul 24Oct 24Jan 25Apr 25Jul 25Oct 25Jan 26Apr 26Jul 26

Attendance

Turnout in the States Assembly — 2022–2026 Assembly

The States Assembly records a reason against every non-vote, so being ill, off-island, on parental leave or barred by a declared interest can be told apart from simply not turning up. Absences with an accepted reason are removed from both sides of the rate rather than held against the member.

98%

of the 892 votes they were expected to cast in 2022–2026 Assembly

  • Voted or abstained879
  • Not present for vote13

Manifesto

Promises, and how they voted — 2022–2026 Assembly

Grouped by policy area. Each promise carries the recorded States Assembly votes that test it, and whether this member voted to deliver — open any vote for the motion and the reasoning. A vote counts against a promise only where it plainly contradicts it; where a member voted against one particular measure but the breach is arguable, the vote is shown and set aside rather than counted. Promises no recorded vote has borne on yet are marked as untested rather than scored.

Voted to deliverVoted againstAbsent or abstained

Housing & Planning

2 promises · 2 kept

28recorded votes

18 Pour · 10 Contre

  • Keptdirectional

    Candidate will push for prioritising social housing and affordable properties for first-time buyers.

    “I am concerned that the Island should prioritise the needs of the less well-off and first time buyers. This means the provision of social housing and affordable properties for first time buyers.”

    HousingCost Of Living

    15 recorded votes test this promise

    12 Pour · 3 Contre
    • 04 Oct 2022✓P.92/2022 — Cost of living crisis – measures affecting Andium Homes rent increases — Pour, voted to deliver16-24

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Cost of living measures affecting Andium Homes rent increases directly bears on the affordability of social housing for tenants.

    • 15 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(11) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): eleventh amendment Ringfenced Stamp Duty (P.97/2022 Amd.(11)) — Pour, voted to deliver17-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Ringfenced stamp duty amendment would direct housing tax revenues towards affordable housing, directly bearing on the promise to prioritise social housing.

    • 19 Apr 2023✓P.14/2023 — Development Levies - as amended - parts (a) and (b) — Pour, voted to deliver40-1

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Development levies on new building bear on funding affordable and social housing provision, advancing the promise on social housing and affordable properties.

    • 19 Apr 2023✓P.15/2023 — Jersey Homes Trust rent increase – assistance scheme. — Pour, voted to deliver18-23

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Jersey Homes Trust rent increase assistance scheme bears on protecting social housing tenants, advancing the promise on social housing.

    • 19 Jul 2023✓P.48/2023 — Mortgage repayment assistance. — Pour, voted to deliver19-24

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Mortgage repayment assistance directly bears on helping residents, including first-time buyers, afford homes.

    • 14 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(11).Com. — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 P72 Amendment 11 - AHP scheme — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach1-42

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Affordable Housing Programme scheme amendment directly bears on prioritising social housing and affordable properties for first-time buyers.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise commits to prioritising social and affordable housing generally, but voting against one specific amendment to a Government Plan's affordable housing scheme is not plainly the same as opposing that goal, since the member could prefer a different mechanism or have objections to the particular terms of this amendment.

    • 13 Dec 2023✓P.72/2023 Amd.(19) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): nineteenth amendment. Investment of stamp duty uplift into first time buyer funds — Pour, voted to deliver12-34

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This amendment to invest stamp duty revenue into first-time buyer funds directly advances the promise to prioritise affordable properties for first-time buyers.

    • 28 Nov 2024·P.51/2024 Amd.(17) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): seventeenth amendment. Le Squez — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach15-31

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Le Squez Government Plan amendment directly bears on social housing provision, advancing the promise on social housing prioritisation.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a general directional commitment to prioritise social housing and affordable properties, while the motion is a specific budget amendment concerning Le Squez development funding, and voting against one particular funding measure does not necessarily contradict a general commitment to prioritise social housing, as the member may have had reasons related to mechanism, cost, or alternative approach.

    • 14 May 2025✓P.29/2025 Amd. — Social Rents Plan to Reduce Rental Stress for Tenants (P.29-2025) Amendment — Pour, voted to deliver32-12

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Social Rents Plan amendment to reduce rental stress for tenants directly bears on the promise to prioritise social housing affordability.

    • 14 May 2025✓P.29/2025 — Social Rental Plan to Reduce Rental Stress for Tenants (P.29-2025) as amended — Pour, voted to deliver34-4

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Social Rental Plan to reduce rental stress for tenants as amended directly advances social housing affordability.

    • 23 Apr 2025·P.26/2025 — Increase in Assets and Savings Threshold for the Affordable Housing Gateway (P.26-2025) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach7-30

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Increasing assets and savings threshold for the Affordable Housing Gateway directly bears on access to affordable housing for first-time buyers.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise calls for prioritising social housing and affordable properties for first-time buyers generally, but the motion concerned a specific administrative mechanism (the assets and savings threshold for the Affordable Housing Gateway), and a member could reasonably vote against this particular threshold adjustment while still genuinely pursuing the broader goal of affordable housing provision through other means.

    • 09 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(31). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-first amendment. Empty Residential Properties, as amended — Pour, voted to deliver41-3

      Voting Pour delivers this

      An amendment on empty residential properties could increase housing supply, bearing on social housing and affordable property availability.

    • 26 Jun 2024✓P.37/2024 — Affordable Housing Provision at the Waterfront [P.37-2024] as amended — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Affordable housing provision at the Waterfront directly advances the promise to prioritise affordable properties for residents.

    • 09 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(31).Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-first amendment (P.70/2025 Amd.(31)), amendment. Empty Residential Properties — Pour, voted against, not counted as a breach16-27

      Voting Contre delivers this

      This amendment to the empty residential properties amendment, if adopted, could weaken measures to bring empty homes back into use, working against increasing affordable housing supply.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerns prioritising social housing and affordable properties for first-time buyers, while the motion is a specific amendment about empty residential properties within a broader budget, making it unclear whether voting against this particular amendment was the only or best route to honouring that general commitment.

    • 09 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(31).Amd.(2). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-first amendment (P.70/2025 Amd.(31)), second amendment. Empty Residential Properties — Pour, voted to deliver40-4

      Voting Pour delivers this

      A second amendment to the empty residential properties motion bears on increasing housing availability relevant to social and affordable housing.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 10 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): amendment. Development Levies — Contre15-27

      Development levies could be a mechanism to fund affordable housing or social housing, tangentially bearing on the promise to prioritise social and affordable housing.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to prioritise social housing and affordable properties is a general directional commitment, while this motion concerned a specific amendment about development levies within a broader budget, and voting against one particular funding mechanism does not straightforwardly contradict the underlying housing affordability goal.

    • 26 Nov 2024·P.51/2024 Amd.(28).Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): twenty-eighth amendment (P.51/2024 Amd.(28)), amendment. Removal of stamp duty surcharge on second homes — Contre30-14

      An amendment to remove the stamp duty surcharge on second homes could reduce funds available for first-time buyer support and increase competition for housing.

    • 08 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(15). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fifteenth amendment. Removal of 3% Stamp Surcharge — Contre2-42

      Removing the stamp duty surcharge on buy-to-let and second homes could increase competition for properties, working against first-time buyers and social housing priorities.

  • Keptdirectional

    Candidate will work to control and restrict the amount of house building in the parish.

    “we must control the amount of house building in the parish, I have brought amendments to restrict the amount of building in the Loungueville and five oaks area.”

    Planning And DevelopmentHousing

    13 recorded votes test this promise

    6 Pour · 7 Contre
    • 04 Oct 2022✓P.92/2022 — Cost of living crisis – measures affecting Andium Homes rent increases - 'move to next item' proposed by Deputy Inna Gardiner — Contre, voted to deliver19-20

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Voting to move to next item would have blocked measures affecting Andium Homes rent increases; the substantive debate concerned housing growth and affordability pressures.

    • 13 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(2)(Amd) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): second amendment (P.97/2022. Amd.(2).) – amendment Stamp Duty of buy to let investments second homes and holiday homes — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach11-34

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Amendment to increase stamp duty on buy-to-let investments and second homes would restrict speculative housing activity, bearing on controlling house building.

      Considered and set aside: this motion does not bear on the promise. The promise concerned controlling the volume of house building in the parish, while the motion was about stamp duty on buy-to-let investments, second homes, and holiday homes — a tax measure with no direct connection to restricting building quantities in St Saviour.

    • 13 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(2) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): second amendment Stamp Duty of buy to let investments second homes and holiday homes (P.97/2022 Amd.(2)) Part 1 — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach16-29

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Increasing stamp duty on buy-to-let investments, second homes and holiday homes would restrict speculative house purchasing and bear on controlling the housing market.

      Considered and set aside: this motion does not bear on the promise. The promise concerns controlling the volume of house building in the parish, while the motion concerns stamp duty on buy-to-let investments, second homes, and holiday homes — a tax measure with no direct connection to restricting residential construction in a specific parish.

    • 13 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(2) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): second amendment Stamp Duty of buy to let investments second homes and holiday homes (P.97/2022 Amd.(2)) Part 2 — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach2-42

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part 2 of the stamp duty amendment on buy-to-let and second homes similarly bears on restricting investment-driven house building and purchasing.

      Considered and set aside: this motion does not bear on the promise. The promise concerns controlling and restricting house building in the parish, while the motion is about stamp duty on buy-to-let investments, second homes, and holiday homes — a tax policy measure unrelated to planning or construction volume controls.

    • 19 Apr 2023✓P.14/2023 — Development Levies - as amended - parts (a) and (b) — Pour, voted to deliver40-1

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Development levies on new building directly bear on controlling and funding the consequences of house building, materially advancing control of development.

    • 29 Nov 2023✓P.87/2023 — Minimum Residential Space Standards (P.87/2023) - Paragraph (c) — Pour, voted to deliver13-27

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Minimum residential space standards paragraph (c) further regulates housing development, bearing on controlling house building.

    • 29 Nov 2023✓P.87/2023 — Minimum Residential Space Standards (P.87/2023) - Paragraph (b) — Pour, voted to deliver16-22

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Minimum residential space standards paragraph (b) further regulates housing development, bearing on controlling house building.

    • 29 Nov 2023✓P.87/2023 — Minimum Residential Space Standards (P.87/2023) - Paragraph (a) — Pour, voted to deliver22-20

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Minimum residential space standards paragraph (a) directly regulates the quality and size of housing, bearing on controlling housing development.

    • 29 Nov 2024✓P.51/2024 Amd.(2) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024) – second amendment. West of Island Planning Framework — Pour, voted to deliver40-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The West of Island Planning Framework directly concerns planning and development control, bearing on restricting house building in the island.

    • 01 Apr 2025·P.16/2025 — Increase Stamp Duty for Properties that are not Principal Residences to 5 per cent (P.16-2025) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach3-41

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Increasing stamp duty for properties that are not principal residences would restrict investment-led house purchasing and bear on controlling housing growth.

      Considered and set aside: this motion does not bear on the promise. The promise concerns controlling and restricting the volume of house building in the parish, while the motion concerns stamp duty rates on non-principal-residence property purchases — a tax measure with no direct bearing on limiting construction in St Saviour.

    • 27 Mar 2026·P.51/2026 — Removal of Interest Tax Relief for Buy-to-Let Mortgages (P.51-2026) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach18-21

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Removal of interest tax relief for buy-to-let mortgages would reduce investor demand for housing and bear on restricting housing market growth.

      Considered and set aside: this motion does not bear on the promise. The promise concerns controlling the volume of house building in the parish, while the motion concerns removing tax relief on buy-to-let mortgages — a fiscal measure with no direct connection to restricting development or planning in the parish.

    • 26 Jun 2024✓P.37/2024 — Affordable Housing Provision at the Waterfront [P.37-2024] as amended — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Affordable housing provision at the Waterfront bears on housing development policy and the balance between housing supply and control of development.

    • 13 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(2) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): second amendment Stamp Duty of buy to let investments second homes and holiday homes (P.97/2022 Amd.(2)) Part 3 — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach2-42

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part 3 of the stamp duty amendment on buy-to-let and second homes bears on restricting housing market demand and controlling development.

      Considered and set aside: this motion does not bear on the promise. The promise concerns controlling the volume of house building in the parish, while the motion deals with stamp duty on buy-to-let investments, second homes, and holiday homes—a tax policy on property transactions that has no direct bearing on restricting new house building in St Saviour.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 29 Nov 2023·P.83/2023 — Draft Planning and Building (Conservation Areas) (Jersey) Regulations 202-. Third Reading — Contre38-9

      Third reading of conservation areas regulations restricts development in designated areas, tangentially bearing on controlling house building.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The motion concerns Conservation Areas regulations generally, and while conservation designations can restrict development, voting against this specific regulatory instrument does not straightforwardly contradict a promise to control house-building in the parish, as a member could oppose this particular mechanism while still pursuing that goal through other means.

    • 29 Nov 2023·P.83/2023 — Draft Planning and Building (Conservation Areas) (Jersey) Regulations 202-. Principles — Contre36-9

      Conservation areas regulations restrict development in designated areas, tangentially bearing on controlling house building.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerned restricting house building in St Saviour parish, while this motion concerns Conservation Area regulations broadly across Jersey, so voting against it cannot straightforwardly be read as opposing controls on parish house-building without inferring a connection between conservation area designation and housing restriction.

    • 29 Nov 2023·P.83/2023 — Draft Planning and Building (Conservation Areas) (Jersey) Regulations 202-. Regulations — Pour49-0

      Conservation areas regulations restrict development in designated areas, tangentially bearing on controlling house building.

Health & Social Care

4 promises · 4 kept

47recorded votes

36 Pour · 10 Contre · 1 away

  • Keptdirectional

    Candidate will strive to maintain health and social services and protect pensions.

    “I will strive to maintain our health and social services and make sure pensions are protected”

    Health And CareSocial Security And Benefits

    20 recorded votes test this promise

    14 Pour · 6 Contre
    • 14 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(4) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): fourth amendment HIF Transfers (P.97/2022 Amd.(4)) — Pour, voted to deliver31-13

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Health Insurance Fund transfer amendment bears on health service funding, directly relevant to maintaining health and social services.

    • 14 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(18) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): eighteenth amendment Free GP visits for children and young people — Pour, voted to deliver24-22

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Free GP visits for children and young people bears on maintaining accessible health services for residents.

    • 14 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(20) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): twentieth amendment Hospital funding — Pour, voted to deliver33-12

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Hospital funding amendment directly bears on maintaining health services for residents.

    • 14 Jun 2023·P.19/2023 — Health and Community Services Interim Board as amended — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach28-16

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Establishing a Health and Community Services Interim Board bears on maintaining governance of health and social services.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "maintain health and social services" is a general directional commitment, and voting against one specific governance mechanism (an Interim Board for Health and Community Services) does not straightforwardly contradict that goal, as the member could oppose this particular structure while still pursuing the broader aim through different means.

    • 13 Sept 2023✓P.59/2023 — Increase to Christmas Bonus (Part A only) — Pour, voted to deliver46-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Increasing Christmas Bonus directly protects pensioners financially, bearing on the promise to maintain pensions.

    • 12 Dec 2023✓P.72/2023 Amd.(29).Amd — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): twenty-ninth amendment (P.72/2023 Amd.(29)) – amendment. Funding of Acute Cardiac Nursing. — Pour, voted to deliver49-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Funding of Acute Cardiac Nursing directly maintains critical health service provision for residents.

    • 12 Dec 2023✓P.72/2023 Amd.(31) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): thirty-first amendment. Vaccination Service. — Pour, voted to deliver49-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Vaccination Service amendment directly bears on maintaining public health services.

    • 12 Dec 2023✓P.72/2023 Amd.(6) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): sixth amendment. (P.72/2023 Amd.(6)). Medical Hosiery and wound dressing funding. — Pour, voted to deliver49-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Medical hosiery and wound dressing funding directly bears on maintaining health services for residents.

    • 03 Oct 2023✓P.64/2023 — Extension of Cold Weather Bonus - as amended — Pour, voted to deliver42-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Extension of Cold Weather Bonus protects vulnerable residents including pensioners, bearing on the promise to protect pensions and social welfare.

    • 12 Dec 2023✓P.72/2023 — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): amendment. Social Security grant funding — Pour, voted to deliver26-21

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The amendment on the States grant to the Social Security Fund directly bears on funding health and social services infrastructure.

    • 17 Jan 2024✓P.99/2023 — Draft Cold Weather Bonus and Payments (Amendment – Extension of Eligibility) (Jersey) Regulations 202-. Third reading — Pour, voted to deliver41-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Extension of Cold Weather Bonus eligibility directly protects pensioners and vulnerable residents financially.

    • 17 Jul 2024·P.43/2024 — New Healthcare Facilities Programme Paragraph (b) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach15-29

      Voting Pour delivers this

      New Healthcare Facilities Programme paragraph (b) bears on maintaining adequate health service infrastructure.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "maintain health and social services" is a general directional commitment, and voting against one specific paragraph of a healthcare facilities programme does not plainly contradict it, as the member could oppose this particular measure for reasons of cost, design, or alternative approach while still pursuing the broader goal.

    • 17 Jul 2024·P.43/2024 — New Healthcare Facilities Programme paragraph (a) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach13-30

      Voting Pour delivers this

      New Healthcare Facilities Programme paragraph (a) bears on maintaining adequate health service infrastructure.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "maintain health and social services" is a general directional commitment, and voting against one specific healthcare facilities programme motion does not plainly contradict it, as the member could have opposed this particular programme on grounds of cost, design, or mechanism while still supporting the broader aim of maintaining health services.

    • 28 Nov 2024·P.51/2024 Amd.(6) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028: sixth amendment. New Healthcare Facilities Programme expenditure — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach17-28

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Government Plan amendment on New Healthcare Facilities Programme expenditure directly bears on maintaining health services.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a general directional commitment to maintain health services, while the motion concerns a specific capital expenditure amendment to the New Healthcare Facilities Programme within a broader budget, and voting against one particular funding mechanism or amendment does not necessarily contradict a general commitment to maintaining health services.

    • 11 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(11). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): eleventh amendment. Overpayments of Social Security Contributions, as amended — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      An amendment on overpayments of Social Security contributions directly relates to maintaining the Social Security system underpinning health and social services.

    • 10 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(28)(re-issue). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): twenty-eighth amendment. Funding for respite care, Part (2) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach8-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Redirecting funds into palliative and respite care directly supports maintaining health and social services for residents.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "maintain health and social services" is a broad directional commitment, and voting against one specific reallocation of funding (from assisted dying to palliative care) does not straightforwardly contradict it, as the member could reasonably hold that the existing budget allocation adequately maintains health services without this particular redirection.

    • 12 Mar 2026✓P.27/2026 — Assess Affordability of Qualifying State Pensioners receiving Home Carer's Allowance (P.27-2026) — Pour, voted to deliver8-31

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Assessing affordability for qualifying state pensioners receiving Home Carer's Allowance directly bears on protecting pensions and social care for elderly residents.

    • 11 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(2). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): second amendment. Health Insurance Fund Contributions — Pour, voted to deliver14-28

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Raising the share of Social Security contributions allocated to the Health Insurance Fund directly supports maintaining health services.

    • 08 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(4)(re-issue) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fourth amendment. Grants to States Funds — Pour, voted to deliver15-25

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This amendment sought to halve the reduction in the States grant to the Social Security Fund, which would help maintain social services funding.

    • 10 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(28)(re-issue). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): twenty-eighth amendment. Funding for respite care, Part (1) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach9-31

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part 1 of the amendment to redirect funds into palliative and respite care directly supports maintaining health and social services.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "maintain health and social services" is a general directional commitment, and voting against one specific funding-reallocation amendment (redirecting £2.6m to palliative and respite care) does not plainly contradict it, as a member could oppose this particular mechanism while still believing they are supporting health services overall.

  • Keptdirectional

    Candidate will work to protect pensions for residents.

    “Work hard to protect pensions”

    Social Security And Benefits

    18 recorded votes test this promise

    15 Pour · 2 Contre · 1 away
    • 21 Sept 2022✓P.82/2022(Re-issue) — Draft Social Security (Amendment of Law - Temporary Reduction of Contribution Rates) (Jersey) Regulations 202-. Third Reading — Pour, voted to deliver46-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Draft Social Security regulations temporarily reducing contribution rates directly bears on social security funding that underpins pensions.

    • 15 Dec 2022–P.97/2022(Amd)(23) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): twenty-third amendment Removing the Upper Earnings caps — Absent, did not take a side16-28

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Removing upper earnings caps on social security contributions bears on the funding and sustainability of pension and benefit systems.

    • 13 Sept 2023✓P.59/2023 — Increase to Christmas Bonus (Part A only) — Pour, voted to deliver46-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The motion to increase the Christmas Bonus directly delivers additional financial support to pensioners, squarely advancing the promise to protect pensions for residents.

    • 14 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(3) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 P72 Amendment 3 - Removal of earnings cap — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach12-33

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Removal of earnings cap on social security contributions bears on the sustainability of the social security fund from which pensions are paid.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "protect pensions" is a general directional commitment, and voting against one specific amendment (removal of an earnings cap) does not straightforwardly contradict it, as a member could oppose this particular mechanism while still pursuing pension protection through other means.

    • 03 Oct 2023✓P.64/2023 — Extension of Cold Weather Bonus - as amended — Pour, voted to deliver42-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Extension of Cold Weather Bonus directly provides additional financial support to vulnerable residents including pensioners.

    • 29 Nov 2023✓P.84/2023 — Draft Christmas Bonus (Miscellaneous Amendments) (Jersey) Regulations 202-.Third Reading — Pour, voted to deliver45-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Draft Christmas Bonus miscellaneous amendments directly concern pension-related bonus payments to eligible residents.

    • 12 Dec 2023✓P.72/2023 — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): amendment. Social Security grant funding — Pour, voted to deliver26-21

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The States grant to the Social Security Fund amendment directly bears on funding pensions for residents.

    • 17 Jan 2024✓P.99/2023 — Draft Cold Weather Bonus and Payments (Amendment – Extension of Eligibility) (Jersey) Regulations 202-. Third reading — Pour, voted to deliver41-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Extension of eligibility for Cold Weather Bonus payments directly expands financial protection for elderly and vulnerable residents.

    • 07 Feb 2023✓P.110/2022 — Draft Social Security (Amendment of Law No. 17) (Jersey) Regulations 202- (P.110-2022) Principles — Pour, voted to deliver27-16

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Draft Social Security Amendment regulations principles directly concern social security law that underpins pension and benefit protections.

    • 07 Feb 2023✓P.110/2022 — Draft Social Security (Amendment of Law No. 17) (Jersey) Regulations 202- (P.110-2022) Regulations — Pour, voted to deliver26-15

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Draft Social Security Amendment regulations directly concern social security law that underpins pension protections.

    • 07 Feb 2023✓P.110/2022 — Draft Social Security (Amendment of Law No. 17) (Jersey) Regulations 202- (P.110-2022) Third Reading — Pour, voted to deliver28-14

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Third reading of Social Security Amendment regulations directly concerns social security law underpinning pension protections.

    • 29 Nov 2024✓P.62/2024 — Draft Social Security Law (Payments into the Social Security Funds Regulations — Pour, voted to deliver31-13

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Payments into the Social Security Funds directly bear on the financial sustainability of the social security system that funds pensions.

    • 29 Nov 2024✓P.62/2024 — Draft Social Security Law (Payments into Social Security Fund) (Jersey) Amendment Regulations 202- — Pour, voted to deliver31-13

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Draft Social Security Law amendment regulations on payments into the Social Security Fund directly bear on pension fund sustainability.

    • 11 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(11). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): eleventh amendment. Overpayments of Social Security Contributions, as amended — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      An amendment on overpayments of Social Security contributions directly relates to protecting the integrity of pension and Social Security provisions.

    • 10 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(5). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fifth amendment. Upper Earnings Limit, Part 1 (Social Security contributions) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach13-30

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Removing the upper earnings limit on Social Security contributions would increase revenue into the Social Security Fund, helping to protect pension sustainability.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "protect pensions" is a general directional commitment, and voting against one specific mechanism—removing the upper earnings limit on Social Security contributions—does not plainly contradict it, as a member could oppose this particular measure while still pursuing pension protection through other means or on affordability/policy grounds.

    • 10 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(5). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fifth amendment. Upper Earnings Limit, Part 2 (Long-Term Care contributions) — Pour, voted to deliver16-28

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Removing the upper earnings limit on Long-Term Care contributions would increase fund revenue, helping protect long-term care provisions for elderly residents.

    • 12 Mar 2026✓P.27/2026 — Assess Affordability of Qualifying State Pensioners receiving Home Carer's Allowance (P.27-2026) — Pour, voted to deliver8-31

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Assessing affordability for qualifying state pensioners receiving Home Carer's Allowance directly bears on protecting pensioners' financial welfare.

    • 08 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(4)(re-issue) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fourth amendment. Grants to States Funds — Pour, voted to deliver15-25

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Halving the reduction in the States grant to the Social Security Fund directly protects the fund from which pensions are drawn.

  • Keptaspirational

    Candidate will make provisions to support senior citizens living comfortably and safely.

    “I will make provisions that enable our senior citizens to live comfortably and safely.”

    Social Security And BenefitsHealth And Care

    8 recorded votes test this promise

    6 Pour · 2 Contre
    • 13 Sept 2023✓P.59/2023 — Increase to Christmas Bonus (Part A only) — Pour, voted to deliver46-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Increasing Christmas Bonus directly supports senior citizens living comfortably by providing additional financial support.

    • 03 Oct 2023✓P.64/2023 — Extension of Cold Weather Bonus - as amended — Pour, voted to deliver42-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Extension of Cold Weather Bonus directly supports senior citizens living safely and comfortably during cold weather.

    • 17 Jan 2024✓P.99/2023 — Draft Cold Weather Bonus and Payments (Amendment – Extension of Eligibility) (Jersey) Regulations 202-. Third reading — Pour, voted to deliver41-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Extension of eligibility for Cold Weather Bonus directly supports more senior citizens living safely.

    • 29 Nov 2023✓P.84/2023 — Draft Christmas Bonus (Miscellaneous Amendments) (Jersey) Regulations 202-.Third Reading — Pour, voted to deliver45-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Christmas Bonus amendments directly support senior citizens financially, enabling more comfortable living.

    • 12 Mar 2026✓P.27/2026 — Assess Affordability of Qualifying State Pensioners receiving Home Carer's Allowance (P.27-2026) — Pour, voted to deliver8-31

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Assessing affordability for qualifying state pensioners receiving Home Carer's Allowance directly bears on supporting senior citizens living safely at home.

    • 10 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(28)(re-issue). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): twenty-eighth amendment. Funding for respite care, Part (2) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach8-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Redirecting funds into palliative and respite care supports making provisions for senior citizens to live comfortably and safely.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to support senior citizens living comfortably and safely is a broad directional commitment, and voting against this specific reallocation of £2.6 million to palliative and respite care does not plainly contradict it, as the member could reasonably hold that the existing budget arrangements or other measures better serve that goal.

    • 11 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(2). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): second amendment. Health Insurance Fund Contributions — Pour, voted to deliver14-28

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Raising contributions to the Health Insurance Fund supports health provisions that help senior citizens live comfortably and safely.

    • 10 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(28)(re-issue). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): twenty-eighth amendment. Funding for respite care, Part (1) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach9-31

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part 1 of the amendment to fund respite care supports provisions for senior citizens to live comfortably and safely.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to support senior citizens living comfortably and safely is a broad, general commitment, and voting against one specific funding reallocation between assisted dying and palliative care does not straightforwardly contradict it, as the member could reasonably hold that the overall Budget delivers on that promise through other means or that this particular amendment was not the right mechanism.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 22 Apr 2025·P.25/2025 — Organ Donation Memorial (P.25-2025) — Pour42-0

      Organ donation memorial tangentially touches on end-of-life wellbeing but does not directly bear on senior citizens living comfortably and safely.

  • Keptdirectional

    Candidate will continue campaigning for an insurance scheme to protect elderly residents from selling homes for care costs.

    “I have campaigned tirelessly with others for the introduction of an insurance scheme for people in later years, to ensure they won't be forced to sell their homes, should one of the partners succumb to long term medical care.”

    Social Security And BenefitsHealth And CareHousing

    1 recorded vote tests this promise

    1 Pour
    • 12 Mar 2026✓P.27/2026 — Assess Affordability of Qualifying State Pensioners receiving Home Carer's Allowance (P.27-2026) — Pour, voted to deliver8-31

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Assessing affordability for qualifying state pensioners receiving Home Carer's Allowance directly bears on protecting elderly residents from the financial burden of care costs, advancing the promise on an insurance-type protection scheme.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 14 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(4)(Amd)(Re-issue) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): fourth amendment (P.97/2022. Amd.(4).) – amendment Health Insurance Fund Transfer (P.97/2022 Amd.(4)Amd.) — Contre16-29

      Health Insurance Fund transfer amendment bears on the use of insurance-related health funds, tangentially relating to an insurance scheme concept for elderly care costs.

    • 10 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(5). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fifth amendment. Upper Earnings Limit, Part 2 (Long-Term Care contributions) — Pour16-28

      Removing the cap on Long-Term Care contributions increases fund revenue, tangentially relating to protecting elderly residents from selling homes for care costs.

Economy, Tax & Cost of Living

1 promise · 1 kept

11recorded votes

11 Pour

  • Keptaspirational

    Candidate will work to ensure parishioners are not left without food and fuel amid rising costs.

    “I am very concerned about rising food and fuel costs. I will do my very best to make sure parishioners do not go without.”

    Cost Of LivingSocial Security And Benefits

    11 recorded votes test this promise

    11 Pour
    • 20 Sept 2022✓P.80/2022(Amd)(5) — Mini-Budget 2022 (P.80/2022): fifth amendment. Extend the temporary Social Security contribution reduction to 31 March 2023 — Pour, voted to deliver14-30

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Extending the temporary reduction in Social Security contributions helps ease cost-of-living pressures on parishioners regarding food and fuel costs.

    • 21 Sept 2022✓P.80/2022(Re-issue) — Mini Budget 2022 — Pour, voted to deliver46-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Mini-Budget overall bears on cost of living support for residents amid rising costs.

    • 20 Sept 2022✓P.80/2022(Amd)(3) — Mini-Budget 2022 (P.80/2022): third amendment. Community Costs Bonus threshold and deadline — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Mini-Budget third amendment bears on cost of living measures to support residents amid rising food and fuel costs.

    • 21 Sept 2022✓P.81/2022(Re-issue) — Draft Finance (Budget - Cost of living) (Jersey) Law 202-. Third Reading — Pour, voted to deliver46-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Draft Finance Budget Cost of Living Law directly provides financial relief measures for residents amid rising costs.

    • 21 Sept 2022✓P202200083040000000400000000000000|P.83/2022(Amd)(Amd) — Draft Community Costs Bonus (Amendment) (Jersey) Regulations 202-. (P.83/2022): amendment (P.83/2022 Amd.) – amendment — Pour, voted to deliver49-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Community Costs Bonus amendment directly bears on financial support to help residents with rising costs of living including food.

    • 01 Nov 2022✓P.94/2022(Re-issue) — Draft Income Support (Amendment No. 22) (Jersey) Regulations 202- Principles — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Income Support amendment bears on financial support for residents facing rising food and fuel costs.

    • 01 Nov 2022✓P.94/2022(Re-issue) — Draft Income Support (Amendment No. 22) (Jersey) Regulations 202- Regulations as amended — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Income Support regulations as amended provide financial support for residents facing rising costs.

    • 01 Nov 2022✓P.94/2022(Re-issue) — Draft Income Support (Amendment No. 22) (Jersey) Regulations 202- Third Reading — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Third reading of Income Support amendment provides financial support for residents facing rising costs.

    • 24 Nov 2022✓P.100/2022 — Cost of living crisis – Removal of 5% goods and services tax (GST) from food (excluding alcoholic drinks) — Pour, voted to deliver17-28

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Removing GST from food directly reduces food costs for parishioners amid rising costs, squarely advancing the promise to ensure residents are not left without food.

    • 19 Apr 2023✓P.15/2023 — Jersey Homes Trust rent increase – assistance scheme. — Pour, voted to deliver18-23

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Jersey Homes Trust rent increase assistance scheme directly bears on protecting residents from rising housing costs, bearing on the promise about food and fuel affordability.

    • 07 Nov 2023✓P.77/2023 — Draft Income Support (Amendment No. 23) (Jersey) Regulations 202- Third Reading — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Draft Income Support Amendment regulations bear on financial support for residents amid rising costs.

Infrastructure & Environment

6 promises · 6 kept

17recorded votes

11 Pour · 6 Contre

  • Keptconditional

    Candidate will continue campaigning to improve public transport if re-elected.

    “If re-elected I would continue my campaign improve public transport.”

    Infrastructure And Transport

    3 recorded votes test this promise

    1 Pour · 2 Contre
    • 16 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(6) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): sixth amendment Walking and Cycling routes — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Walking and cycling routes funding advances sustainable transport options, bearing on the public transport improvement campaign.

    • 14 Jun 2023·P.33/2023 — Provision of a free hopper bus service for Active card holders to Springfield stadium. — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach19-25

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The motion for a free hopper bus service for Active card holders directly delivers improved public transport provision, squarely advancing the campaign promise on public transport.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. A general promise to "improve public transport" does not commit the member to supporting every specific transport proposal; voting against one particular free hopper-bus scheme for Active card holders is not plainly the same as abandoning a campaign to improve public transport generally.

    • 14 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(9) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): ninth amendment. Subsidised Annual Bus Pass — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach17-29

      Voting Pour delivers this

      An amendment to fund a subsidised annual bus pass directly advances improving and promoting public transport for residents.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "improve public transport" is a general directional commitment, and voting against one specific funding mechanism (a subsidised annual bus pass) does not necessarily contradict it, as the member could support public transport improvement through different means or have objections to this particular measure's funding or design.

  • Keptdirectional

    Candidate will work to minimise waste and promote environmental responsibility.

    “We must minimise our waste. We all have to take responsibility and plan for the future. We need green lanes, not green beaches!”

    Environment And Climate

    4 recorded votes test this promise

    3 Pour · 1 Contre
    • 13 Sept 2023✓P.65/2023 — Reinstate the re-use centre at La Collette. As amended. — Pour, voted to deliver44-1

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Reinstating the re-use centre at La Collette directly promotes recycling and waste reduction, advancing the promise to minimise waste.

    • 18 Jul 2023✓P.17/2023 — La Collette Waste Management Site – Development Plan. As amended — Pour, voted to deliver39-3

      Voting Pour delivers this

      La Collette Waste Management Site development plan directly bears on waste management infrastructure, advancing the promise to minimise waste.

    • 12 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(14) — Government Plan P72-2023 Amendment 14 - Waste charges — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach16-31

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Waste charges amendment to the Government Plan directly bears on environmental responsibility and waste management policy.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "minimise waste and promote environmental responsibility" is a general directional commitment, and voting against one specific waste-charges amendment does not straightforwardly contradict it, as the member could oppose this particular mechanism while still pursuing waste reduction through other means.

    • 09 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(32). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-second amendment. Environment Departmental Funding, Part 2 only — Pour, voted to deliver44-1

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Restoring £656,000 to the Environment department's budget directly supports environmental responsibility and minimising waste.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 01 Mar 2023·P.117/2022 — Establishment of a Climate Council - as amended — Pour45-0

      Establishing a Climate Council bears on environmental responsibility, tangentially touching the promise to promote environmental responsibility.

    • 22 Apr 2025·P.11/2025 — Evidence-based Energy Strategy (P.11-2025) as amended — Pour43-0

      Evidence-based Energy Strategy bears on environmental responsibility, tangentially touching the promise to minimise waste and promote environmental responsibility.

  • Keptdirectional

    Candidate will continue working on a safer routes to school scheme.

    “I am at present working on a safer route to school scheme”

    Infrastructure And TransportChildren And Families

    1 recorded vote tests this promise

    1 Pour
    • 16 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(6) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): sixth amendment Walking and Cycling routes — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Walking and cycling routes amendment directly funds infrastructure for safer routes, bearing on the safer routes to school commitment.

  • Keptdirectional

    Candidate will work to improve pedestrian safety and tackle speeding.

    “I will work for greater pedestrian safety and control speeding.”

    Infrastructure And Transport

    3 recorded votes test this promise

    3 Pour
    • 13 May 2025✓P.23/2025 (re-issue) — Road Traffic - Offences and Penalties (P.23-2025) as amended — Pour, voted to deliver47-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Road Traffic Offences and Penalties motion directly concerns enforcement measures that bear on tackling speeding and improving pedestrian safety.

    • 16 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(6) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): sixth amendment Walking and Cycling routes — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Walking and cycling routes funding improves infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists, bearing on the promise to improve pedestrian safety.

    • 22 Oct 2025✓P.54/2025 — Supplementary Planning guidance: parking (P.54-2025) paragraph (a) — Pour, voted to deliver26-11

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Supplementary planning guidance on parking bears on pedestrian safety by addressing vehicle parking and movement in public spaces.

  • Keptdirectional

    Candidate will work to make cycling to school safer for children.

    “We must make it safer for our children to cycle to school.”

    Infrastructure And TransportChildren And Families

    2 recorded votes test this promise

    2 Pour
    • 16 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(6) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): sixth amendment Walking and Cycling routes — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Walking and cycling routes amendment directly funds infrastructure to make cycling safer, squarely advancing the promise to make cycling to school safer for children.

    • 13 May 2025✓P.23/2025 (re-issue) — Road Traffic - Offences and Penalties (P.23-2025) as amended — Pour, voted to deliver47-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Road Traffic Offences and Penalties bears on enforcement measures that improve road safety for cyclists, including children cycling to school.

  • Keptdirectional

    Candidate will promote affordable transport options for residents.

    “Promote the use of affordable transport.”

    Infrastructure And TransportCost Of Living

    4 recorded votes test this promise

    1 Pour · 3 Contre
    • 14 Jun 2023·P.33/2023 — Provision of a free hopper bus service for Active card holders to Springfield stadium. — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach19-25

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The motion to provide a free hopper bus service for Active card holders directly delivers affordable transport for residents, squarely advancing the promise.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a general directional commitment to promote affordable transport, and voting against one specific free hopper bus proposal does not plainly contradict it, as the member could reasonably oppose this particular mechanism while still pursuing affordable transport through other means.

    • 16 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(6) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): sixth amendment Walking and Cycling routes — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Walking and cycling routes amendment to the Government Plan advances affordable transport infrastructure for residents.

    • 19 Jul 2023✓P.50/2023 — Supplementary Planning Guidance – Parking Strategy. — Contre, voted to deliver19-24

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The supplementary planning guidance on parking strategy, if adopted, could reduce walking and cycling options; voting contre advances affordable transport alternatives.

    • 14 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(9) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): ninth amendment. Subsidised Annual Bus Pass — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach17-29

      Voting Pour delivers this

      A subsidised annual bus pass directly promotes affordable transport options for residents.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. While a subsidised bus pass relates to affordable transport, voting against one specific funding mechanism for one specific scheme does not straightforwardly contradict a general manifesto commitment to "promote affordable transport," as the member could support the goal while objecting to this particular measure's cost, design, or funding source.

Governance & Public Services

1 promise · 1 kept

4recorded votes

4 Pour

  • Keptdirectional

    Candidate will work hard to eliminate antisocial behaviour in the parish.

    “I am also very concerned about law-and-order issues and will work hard to eliminate antisocial behaviour.”

    Justice And Home AffairsParish And Local Government

    4 recorded votes test this promise

    4 Pour
    • 07 Feb 2024✓P.97/2023 — Draft Crime (Public Order) Law [P.97-2023] Principles — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Draft Crime Public Order Law principles directly bears on tackling antisocial behaviour, advancing the promise to eliminate antisocial behaviour.

    • 07 Feb 2024✓P.97/2023 — Draft Crime (Public Order) Law [P.97-2023] Articles — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Draft Crime Public Order Law articles directly bears on tackling antisocial behaviour in the parish.

    • 07 Feb 2024✓P.97/2023 — Draft Crime (Public Order) Law [P.97-2023] Third Reading — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Draft Crime Public Order Law third reading directly bears on tackling antisocial behaviour by enacting enforcement powers.

    • 09 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(23). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): twenty-third amendment. Increased Police funding — Pour, voted to deliver36-5

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Increasing police funding supports tackling antisocial behaviour and improving community safety in the parish.

Kevin Charles Lewis’s record changes with every States Assembly sitting. Follow us on LinkedIn and we will tell you when it does.

Follow on LinkedIn