Kristina Louise Moore

Voting Contre delivers this

This vote was on moving to next item to avoid debating measures affecting Andium Homes rent increases, which directly bears on affordable housing delivery without delay.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The motion was a procedural "move to next item" vote about Andium Homes rent increases during a cost-of-living debate, which concerns affordable housing costs rather than the delivery of affordable housing sites, making the link to the manifesto promise about identifying and delivering housing sites without delay too indirect to constitute a clear breach.

Voting Pour delivers this

This vote on cost of living measures affecting Andium Homes rent increases directly bears on the promise to deliver affordable housing without delay.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerned delivering affordable housing sites without delay and identifying new sites, whereas this motion addressed Andium Homes rent increases during the cost of living crisis — a related but distinct matter of rental affordability rather than site delivery or identification.

Voting Pour delivers this

The motion on the Gas Place Primary School Site as an identified public building for development bears on the promise to identify additional sites including empty public buildings.

Voting Pour delivers this

Development levies (parts a and b) relate to funding mechanisms for housing delivery, bearing on the promise to deliver affordable housing sites.

Voting Pour delivers this

This Government Plan amendment on the Affordable Housing Programme (AHP scheme) directly relates to delivering affordable housing.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a general directional commitment to deliver affordable housing sites without delay, while the motion concerns a specific amendment to the Affordable Housing Programme within the Government Plan 2024–2027, and voting against one particular scheme amendment does not unambiguously contradict a general commitment to accelerate affordable housing delivery, as the member may have had objections to the specific mechanism or funding approach rather than the goal itself.

Voting Pour delivers this

Investing stamp duty uplift from second homes into first-time buyer funds directly advances affordable housing for first-time buyers, bearing on the promise to deliver affordable housing without delay.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerns delivering affordable housing sites and identifying additional sites, while the motion addressed a specific fiscal mechanism (directing stamp duty revenue to first-time buyer funds), so voting against this particular funding measure does not straightforwardly contradict a promise about site delivery and identification.

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment concerning Le Squez relates to affordable housing estate improvement, bearing on delivering agreed affordable housing without delay.

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment to the Social Rents Plan to Reduce Rental Stress for Tenants directly bears on affordable housing policy.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerns delivering affordable housing sites without delay and identifying additional sites, while the motion is a specific amendment to a Social Rents Plan about rental stress for tenants—a related but distinct mechanism (rent levels rather than site delivery), and voting against one particular amendment does not clearly contradict a general commitment to affordable housing site delivery.

Voting Pour delivers this

The Social Rental Plan to Reduce Rental Stress for Tenants as amended directly advances affordable housing for residents.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a general directional commitment to deliver affordable housing sites without delay, while the motion concerns a specific Social Rental Plan to reduce rental stress for tenants—a related but distinct policy mechanism—meaning voting against it does not plainly contradict the promise, as the member could support affordable housing through other routes.

Voting Pour delivers this

The motion on increasing assets and savings thresholds for the Affordable Housing Gateway bears on widening access to affordable housing delivery.

Voting Pour delivers this

The motion on proposed use of the former Jersey Gas site relates to the promise to identify additional sites including empty public buildings.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a general directional commitment to deliver affordable housing sites without delay and identify additional sites, while this motion concerns one specific site (the former Jersey Gas site) and a request for reconsideration of its proposed use — voting against reconsideration could reflect a judgement about that particular site's suitability or process rather than a rejection of the broader affordable housing goal.

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment on empty residential properties addresses bringing unused housing stock back into use, directly relevant to the promise to identify additional housing sites including empty properties.

Voting Pour delivers this

The motion on affordable housing provision at the Waterfront directly advances the promise to deliver affordable housing sites.

Voting Pour delivers this

The Meanwhile Use of the Former Gas Place Site bears on identifying empty public sites for community/housing use.

Voting Contre delivers this

A vote on deferring approval of an Andium Homes site sale (Kensington Place) directly bears on delivering agreed affordable housing sites without delay.

Voting Contre delivers this

This amendment sought to weaken the empty residential properties amendment; voting against it preserves stronger measures to bring empty properties into use, advancing the promise.

Voting Pour delivers this

The second amendment to the empty residential properties motion further refines measures to address empty housing, relevant to the promise to identify additional housing sites including empty public buildings.

Voting Pour delivers this

Walking and Cycling routes amendment advances road safety and community-centred transport as promised.

Voting Pour delivers this

Jersey Homes Trust rent increase assistance scheme supports families and community wellbeing as promised.

Voting Pour delivers this

Supplementary Planning Guidance on Parking Strategy bears on the road safety dimension of the community-centred approach promised.

Considered and set aside: this motion does not bear on the promise. The promise concerns loneliness, road safety, and family support through a community-centred approach, while the motion is about supplementary planning guidance on parking strategy, a distinct and specific planning/development matter that does not directly bear on any of those commitments.

Voting Pour delivers this

Financial support for parents of babies needing neonatal care supports families as promised.

Voting Pour delivers this

IVF Funding supports families as part of the community-centred approach promised.

Voting Pour delivers this

Road Traffic Offences and Penalties directly advances the promise to improve road safety.

Voting Pour delivers this

Supplementary Planning Guidance on parking bears on road safety as part of the community-centred approach promised.

Voting Pour delivers this

Adding funding to the free childcare scheme supports families with young children, directly bearing on the promise to support families through community-centred approaches.

Voting Pour delivers this

Redirecting funds into palliative and respite care supports families dealing with serious illness, touching the promise's commitment to support families.

Voting Pour delivers this

Delivering neighbourhood regeneration funding in St. Helier is a community-centred investment that supports families and community cohesion, directly relevant to the promise.

Voting Pour delivers this

Increasing police funding directly supports community safety and road safety, bearing on the promise to pursue a community-centred approach to improve road safety.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise commits to improving road safety and supporting families via a community-centred approach, but the motion is a specific budget reallocation of £240,000 between Health and Police, and voting against it does not straightforwardly contradict those general commitments—a member could oppose this particular funding mechanism while still pursuing the same goals by other means.

Voting Pour delivers this

Part 1 of the respite care amendment similarly bears on supporting families, a core element of the community-centred approach promised.

Voting Pour delivers this

Our Hospital Project: Reporting directly bears on the promise to pursue a less costly hospital solution with transparency.

Considered and set aside: this motion does not bear on the promise. The motion concerned reporting arrangements for the hospital project, not the substantive choice of hospital site or configuration, so voting against a reporting mechanism does not contradict a promise about pursuing a dual-site solution or resolving primary care funding.

Voting Contre delivers this

The amendment on Health Insurance Fund Transfer could affect primary care funding; opposing it (voting contre) may preserve better primary care funding arrangements.

Considered and set aside: this motion does not bear on the promise. The motion concerns a specific technical amendment about a Health Insurance Fund transfer within the Government Plan, which is a funding mechanism detail rather than a direct vote on the dual-site hospital solution the promise addressed.

Voting Pour delivers this

HIF Transfers amendment in the Government Plan bears on primary care funding resolution as promised.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerns pursuing a dual-site hospital solution and resolving primary care funding, while the motion is a specific amendment about HIF (Hospital Infrastructure Fund) transfers within the Government Plan, which is a financial/procedural mechanism rather than a direct vote on adopting or rejecting a dual-site hospital approach.

Voting Pour delivers this

Funding multi-morbidity GP consultations relates to resolving primary care funding as promised.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "resolve primary care funding" is a general directional commitment, and voting against one specific amendment about multi-morbidity GP consultation funding is not the same as voting against primary care funding reform as a whole, as the member could have preferred a different mechanism or approach.

Voting Pour delivers this

Free GP visits for children bears on resolving primary care funding as promised.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "resolve primary care funding" is a broad directional commitment, and voting against one specific amendment (free GP visits for children and young people) does not plainly contradict it, since a member could oppose this particular mechanism while still pursuing primary care funding reform through other means.

Voting Pour delivers this

Hospital funding amendment in the Government Plan bears on resolving the hospital funding question as promised.

Voting Pour delivers this

Health and Community Services Interim Board relates to governance of the healthcare system, bearing on hospital and primary care reform.

Voting Pour delivers this

New Healthcare Facilities Programme paragraph (b) directly bears on the promise to pursue a less costly dual-site hospital solution.

Voting Pour delivers this

New Healthcare Facilities Programme paragraph (a) directly bears on the promise to pursue a less costly dual-site hospital solution.

Voting Pour delivers this

The New Healthcare Facilities Programme expenditure amendment bears directly on delivering a hospital solution.

Voting Pour delivers this

Raising the Health Insurance Fund share of Social Security contributions addresses primary care funding, directly relevant to the promise to resolve primary care funding.

Voting Pour delivers this

The Skills Development Fund vote directly advances investment in lifelong learning as promised.

Voting Pour delivers this

Updating Higher Education Student Funding directly advances the promise to invest in education through to lifelong learning.

Voting Pour delivers this

Youth Service Statutory Provision bears on the promise to invest in education and support for young people.

Voting Contre delivers this

The amendment to Youth Services Statutory Provision, if rejected, means the main proposition (supporting youth services) is advanced, bearing on education investment.

Voting Pour delivers this

Fully funded education or training for 16-18 year olds directly advances the promise to invest in education from early childhood through to lifelong learning.

Voting Pour delivers this

Fully funded education or training for 16-18 year olds (paragraph a) directly advances the promise to pursue investment in education.

Voting Pour delivers this

Delivery of bilingual primary schools paragraph (c) bears on early childhood education investment.

Voting Pour delivers this

Delivery of bilingual primary schools bears on investment in education from early childhood.

Voting Pour delivers this

Modern Languages in Schools amendment bears on investment in education as promised.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a general directional commitment to investment in education, while the motion concerns a specific amendment about modern languages teaching in schools; voting against one particular languages-policy amendment does not plainly contradict a broad promise to pursue educational investment.

Voting Pour delivers this

Raising childcare funding rates for 2-3 year olds supports early childhood provision, directly relevant to the promise to invest in education from early childhood.

Voting Pour delivers this

Delivery of bilingual primary schools paragraph (a) bears on early childhood education investment.

Voting Pour delivers this

Adding funding to the Jersey Premium scheme for sport and physical activity in primary schools is an investment in early childhood education and development, relevant to the promise.

Voting Contre delivers this

The amendment opposes savings cuts to the Children's Commissioner's office, which oversees children's welfare and education; voting against savings there supports the promise to invest in education from early childhood.

Voting Pour delivers this

Adjusting apprenticeship grants for inflation supports lifelong and vocational learning, bearing on the promise to pursue investment in education through to lifelong learning.

Voting Pour delivers this

Funding free GP visits for all full-time students is an investment in student welfare and lifelong learning support, bearing on the promise to invest in education through to lifelong learning.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerns investment in education and lifelong learning, whereas this motion specifically funds free GP visits for students—a healthcare measure—and voting against one optional health-funding mechanism does not straightforwardly contradict a general commitment to educational investment.

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment for additional education funding directly advances the promise to pursue investment in education from early childhood through to lifelong learning.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. While the member promised to pursue investment in education, voting against one specific funding amendment does not clearly contradict that general commitment, as the member may have opposed this particular mechanism, funding source, or level while still pursuing educational investment through other means.

Voting Pour delivers this

Extending the temporary Social Security contribution reduction directly addresses the rising cost of living by keeping more money in workers' pockets, bearing on the promise to deliver targeted cost-of-living solutions.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise was to establish a taskforce for targeted cost-of-living solutions, while the motion concerned a specific, time-limited extension of a Social Security contribution reduction — a different mechanism, and voting against one particular measure does not clearly contradict a general commitment to tackle rising costs via a taskforce.

Voting Pour delivers this

The Mini Budget 2022 included cost of living measures, directly bearing on the promise to establish targeted solutions for rising cost of living.

Voting Pour delivers this

Widening the income threshold for the Community Costs Bonus and extending its deadline is a targeted measure to tackle the rising cost of living for lower-income households.

Voting Pour delivers this

The Draft Finance (Budget - Cost of Living) Law directly delivers cost of living targeted financial measures.

Voting Pour delivers this

Temporary reduction of Social Security contribution rates is a targeted cost of living relief measure.

Voting Pour delivers this

Increasing the minimum wage is a targeted measure to tackle cost of living for low-income workers.

Voting Pour delivers this

Removing GST from food is a targeted cost of living measure directly bearing on the promise to tackle rising cost of living.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise was to establish a taskforce to deliver targeted solutions, not to support any specific measure such as removing GST from food; voting against this particular motion is consistent with preferring a different mechanism to address the cost of living.

Voting Pour delivers this

Removing GST on sanitary products is a targeted cost of living measure for residents.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise was to establish a taskforce for cost-of-living solutions generally, while this motion concerned one specific fiscal measure (GST exemption on sanitary products), and voting against it does not clearly contradict the broader, mechanism-specific promise about a taskforce.

Voting Pour delivers this

Increasing the Christmas Bonus is a targeted financial measure to help residents with cost of living.

Voting Pour delivers this

Extension of Cold Weather Bonus is a targeted cost of living support measure.

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment on Jersey Business support relates to reducing regulatory/financial burden for SMEs as promised.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The motion concerns a specific amendment about Jersey Business within the Government Plan, and voting against it does not straightforwardly contradict a general manifesto commitment to reduce SME regulation and keep taxes low, as a member could oppose this particular mechanism while still pursuing those goals through other means.

Voting Pour delivers this

Enhanced Capital Allowance for businesses bears on keeping taxes low and fair for SMEs.

Voting Pour delivers this

The Regtech amendment to the Government Plan relates to reducing regulatory burden through technology for businesses.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a general directional commitment to reduce SME regulation and keep taxes low, while the motion concerns a specific "Regtech" amendment to the Government Plan whose precise mechanism and scope cannot be assessed from the title alone, meaning voting against it does not plainly contradict the promise without inferring that this particular measure was the necessary means to honour it.

Voting Pour delivers this

The Economy Strategy amendment bears on the promise to reduce regulation and support SMEs.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The motion concerns an amendment to the Economy Strategy within the Government Plan, but without knowing the specific content of Amendment 28, it cannot be determined whether voting against it plainly contradicts a promise to reduce SME regulation and keep taxes low—a member could reasonably oppose a specific amendment while still pursuing those general goals through other means.

Voting Pour delivers this

Jersey Business Revenue Expenditure amendment directly relates to supporting SMEs as promised.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a general directional commitment to reduce SME regulation and keep taxes low, while the motion concerns a specific revenue expenditure amendment to Jersey Business within the Government Plan, and voting against one particular funding mechanism for Jersey Business does not straightforwardly contradict a broad promise about reducing red tape and tax principles.

Voting Pour delivers this

Enhanced Capital Allowance as amended bears on keeping taxes low and supportive for SMEs.

Voting Pour delivers this

Jersey Business and Digital Jersey Savings amendment relates to supporting SME-focused agencies.

Voting Contre delivers this

Removing the upper earnings limit on Social Security contributions would significantly increase the tax burden on higher-earning employees and employers including SMEs, contrary to keeping taxes low.

Voting Contre delivers this

Removing the upper earnings limit on Long-Term Care contributions would raise costs on employers including SMEs, contrary to the promise to keep taxes low and reduce burdens on businesses.

Voting Pour delivers this

Freezing government spending at 2025 levels is a fiscal discipline measure consistent with keeping taxes low and reducing regulatory and financial burdens, bearing on the promise.

Voting Contre delivers this

Replacing the 20% standard income tax rate with 25% would raise taxes, directly contrary to the promise to keep taxes low, broad, simple and fair.

Voting Contre delivers this

The amendment to the Climate Council proposition (part a) could alter the council's scope, and rejecting it preserves the fuller climate governance structure.

Voting Pour delivers this

Establishing a Climate Council directly advances the promise to deliver a costed plan for carbon neutrality.

Voting Pour delivers this

The La Collette Waste Management Site Development Plan advances moving towards a zero-waste circular economy as promised.

Voting Pour delivers this

Reinstating the re-use centre at La Collette directly supports moving towards a zero-waste circular economy.

Voting Pour delivers this

Waste charges in the Government Plan bear on funding a zero-waste circular economy approach.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise commits to moving toward a zero-waste circular economy, but voting against one specific amendment on waste charges does not plainly contradict that general directional commitment, as the member could oppose this particular mechanism while pursuing the broader goal through other means.

Voting Contre delivers this

The amendment to the Offshore Wind proposition could dilute the main proposal; rejecting it preserves offshore wind investment which advances carbon neutrality.

Voting Pour delivers this

Offshore Wind directly advances the promise to move Jersey towards carbon neutrality.

Voting Pour delivers this

An evidence-based energy strategy directly advances the promise to deliver a costed plan for carbon neutrality.

Voting Pour delivers this

Restoring Environment department budget supports the capacity to deliver environmental programmes including carbon neutrality and circular economy initiatives, bearing on the promise.

Voting Pour delivers this

Reduction in residency requirement for entitlement to work bears on population and workforce decisions the People & Skills Commission would guide.

Voting Pour delivers this

States Employment Board Annual Reporting advances transparency and public accountability in government decision-making as promised.

Voting Pour delivers this

Amendment to Standing Orders – States Decision Tracker directly advances transparency in government decision-making.

Voting Pour delivers this

Reporting of headcount and vacancies advances transparency in government operations as promised.

Voting Pour delivers this

Audit of Government Department Vacancies directly advances transparency in government decision-making.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. An audit of government department vacancies is one specific procedural mechanism, and voting against it does not plainly contradict a general promise about public engagement and transparency without inferring that this particular audit was a necessary means of fulfilling that commitment.

Voting Pour delivers this

A Performance Framework amendment advances accountability and transparency in government as promised.

Voting Pour delivers this

Continuation of the Annual Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey supports data-driven, transparent government decision-making.