Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
PRE-LAUNCH FEEDBACK PHASE — Public launch: Friday, 18 September 2026
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← All members

Lucy Kate Frances Stephenson

Deputy for St Mary, St Ouen and St Peter · Independent

Member of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (Jersey Branch) Executive committee · Member of the Bailiff's Consultative Panel · Assistant Minister for Justice and Home Affairs · Member of Privileges and Procedures Committee · Assistant Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning

Lucy Kate Frances Stephenson

Lucy Stephenson was first elected to the States Assembly in 2022 as Deputy for St Mary, St Ouen and St Peter, and was re-elected to the same seat in 2026. During her first term she served as Assistant Chief Minister and held assistant minister roles across economic development, infrastructure and sustainable economic development, all in 2023–2024. She also chaired the Diversity Forum and was Vice Chair of the Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel from 2024 to 2026. In the current term she serves as Assistant Minister for Justice and Home Affairs and Assistant Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning, and remains a member of the Privileges and Procedures Committee.

Her 2026 campaign focused on building healthier, more resilient communities while balancing fiscal prudence with delivery for Islanders. Key pledges included a temporary 10p-per-litre fuel duty cut to ease cost-of-living pressures, raising preventative health spending from 2% to 6% of the total health budget, ensuring fair access to fertility treatment, widening the assisted purchase home ownership scheme, and establishing a birthrate taskforce to address barriers to starting or growing families.

Stephenson's manifesto draws on her involvement in sport policy, referencing her role in a strategic reset of Jersey Sport and the development of a performance sport programme during her previous term.

Sources

—

States participation

4

Votes expected

Have your say

Constituent feedback

Public commentary and ratings from readers on how Lucy Kate Frances Stephenson is doing. This is not Lucy Kate Frances Stephenson’s own response.

No comments yet. Be the first to rate this member’s term so far.

Comments open soon. Sign-in for this feature is still being configured.

Coverage

Media mentions

Every Jersey media article naming this member, month by month. Accented bars mark coverage spikes — hover or focus any month to see the stories behind it.

1Apr 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26Aug 26Sep 26

Attendance

Turnout in the States Assembly — 2026–2030 Assembly

The States Assembly records a reason against every non-vote, so being ill, off-island, on parental leave or barred by a declared interest can be told apart from simply not turning up. Absences with an accepted reason are removed from both sides of the rate rather than held against the member.

4 votes in 2026–2030 Assembly so far — fewer than the 10 needed before this scorecard will publish a participation rate. The record to date:

  • Voted or abstained4

Manifesto

Promises, and how they voted — 2026–2030 Assembly

Grouped by policy area. Each promise carries the recorded States Assembly votes that test it, and whether this member voted to deliver — open any vote for the motion and the reasoning. A vote counts against a promise only where it plainly contradicts it; where a member voted against one particular measure but the breach is arguable, the vote is shown and set aside rather than counted. Where no recorded vote bears on a promise, an AI delivery verdict assesses progress against the public record.

Voted to deliverVoted againstAbsent or abstained

Housing & Planning

1 promise · 0 kept

No recorded States Assembly vote bears on this area yet.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Widen the assisted purchase home ownership scheme criteria to help more Islanders buy family homes.

    “Widening the assisted purchase home ownership scheme criteria so Islanders can buy a family home, including in our parishes, while growing their family.”

    HousingChildren And Families
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Deputy Stephenson was re-elected on 7 June 2026 and the new Assembly first sat on 19 June 2026, giving only a approximately three-month window. However, no evidence was found of any action by Stephenson toward widening the assisted purchase scheme criteria: she holds Assistant Home Affairs and Assistant Education ministerial roles, not a housing brief. The Housing Minister (Deputy Malcolm Ferey) indicated in July 2026 that extending the First Step Scheme to help second-time buyers move into family homes was only in 'very early discussions' with the Council of Ministers, with cost concerns flagged; the scheme itself remains restricted to first-time buyers.

Health & Social Care

4 promises · 0 kept

1recorded vote

1 Contre

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Pursue a fair deal for Islanders who complete a full Social Security contribution record before pension age.

    “A fair deal for Islanders who achieve a full Social Security contribution record before reaching pensionable age.”

    Social Security And Benefits

    1 recorded vote tests this promise

    1 Contre
    • 08 Sept 2026·P.63/2026 — Reinstate the States Grant to the Social Security Fund (P.63-2026) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach6-41

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Reinstating the States Grant to the Social Security Fund directly supports the financial sustainability of the Social Security system that underpins pension entitlements for Islanders who complete a full contribution record.

      Considered and set aside: this vote has not been adjudicated as a clear breach.

  • No recorded votespecific

    Increase preventative health investment from 2% to 6% of total health spending.

    “Increasing investment in preventative health from 2% of health spending to 6%.”

    Health And CarePublic Finances
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Deputy Stephenson was re-elected on 7 June 2026 and the 2026–2030 Assembly first sat on 19 June 2026 — fewer than three months before the assessment date of 12 September 2026. No proposition, ministerial statement, Government Plan amendment, or scrutiny initiative specifically targeting an increase in Jersey's preventative health spending from 2% to 6% has been identified in that window. Furthermore, Stephenson's post-election ministerial appointments were as Assistant Minister for Justice and Home Affairs and Assistant Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning — neither role gives her direct leverage over health spending allocations, making progress on this promise dependent on advocacy rather than executive action.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Champion sport and physical activity to benefit communities and promote Jersey internationally.

    “Championing sport and physical activity to transform lives, strengthen communities and promote Jersey internationally.”

    Health And CareTourism
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Deputy Stephenson re-entered the 2026-2030 Assembly on 7 June 2026 and was appointed Assistant Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning and Assistant Minister for Home Affairs in early July 2026; however, the sport and physical activity remit in the new government was explicitly awarded to Senator Serena Kersten as part of her Education and Infrastructure portfolios, not to Stephenson. No evidence was found — in the roughly three months since the new Assembly sat (19 June 2026) — of Stephenson taking any specific action, lodging any proposition, or making any ministerial statement in pursuit of her manifesto commitment to champion sport and physical activity. The promise therefore remains unactioned in the 2026-2030 term, noting the very short window elapsed.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Ensure fair access to fertility treatment for all Islanders who need it.

    “Building on my successful IVF proposition to ensure fair access to fertility treatment for all who need it.”

    Health And CareDisability And Inclusion
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictPartialhigh confidence

    Deputy Stephenson's foundational IVF proposition (P.20/2024) was adopted by the States Assembly on 30 April 2024 by 44 votes to one, leading to new access criteria in force from 1 January 2025 and deals with two UK clinics (Lister Fertility Clinic and Bristol Centre for Reproductive Medicine) for around 90 funded cycles per year. Criteria were further widened in October 2025 to include same-sex female couples (without requiring proof of infertility via artificial insemination) and couples where one partner has children from a previous relationship. However, significant gaps in 'fair access for all' remain: single parents, same-sex male couples, and those requiring surrogacy remain excluded; around £280,000 of the 2025 budget was diverted to offset wider Health Department pressures rather than helping additional patients; and by April 2026 the Jersey Evening Post reported the £620,000 annual budget faced a shortfall due to unaccounted staffing costs, with services potentially pausing in November 2026 — prompting Stephenson to continue publicly campaigning for budget protection and wider criteria.

Education & Families

1 promise · 0 kept

No recorded States Assembly vote bears on this area yet.

  • No recorded votespecific

    Establish a birthrate taskforce to address barriers to starting or growing families.

    “A birthrate taskforce to tackle barriers for those wanting to start or grow their families.”

    Children And FamiliesHealth And Care
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Deputy Lucy Stephenson was re-elected on 7 June 2026 and appointed as Assistant Minister for Education and Assistant Minister for Home Affairs in the new 2026–2030 Assembly (confirmed by Bailiwick Express, July 2026), but no evidence was found of a birthrate taskforce being established or formally proposed by her or the Government of Jersey as of 13 September 2026. The new Assembly first sat on 19 June 2026, giving only approximately three months in which to act; this is a very short window, and the absence of any announcement or proposition should not be read as a policy failure. No independent Jersey sources (statesassembly.je, gov.je, Jersey Evening Post, Bailiwick Express) reported any birthrate taskforce initiative in this period.

Economy, Tax & Cost of Living

2 promises · 0 kept

No recorded States Assembly vote bears on this area yet.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Support productivity-led economic growth and diversification complementing established industries.

    “Supporting productivity-led growth and economic diversification which complements our established industries and enhances life in Jersey.”

    Economy And Business
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Deputy Stephenson was re-elected on 7 June 2026 and the 2026-2030 Assembly first sat on 19 June 2026 — only approximately three months before the assessment date. She was appointed Assistant Home Affairs Minister and Assistant Education Minister under Chief Minister Farnham, neither of which directly maps to an economic diversification or productivity portfolio; no proposition, ministerial statement, or formal initiative attributable to her specifically advancing productivity-led economic diversification has been identified in that short window. The promise therefore remains at manifesto-pledge stage with no traceable delivery action, though the brevity of the term (under three months) means this reflects the limited timeframe rather than inaction.

  • No recorded votespecific

    Introduce a temporary 10p per litre fuel duty cut to reduce costs for Islanders.

    “A temporary 10p per litre fuel duty cut to offset spiralling costs.”

    Cost Of LivingTax And Gst
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedhigh confidence

    Deputy Stephenson lodged a proposition in June 2026 calling for a 10p per litre fuel duty cut from 1 October to 31 December 2026, directly honouring her manifesto promise. However, as reported by the Jersey Evening Post on 5 September 2026, she withdrew the proposition days before its scheduled States Assembly debate following 'constructive discussions' with Treasury Minister Alan Maclean, who indicated that 'targeted measures' to address cost-of-living pressures would instead be included in the forthcoming Budget. As of 12 September 2026, no Budget measures have been announced or passed, and the specific 10p fuel duty cut has not been implemented; the outcome depends entirely on what the Budget will contain.

Governance & Public Services

3 promises · 0 kept

No recorded States Assembly vote bears on this area yet.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Strengthen Channel Islands partnerships and develop new links with Guernsey through the Women's Parliamentary Caucus.

    “Strengthening ties with Channel Island partners. Jersey's Women's Parliamentary Caucus, launched under my leadership, can develop new positive links with Guernsey.”

    Governance And Constitution
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Deputy Stephenson chaired the launch of Jersey's first Women's Parliamentary Caucus in March 2026 (pre-dating the 2026-2030 Assembly), and was confirmed as its Chair following her re-election in June 2026. However, the specific manifesto commitment — using the Caucus to develop new links with Guernsey — has no independently reported evidence of progress: the inter-parliamentary engagement identified since the launch was with the Senedd Women's Caucus (Wales), not a Guernsey counterpart. The 2026-2030 Assembly first sat on 19 June 2026, giving only approximately three months for action by the assessment date of 12 September 2026, so the absence of progress does not in itself indicate failure.

  • No recorded voteaspirational

    Make evidence-based decisions balancing community priorities with fiscal prudence.

    “Working collaboratively to make evidence-based decisions which balance community priorities with fiscal prudence.”

    Governance And ConstitutionPublic Finances
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Deputy Stephenson was re-elected to the 2026–2030 Assembly on 7 June 2026 and the new Assembly first sat on 19 June 2026. As of 12 September 2026 — fewer than three months into the term — no independent evidence has emerged of specific actions or initiatives attributable to her that would constitute measurable delivery of this highly aspirational, process-oriented pledge. Her confirmed post-election role is membership of the Bailiff's Consultative Panel, but no scrutiny panel, ministerial, or other formal governance appointment in the new term has yet been publicly reported. The promise itself describes a general working method rather than a discrete deliverable, making near-term verification inherently difficult, and the short time elapsed since the Assembly first sat means absence of evidence should not be read as failure.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Work with Connétables to strengthen local communities and protect countryside and coastline including key bays.

    “Work with the Connétables to strengthen our local communities, supporting a sense of belonging and place. This includes continuing to protect our countryside and coastline, particularly our iconic bays of St Ouen, Grève de Lecq and Plémont.”

    Parish And Local GovernmentEnvironment And Climate
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Deputy Stephenson was re-elected on 7 June 2026 and the new Assembly first sat on 19 June 2026, giving her fewer than three months in the 2026-2030 term as of the assessment date. No independent reporting from the Jersey Evening Post, Bailiwick Express, or States Assembly records surfaced evidence of specific new initiatives by Stephenson to work with the Connétables on community strengthening or coastline protection in that window; her only confirmed new-term role was appointment to the Bailiff's Consultative Panel in July 2026. The major coastal protection action most relevant to this promise — the acquisition of the Grève de Lecq seaside café site for £3.6m and its gifting to the National Trust for Jersey — was completed during the previous 2022-2026 Assembly term under Chief Minister Farnham's proposition, predating this manifesto commitment. The status is recorded as 'outstanding' solely because no delivery evidence has emerged yet; the very short timeframe in office means this should not be read as a failure.

Manifesto · Closed term

Promises, and how they voted — 2022–2026 Assembly

Deputy for St Mary, St Ouen and St Peter · Independent. This term has closed — shown here as this member's earlier record, not the live one. A vote counts against a promise only where it plainly contradicts it; an arguable breach is shown and set aside rather than counted.

100%

Kept rate

97%

States participation

10

Promises tracked

96%

of the 792 votes they were expected to cast in 2022–2026 Assembly

  • Voted or abstained765
  • Not present for vote27

Set aside from the rate · 100

  • Out of the Island3
  • Parental responsibilities97

These 100 ballots are removed from both sides of the rate, not counted as absences. Each is a vote the member either could not cast or was barred from casting. Reasons are the States Assembly’s own, as published in its voting record.

Voted to deliverVoted againstAbsent or abstained

Housing & Planning

2 promises · 2 kept

27recorded votes

6 Pour · 16 Contre · 5 away

  • Keptdirectional

    Will pursue creative housing solutions including tackling empty properties and considering new taxes and tax breaks.

    “We must balance protecting green space with providing homes. Building more is not the only answer. Let's be creative, tackle empty properties, consider new taxes and tax breaks and more.”

    HousingTax And Gst

    23 recorded votes test this promise

    5 Pour · 13 Contre · 5 away
    • 13 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(26)(Amd) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): twenty-sixth amendment (P.97/2022. Amd.(26).) – amendment Rent-a-room tax relief (Part 1) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach14-29

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This vote concerned introducing rent-a-room tax relief (Part 1), a tax break directly touching the promise to consider new taxes and tax breaks as creative housing solutions.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "consider new taxes and tax breaks" is a general directional commitment, and voting against one specific rent-a-room tax relief mechanism does not plainly contradict it, as the member could reasonably have opposed this particular measure while still pursuing the broader goal of creative housing solutions through other means.

    • 13 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(26)(Amd) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): twenty-sixth amendment (P.97/2022. Amd.(26).) – amendment Rent-a-room tax relief (Part 2) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach13-29

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part 2 of the rent-a-room tax relief amendment similarly concerns a tax break as a creative housing solution.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise broadly mentions considering new tax breaks among several creative housing ideas, but voting against one specific rent-a-room tax relief measure does not clearly contradict that general, exploratory commitment, as the member could have opposed this particular mechanism while still pursuing other tax breaks or creative housing solutions.

    • 13 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(2)(Amd) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): second amendment (P.97/2022. Amd.(2).) – amendment Stamp Duty of buy to let investments second homes and holiday homes — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach11-34

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This amendment proposed increased stamp duty on buy-to-let investments and second/holiday homes, a new tax measure aimed at housing supply, directly relevant to the promise to consider new taxes.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. While the promise mentions considering new taxes and tax breaks on housing, voting against one specific stamp duty amendment on buy-to-let and second homes is not plainly a breach, as the member could reasonably oppose this particular mechanism while still pursuing the broader creative housing agenda through other means.

    • 13 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(26) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): twenty-sixth amendment Rent-a-room tax relief — Pour, voted to deliver32-15

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The adopted rent-a-room tax relief amendment directly implements a tax break as a creative housing solution, bearing on the promise to consider such measures.

    • 13 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(2) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): second amendment Stamp Duty of buy to let investments second homes and holiday homes (P.97/2022 Amd.(2)) Part 1 — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach16-29

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part 1 of the stamp duty amendment on buy-to-let/second homes is a new tax measure bearing on the promise to pursue new taxes as creative housing solutions.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "consider new taxes and tax breaks" is a broad, directional commitment, and voting against one specific stamp duty amendment on buy-to-let/second homes could reflect a judgement that this particular mechanism was not the right approach rather than a rejection of the general principle of exploring new taxes.

    • 13 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(2) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): second amendment Stamp Duty of buy to let investments second homes and holiday homes (P.97/2022 Amd.(2)) Part 2 — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach2-42

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part 2 of the stamp duty amendment on buy-to-let/second homes similarly bears on the promise to consider new taxes for housing.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "consider new taxes and tax breaks" is a general, directional commitment to explore options, and voting against one specific stamp duty amendment on buy-to-let and second homes could reflect a judgement that this particular mechanism was not the right approach, rather than a rejection of the broader goal of using tax measures creatively for housing.

    • 15 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(11) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): eleventh amendment Ringfenced Stamp Duty (P.97/2022 Amd.(11)) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach17-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The ringfenced stamp duty amendment proposed directing stamp duty revenues to housing purposes, a creative fiscal housing measure relevant to the promise.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise calls broadly for "considering new taxes and tax breaks" as one of several creative housing solutions, but voting against one specific stamp duty ringfencing amendment does not clearly contradict that general, exploratory commitment, as the member could reasonably oppose this particular mechanism while still pursuing the broader goal through other means.

    • 11 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(17) — Government Plan P72-2023 Amendment 17 - rent a room — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach10-36

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Government Plan amendment 17 on rent-a-room relief bears on the promise to consider tax breaks as creative housing solutions.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "consider new taxes and tax breaks" is a general directional commitment, and voting against one specific tax-break mechanism (a rent-a-room scheme) does not plainly contradict it, since the member could reasonably judge this particular measure unsuitable while still pursuing the broader goal through other means.

    • 11 Dec 2023✓P.72/2023 Amd.(22).Amd — Government Plan P72-2023 Amendment 22 Amendment - Abolition of interest relief for landlords — Pour, voted to deliver31-13

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The amendment on abolition of interest relief for landlords is a tax measure directly touching the promise to consider new taxes in housing.

    • 11 Dec 2023✓P.72/2023 Amd.(22) — Government Plan P72-2023 Amendment 22 as amended - Abolition of interest relief for landlords — Pour, voted to deliver33-12

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The adopted abolition of interest relief for landlords (as amended) implements a new tax measure in housing, relevant to the promise.

    • 13 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(19) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): nineteenth amendment. Investment of stamp duty uplift into first time buyer funds — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach12-34

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Investing the higher stamp duty revenue on second homes into first-time buyer funds is a creative housing tax measure of the type the promise commits to pursuing.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "consider new taxes and tax breaks" for housing is a general directional commitment, and voting against one specific mechanism—redirecting stamp duty revenue into first-time buyer funds—does not plainly contradict it, as the member could support the broader goal while opposing this particular fiscal allocation.

    • 26 Nov 2024–P.51/2024 Amd.(28) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): twenty-eighth amendment. Removal of stamp duty surcharge on second homes - as amended — Excused, did not take a side23-24

      Voting Contre delivers this

      This amendment proposed removing the stamp duty surcharge on second homes, which would reduce a tax measure on housing; voting contre preserves the tax bearing on the promise to use new taxes as creative housing solutions.

    • 26 Nov 2024–P.51/2024 Amd.(25)(re-issue) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): twenty-fifth amendment. Stamp Duty Exemption - as amended — Excused, did not take a side7-36

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The stamp duty exemption amendment relates to tax measures in housing, bearing on the promise to consider new taxes and tax breaks.

    • 01 Apr 2025·P.16/2025 — Increase Stamp Duty for Properties that are not Principal Residences to 5 per cent (P.16-2025) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach3-41

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This proposition sought to increase stamp duty for properties that are not principal residences, a new tax measure directly advancing the promise to consider new taxes as creative housing solutions.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "consider new taxes and tax breaks" is a general, directional commitment to explore options, and voting against one specific stamp duty increase on non-principal residences could reflect a judgement that this particular measure was not the right mechanism, rather than an abandonment of the broader goal.

    • 14 May 2025·P.29/2025 Amd. — Social Rents Plan to Reduce Rental Stress for Tenants (P.29-2025) Amendment — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach32-12

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Social Rents Plan amendment to reduce rental stress for tenants is a creative housing policy measure bearing on the promise to pursue creative housing solutions.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "consider new taxes and tax breaks" as one of several creative housing solutions is a broad, directional commitment, and without knowing the specific content of the amendment to the Social Rents Plan, voting against one particular amendment on social rents cannot clearly be characterised as contradicting that general aspiration — a member could oppose a specific amendment while still honestly pursuing the broader goal through other means.

    • 14 May 2025✓P.29/2025 — Social Rental Plan to Reduce Rental Stress for Tenants (P.29-2025) as amended — Pour, voted to deliver34-4

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Social Rental Plan as amended to reduce rental stress bears on the promise to pursue creative housing solutions.

    • 09 Dec 2025–P.70/2025 Amd.(31). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-first amendment. Empty Residential Properties, as amended — Absent, did not take a side41-3

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This motion directly addresses empty residential properties, a named element of the promise to pursue creative housing solutions by tackling empty properties.

    • 27 Mar 2026·P.51/2026 — Removal of Interest Tax Relief for Buy-to-Let Mortgages (P.51-2026) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach18-21

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This vote concerned removal of interest tax relief for buy-to-let mortgages, a new tax measure in housing directly relevant to the promise to consider new taxes as creative housing solutions.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "consider new taxes and tax breaks" is a directional commitment to explore options, not a binding pledge to support any specific tax measure, so voting against this particular removal of mortgage interest tax relief could reflect a judgement that this mechanism was not the right approach rather than a rejection of the underlying goal.

    • 26 Nov 2024–P.51/2024 Amd.(28).Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): twenty-eighth amendment (P.51/2024 Amd.(28)), amendment. Removal of stamp duty surcharge on second homes — Excused, did not take a side30-14

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Removing the stamp duty surcharge on second homes reduces a tax lever targeting housing, working against the promise to consider new taxes on properties to address housing.

    • 13 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(2) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): second amendment Stamp Duty of buy to let investments second homes and holiday homes (P.97/2022 Amd.(2)) Part 3 — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach2-42

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part 3 of the stamp duty amendment on buy-to-let investments and second homes is a direct test of the promise to consider new taxes as creative housing solutions.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "consider new taxes and tax breaks" is a general, directional commitment rather than a pledge to support any specific tax measure, so voting against one particular Stamp Duty amendment on buy-to-let and second homes could reflect a judgement about that specific mechanism rather than abandoning the broader housing goal.

    • 09 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(31).Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-first amendment (P.70/2025 Amd.(31)), amendment. Empty Residential Properties — Pour, voted against, not counted as a breach16-27

      Voting Contre delivers this

      This amendment to the empty-properties amendment would alter the approach to tackling empty residential properties; voting against it preserves the substantive empty-properties measure that the promise supports.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "consider" new taxes on empty properties is directional and exploratory, and voting for rather than against an amendment on empty residential properties could reflect a judgement about the specific mechanism rather than abandoning the underlying goal.

    • 08 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(15). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fifteenth amendment. Removal of 3% Stamp Surcharge — Contre, voted to deliver2-42

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Removing the stamp duty surcharge on buy-to-let and second homes works against using tax levers to address housing supply, which the promise explicitly names as a tool to pursue.

    • 09 Dec 2025–P.70/2025 Amd.(31).Amd.(2). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-first amendment (P.70/2025 Amd.(31)), second amendment. Empty Residential Properties — Absent, did not take a side40-4

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This second amendment to the empty-properties provision shapes how the empty residential properties policy operates, directly bearing on the promise to tackle empty properties.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 29 Nov 2023·P.87/2023 — Minimum Residential Space Standards (P.87/2023) - Paragraph (a) — Contre22-20

      Minimum residential space standards paragraph (a) touches housing quality, a tangential aspect of creative housing solutions.

      Considered and set aside: this motion does not bear on the promise. The promise concerns creative housing solutions such as tackling empty properties and new taxes or tax breaks, while the motion deals with minimum residential space standards — a different regulatory mechanism with no clear connection to what was specifically promised.

    • 10 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): amendment. Development Levies — Contre15-27

      Development levies are a new tax mechanism that could generate revenue to address housing, touching the promise to consider new taxes as creative housing solutions.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise calls for "creative" housing solutions including "new taxes and tax breaks," but voting against one specific development levy amendment does not clearly contradict that general directional commitment, as the member could oppose this particular mechanism while still pursuing the broader goal through other means.

    • 11 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(14). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fourteenth amendment. Mortgage Interest Tax Relief — Pour13-26

      Reinstating mortgage interest tax relief is a tax break related to housing, touching the promise to consider new tax breaks as part of creative housing solutions.

    • 11 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(14).Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fourteenth amendment (P.70/2025 Amd.(14)), amendment. Mortgage Interest Tax Relief — Contre19-21

      This amendment to the mortgage interest tax relief proposal concerns the design of a housing-related tax break, a detail within the broader housing-tax-measures commitment.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise mentions considering new taxes and tax breaks in the context of creative housing solutions, but voting against one specific reinstated tax relief (mortgage interest relief) does not plainly contradict a general commitment to "consider" such measures, as the member could reasonably judge this particular relief an unsuitable or unaffordable mechanism.

  • Keptaspirational

    Will consider introducing a lodger scheme to provide community homes for temporary workers.

    “We should consider a lodger scheme to provide community homes for temporary workers.”

    HousingPopulation And Migration

    4 recorded votes test this promise

    1 Pour · 3 Contre
    • 13 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(26)(Amd) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): twenty-sixth amendment (P.97/2022. Amd.(26).) – amendment Rent-a-room tax relief (Part 1) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach14-29

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The rent-a-room tax relief amendment is directly connected to a lodger/room-renting scheme, which bears on the promise to introduce a lodger scheme for temporary workers.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise was to "consider" a lodger scheme for temporary workers, while the motion concerned rent-a-room tax relief, a related but distinct mechanism, and opposing one specific fiscal measure does not clearly contradict a general commitment to explore lodger arrangements.

    • 13 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(26) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): twenty-sixth amendment Rent-a-room tax relief — Pour, voted to deliver32-15

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The adopted rent-a-room tax relief directly incentivises homeowners to take in lodgers, closely related to the promise of a lodger scheme for temporary workers.

    • 11 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(17) — Government Plan P72-2023 Amendment 17 - rent a room — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach10-36

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Government Plan amendment 17 on rent-a-room relief directly incentivises lodger arrangements, bearing on the promise to introduce a lodger scheme.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise was only to "consider" a lodger/rent-a-room scheme, and voting against one specific amendment to implement such a scheme does not clearly contradict a commitment to consider it, since consideration could lead to rejection or a different approach.

    • 13 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(26)(Amd) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): twenty-sixth amendment (P.97/2022. Amd.(26).) – amendment Rent-a-room tax relief (Part 2) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach13-29

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part 2 of the rent-a-room tax relief amendment also bears on incentivising lodger arrangements, relevant to the promise of a lodger scheme.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise was to "consider" a lodger scheme for temporary workers, while the motion concerned rent-a-room tax relief specifically — a related but distinct mechanism, and voting against one particular tax measure does not straightforwardly contradict a commitment to consider a broader lodger scheme concept.

Health & Social Care

1 promise · 1 kept

2recorded votes

1 Pour · 1 Contre

  • Keptdirectional

    Will work to create a fairer and better-funded assisted reproduction service for all couples needing fertility treatment.

    “Creating a fairer and better-funded assisted reproduction service – we are currently failing the around 1 in 6 couples who need fertility treatment to grow their families. This includes same-sex couples and cancer patients.”

    Health And CareDisability And Inclusion

    2 recorded votes test this promise

    1 Pour · 1 Contre
    • 30 Apr 2024✓P.20/2024 — In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) Funding — Pour, voted to deliver44-1

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The IVF Funding proposition is a direct test of the promise to create a fairer and better-funded assisted reproduction service for all couples needing fertility treatment.

    • 30 Apr 2024·P.20/2024 — In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) Funding (P.20-2024): Amendment — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach28-15

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The IVF Funding amendment vote is a direct test of the promise, determining the shape of the funded assisted reproduction service.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a general directional commitment to improve IVF/fertility funding, but voting against one specific amendment does not necessarily contradict that goal, as the member may have opposed this particular mechanism, funding level, or approach while still pursuing the broader aim by other means.

Education & Families

1 promise · 1 kept

4recorded votes

3 Pour · 1 Contre

  • Keptaspirational

    Will work to establish a vision for a world-leading education system backed by a funded delivery plan.

    “Previous governments have failed to prioritise education. This needs to change. Let's agree a vision of a 'world leading education system' and set out a funded delivery plan. We must listen to staff – they are valuable experts.”

    EducationPublic Finances

    4 recorded votes test this promise

    3 Pour · 1 Contre
    • 17 Jul 2024✓P.38/2024 — Fully funded education or training for 16-18 year olds paragraph (c) — Pour, voted to deliver17-27

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This vote on fully funded education or training for 16-18 year olds paragraph (c) bears on the promise to work towards a well-funded education system.

    • 17 Jul 2024✓P.38/2024 — Fully funded education or training for 16-18 year olds paragraph (a) — Pour, voted to deliver13-31

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Paragraph (a) of fully funded education or training for 16-18 year olds directly relates to the promise to work for a funded education delivery plan.

    • 09 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(8). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): eighth amendment. Sport addition to Jersey Premium — Pour, voted to deliver11-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This is the member's own amendment adding funded sport and physical activity to the Jersey Premium scheme in primary schools, a concrete step towards a funded education delivery plan.

    • 13 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(20) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): twentieth amendment. Additional funding for education — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach13-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This motion seeks additional funding for education, directly bearing on the promise to establish a world-leading education system backed by a funded delivery plan.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a general directional commitment to prioritise education with a funded delivery plan, while the motion is one specific funding amendment to the Government Plan, and voting against it could reflect a judgement about the particular mechanism, amount, or source of funding rather than opposition to the broader goal.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 05 Feb 2025·P.74/2024 Amd. — Modern Languages in Schools (P74-2024) amendment - Parts 3 & 4 — Excused24-20

      Modern languages in schools amendment bears on the vision for a world-leading education system, though only for one curriculum element.

    • 24 Oct 2024·P.45/2024 — Delivery of Three Bilingual Primary Schools as amended Paragraph (b) — Excused22-20

      Delivery of three bilingual primary schools paragraph (b) relates to developing a vision for a world-leading education system including language capability.

    • 24 Oct 2024·P.45/2024 — Delivery of Three Bilingual Primary Schools as amended Paragraph (c) — Excused11-29

      Delivery of three bilingual primary schools paragraph (c) similarly touches the promise about education vision.

    • 24 Oct 2024·P.45/2024 — Delivery of Three Bilingual Primary Schools as amended Paragraph (a) — Excused15-26

      Paragraph (a) of the bilingual primary schools vote relates to education planning and vision, touching the promise.

Economy, Tax & Cost of Living

2 promises · 2 kept

17recorded votes

12 Pour · 1 Contre · 4 away

  • Keptdirectional

    Will push to accelerate school meals roll-out and review benefit criteria to address cost of living.

    “Let's speed up the roll-out of school meals, review benefit criteria and consider catch-all options ASAP.”

    Cost Of LivingSocial Security And Benefits

    13 recorded votes test this promise

    10 Pour · 1 Contre · 2 away
    • 20 Sept 2022✓P.80/2022(Amd)(3) — Mini-Budget 2022 (P.80/2022): third amendment. Community Costs Bonus threshold and deadline — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Widening the income threshold for the Community Costs Bonus directly bears on reviewing benefit criteria to address cost of living, as the promise commits to.

    • 01 Nov 2022✓P.94/2022(Re-issue) — Draft Income Support (Amendment No. 22) (Jersey) Regulations 202- Principles — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Draft Income Support Amendment No. 22 Principles vote relates to reviewing benefit criteria, directly relevant to the promise to review benefit criteria to address cost of living.

    • 01 Nov 2022✓P.94/2022(Re-issue) — Draft Income Support (Amendment No. 22) (Jersey) Regulations 202- Regulations as amended — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Income Support Amendment regulations as amended bear on benefit criteria review for cost of living, relevant to the promise.

    • 01 Nov 2022✓P.94/2022(Re-issue) — Draft Income Support (Amendment No. 22) (Jersey) Regulations 202- Third Reading — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Third Reading of Income Support Amendment No. 22 finalises benefit changes, directly relevant to the promise to review benefit criteria.

    • 24 Nov 2022·P.100/2022 — Cost of living crisis – Removal of 5% goods and services tax (GST) from food (excluding alcoholic drinks) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach17-28

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The vote on removing 5% GST from food directly bears on cost-of-living measures and the promise to review benefit criteria to address cost of living.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise was specifically about accelerating school meals roll-out and reviewing benefit criteria, while the motion concerned removing GST from food—a different mechanism for addressing cost of living, which the member could reasonably oppose while still pursuing their stated school-meals and benefit-criteria commitments.

    • 13 Sept 2023✓P.59/2023 — Increase to Christmas Bonus (Part A only) — Pour, voted to deliver46-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The vote to increase the Christmas Bonus bears on cost-of-living support, relevant to the promise to review benefit criteria to address cost of living.

    • 03 Oct 2023✓P.64/2023 — Extension of Cold Weather Bonus - as amended — Pour, voted to deliver42-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Extension of the Cold Weather Bonus directly addresses cost-of-living support, relevant to the promise to review benefit criteria to address cost of living.

    • 07 Nov 2023✓P.77/2023 — Draft Income Support (Amendment No. 23) (Jersey) Regulations 202- Third Reading — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Income Support Amendment No. 23 Third Reading finalises benefit changes bearing on the promise to review benefit criteria to address cost of living.

    • 29 Nov 2023✓P.84/2023 — Draft Christmas Bonus (Miscellaneous Amendments) (Jersey) Regulations 202-.Third Reading — Pour, voted to deliver45-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Christmas Bonus miscellaneous amendments vote relates to benefit improvements bearing on the cost-of-living promise.

    • 17 Jan 2024✓P.99/2023 — Draft Cold Weather Bonus and Payments (Amendment – Extension of Eligibility) (Jersey) Regulations 202-. Third reading — Pour, voted to deliver41-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Extension of eligibility for the Cold Weather Bonus directly reviews benefit criteria for cost-of-living support, relevant to the promise.

    • 24 Oct 2024–P.59/2024 — Draft Income Support (Jersey) Amendment Regulations 202- Principles — Excused, did not take a side39-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Draft Income Support Amendment Regulations Principles relates to reviewing and updating benefit criteria, directly relevant to the promise.

    • 24 Oct 2024–P.59/2024 — Draft Income Support (Jersey) Amendment Regulations 202- Third Reading — Excused, did not take a side42-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Draft Income Support Amendment Regulations Third Reading finalises benefit changes bearing on the cost-of-living promise.

    • 09 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(8). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): eighth amendment. Sport addition to Jersey Premium — Pour, voted to deliver11-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Adding funded sport to the Jersey Premium scheme in primary schools is a school-based cost-of-living support measure aligned with the promise to accelerate school-linked benefits.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 01 Nov 2022·P.94/2022(Amd)(Re-issue) — Draft Income Support (Amendment No. 22) (Jersey) Regulations 202- (P.94/2022): amendment — Contre14-29

      The amendment to Income Support regulations touches benefit criteria details, a package-detail vote relevant to the promise at a lower level.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise to "review benefit criteria" is a general directional commitment, and without knowing whether this specific Income Support amendment addressed that review in a way consistent with the promise, voting against one particular amendment to Income Support regulations is not self-evidently a breach—the member could have opposed this specific mechanism while still pursuing the broader goal.

    • 01 Nov 2022·P202200094040000020000000000000000|P.94/2022(Amd)(2) — Draft Income Support (Amendment No.22) (Jersey) Regulations 202- (P.94/2022): second amendment — Pour45-0

      The second amendment to Income Support No. 22 touches benefit criteria details relevant to cost-of-living measures.

  • Keptdirectional

    Will pursue gender balance and inclusion measures to improve economic productivity.

    “Addressing gender imbalance and inclusion is an often overlooked way to help tackle the economic productivity decline and empower workforces.”

    Economy And BusinessDisability And Inclusion

    4 recorded votes test this promise

    2 Pour · 2 away
    • 14 Jun 2023✓P.31/2023 — Breakdown of Gender Pay - as amended — Pour, voted to deliver33-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Breakdown of Gender Pay vote (as amended) directly bears on the promise to pursue gender balance measures to improve economic productivity.

    • 24 Oct 2024–P.64/2024 — Gender Pay and Income Ratio Consultation — Excused, did not take a side11-30

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Gender Pay and Income Ratio Consultation vote directly advances the promise to pursue gender balance measures for economic productivity.

    • 24 Oct 2024–P.64/2024 — Gender Pay and Income Ratio Consultation — Excused, did not take a side11-30

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The second Gender Pay and Income Ratio Consultation vote is another direct test of the promise to pursue gender balance measures for economic productivity.

    • 12 Dec 2023✓P.72/2023 Amd.(13) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): thirteenth amendment. Violence against Women and Girls Taskforce recommendations - annual progress report. — Pour, voted to deliver49-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Violence against Women and Girls Taskforce annual progress report amendment bears on gender inclusion measures relevant to the promise.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 23 Nov 2022·P.99/2022 — Draft Employment (Minimum Wage) (Amendment No. 17) (Jersey) Regulations 202- Third Reading — Pour43-0

      The Minimum Wage increase amendment relates to economic inclusion, tangentially touching the promise to pursue inclusion measures to improve economic productivity.

Infrastructure & Environment

1 promise · 0 kept

No recorded States Assembly vote bears on this area yet.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Will work to develop a funding mechanism to extend the mains water network across the island.

    “Developing a funding mechanism to extend the mains water network, linking drains in where possible. We all deserve access to safe drinking water.”

    Infrastructure And TransportPublic Finances
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    No evidence was found that Deputy Stephenson developed or advanced a specific funding mechanism to extend the mains water network during the 2022–2026 Assembly term. Although she served as Assistant Minister for Infrastructure from January 2023 to January 2024, searches of States Assembly records, gov.je, and authorised Jersey media produced no proposition, ministerial report, or policy announcement attributable to her on this issue. A written question answered in April 2025 (WQ.161/2025, lodged by a different deputy) confirmed that approximately 2,800 properties (~5% of households) still lacked mains water, that full connection would cost over £36 million, and that Jersey Water's extension programme remained constrained by funding availability — indicating that the underlying problem identified in the manifesto remained unresolved at the end of the term.

Governance & Public Services

3 promises · 2 kept

7recorded votes

6 Pour · 1 away

  • No recorded votespecific

    Will push to create a new forum of district representatives and develop or update parish plans.

    “Let's create a new forum of district representatives, and update or create parish plans to agree visions we can all work to.”

    Parish And Local GovernmentGovernance And Constitution
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedhigh confidence

    Exhaustive searches of statesassembly.je, vote.je, the Jersey Evening Post, Bailiwick Express, and flow.je returned no evidence that a district representatives forum was ever created, or that parish plans for St Mary, St Ouen and St Peter were developed or updated, during the 2022–2026 Assembly term. Deputy Stephenson's March 2026 re-election coverage in the Jersey Evening Post highlighted her IVF funding success, scrutiny panel roles, and the Diversity Forum chairmanship, but made no mention of the parish-forum or parish-plans pledge. Her 2026 manifesto on vote.je acknowledged the parishes had 'an important role to play' within a modernised parish system, but did not claim the 2022 commitment had been delivered, suggesting the promise lapsed with the end of the 2022–2026 term.

  • Keptdirectional

    Will push for a real-time population monitoring mechanism to underpin a future population policy.

    “We need a mechanism to monitor population in real-time–a population policy can then follow.”

    Population And MigrationGovernance And Constitution

    4 recorded votes test this promise

    3 Pour · 1 away
    • 28 Nov 2024–P.72/2024 Amd.(3). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): third amendment. Statistics Jersey Funding - as amended — Excused, did not take a side42-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Statistics Jersey Funding amendment (as amended) supports the statistical infrastructure needed for real-time population monitoring, directly relevant to the promise.

    • 10 Sept 2024✓P.29/2024 — Draft Statistics and Census (Jersey) Amendment Law 202- Principles — Pour, voted to deliver42-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Draft Statistics and Census Amendment Law principles vote directly bears on the statistical infrastructure for population monitoring, relevant to the promise for a real-time population monitoring mechanism.

    • 10 Sept 2024✓P.29/2024 — Draft Statistics and Census (Jersey) Amendment Law 202- Articles — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Draft Statistics and Census Amendment Law articles vote similarly advances statistical capacity for population monitoring.

    • 10 Jul 2025✓P.49/2025 — Continuation of Annual Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey (P.49-2025) — Pour, voted to deliver38-1

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The vote on continuation of the Annual Jersey Opinions and Lifestyle Survey directly supports ongoing population data collection, bearing on the promise for a population monitoring mechanism.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 03 Oct 2023·P.56/2023 — Draft Register of Names and Addresses (Amendment) (Jersey) Law 202- Third Reading — Pour44-0

      The Register of Names and Addresses amendment touches population data infrastructure, tangentially relevant to a real-time population monitoring mechanism.

    • 28 Nov 2024·P.51/2024 Amd.(3).Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): third amendment (P.51/2024 Amd.(3)), amendment. Statistics Jersey Funding — Excused22-21

      Funding Statistics Jersey supports the statistical infrastructure needed for a real-time population monitoring mechanism, touching the promise to underpin future population policy.

    • 11 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(18). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): eighteenth amendment. Statistics Jersey, Administrative Support Funding — Pour18-25

      Administrative support funding for Statistics Jersey sustains the agency whose data capacity would underpin a real-time population monitoring mechanism.

  • Keptdirectional

    Will work to improve government communications to rebuild public trust and confidence.

    “We must break that cycle, starting with electing ministers who will regain control over their communications.”

    Governance And ConstitutionPublic Sector Reform

    3 recorded votes test this promise

    3 Pour
    • 24 Nov 2022✓P.107/2022 — States Employment Board – Annual Reporting — Pour, voted to deliver38-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The States Employment Board Annual Reporting vote advances transparency and public accountability in government, relevant to the promise to improve government communications to rebuild public trust.

    • 17 Jan 2024✓P.93/2023 — Amendment to Standing Orders – States Decision Tracker. — Pour, voted to deliver42-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Amendment to Standing Orders – States Decision Tracker directly improves public visibility of government decisions, bearing on the promise to improve government communications.

    • 17 Oct 2023✓P.69/2023 — Reporting of headcount and vacancies - Paragraph (a) as Amended — Pour, voted to deliver32-12

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Reporting of headcount and vacancies (paragraph a as amended) improves government transparency, relevant to the promise to improve government communications and rebuild public trust.

Lucy Kate Frances Stephenson’s record changes with every States Assembly sitting. Follow us on LinkedIn and we will tell you when it does.

Follow on LinkedIn