Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← All members

Lyndsay Victoria Feltham

Deputy for St Helier Central · Reform Jersey

Chair of Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel

Lyndsay Victoria Feltham

Lyndsay Feltham was first elected to the States Assembly in 2022 as Deputy for St Helier Central, and was re-elected to the same seat in 2026 with Reform Jersey. In her first term she served as Chair of the Public Accounts Committee, Vice Chair of the Future Hospital Review Panel, Chair of the Machinery of Government Review Sub-Committee, and as a member of the Privileges and Procedures Committee. She subsequently served as Minister for Social Security from 2024 to 2026. Since 2026 she has held the position of Chair of the Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel.

Feltham stood for re-election on a platform of fairness and practical representation for St Helier Central, a constituency she describes as home to families, pensioners, renters, and people from diverse backgrounds. Her stated priorities for the 2026–2030 term centre on the cost of living, decent and secure housing, support for families, dignity for pensioners and disabled Islanders, and improved pay and conditions for workers. She also pledged to remain accessible and active in the district, ensuring St Helier Central is strongly represented in the Assembly.

Feltham notes a family connection to public service in the district, with her mother having previously served the Rouge Bouillon area as Deputy.

Sources

—

States participation

5

Votes expected

Have your say

Constituent feedback

Reader ratings and comments. Not Lyndsay Victoria Feltham’s own response.

Rate Lyndsay Victoria Feltham

with

Attendance

Turnout in the States Assembly — 2026–2030 Assembly

The States Assembly records a reason against every non-vote, so being ill, off-island, on parental leave or barred by a declared interest can be told apart from simply not turning up. Absences with an accepted reason are removed from both sides of the rate rather than held against the member.

5 votes in 2026–2030 Assembly so far — fewer than the 10 needed before this scorecard will publish a participation rate. The record to date:

  • Voted or abstained5

Manifesto

Promises, and how they voted — 2026–2030 Assembly

Grouped by policy area. Each promise carries the recorded States Assembly votes that test it, and whether this member voted to deliver — open any vote for the motion and the reasoning. A vote counts against a promise only where it plainly contradicts it; where a member voted against one particular measure but the breach is arguable, the vote is shown and set aside rather than counted. Where no recorded vote bears on a promise, an AI delivery verdict assesses progress against the public record.

Voted to deliverVoted againstAbsent or abstained

Economy, Tax & Cost of Living

1 promise · 0 kept

No recorded States Assembly vote bears on this area yet.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Candidate will prioritise cost of living, housing, family support, pensioners, disability, and workers' rights.

    “My priorities will remain the cost of living, decent and secure housing, support for families, dignity for pensioners and disabled Islanders, and better pay and conditions at work.”

    Cost Of LivingHousingSocial Security And Benefits
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictIn progressmedium confidence

    Feltham was re-elected to the 2026–2030 Assembly in June 2026 and, outside ministerial government, was appointed Chair of the Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel — a role from which she has already challenged the government on housing and affordability. By August 2026 she was pressing the Chief Minister on the new Housing and Work Control Panel, and by September 2026 she was using scrutiny hearings to question what tangible outcomes on household incomes and affordable homes the government intended to deliver (Jersey Evening Post, 20 August and 20 September 2026). The Assembly term is only around three months old, making early scrutiny activity the clearest available mechanism for pursuing her stated priorities rather than ministerial delivery.

Governance & Public Services

2 promises · 0 kept

No recorded States Assembly vote bears on this area yet.

  • No recorded voteaspirational

    Candidate will continue working for fairness and strong constituency representation if re-elected.

    “If I am re-elected, I will keep working for a fairer Jersey and strong representation for St Helier Central.”

    Governance And ConstitutionParish And Local Government
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictIn progressmedium confidence

    Feltham was re-elected as Deputy for St Helier Central on 7 June 2026, receiving 982 votes and securing one of the four seats in the district, confirming she has the mandate to pursue this commitment. The new 2026-2030 Assembly first sat on 19 June 2026, meaning only approximately three months had elapsed by the assessment date of 25 September 2026; no specific policy outcomes attributable to this broad representational promise could be verified in that short window. She was also named co-leader of Reform Jersey in July 2026, indicating continued active engagement in Jersey politics.

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Candidate will remain accessible to constituents and ensure St Helier Central is properly represented in the Assembly.

    “I will continue to be accessible and active in the district, while making sure people in St Helier Central are properly represented in the States Assembly.”

    Parish And Local GovernmentGovernance And Constitution
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictIn progressmedium confidence

    Feltham was re-elected as Deputy for St Helier Central in June 2026, receiving 982 votes (ITV Channel, 8 June 2026), confirming her mandate to represent the constituency. She has taken on the role of Chair of a Scrutiny Panel overseeing the Chief Minister and Treasury Minister in the 2026-2030 Assembly (Bailiwick Express, 2 July 2026), and her States Assembly profile shows a history of constituency drop-in surgeries at St Helier Town Hall. However, the new term only began on 19 June 2026 — just over three months before the assessment date — which is too short a window to draw firm conclusions about the ongoing fulfilment of a broad accessibility and representation commitment.

Voting record

Recent recorded votes

This member's most recent votes in the States Assembly's electronic voting record, regardless of whether they relate to a manifesto promise.

Manifesto · Closed term

Promises, and how they voted — 2022–2026 Assembly

Deputy for St Helier Central · Independent. This term has closed — shown here as this member's earlier record, not the live one. A vote counts against a promise only where it plainly contradicts it; an arguable breach is shown and set aside rather than counted.

100%

Kept rate

100%

States participation

5

Promises tracked

99%

of the 884 votes they were expected to cast in 2022–2026 Assembly

  • Voted or abstained880
  • Not present for vote4

Set aside from the rate · 8

  • Ill7
  • Declared an interest1

These 8 ballots are removed from both sides of the rate, not counted as absences. Each is a vote the member either could not cast or was barred from casting. Declaring an interest is the member doing the right thing, and marking them down for it would penalise exactly the behaviour a scorecard should encourage. Reasons are the States Assembly’s own, as published in its voting record.

Voted to deliverVoted againstAbsent or abstained

Housing & Planning

2 promises · 2 kept

61recorded votes

39 Pour · 20 Contre · 2 away

  • Keptspecific

    Will introduce a landlord licensing scheme to ensure rental property safety and tenant protection.

    “We will also bring in a landlord licensing scheme to ensure that rented properties are safe to live in and tenants are protected.”

    Housing

    8 recorded votes test this promise

    5 Pour · 3 Contre
    • 18 Jul 2023✓P.40/2023 — Draft Public Health and Safety (Rented Dwellings) (Licensing) (Jersey) Regulations 202- Principles — Pour, voted to deliver34-10

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This vote on the Principles of the Draft Public Health and Safety (Rented Dwellings) (Licensing) Regulations is a direct test of the landlord licensing scheme promised.

    • 28 Nov 2023✓P.40/2023 — Draft Public Health and Safety (Rented Dwellings) (Licensing) (Jersey) Regulations 202- Regulation 2 — Pour, voted to deliver35-4

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Regulation 2 of the Rented Dwellings Licensing Regulations directly establishes the licensing framework promised for rental property safety.

    • 28 Nov 2023✓P.40/2023 — Draft Public Health and Safety (Rented Dwellings) (Licensing) (Jersey) Regulations 202- Regulations 3-6 — Pour, voted to deliver37-4

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Regulations 3-6 of the Rented Dwellings Licensing Regulations advance the landlord licensing scheme for rental property safety promised.

    • 28 Nov 2023✓P.40/2023 — Draft Public Health and Safety (Rented Dwellings) (Licensing) (Jersey) Regulations 202- Third Reading — Pour, voted to deliver37-9

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Third Reading of the Rented Dwellings Licensing Regulations is the final adoption of the landlord licensing scheme directly promised.

    • 28 Nov 2023✓P.40/2023 — Draft Public Health and Safety (Rented Dwellings) (Licensing) (Jersey) Regulations 202- Reference back — Contre, voted to deliver18-26

      Voting Contre delivers this

      A reference back of the Rented Dwellings Licensing Regulations would delay or derail the landlord licensing scheme promised; voting contre advances the promise.

    • 28 Nov 2023✓P.40/2023 Amd.(11) — Draft Public Health and Safety (Rented Dwellings) (Licensing) (Jersey) Regulations 202-. (P.40/2023): eleventh amendment. — Pour, voted to deliver49-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The eleventh amendment to the Rented Dwellings Licensing Regulations bears directly on the scope and strength of the landlord licensing scheme promised.

    • 28 Nov 2023·P.40/2023 — Draft Public Health and Safety (Rented Dwellings) (Licensing) (Jersey) Regulations 202- Regulation 2 (Amd 11 Amd) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach12-35

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Regulation 2 of the Rented Dwellings Licensing Regulations (amendment to amendment) bears directly on the scope of the landlord licensing scheme promised.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The member promised to introduce a landlord licensing scheme, and this motion concerns licensing regulations for rented dwellings, but the vote is on a specific amendment to an amendment (Amendment 11 to the draft Regulations), and voting against one particular amendment to the scheme's regulations does not necessarily contradict supporting the scheme itself, as the member may have opposed this specific amendment while still backing the overall licensing framework.

    • 28 Nov 2023·P.40/2023 — Draft Public Health and Safety (Rented Dwellings) (Licensing) (Jersey) Regulations 202- Regulation 2 (Amd 11 Amd 2) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach7-33

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Regulation 2 amendment (Amd 11 Amd 2) of the Rented Dwellings Licensing Regulations bears on the landlord licensing scheme promised.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The member promised to introduce a landlord licensing scheme, and this motion concerns such a scheme, but it is an amendment to an amendment of a specific regulation, and voting against one particular amendment within the legislative detail of a licensing scheme does not necessarily contradict the broader commitment to introduce landlord licensing.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 21 Sept 2022·P.80/2022(Amd)(2) — Mini-Budget 2022 (P.80/2022): second amendment. Residential rent controls — Pour9-35

      Residential rent controls directly target tenant protection, which overlaps with the landlord licensing scheme's goal of protecting tenants, though the mechanism differs.

    • 09 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(31). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-first amendment. Empty Residential Properties, as amended — Pour41-3

      An amendment on empty residential properties touches on housing regulation and landlord accountability, which is adjacent to a landlord licensing scheme.

  • Keptdirectional

    Will pursue proper rent regulation and support for first-time buyers as part of a Housing Crisis Action Plan.

    “Reform Jersey has published a 'Housing Crisis Action Plan', which includes proper rent regulation and support for first-time buyers.”

    HousingCost Of Living

    53 recorded votes test this promise

    34 Pour · 17 Contre · 2 away
    • 21 Sept 2022·P.89/2022(Amd) — Composition of Rent Tribunal (P.89/2022): amendment - Part 1 — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach31-14

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This vote amends the composition of the Rent Tribunal, a body central to rent regulation, directly bearing on promise to pursue proper rent regulation.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerns "proper rent regulation" broadly, while this motion concerns the specific composition of the Rent Tribunal — a procedural/structural detail that a member could reasonably oppose while still pursuing rent regulation through other means or a differently constituted body.

    • 21 Sept 2022·P.89/2022(Amd) — Composition of Rent Tribunal (P.89/2022): amendment - Parts 2 to 4 — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach36-8

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Parts 2-4 of the Rent Tribunal composition amendment further reform the rent regulation body that underpins the housing crisis action plan promise.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise commits to "proper rent regulation" broadly, but the motion concerns the specific composition of the Rent Tribunal — a procedural/structural matter about tribunal membership rather than the principle of rent regulation itself — so voting against this particular amendment does not plainly contradict the promise to pursue rent regulation.

    • 21 Sept 2022–P.89/2022 — Composition of Rent Tribunal - as amended — Abstained, did not take a side12-23

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The final vote on the amended Rent Tribunal composition proposition directly tests support for reforming the rent regulation infrastructure promised.

    • 04 Oct 2022✓P.92/2022 — Cost of living crisis – measures affecting Andium Homes rent increases - 'move to next item' proposed by Deputy Inna Gardiner — Contre, voted to deliver19-20

      Voting Contre delivers this

      A motion to move to next item on Andium Homes rent increases would have blocked debate on limiting social housing rent rises, working against the housing crisis action plan promise.

    • 04 Oct 2022✓P.92/2022 — Cost of living crisis – measures affecting Andium Homes rent increases — Pour, voted to deliver16-24

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This vote directly concerns measures affecting Andium Homes rent increases, a core element of a Housing Crisis Action Plan aimed at rent regulation.

    • 24 Nov 2022✓P.106/2022 — Rent Control Tribunal: Chair and Member nominations Lodged: 1st November 2022 Minister for Housing and Communities - Reference Back — Pour, voted to deliver23-18

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Referring back the Rent Control Tribunal chair/member nominations bears on proper governance of rent regulation machinery promised.

    • 13 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(2)(Amd) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): second amendment (P.97/2022. Amd.(2).) – amendment Stamp Duty of buy to let investments second homes and holiday homes — Pour, voted to deliver11-34

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Increasing stamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes is a standard first-time buyer support measure that directly bears on the housing crisis action plan promise.

    • 13 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(2) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): second amendment Stamp Duty of buy to let investments second homes and holiday homes (P.97/2022 Amd.(2)) Part 1 — Pour, voted to deliver16-29

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part 1 of stamp duty increases on buy-to-let and second homes directly supports first-time buyers as promised.

    • 13 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(2) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): second amendment Stamp Duty of buy to let investments second homes and holiday homes (P.97/2022 Amd.(2)) Part 2 — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach2-42

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part 2 of stamp duty increases on buy-to-let investments and second homes bears on first-time buyer support promised.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise was to pursue rent regulation and first-time buyer support as part of a Housing Crisis Action Plan, while this motion concerned a specific stamp duty measure on buy-to-let and second homes — a related but distinct mechanism whose rejection does not straightforwardly contradict the broader, general promise to pursue housing reform.

    • 15 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(11) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): eleventh amendment Ringfenced Stamp Duty (P.97/2022 Amd.(11)) — Pour, voted to deliver17-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Ringfencing stamp duty for housing purposes directly supports the housing crisis action plan promise of funding for housing measures.

    • 19 Apr 2023✓P.13/2023 — Regulation of Estate Agents - as amended — Pour, voted to deliver42-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Regulation of estate agents bears on the broader housing crisis action plan by improving the housing market's fairness for buyers.

    • 19 Apr 2023✓P.14/2023 — Development Levies - as amended - parts (a) and (b) — Pour, voted to deliver40-1

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Development levies (parts a and b) are a mechanism to fund affordable housing, directly relevant to the housing crisis action plan promise.

    • 19 Apr 2023✓P.15/2023 — Jersey Homes Trust rent increase – assistance scheme. — Pour, voted to deliver18-23

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Jersey Homes Trust rent increase assistance scheme directly relates to the rent regulation and tenant support aspects of the housing crisis action plan.

    • 02 May 2023✓P.18/2023 — Rent Control Measures [P.18/2023] - as amended - paragraph (a)(i) — Pour, voted to deliver19-23

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Rent Control Measures paragraph (a)(i) directly implements rent regulation, the core of the housing crisis action plan promise.

    • 02 May 2023✓P.18/2023 — Rent Control Measures [P.18/2023] - as amended - paragraph (a)(ii) — Pour, voted to deliver17-25

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Rent Control Measures paragraph (a)(ii) directly implements rent regulation promised in the housing crisis action plan.

    • 02 May 2023✓P.18/2023 — Rent Control Measures [P.18/2023] - as amended - paragraph (a)(iii) — Pour, voted to deliver12-30

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Rent Control Measures paragraph (a)(iii) directly implements rent regulation that is the central commitment of the housing crisis action plan promise.

    • 02 May 2023✓P.18/2023 — Rent Control Measures [P.18/2023] - as amended - paragraph (b)(i) — Pour, voted to deliver10-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Rent Control Measures paragraph (b)(i) forms part of the rent control package directly promised in the housing crisis action plan.

    • 02 May 2023✓P.18/2023 — Rent Control Measures [P.18/2023] - as amended - paragraph (b)(ii) — Pour, voted to deliver16-26

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Rent Control Measures paragraph (b)(ii) is part of the rent control framework directly promised.

    • 02 May 2023✓P.18/2023 — Rent Control Measures [P.18/2023] - as amended - paragraph (c) — Pour, voted to deliver22-20

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Rent Control Measures paragraph (c), the only adopted part, still partially delivers on the rent regulation commitment.

    • 19 Jul 2023✓P.48/2023 — Mortgage repayment assistance. — Pour, voted to deliver19-24

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Mortgage repayment assistance directly supports first-time buyers and homeowners under financial stress, bearing on the housing crisis action plan promise.

    • 11 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(22).Amd — Government Plan P72-2023 Amendment 22 Amendment - Abolition of interest relief for landlords — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach31-13

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Abolition of interest relief for landlords is a direct measure to level the playing field for first-time buyers, bearing on the housing crisis action plan promise.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerned rent regulation and first-time buyer support as part of a broad Housing Crisis Action Plan, while this motion specifically concerned abolishing interest relief for landlords — a related but distinct fiscal mechanism whose connection to rent regulation or first-time buyer support requires inferential steps rather than being self-evident from the promise.

    • 11 Dec 2023✓P.72/2023 Amd.(22) — Government Plan P72-2023 Amendment 22 as amended - Abolition of interest relief for landlords — Pour, voted to deliver33-12

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The amended abolition of interest relief for landlords directly supports first-time buyers as promised in the housing action plan.

    • 14 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(11).Com. — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 P72 Amendment 11 - AHP scheme — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach1-42

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Affordable Home Purchase scheme amendment directly supports first-time buyers as committed to in the housing crisis action plan.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerns rent regulation and first-time buyer support as part of a broad Housing Crisis Action Plan, while this motion concerns a specific Affordable Housing Programme (AHP) scheme amendment to the Government Plan, and voting against one particular AHP funding or scheme mechanism does not straightforwardly contradict a general manifesto commitment to housing reform, as the member may have opposed this specific implementation while pursuing the broader goal through other means.

    • 13 Dec 2023✓P.72/2023 Amd.(19) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): nineteenth amendment. Investment of stamp duty uplift into first time buyer funds — Pour, voted to deliver12-34

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Investing stamp duty revenue from second homes into first-time buyer funds directly delivers the promise's specific commitment to support for first-time buyers.

    • 26 Nov 2024✓P.51/2024 Amd.(28) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): twenty-eighth amendment. Removal of stamp duty surcharge on second homes - as amended — Contre, voted to deliver23-24

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Removal of stamp duty surcharge on second homes would undermine first-time buyer support by easing competition from investors, contrary to the housing action plan promise.

    • 26 Nov 2024✓P.51/2024 Amd.(25)(re-issue) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): twenty-fifth amendment. Stamp Duty Exemption - as amended — Contre, voted to deliver7-36

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Stamp duty exemption amendment would reduce costs for property investors, working against first-time buyer prioritisation promised.

    • 01 Apr 2025·P.16/2025 — Increase Stamp Duty for Properties that are not Principal Residences to 5 per cent (P.16-2025) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach3-41

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Increasing stamp duty for properties not used as principal residences directly supports first-time buyers over investors as promised.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerned rent regulation and first-time buyer support as part of a Housing Crisis Action Plan, while the motion addressed a specific stamp duty increase on non-principal residences — a related but distinct policy instrument that the member could reasonably oppose on grounds other than rejecting the broader housing promise.

    • 14 May 2025✓P.29/2025 Amd. — Social Rents Plan to Reduce Rental Stress for Tenants (P.29-2025) Amendment — Pour, voted to deliver32-12

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Amendment to a Social Rents Plan to Reduce Rental Stress for Tenants directly delivers on the rent regulation aspect of the housing crisis action plan.

    • 14 May 2025✓P.29/2025 — Social Rental Plan to Reduce Rental Stress for Tenants (P.29-2025) as amended — Pour, voted to deliver34-4

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Social Rental Plan to Reduce Rental Stress for Tenants directly delivers on the rent regulation and tenant support promised.

    • 23 Apr 2025·P.26/2025 — Increase in Assets and Savings Threshold for the Affordable Housing Gateway (P.26-2025) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach7-30

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Increasing assets/savings threshold for the Affordable Housing Gateway expands access to affordable housing support promised for first-time buyers.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerns rent regulation and first-time buyer support as part of a broad Housing Crisis Action Plan, while the motion specifically addresses the assets and savings threshold for the Affordable Housing Gateway — a related but distinct mechanism that the member could reasonably oppose without abandoning the overall housing promise.

    • 11 Sept 2025✓P.24/2025. Amd.(3) — Draft Residential Tenancy (Jersey) Amendment Law 202- (P.24-2025) Amendment 3 — Pour, voted to deliver46-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Amendment 3 to the Residential Tenancy Amendment Law advances tenant protection and rent regulation promised.

    • 11 Sept 2025–P.40/2025 — Third Reading — Absent, did not take a side42-1

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Third Reading of the Residential Tenancy Amendment Law is the final vote delivering on rent regulation and tenant protection promised.

    • 09 Sept 2025✓P.24/2025 — Principles — Pour, voted to deliver29-19

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Principles vote on the Residential Tenancy Amendment Law is a direct test of support for the rent regulation and tenant protection legislation promised.

    • 10 Sept 2025·P.24/2025 Amd.Amd. — Draft Residential Tenancy (Jersey) Amendment Law 202- (P.24-2025) Amendment (P.24-2025 Amd.) Amendment — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach28-19

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Amendment to the Residential Tenancy Amendment Law bears directly on rental regulation and tenant protection promised in the housing crisis action plan.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise supports rent regulation generally, but voting against a specific amendment to an amendment of the Residential Tenancy Law could reflect a preference for a different formulation or mechanism rather than opposition to rent regulation itself, making a breach non-obvious without knowing the amendment's precise content relative to the promised policy.

    • 10 Sept 2025·P.24/2025 Amd. — Part 1 — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach21-24

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part 1 of the Residential Tenancy Amendment Law proceedings directly advances rental regulation promised.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. Although the motion concerns rent regulation, which the promise explicitly named, a member could vote against this particular rent-capping mechanism while still pursuing "proper rent regulation" through a different approach, so rejecting one specific amendment does not unambiguously contradict the broader manifesto commitment.

    • 10 Sept 2025·P.24/2025 Amd. — Part 2 — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach21-24

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part 2 of the Residential Tenancy Amendment Law directly advances tenant protection and rent regulation promised.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. While the motion concerns residential tenancy law and is related to rent regulation, voting against one specific amendment about periodic tenancies does not clearly contradict a general manifesto commitment to "proper rent regulation," as the member could oppose this particular mechanism while still pursuing the broader goal through other means.

    • 10 Sept 2025·P.24/2025 Amd. — Part 3 — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach21-24

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part 3 of the Residential Tenancy Amendment Law advances rental regulation and tenant protection promised.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is to pursue "proper rent regulation" as part of a broad Housing Crisis Action Plan, but this motion concerns a specific mechanism (civil penalties) within a tenancy amendment law, and voting against one particular enforcement provision does not necessarily contradict a general commitment to rent regulation — the member could oppose this specific penalty mechanism while still supporting rent regulation overall.

    • 10 Sept 2025✓P.24/2025 Amd.(2). — Part 1 — Pour, voted to deliver36-5

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Adopted Part 1 of Residential Tenancy Amendment Law directly delivers on rent regulation and tenant protection promised.

    • 10 Sept 2025✓P.24/2025 Amd.(2). — Part 2 — Pour, voted to deliver27-17

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Adopted Part 2 of Residential Tenancy Amendment Law directly advances rent regulation promised.

    • 10 Sept 2025✓P.24/2025 Amd.(2). — Part 3 — Pour, voted to deliver36-8

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Adopted Part 3 of Residential Tenancy Amendment Law advances tenant protection promised in the housing crisis action plan.

    • 10 Sept 2025✓P.24/2025 Amd.(4). — Part 3 — Pour, voted to deliver35-6

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Further Part 3 vote on Residential Tenancy Amendment Law advances tenant protections in the housing crisis action plan.

    • 10 Sept 2025✓P.24/2025 Amd.(4). — Part 4 — Pour, voted to deliver37-3

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part 4 of Residential Tenancy Amendment Law advances rental regulation and tenant protection promised.

    • 10 Sept 2025✓P.24/2025 Amd.(5). — Draft Residential Tenancy (Jersey) Amendment Law 202- (P.24-2025) Amendment 5 — Pour, voted to deliver14-28

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Amendment 5 to the Residential Tenancy Amendment Law bears on the scope of tenant protections promised.

    • 09 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(31). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-first amendment. Empty Residential Properties, as amended — Pour, voted to deliver41-3

      Voting Pour delivers this

      An amendment on empty residential properties addresses housing supply and regulation, which materially bears on the Housing Crisis Action Plan commitment.

    • 11 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(14). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fourteenth amendment. Mortgage Interest Tax Relief — Contre, voted to deliver13-26

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Reinstating mortgage interest tax relief would primarily benefit existing property investors rather than first-time buyers, working against the promise's focus on first-time buyer support and rent regulation.

    • 11 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(14).Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fourteenth amendment (P.70/2025 Amd.(14)), amendment. Mortgage Interest Tax Relief — Pour, voted to deliver19-21

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This amendment to the mortgage interest tax relief amendment would modify or soften the reinstatement; supporting it over the main amendment aligns with protecting first-time buyer interests.

    • 12 Mar 2026✓P.50/2026 — Rent Tribunal - appointment of Chair, Deputy Chair and Member positions P.50-2026 — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Appointment of Rent Tribunal Chair, Deputy Chair and Members is essential to making the rent regulation machinery promised actually function.

    • 27 Mar 2026✓P.51/2026 — Removal of Interest Tax Relief for Buy-to-Let Mortgages (P.51-2026) — Pour, voted to deliver18-21

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Removal of interest tax relief for buy-to-let mortgages supports first-time buyers over landlord investors, bearing directly on the housing action plan promise.

    • 26 Jun 2024✓P.37/2024 — Affordable Housing Provision at the Waterfront [P.37-2024] as amended — Pour, voted to deliver44-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Affordable housing provision at the Waterfront directly advances first-time buyer support and affordable housing supply promised in the action plan.

    • 26 Nov 2024·P.51/2024 Amd.(28).Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): twenty-eighth amendment (P.51/2024 Amd.(28)), amendment. Removal of stamp duty surcharge on second homes — Pour, voted against, not counted as a breach30-14

      Voting Contre delivers this

      This amendment sought to remove the stamp duty surcharge on second homes; voting against it preserves a measure that makes the housing market less competitive against first-time buyers, aligning with the promise's housing action goals.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerns rent regulation and first-time buyer support, while this motion is specifically about removing a stamp duty surcharge on second homes—a distinct mechanism not named in the promise, and opposing it is only one possible route toward the general goal of housing affordability.

    • 13 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(2) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): second amendment Stamp Duty of buy to let investments second homes and holiday homes (P.97/2022 Amd.(2)) Part 3 — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach2-42

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Part 3 of stamp duty increase on buy-to-let and second homes directly supports first-time buyers as part of the promised housing action plan.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerned rent regulation and first-time buyer support as part of a broader Housing Crisis Action Plan, while this motion specifically concerned stamp duty on buy-to-let investments, second homes, and holiday homes — a related but distinct mechanism that a member could reasonably reject while still pursuing the promised housing reforms through other means.

    • 08 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(15). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fifteenth amendment. Removal of 3% Stamp Surcharge — Contre, voted to deliver2-42

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Removing the 3% stamp duty surcharge on buy-to-let and second homes would reduce the competitive disadvantage faced by first-time buyers, so voting against this removal supports the housing regulation promise.

    • 21 Sept 2022✓P.80/2022(Amd)(2) — Mini-Budget 2022 (P.80/2022): second amendment. Residential rent controls — Pour, voted to deliver9-35

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This amendment to introduce residential rent controls for two years directly advances the promise's commitment to pursuing proper rent regulation.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 13 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(26) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): twenty-sixth amendment Rent-a-room tax relief — Contre32-15

      Rent-a-room tax relief is a housing market measure that tangentially relates to housing affordability within the broader housing crisis action plan.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise concerns rent regulation and first-time buyer support, while this motion is specifically about rent-a-room tax relief — a distinct mechanism in a different area of housing policy — so voting against it does not straightforwardly contradict the manifesto commitment.

    • 29 Nov 2023·P.87/2023 — Minimum Residential Space Standards (P.87/2023) - Paragraph (c) — Pour13-27

      Minimum residential space standards (paragraph c) touch on tenant protection quality measures within the broader housing promise.

    • 11 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(17) — Government Plan P72-2023 Amendment 17 - rent a room — Pour10-36

      Rent-a-room tax relief amendment in the Government Plan is a housing market detail tangentially connected to housing affordability.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise supports rent regulation generally, but whether voting against a specific "rent a room" amendment to the Government Plan was the correct mechanism to deliver that promise requires inference about how this particular provision relates to broader rent regulation policy.

    • 29 Nov 2023·P.87/2023 — Minimum Residential Space Standards (P.87/2023) - Paragraph (b) — Pour16-22

      Minimum residential space standards (paragraph b) relate to housing quality aspects that touch the housing crisis action plan's tenant protection aims.

    • 29 Nov 2023·P.87/2023 — Minimum Residential Space Standards (P.87/2023) - Paragraph (a) — Pour22-20

      Minimum residential space standards (paragraph a) relate to housing quality within the broader housing crisis action plan.

    • 12 Nov 2024·P.70/2024 — Pets in rental properties (P.70-2024) as amended — Excused29-10

      Pets in rental properties (as amended) is a tenant protection measure that partially relates to the broader tenant protection promised in the housing action plan.

    • 01 Oct 2025·P.61/2025 Amd. — Statutory Pre-Sale Agreements for Standard Residential Property Transactions (P.61-2035) - Amendment — Pour39-4

      Statutory pre-sale agreements for residential property transactions improve market transparency for first-time buyers, tangentially related to the housing action plan.

    • 01 Oct 2025·P.61/2025 — Statutory Pre-Sale Agreements for Standard Residential Property Transactions (P.61-2035) - as amended — Pour44-2

      Pre-sale agreements for standard residential property transactions as amended touch housing market fairness relevant to first-time buyer support.

    • 10 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd. — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): amendment. Development Levies — Pour15-27

      Development levies can be a tool to fund affordable housing and first-time buyer support, touching the promise's housing crisis action plan.

Health & Social Care

1 promise · 1 kept

5recorded votes

4 Pour · 1 Contre

  • Keptdirectional

    Will introduce measures to make GP visits free at the point of need.

    “Healthcare should be free at the point of need, and a Reform Jersey led government would bring in measures to make it free for you to see your doctor.”

    Health And Care

    5 recorded votes test this promise

    4 Pour · 1 Contre
    • 14 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(16) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): sixteenth amendment Multi-morbidity GP consultations — Pour, voted to deliver14-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This Government Plan amendment specifically concerns free GP consultations for multi-morbidity patients, directly bearing on the promise of free GP visits at point of need.

    • 14 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(18) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): eighteenth amendment Free GP visits for children and young people — Pour, voted to deliver24-22

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This Government Plan amendment provides free GP visits for children and young people, directly advancing the promise of free GP visits at point of need.

    • 14 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(4) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): fourth amendment HIF Transfers (P.97/2022 Amd.(4)) — Pour, voted to deliver31-13

      Voting Pour delivers this

      HIF Transfers amendment bears on the funding available to support free GP visits as promised.

    • 14 Dec 2022·P.97/2022(Amd)(4)(Amd)(Re-issue) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): fourth amendment (P.97/2022. Amd.(4).) – amendment Health Insurance Fund Transfer (P.97/2022 Amd.(4)Amd.) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach16-29

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The Health Insurance Fund Transfer amendment relates to funding mechanisms that underpin free or subsidised GP access promised.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a general directional commitment to make GP visits free at the point of need, while this motion concerns a specific amendment about a Health Insurance Fund transfer within a Government Plan, and voting against one particular funding mechanism does not necessarily contradict the overall goal of free GP access.

    • 12 Dec 2023✓P.72/2023 Amd.(18) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): eighteenth amendment. Free GP visits for all full time students — Pour, voted to deliver24-20

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This amendment directly funds free GP visits for full-time students, a concrete step toward the promise of making GP visits free at the point of need.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 12 Dec 2023·P.72/2023 Amd.(6).Amd.Amd — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): sixth amendment (P.72/2023 Amd.(6)), amendment, amendment. Medical Hosiery and wound dressing funding — Pour49-0

      Funding for medical hosiery and wound dressings relates to reducing out-of-pocket healthcare costs, touching the broader promise of free healthcare at the point of need.

    • 11 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(2). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): second amendment. Health Insurance Fund Contributions — Contre14-28

      Increasing the share of Social Security contributions allocated to the Health Insurance Fund could support funding for free GP visits, bearing indirectly on the promise.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is to make GP visits free at the point of need, while the motion concerns a specific, incremental funding mechanism (raising the Health Insurance Fund allocation from 2% to 2.5%), and a member could reasonably oppose this particular fiscal measure while still pursuing the broader goal through alternative means.

Economy, Tax & Cost of Living

1 promise · 1 kept

13recorded votes

12 Pour · 1 Contre

  • Keptdirectional

    Will increase the minimum wage to a living wage and cut GST on essential items to reduce income inequality.

    “We would also reduce income inequality by increasing the Minimum Wage to a living wage and cutting GST on essential items.”

    Cost Of LivingTax And GstSocial Security And Benefits

    13 recorded votes test this promise

    12 Pour · 1 Contre
    • 20 Sept 2022✓P.80/2022(Amd)(3) — Mini-Budget 2022 (P.80/2022): third amendment. Community Costs Bonus threshold and deadline — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Widening the income threshold for the Community Costs Bonus and extending its deadline directly reduces cost burdens on lower-income residents, materially advancing the goal of cutting costs on essentials to reduce income inequality.

    • 23 Nov 2022✓P.99/2022 — Draft Employment (Minimum Wage) (Amendment No. 17) (Jersey) Regulations 202- Third Reading — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Third Reading of the Employment (Minimum Wage) Amendment Regulations directly delivers on the promise to raise the minimum wage toward a living wage.

    • 24 Nov 2022✓P.100/2022 — Cost of living crisis – Removal of 5% goods and services tax (GST) from food (excluding alcoholic drinks) — Pour, voted to deliver17-28

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This vote directly concerns removing GST from food, the core of the promise to cut GST on essential items to reduce income inequality.

    • 15 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(23) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): twenty-third amendment Removing the Upper Earnings caps — Pour, voted to deliver16-28

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Removing upper earnings caps on social security contributions relates to income inequality reduction promised alongside minimum wage and GST measures.

    • 01 Mar 2023✓P.5/2023 — Trainee Minimum Wage - as amended — Pour, voted to deliver41-7

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Trainee minimum wage (as amended) advances the broader minimum wage commitment promised.

    • 01 Mar 2023✓P202300005040000000000000000000000|P.5/2023(Amd) — Trainee Minimum Wage (P.5/2023): amendment. — Pour, voted to deliver49-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Amendment to trainee minimum wage directly advances the minimum wage to living wage promise.

    • 15 Dec 2022✓P.97/2022(Amd)(22) — Proposed Government Plan 2023-2026 (P.97/2022): twenty-second amendment GST on Sanitary Products — Pour, voted to deliver24-22

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Removing GST on sanitary products is a partial delivery on the promise to cut GST on essential items.

    • 12 Sept 2023✓P.58/2023 — GST on menstrual sanitary products (P.66/2022) - Rescindment. — Contre, voted to deliver25-21

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Rescinding the GST-on-menstrual-products decision would remove a GST cut on essential items, working against the promise to cut GST on essentials; voting contre preserves the cut.

    • 17 Jan 2024✓P.100/2023 — Draft Employment (Amendment No. 15) (Jersey) Law 202-- Third reading — Pour, voted to deliver41-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Third Reading of Employment Amendment No. 15 Law directly advances employment and minimum wage standards promised.

    • 16 Jul 2024✓P.36/2024 — Draft Employment (Minimum Wage and Benefits in Kind) (Jersey) Amendment Law 202- principles — Pour, voted to deliver32-8

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Principles of the Employment (Minimum Wage and Benefits in Kind) Amendment Law directly advances the minimum wage to living wage promise.

    • 16 Jul 2024✓P.36/2024 — Draft Employment (Minimum Wage and Benefits in Kind) (Jsy) Amd Law 202- Third Reading — Pour, voted to deliver34-7

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Third Reading of the Employment (Minimum Wage and Benefits in Kind) Amendment Law directly delivers on the minimum wage promise.

    • 20 Sept 2022✓P.78/2022 — Minimum Wage: Alignment with the Living Wage - as amended — Pour, voted to deliver43-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      This vote directly adopts aligning the minimum wage with the living wage, the central commitment of promise 2.

    • 16 Jul 2024✓P.36/2024 — Draft Employment (Minimum Wage and Benefits in Kind) (Jersey) Amendment Law 202- Articles — Pour, voted to deliver33-7

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Articles of the Employment (Minimum Wage and Benefits in Kind) Amendment Law advance the minimum wage to living wage promise.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 10 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(5). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fifth amendment. Upper Earnings Limit, Part 1 (Social Security contributions) — Pour13-30

      Removing the upper earnings limit on Social Security contributions would make the system more progressive, indirectly advancing the income-inequality reduction aspect of the promise.

    • 10 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(5). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): fifth amendment. Upper Earnings Limit, Part 2 (Long-Term Care contributions) — Pour16-28

      Removing the upper earnings limit on Long-Term Care contributions makes that levy more progressive, bearing on the promise's goal of reducing income inequality.

    • 20 Sept 2022·P.80/2022(Amd)(4) — Mini-Budget 2022 (P.80/2022): fourth amendment. Replace the 20% standard rate of personal income tax with 25% for all but High Value Residents — Pour11-34

      Replacing the flat 20% income tax rate with 25% plus marginal-rate reliefs would redistribute the tax burden and reduce income inequality, touching the promise's goal of reducing inequality.

    • 20 Sept 2022·P.80/2022(Amd)(6)(Re-issue) — Mini-Budget 2022 (P.80/2022): sixth amendment. New personal tax allowance — Pour9-33

      A new personal tax allowance would increase net income for lower earners, partially advancing the income-inequality reduction goal of the promise.

Governance & Public Services

1 promise · 1 kept

9recorded votes

3 Pour · 6 Contre

  • Keptdirectional

    Will work to reduce public sector waste and redirect funds to improve frontline services including mental health and education.

    “waste should be reduced in the public sector so that public money can be invested to improve frontline services such as mental health, education, family support, and care for the aged.”

    Public Sector ReformPublic Finances

    9 recorded votes test this promise

    3 Pour · 6 Contre
    • 17 Oct 2023✓P.69/2023 — Reporting of headcount and vacancies - Paragraph (a) as Amended — Pour, voted to deliver32-12

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Reporting on headcount and vacancies (paragraph a) advances transparency over public sector staffing, relevant to the promise to identify and reduce public sector waste.

    • 17 Oct 2023·P.73/2023 — Audit of Government Department Vacancies — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach1-44

      Voting Pour delivers this

      An audit of Government Department vacancies directly supports identifying public sector waste and inefficiency as promised.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. While an audit of government department vacancies could relate to identifying public sector waste, voting against this specific procedural mechanism does not plainly contradict a general promise to reduce waste, as the member could reasonably prefer different means of achieving that goal.

    • 14 Dec 2023✓P.72/2023 Amd.(30).Amd — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 P72 Amendment 30 as amended - Freeze on Public Health staff appointments — Contre, voted to deliver37-10

      Voting Contre delivers this

      A freeze on public health staff appointments would cut frontline health services rather than redirect waste savings to them, working against the promise; voting contre advances the promise.

    • 27 Feb 2024✓P.8/2024 (re-issue) — Cabinet Office Expenditure Savings [P.8-2024] — Pour, voted to deliver38-0

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Cabinet Office expenditure savings directly advances the promise to reduce public sector waste and redirect funds to frontline services.

    • 26 Jun 2024·P.35/2024 — Transfer of 2024 Departmental Underspend into the Stabilisation Fund [P.35-2024] — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach1-42

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Transferring 2024 departmental underspend to the Stabilisation Fund is a fiscal discipline measure related to the promise to reduce waste and manage public funds responsibly.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a general directional commitment to reduce waste and redirect funds to frontline services, while the motion concerned a specific procedural mechanism—transferring departmental underspends into the Stabilisation Fund rather than directly into frontline services—so voting against it does not plainly contradict the promise, as a member could reasonably prefer the funds be directed differently.

    • 12 Mar 2026·P.44/2026 — Curbing Growth of Public Sector - End-to-End Review of Government Procesess (P.44-2026) — Contre, voted against, not counted as a breach2-42

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Curbing growth of public sector through an end-to-end review of government processes directly advances the promise to reduce public sector waste.

      Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise is a general directional commitment to reduce public sector waste, while the motion proposed one specific mechanism (an end-to-end review of government processes); a member could vote against this particular review while still honestly pursuing waste reduction through different means or on the grounds that this specific mechanism was flawed or unnecessary.

    • 11 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(17). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): seventeenth amendment. Office of the Children's Commissioner for Jersey, 2026 Savings Allocation — Contre, voted to deliver14-26

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Opposing savings cuts applied to the Office of the Children's Commissioner protects a frontline children's service, consistent with the promise to redirect funds to frontline services.

    • 09 Dec 2025✓P.70/2025 Amd.(35) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): thirty-fifth amendment. Reduction in Public Expenditure — Contre, voted to deliver2-40

      Voting Contre delivers this

      Freezing government spending at 2025 levels would be a broad real-terms cut rather than targeted waste reduction, which could undermine frontline services the promise commits to improving.

    • 13 Dec 2023✓P.72/2023 Amd.(20) — Proposed Government Plan 2024-2027 (P.72/2023): twentieth amendment. Additional funding for education — Pour, voted to deliver13-32

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Additional funding for education directly advances the promise's commitment to redirecting funds to improve frontline services including education.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 28 Nov 2024·P.51/2024 Amd.(16) — Proposed Budget(Government Plan) 2025-2028: sixteenth amendment. New Office — Contre7-38

      A new office expenditure amendment bears on whether public funds are spent on infrastructure vs. redirected to frontline services as promised.

    • 28 Nov 2024·P.51/2024 Amd.(21) — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2025-2028 (P.51/2024): twenty-first amendment. Transform Project — Contre12-29

      The Transform Project amendment concerns a major government IT/transformation programme that could deliver public sector efficiency savings promised.

    • 09 Dec 2025·P.70/2025 Amd.(23). — Proposed Budget (Government Plan) 2026-2029 (P.70/2025): twenty-third amendment. Increased Police funding — Pour36-5

      Moving funds to increase police funding from within the health budget relates to redirecting public funds to frontline services, partially touching the promise's direction.

Lyndsay Victoria Feltham’s record changes with every States Assembly sitting. Follow us on LinkedIn and we will tell you when it does.

Follow on LinkedIn