Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2026 election manifesto
Rank 7 of 46

Alan Maclean

The manifesto identifies four priorities: affordability through an anti-inflation strategy, economic growth through a business-friendly regulatory environment and new sectors including AI, fintech and medical tourism, deregulation to support job creation, and control of government spending through service redesign and private-sector partnership. It also calls for planning services to be reformed to deliver faster, and for fiscal reserves to be rebuilt in line with Fiscal Policy Panel advice. Commitments are directional throughout, with no figures, dates or named mechanisms attached to any of the pledges.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“A respectable sketch”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
62
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“A credible stretch”

The manifesto sets out four named priorities spanning affordability, economic growth, deregulation and fiscal discipline, and adds a specific call to rebuild reserves and reform planning services. The scope extends across several policy areas, including new growth sectors such as AI, fintech and medical tourism. The vision is coherent, though it is largely oriented towards restoring conditions rather than introducing structural departures from existing policy.

38
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Broad commitments”

The four priorities are named and briefly described, and the planning and reserves pledges carry a degree of directional precision. However, no commitment is accompanied by a figure, a date or a named legislative mechanism. The anti-inflation strategy is described as something to be updated and implemented, and the economic growth and deregulation pledges name sectors without specifying how barriers would be removed or what regulatory changes would follow.

58
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The pledge to rebuild reserves cites the Fiscal Policy Panel's own advice as the basis for the commitment, which grounds it in an established independent process. The spending control measures, service redesign and private-sector partnership approach are consistent with approaches that have been applied in Jersey before. The anti-inflation and growth pledges are directional and depend on a range of conditions, including business and external economic behaviour, that are outside the Assembly's direct control.

55
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Needs an Assembly majority and a willing Council of Ministers”

The Scorecard records posts as Minister for Treasury and Resources (from 2026-06-30) and as Assistant Minister for Infrastructure (from 2026-07-29). The pledges on fiscal reserves, government spending control and the anti-inflation strategy fall within the same subject area as the Treasury post. The pledges on planning, deregulation, economic growth and new sectors require Assembly support, representing a majority of 25 of 49 members, as well as agreement across the relevant policy areas.

62
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“Reasonably specific”

A substantial portion of the text is composed of general statements of values and intent, including references to sound judgement, the importance of follow-through, and Jersey being a wonderful place to live and work. The four priorities are named, but each is described in a single sentence without elaboration. The closing section, drawing on previous roles to frame the candidate's suitability, does not add further policy commitments.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 7 of 46 · Scored by the Jersey States Member Scorecard team