Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2026 election manifesto
Rank 34 of 46

Alex Frederick Curtis

The manifesto sets out a platform of fiscal restraint, evidence-based governance, planning reform through the Island Plan, and population management within the island's capacity. The planning section names specific protections sought for family homes, employment land including hotels, and green space in St Clement. The remaining commitments, covering education and health spending, personal freedoms and economic policy, are expressed in directional terms without figures, dates or named mechanisms. The manifesto describes the candidate's professional background in data and decision-making and references a voting record available externally.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
38
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“The art of the possible”

The manifesto sets out a broadly conservative platform: fiscal discipline, evidence-based decision-making, planning reform through the Island Plan, and population control. These are real policy positions, but the connecting vision is largely one of consolidation and restraint rather than a reform programme. The widest reach is in planning, where the manifesto calls for sustainable development, protection of family homes, employment land and green space in St Clement, but even here the scope is bounded by existing processes.

28
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Mostly directional”

Almost every commitment is directional: 'we must deliver', 'we should ensure', 'we must better protect'. The planning section names specific categories (family houses, employment land, hotels, green space in St Clement) and the Island Plan as a named mechanism, which gives it more grip than the rest of the manifesto. No pledge carries a figure, a date or a named legislative mechanism beyond that single reference to the Island Plan.

55
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The call for fiscal discipline and evidence-based policy is consistent with what the Assembly can do in practice, and the Island Plan is a genuine, existing vehicle for the planning commitments described. The manifesto does not promise new spending or tax cuts, which avoids the common problem of unfunded commitments. However, no revenue source or saving is named for any proposal, and the commitment to review education and health spending does not identify what 'wise' spending looks like in practice.

55
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Needs an Assembly majority and a willing Council of Ministers”

The Scorecard records Curtis as Chair of Planning Committee and as a Member of the Environment, Housing and Infrastructure Scrutiny Panel. The planning pledges, including those relating to the Island Plan, sustainable development, protection of family homes, employment land and green space, fall within the same subject area as those recorded posts. The remaining pledges, covering fiscal discipline, education and health spending, population policy, and opposition to overregulation, fall outside that subject area and depend on other decision-makers.

78
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“General in places”

A substantial portion of the text consists of general statements of values and intent: financial discipline, personal responsibility, simplicity, community. The closing passage about applying a people-first attitude and approaching decisions with honesty does not carry a commitment. The planning section is the exception, naming specific categories of land and development. The overall balance of the text is toward directional and aspirational language rather than specific commitments.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 34 of 46 · Scored by the Jersey States Member Scorecard team