Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2026 election manifesto
Rank 32 of 46

Arlene Maltman

The manifesto sets out priorities across housing, transport, planning, education, healthcare, gender equality, the rural economy, and financial services. The most specific commitment is a campaign for a hopper bus connecting the three parishes with the Enid Quenault Centre and expanded cycle paths. Other pledges include support for affordable homes sensitive to the rural landscape, faster planning for small businesses, digital and financial skills teaching in schools, and reduced gender pay gap. The manifesto endorses the Rural Economic Framework, the Visitor Economy Strategy, and the Jersey Finance competitiveness review, and expresses support for the honorary system and parish life.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
52
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“A credible stretch”

The manifesto spans a wide range of policy areas, including housing, transport, planning, education, healthcare, the rural economy, gender equality, financial services, and the environment. The scope is genuine, but each area receives only brief treatment, and there is no overarching reform programme or named investment envelope that ties the commitments together. The manifesto reads as a broad list of priorities rather than a coherent transformative vision.

32
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Broad commitments”

The most specific commitment in the manifesto is a campaign for a hopper bus linking the three parishes with the Enid Quenault Centre and expanded cycle paths, which names a route and a destination. The remaining pledges, including those on affordable housing, planning reform, digital skills in schools, and gender pay gap reduction, are directional statements with no figures, timeframes or named mechanisms. The endorsement of named frameworks, such as the Rural Economic Framework and the Visitor Economy Strategy, adds some definition but these are existing documents rather than new commitments.

53
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The manifesto does not identify revenue sources or savings to fund any of its commitments, including housing, transport and education pledges. The pledges themselves are, for the most part, appropriately modest in scope for a single Assembly member, and those that reference existing frameworks such as the Jersey Finance competitiveness review are grounded in existing policy processes. The absence of any discussion of cost or constraint limits the realism score, but the overall level of ambition is not so high as to create an obvious mismatch between promise and resource.

43
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Relies on other decision-makers”

The Scorecard records no post for this member; that does not establish that none exists. The transport commitment, campaigning for a hopper bus and cycle paths, and the education commitment regarding digital and financial skills in schools would each require Assembly support and cooperation from other decision-makers. The housing, planning, and rural economy pledges similarly depend on broader Assembly majorities and policy processes beyond the control of a single member. The commitment to work with the Connétables is deliverable through engagement and advocacy, but does not by itself secure any specific outcome. In all cases, meaningful delivery would require a majority of 25 of 49 members and alignment with other decision-makers.

68
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“General in places”

A substantial portion of the text consists of general statements of values and intent, including expressions of passion for the Island, commitment to common sense, support for active ageing, and endorsement of arts and culture, without attached mechanisms or timelines. Biographical content about background and career occupies a material share of the statement. The closing section, covering the circular economy, talent retention and spending on Island, is aspirational in character rather than specific. The hopper bus commitment and the named frameworks provide some concrete content, but much of the manifesto does not move beyond directional language.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 32 of 46 · Scored by the Jersey States Member Scorecard team