Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2026 election manifesto
Rank 40 of 46

Barbara Ward

The manifesto sets out a continuity-and-improvement platform centred on health policy, particularly hospital delivery and the Health Partnership Board, alongside a group of Social Security and older-persons concerns: opposing the diversion of States Grant funds, addressing double taxation on Social Security payments, introducing tax incentives for older workers returning to employment, and establishing a Carers Allowance. Each commitment is stated as a direction or a need; none carries a figure, a date or a named legislative or funding mechanism. The majority of the text describes past service and parish involvement.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
48
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“The art of the possible”

The manifesto addresses a recognisable cluster of reform areas: hospital delivery, a Carers Allowance, tax incentives for older workers, the double-taxation of Social Security payments, and the protection of the States Grant to the Social Security Scheme. These are coherent concerns, but each is stated as a direction of travel rather than as a reform programme. The connecting vision is continuity in health and a protective stance toward Social Security, which is a modest rather than transformative scope.

28
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Mostly directional”

None of the pledges carries a figure, a date, a named legislative mechanism or a costed proposal. The hospital pledge is entirely directional ('ensuring our new hospital is built; staffed well; up and running'). The Carers Allowance, the tax incentives for older workers, and the Social Security Grant pledge are each stated as a need or intention without any specification of rate, eligibility, timeline or mechanism. The double-taxation pledge names the problem but offers no proposed remedy.

52
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The hospital and health continuity pledges reflect work already under way and are consistent with the direction of existing policy, which gives them some grounding. The Social Security and Carers Allowance pledges address real gaps but carry no revenue source or legislative pathway, which introduces uncertainty. The tax-incentive pledge for older workers similarly names no funding offset. None of the pledges assumes resources or powers that are unavailable, but none demonstrates how the fiscal or legislative pieces would fit together.

42
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Relies on other decision-makers”

The Scorecard records Ward as a Member of the Legislation Advisory Board. The manifesto's health and hospital continuity pledges are in a related subject area. The Social Security, Carers Allowance, tax-incentive and States Grant pledges are distinct policy areas and would require Assembly support (a majority of 25 of 49) as well as agreement across the relevant parts of government. The pledge to 'remain part of the Health team' depends on appointment decisions that are outside the candidate's sole control.

72
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“General in places”

A substantial portion of the text is biographical narrative and statements of personal quality ('ability and the energy', 'passionate in improving provisions') rather than commitments. The opening paragraphs detail past roles and parish involvement without attaching specific pledges. The closing lines appeal to voter support in general terms. The policy commitments, when they appear, are compressed into the final third of the statement and are each a single directional sentence.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 40 of 46 · Scored by the Jersey States Member Scorecard team