Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2026 election manifesto
Reform JerseyRank 24 of 46

Carina Soares Alves

The manifesto sets out five areas of focus, namely worker protections, local business support, health and wellbeing, responsible public spending, and transparency, framed largely as continuations of work carried out in the previous term. Past achievements are cited with some specificity, including free GP visits for under-18s and whistleblowing legislation. Forward-looking pledges are directional throughout, with no figures, dates or named mechanisms attached to any of them. Revenue-raising is described as progressive and sustainable but not elaborated, and digital integration is proposed as a route to efficiency without further detail.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
48
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“The art of the possible”

The manifesto covers five broad areas: worker protections, local business support, health and wellbeing, public spending, and transparency. Each is framed as a continuation of existing work rather than a departure from it, and the revenue-raising pledge is described as 'progressive and sustainable' but is not developed further. The overall vision is one of incremental improvement rather than structural reform.

32
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Broad commitments”

The manifesto lists past achievements with reasonable specificity, including free GP visits for under-18s and the extension of bus passes to apprentices, but the forward-looking pledges carry no figures, dates or named mechanisms. Each priority section states an intention, such as championing stronger workplace protections or integrating digital systems, without identifying a concrete action, a target or a timeframe.

58
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The manifesto acknowledges the need to match spending with progressive revenue-raising and identifies digital integration as a route to efficiency, which reflects a practical awareness of fiscal constraints. However, no revenue source is named, no saving is quantified, and the link between the stated aims and any specific mechanism is absent, which leaves the spending and efficiency pledges resting on general principle rather than a concrete plan.

52
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Needs an Assembly majority and a willing Council of Ministers”

The Scorecard records Soares Alves as Chair of the Privileges and Procedures Committee and a member of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association executive committee. The transparency and civic engagement pledges, which include accessible information and clear communication, sit closest to the subject area of that committee post. The worker protections, business reform, health, spending and digital systems pledges are outside that subject area and depend on the relevant Ministers and an Assembly majority of 25 of 49 members.

72
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“General in places”

A notable proportion of the text consists of general statements of intent and values, for example 'building a community that doesn't just get by, but truly thrives' and 'every islander feels seen, heard, and empowered'. The five priority sections each open with a broad framing sentence and close with a directional commitment, leaving little space for specific content. The achievements section is more concrete, but it accounts for a smaller share of the overall text.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 24 of 46 · Scored by the Jersey States Member Scorecard team