Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2026 election manifesto
Reform JerseyRank 2 of 46

Catherine Dolores Curtis

The manifesto sets out a cross-portfolio programme centred on cost of living measures, child poverty, education, online harms, and a proposed Bank of Jersey modelled on the Bank of Gibraltar. It draws heavily on the candidate's record of past amendments and panel work, and the main forward commitments are to follow through on three named reviews and to launch a parish-agreed child poverty group after the election. The Bank of Jersey proposal is the most expansive pledge but is presented without a delivery mechanism or timeline.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“A respectable sketch”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
62
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“A credible stretch”

The manifesto covers a broad range of areas including cost of living, child poverty, education reform, online harms, road safety, and a proposed Bank of Jersey, which together constitute a cross-portfolio programme rather than a narrow platform. The Bank of Jersey proposal is the most expansive single commitment, framed as a revenue-generating institution on the model of the Bank of Gibraltar. The remaining pledges are oriented toward following through on existing review recommendations rather than opening new policy territory.

45
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Broad commitments”

The Bank of Jersey pledge references a comparable institution and describes a potential revenue outcome, but carries no timeline, governance mechanism, or capitalisation detail. The child poverty group pledge is the most grounded, naming parish agreement and a post-election launch point. The commitment to follow through on three named reviews provides specific subject matter but no dates, mechanisms, or targets for implementation.

52
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The child poverty group and review follow-through pledges are consistent with what a Deputy can pursue, and the past amendments cited in the manifesto illustrate familiarity with Assembly processes. The Bank of Jersey proposal rests on an analogy with an institution in a different jurisdiction and acknowledges uncertainty with the phrase could bring in, but the manifesto does not address the legislative, regulatory, or capitalisation steps that would be required, leaving this pledge dependent on conditions not yet established.

63
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Needs an Assembly majority and a willing Council of Ministers”

The Scorecard records Curtis as Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning and as Assistant Minister for Children and Families. The pledges to follow through on the Apprenticeships and Lifelong Learning review and the Secondary Education Funding review, and to address child poverty among St Helier children, fall within the same subject areas as those posts. The Bank of Jersey proposal and the Online Harms implementation are not confined to those subject areas and would depend on other Ministers and an Assembly majority.

52
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“Reasonably specific”

A substantial portion of the manifesto is a record of past activities rather than forward-facing commitments, which limits the density of specific pledges for the coming term. The closing lines appeal to working collaboratively and to Jersey as a beautiful island without adding policy content. Where the manifesto does make forward commitments, most sentences carry a named area or reference point, keeping the text reasonably direct.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 2 of 46 · Scored by the Jersey States Member Scorecard team