Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2026 election manifesto
Rank 27 of 46

Chris Rebindaine

The manifesto organises its commitments under four named pillars: Healthy Finances, Healthy Economy, Healthy Land and Water, and Healthy Population. It sets two quantified targets, a four-year reduction in government scope and spending and a reduction of the tax burden for most islanders to below 20%, alongside directional pledges covering regulation, tourism, agriculture, freight links, PFAS, hospital construction, school physical activity and sports governance. The hospital commitment is made conditional on prior financial stabilisation. No revenue sources or named savings are identified to support the tax and spending pledges.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
58
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“A credible stretch”

The manifesto sets out a four-pillar framework spanning public finances, economic regulation, land and water, and population health, which constitutes a cross-portfolio programme rather than a single-issue platform. It includes a named goal of reducing the tax burden for most islanders to below 20% and a commitment to a 'four year slimming course of both scope and spending'. The closing phrase 'vibrant, confident and fit for the 2030s' appears as a general aspiration at the end of the text rather than as a thread connecting each pillar.

38
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Broad commitments”

The manifesto includes quantified commitments: a four-year timeframe for reducing government scope and spending, and a target of reducing the tax burden for most islanders to below 20%. The remaining pledges, covering tourism strategy, agriculture, DFDS, PFAS, hospital construction, schools physical activity and sports governance, are directional without figures, dates or named mechanisms. The hospital pledge is conditional on financial stabilisation, but that condition is not given a measurable trigger.

45
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs significant legislative change”

The manifesto's central proposition, reducing the tax burden to below 20% alongside a four-year reduction in government spending, is internally consistent in direction but does not name a revenue source, a saving, or a spending line to be reduced. The hospital pledge is explicitly conditional on financial stabilisation, which acknowledges a real constraint, but the condition is not defined. Regulatory and tourism pledges are framed as directional positions without identifying the legislative steps or resourcing required.

42
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Relies on other decision-makers”

The Scorecard records Rebindaine as a member of the Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel, the Economic and International Affairs Scrutiny Panel, and the Children, Education and Home Affairs Scrutiny Panel. The economic regulation and public finance pledges sit within subject areas covered by the Economic and International Affairs and Corporate Services panels. The remaining pledges, covering tax reduction, hospital construction, agriculture, DFDS, PFAS, school physical activity and sports governance, would require Assembly support, meaning a majority of 25 of 49 members, and in several cases executive decisions beyond the Assembly alone.

62
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“General in places”

A portion of the text carries specific commitments or named positions, but a considerable share consists of general statements of intent, value assertions and framing language, such as 'a cultural shift is essential', 'common sense, fiscal discipline', and 'Jersey can once again be vibrant, confident and fit for the 2030s'. Several of the four pillars contain more than one sentence of directional framing before arriving at a commitment. The closing paragraph restates values rather than adding further specifics.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 27 of 46 · Scored by the Jersey States Member Scorecard team