Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2026 election manifesto
Rank 17 of 46

Inna Gardiner

The manifesto centres on St Helier parish management, with a named proposal to establish a Town Council and hold regular drop-in sessions as the primary structural commitment. It references a past record of street improvements, green space projects and school-related changes, including a cited figure of £500,000 for neighbourhood improvements. Forward pledges cover green spaces, parking, business support, town centre and Waterfront connectivity, and cost-of-living assistance through community partnerships. Broader advocacy on housing, health and education is stated in directional terms without named mechanisms or funding sources.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
55
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“A credible stretch”

The manifesto sets out a parish-focused vision centred on community participation, green spaces, town centre renewal and cost-of-living support, extending into broader Assembly advocacy on housing, health and education. The proposal to establish a Town Council represents a structural change of some reach. The overall scope is focused on St Helier's management and liveability rather than a cross-portfolio reform programme, which places ambition at a credible but bounded level.

38
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Broad commitments”

The manifesto's strongest specific element is the Town Council and regular drop-in sessions, which names a mechanism. The past record section cites a figure of £500,000 secured for neighbourhood improvements and names specific streets and projects. Forward pledges on green spaces, parking, business support and cost-of-living support are directional, carrying no figures, dates or named delivery mechanisms. The majority of forward commitments describe intent rather than defined action.

58
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

Past delivery claims, including named street improvements, the GROW Project and school-related changes, are presented as a track record that grounds the forward pledges. The cost-of-living commitment is framed as working with charities and community partners, which acknowledges the limits of the role rather than claiming direct spending power. The Town Council proposal names no funding source or legislative basis, and the advocacy pledges on housing and health are aspirational without a named mechanism for delivery.

52
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Needs an Assembly majority and a willing Council of Ministers”

The Scorecard records Gardiner as a Member of the Comité des Connétables and a Member of the Bailiff's Consultative Panel. The parish-focused pledges, including drop-in sessions, green space improvements and community partnerships, align with the parish dimension of the Connétable role. The Town Council proposal and the advocacy pledges on housing, cost of living, health and education would need Assembly support, requiring a majority of 25 of 49 members.

65
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“General in places”

A portion of the text consists of general statements of intent and values, including repeated formulations such as 'I will listen, I will deliver, I will be accountable' and 'St Helier's future belongs to all of us.' Several forward pledges are stated in directional terms without supporting detail. The past record section is more concrete and reduces the overall proportion of general language, preventing a higher waffle score.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 17 of 46 · Scored by the Jersey States Member Scorecard team