Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2026 election manifesto
Rank 45 of 46

Karen Margaret Wilson

The manifesto sets out a case for continued representation of St Clement, identifying six broad areas of local concern: youth facilities, housing conditions, planning, infrastructure, healthcare access and public expenditure. Each area is named as a priority but none is accompanied by a figure, a date or a named mechanism. The manifesto appeals to the candidate's background in nursing and previous experience of ministerial office and scrutiny as reasons for re-election, and the overarching argument is that St Clement should receive a fairer allocation of public resources.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
38
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“The art of the possible”

The manifesto is focused on the parish of St Clement and frames its central purpose as securing a fairer share of public resources for local residents. The areas named, including youth facilities, housing conditions, roads, drainage, healthcare access and community safety, are genuine concerns, but the manifesto does not advance a cross-portfolio programme or a reform package with a named investment envelope. The vision is one of advocacy and continuation rather than a new direction.

22
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Mostly directional”

Every commitment in the manifesto is directional or aspirational: better facilities, improved housing conditions, smarter planning, and challenging waste and inefficiency in public services are all stated without figures, timeframes or named mechanisms. No specific policy instrument, funding line or legislative measure is identified for any of the areas named. The commitment to control public expenditure, for example, carries no named saving, target or process.

52
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The manifesto is grounded in recognisable local concerns and does not make spending or tax promises that exceed what a single member could credibly advocate for. It acknowledges that resources should not simply be absorbed elsewhere and that new development must not worsen existing problems, which reflects an awareness of practical constraints. However, because no commitment is attached to a named funding source, mechanism or timeline, the realistic path from advocacy to outcome is not set out.

42
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Relies on other decision-makers”

The Scorecard records posts as Chair of the Public Accounts Committee, President of the Scrutiny Liaison Committee and Member of the Privileges and Procedures Committee. The commitment to challenge waste and inefficiency in public services sits in the same subject area as the scrutiny and public accounts roles recorded. The remaining pledges, covering planning, housing, youth facilities, roads and drainage, and healthcare access, depend on wider Assembly decisions and do not fall within the subject area of the recorded posts.

78
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“General in places”

A substantial portion of the manifesto text consists of general statements of intent and values: references to integrity, grit and compassion, to listening to residents, to fighting for the parish and to delivering practical solutions. Several sentences describe a problem without attaching a specific action to it. The closing commitment to focus on the everyday experience of living in St Clement is a statement of approach rather than a commitment with a measurable outcome.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 45 of 46 · Scored by the Jersey States Member Scorecard team