Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2026 election manifesto
Reform JerseyRank 38 of 46

Lyndsay Victoria Feltham

The manifesto sets out a record of past work and names a set of priority themes for the coming term, including cost of living, housing, family support, pensioners, disability and workers' rights. The forward-looking section does not specify mechanisms, figures or timeframes for any of these areas; the commitments are to continue working in these directions and to remain accessible to constituents. The manifesto also references the candidate's family connection to the district and situates the re-election bid within the Reform Jersey team.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
38
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“The art of the possible”

The manifesto sets out a broad set of priority areas, including cost of living, housing, family support, pensioners and workers' rights, but does not commit to specific reforms within any of them. The forward-looking section is confined to continuing existing directions of travel rather than proposing new or expanded programmes. The retrospective account of past work is detailed, but ambition for the coming term is expressed at the level of themes rather than goals.

22
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Mostly directional”

The forward commitments carry no figures, dates or named mechanisms. The manifesto's three future-facing pledges are directional or aspirational: to continue working for fairness, to prioritise a list of areas, and to remain accessible to constituents. The specificity in the text belongs entirely to the record of past achievements, not to the programme offered for the next term.

62
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The priority areas identified, cost of living, housing, family support and workers' rights, are consistent with Jersey's existing policy landscape and do not propose measures that would require untested revenue sources or significant constitutional change. Because the commitments are directional rather than specific, there is little in the manifesto that raises realism concerns, though equally there is little that can be assessed against practical constraints.

52
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Needs an Assembly majority and a willing Council of Ministers”

The Scorecard records Feltham as Chair of the Corporate Services Scrutiny Panel from June 2026. The priority areas named in the manifesto, cost of living, housing, family support, pensioners and workers' rights, are not directly within the subject area of that post and would depend on the actions of other Ministers and on securing an Assembly majority. Constituency engagement and accessibility commitments are within the candidate's own control regardless of post.

78
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“General in places”

A substantial portion of the text is made up of general statements of values and intent: commitments to listening, to speaking up, to working hard, and to earning trust. The closing paragraph in particular consists largely of restatements of those values. The forward-looking pledges do not advance beyond naming broad priority areas. The most concrete content in the manifesto describes past achievements rather than future commitments.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 38 of 46 · Scored by the Jersey States Member Scorecard team