Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2026 election manifesto
Rank 41 of 46

Elaine Millar

The manifesto describes a set of thematic priorities, including cost of living, childcare, housing, financial services, public spending and climate change, and references three past achievements as evidence of delivery. Its forward commitments are confined to managing cost of living, supporting businesses and spending wisely, with no figures, dates or named mechanisms attached to any of them. The text gives more space to statements of personal qualities and values than to specific policy positions.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
38
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“The art of the possible”

The manifesto identifies several interconnected challenges, including cost of living, childcare, housing, financial services, the wider economy, public spending and climate change, and frames them as priorities. However, the treatment of each is directional rather than programmatic: no reform package is named, no investment envelope is described and no cross-portfolio commitment is made. The statement amounts to a set of broad thematic intentions rather than a coherent reform programme.

22
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Mostly directional”

The manifesto cites three past achievements with some specificity, including a reduction of GP visit costs by a stated amount in 2023 and an increase in the asset limit and value of Pension Plus, but these are retrospective. The forward-looking pledges, which centre on managing cost of living, supporting businesses and spending wisely, carry no figures, no dates and no named mechanisms. There is nothing in the forward section that a reader could test against an outcome.

52
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The manifesto does not promise spending increases or tax cuts without a revenue source, and its acknowledgement of the need to 'control public spending' is consistent with fiscal constraint. Because the pledges are directional, they do not make claims that could conflict with Jersey's fiscal position. The absence of specific commitments, however, also means there is little to assess for realism: the pledges are broad enough to be consistent with almost any outcome.

48
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Relies on other decision-makers”

The Scorecard records Millar as holding posts of Minister for Social Security, Assistant Minister for Housing and Assistant Minister for External Relations. The forward pledges on cost of living and wise spending overlap thematically with the Social Security and Housing posts. The remaining pledge areas, including business support and climate resilience, do not correspond to the recorded posts and would depend on other decision-makers and Assembly votes to progress.

82
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“General in places”

A substantial portion of the text consists of statements of general intent and personal qualities, including references to thinking 'analytically and clearly', making 'sound, forward-looking decisions' and always putting 'the interests of Jersey first and foremost'. The section headed 'Why vote for me?' contains no specific commitments. The two forward-looking pledges are each a single sentence without elaboration, leaving most of the text occupied by values statements and appeals to experience.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 41 of 46 · Scored by the Jersey States Member Scorecard team