Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2026 election manifesto
Rank 35 of 46

Sir Mark Boleat

The manifesto identifies cost of living as its central concern and groups its priorities under eight broad headings covering economic competitiveness, public finances, housing, healthcare, education, the environment, development and the parish system. Every commitment is stated in directional or aspirational terms, without a figure, date or named mechanism. The candidate acknowledges fiscal pressure and frames commitments cautiously, avoiding promises of new spending. The text devotes considerable space to statements of values, collaborative intent and biography as described in the manifesto itself.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
38
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“The art of the possible”

The manifesto addresses a wide range of policy areas, including cost of living, housing, healthcare, education, the economy and the environment, but the treatment of each is brief and directional rather than reformist. The candidate describes a desire to 'contribute constructively' and to 'help deliver practical solutions', which sets a supportive rather than transformative tone. There is no named reform package, no investment commitment and no cross-portfolio programme; the vision is one of competent stewardship rather than structural change.

18
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Mostly directional”

Across every policy area, the manifesto offers direction without detail: no figure, date, named mechanism or named line item accompanies any commitment. The housing section, for example, commits to 'increasing the availability of affordable housing, particularly for younger Islanders' without naming a target, a tenure type or a delivery body. The same pattern applies to healthcare, education, the economy and public finances. Every pledge is either directional or aspirational in its current form.

55
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The manifesto acknowledges that 'public finances are under increasing pressure' and calls for expenditure to be 'carefully managed', which reflects awareness of fiscal constraints. The candidate does not promise new spending without identifying a source, and the commitments are framed cautiously enough to avoid obvious contradictions. However, because no commitment carries a cost estimate or revenue source, it is not possible to assess whether the implied policy directions are affordable; the realism rests on the absence of overreach rather than the presence of a credible plan.

62
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Needs an Assembly majority and a willing Council of Ministers”

The Scorecard records posts as Minister for Planning and Regulation, Assistant Minister for Education and Lifelong Learning, and Assistant Minister for the Environment from 2026. The manifesto's commitments on appropriate development, environmental protection and education sit in the same subject areas as those posts. The remaining commitments, covering cost of living, affordable housing, the new hospital, preventative healthcare, economic competitiveness and public finances, depend on other Ministers and an Assembly majority of 25 of 49.

82
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“General in places”

A substantial portion of the text consists of statements of intent and values rather than specific commitments: phrases such as 'I believe Jersey benefits most from politicians who are willing to listen', 'Jersey is a special place, with a strong sense of community and identity', and 'I would see it as a privilege to serve' carry no policy content. The priority list in the lower half of the manifesto is structured as a set of headings, each of which restates a general goal without adding a mechanism, figure or timeframe.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 35 of 46 · Scored by the Jersey States Member Scorecard team