Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2026 election manifesto
Rank 18 of 46

Max Brennan Andrews

The manifesto sets out a record of delivery, citing the Skills Development Fund, a Cabinet Office budget reduction, and estate agent redress, then lists forward commitments across economy, government finances, housing, education, and population. Forward pledges include continuing work on estate agent legislation with mandatory exams, proposing a long-term Strategic Reserve funding plan, supporting abolition of the Social Security upper earnings cap, advocating mortgage relief reintroduction, supporting a new Highlands College campus, and pursuing a net-zero migration rate with a named exception for frontline services.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
62
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“A credible stretch”

The manifesto addresses six policy areas: economy and tax, government finances, estate agent regulation, housing, education, and population. It includes a named position on the zero-ten regime, abolition of the Social Security upper earnings cap, net-zero migration, and a new Highlands College campus. The commitments are incremental and issue-specific rather than constituting a cross-portfolio reform programme with a unifying structural vision.

45
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Broad commitments”

A small number of pledges carry named mechanisms: the estate agent regulation law with mandatory exams, a proposal for a long-term Strategic Reserve funding plan, and a long-term homeownership plan. The majority of the remaining commitments are directional, including reducing red tape, streamlining the civil service, supporting mortgage relief, and advocating net-zero migration, without figures, dates or named delivery mechanisms attached.

52
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The manifesto references a concrete past saving from the Cabinet Office budget and the Skills Development Fund, which grounds some claims in existing mechanisms. However, several commitments, notably abolishing the Social Security upper earnings cap and reintroducing mortgage relief, carry fiscal implications that the manifesto does not address in terms of revenue sources or offsetting savings. The net-zero migration position is qualified by an exception for frontline services but no mechanism for managing that threshold is named.

42
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Relies on other decision-makers”

The Scorecard records no post for this member, though it notes that does not establish that none exists. The estate agent regulation law, the Strategic Reserve funding proposal, and the homeownership plan are framed as propositions the candidate would lodge, which falls within what any Assembly member may do. The civil service streamlining, zero-ten reforms, mortgage relief, Highlands College campus, and Social Security cap abolition all depend on other Ministers and an Assembly majority of 25 of 49 members to advance.

55
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“Reasonably specific”

The manifesto opens with a substantive record of delivery and closes with a brief vote appeal, both of which carry specific content. The forward-looking section mixes a few named mechanisms with a larger number of short declarative sentences that state a position without elaborating how it would be pursued, particularly in the economy, housing, and education sections. The overall proportion of directional over mechanistic language is moderate.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 18 of 46 · Scored by the Jersey States Member Scorecard team