Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2026 election manifesto
Rank 29 of 46

Phil Romeril

The manifesto sets out five policy directions: parish modernisation, entrepreneurship, preventive healthcare, pension reform, and innovation through a research campus and a sovereign data trust. It endorses the Value Jersey programme as a framework for more coherent collective government. The commitments are stated without figures, timelines or named mechanisms. A significant share of the text addresses values, biography and critiques of how politics currently operates rather than specifying how the candidate's priorities would be advanced within the Assembly.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
52
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“A credible stretch”

The manifesto sets out a cross-portfolio agenda covering parish modernisation, entrepreneurship, preventive healthcare, pension reform, and a research campus alongside a sovereign data trust. It is not confined to a single issue and includes structural proposals such as reforming how collective government works through the Value Jersey programme. However, the framing is primarily directional, and no named investment envelope or reform timetable gives the programme a sharper edge.

30
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Broad commitments”

The five policy commitments, covering parish services, entrepreneurship, healthcare prevention, pension reform, and innovation infrastructure, are stated without figures, dates or named mechanisms. The research campus and sovereign data trust are the most concrete items, naming two specific structures, but neither carries a delivery route or timeline. The remaining pledges are expressed in directional terms throughout.

48
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs significant legislative change”

The manifesto explicitly acknowledges that 'every election, hundreds of promises are made without a realistic plan to deliver them' and positions its own approach as different, yet the pledges themselves carry no named revenue sources, costings or savings to fund them. The Value Jersey programme is cited as a structuring framework, but how it connects to specific spending or legislative commitments is not stated. The agenda spans several complex policy areas, each of which would require Assembly agreement and ministerial co-operation.

55
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Needs an Assembly majority and a willing Council of Ministers”

The Scorecard records posts as Assistant Minister for Planning and Regulation, Assistant Minister for Social Security, and Assistant Minister for Sustainable Economic Development. The entrepreneurship and economic growth pledges fall within the same subject area as the Sustainable Economic Development post, and pension reform sits within the same subject area as the Social Security post. The remaining pledges, covering parish modernisation, preventive healthcare, the research campus, and the sovereign data trust, depend on other Ministers and an Assembly majority of 25.

72
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“General in places”

A substantial portion of the text is composed of statements of personal values, biographical context, and general commitments to listening, collaboration, and challenging poor decisions. Phrases such as 'I will listen, I will work with others, and I will challenge poor decisions' and the extended passage on how Jersey works best when people work together carry no specific commitment. The policy section is comparatively brief against this broader framing.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 29 of 46 · Scored by the Jersey States Member Scorecard team