Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2026 election manifesto
Rank 43 of 46

Robert David Johnson

The manifesto covers parish accessibility, public expenditure restraint, finance industry awareness, affordable housing and healthcare, with the new hospital and staff recruitment identified as a priority. Most commitments are continuations of current activity, and none carries a figure, date or named mechanism. The housing position is defined by a condition, opposition to large greenfield developments, rather than a positive delivery plan. Parishioners are invited to contact the candidate directly to discuss topics not covered in the statement.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
38
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“The art of the possible”

The manifesto covers parish accessibility, public expenditure, the finance industry, housing and healthcare, which is a reasonable breadth for a Connétable statement. However, most commitments are continuations of existing activity rather than new reform, and the connecting vision does not extend beyond a general preference for restraint and stability. The housing position is defined largely by what the candidate opposes rather than a positive programme.

22
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Mostly directional”

No commitment carries a figure, a date or a named mechanism. The healthcare section offers 'priority to be given to new hospital and recruitment of appropriate staff, with particular regard to accommodation' without specifying what priority means in practice. The expenditure section identifies employee costs and consultants as targets but names no saving, threshold or process. The parish attendance commitment is conditional rather than firm.

55
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The parish-level commitments, daily availability at the Parish Hall and cooperation with the Community Centre, are consistent with the role and are presented with appropriate conditionality. The States-level positions on expenditure and healthcare do not identify a revenue source or saving, and the finance industry section calls for awareness among Members rather than a specific policy change, which keeps those pledges within what the candidate can credibly advocate without requiring resources to be named.

42
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Relies on other decision-makers”

The Scorecard records the candidate as a member of the Comité des Connétables. The parish attendance and Community Centre cooperation pledges sit within the day-to-day work of that role. The pledges on public expenditure, the new hospital, healthcare recruitment and finance industry policy depend on other Ministers and an Assembly majority of 25 of 49 members. The commitment to raise parishioners' concerns with relevant Ministers is within the candidate's reach as a member but the outcome depends on those Ministers.

72
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“General in places”

A notable portion of the text is devoted to biographical context and general statements of values, including the endorsement of a review's opening words and a broad declaration that the finance industry must maintain its international position. Several sentences describe the candidate's disposition or experience rather than stating a commitment. The specific pledges, where present, are brief and are outnumbered by directional or aspirational statements.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 43 of 46 · Scored by the Jersey States Member Scorecard team