Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2026 election manifesto
Rank 33 of 46

Samantha Gleave

The manifesto sets out three cross-portfolio goals, reducing the cost of living through competition, cutting government costs through efficiency, and lowering the cost of business by removing barriers, alongside a constituency agenda for St Helier South covering transport, parking, cycling, green space and consultation on school relocations. It endorses the Value Jersey priorities and calls for better-navigable government services and planning for an ageing population including support for carers. No commitment carries a specific figure, date or named mechanism, and no funding source or saving is identified for any pledge.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
52
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“A credible stretch”

The manifesto sets out three headline goals, reducing the cost of living, cutting government costs, and lowering the cost of business, alongside a constituency agenda covering transport, parking, cycling, green space and consultation on school relocations. The framing is reform-oriented and cross-portfolio rather than narrowly local, which gives the platform breadth. However, the goals are stated at a high level of generality without a named investment envelope, a named reform programme or a cross-cutting vision that connects them into a coherent whole.

28
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Mostly directional”

None of the commitments in the manifesto carries a figure, a date or a named mechanism. The cost-of-living pledge is expressed as 'encouraging cheaper choices and real competition' without identifying which markets or what instrument would be used. The government efficiency pledge names no target, no service line and no saving. The constituency priorities, connecting Colomberie, the Waterfront and Havre des Pas, improving the bus service, increasing green spaces, are each stated in a single phrase with no detail of how or by when. The endorsement of Value Jersey priorities is noted without setting out what those priorities require.

48
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs significant legislative change”

The three headline goals are broadly consistent with actions available to an Assembly member, and the manifesto does not promise spending or tax cuts without acknowledging constraints; its language of 'encouraging' and 'supporting' is appropriately cautious. However, no commitment is matched to a revenue source, a saving or a legislative vehicle, and several pledges, particularly on competition, ageing population planning and parking, depend on actions by other parties whose cooperation is not addressed. The manifesto endorses the Value Jersey priorities without explaining how those priorities would be funded or progressed.

52
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Needs an Assembly majority and a willing Council of Ministers”

The Scorecard records Gleave as Chair of the Economic and International Affairs Scrutiny Panel and as a member of the Planning Committee. The pledges on reducing business costs, removing regulatory barriers and making government easier to navigate fall within the subject area of the Economic and International Affairs Scrutiny Panel. The pledge on major decisions such as school relocations being shaped by proper consultation connects to the Planning Committee post. The remaining pledges, on cost of living, transport, parking, cycling, green space, carers and ageing population, would each require Assembly support to progress.

72
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“General in places”

A substantial portion of the manifesto consists of framing statements and general intent rather than commitments: 'Jersey is not working', 'Jersey does not lack good people, it lacks teamwork', 'we need to move away from divisive them and us politics', and the closing appeal to 'vote differently this time'. The biographical section and the passage on community work occupy several sentences without adding a policy commitment. The constituency priorities section is more concrete in subject matter but each item remains a single general phrase.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 33 of 46 · Scored by the Jersey States Member Scorecard team