Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2026 election manifesto
Reform JerseyRank 21 of 46

Thomas Anthony Coles

The manifesto references four years serving St Helier South and sets out pledges across five areas: government accountability, local infrastructure, pensioner tax relief, economic diversification and shipping costs. The most specific commitment is the reintroduction of the pensioners' income tax threshold, named as funded through a fairer contribution system. Fort Regent and the Shoreline Management Plan are named projects supported without timelines or costings. The biopharmaceuticals and shipping competition pledges are directional, and the government accountability section identifies problems without naming a resolution mechanism.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
52
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“A credible stretch”

The manifesto addresses several distinct policy areas: government accountability, local infrastructure projects, pensioner tax relief, economic diversification into biopharmaceuticals, and shipping competition. The pensioner income tax threshold and the biopharmaceuticals sector represent forward-looking pledges rather than purely defensive ones. However, the pledges across each area are directional rather than constituting a fully developed programme, with government accountability addressed through general aims and no named structural mechanism.

42
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Broad commitments”

The pensioner income tax threshold pledge names a specific instrument and states it would be funded through 'a fairer contribution system', giving it a funding rationale absent from the other pledges. The biopharmaceuticals pledge names existing medicinal cannabis regulatory frameworks as a foundation. The Fort Regent and Shoreline Management Plan pledges name specific projects but carry no timelines, funding details or mechanisms. The shipping competition and government accountability pledges are directional statements without named mechanisms, figures or dates.

50
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The pensioner income tax threshold pledge names a funding rationale, which places it above a purely aspirational level, though the mechanism of a 'fairer contribution system' is not elaborated. The Fort Regent and Shoreline Management Plan pledges align with existing identified projects, which reduces delivery risk on those items. The biopharmaceuticals and shipping competition pledges require coordinated action across regulatory and commercial domains without specifying how that coordination would be achieved. No pledge is accompanied by a costing or a named revenue source beyond the pensioner pledge's broad description.

48
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Relies on other decision-makers”

The Scorecard records Coles as a member of the Environment, Housing and Infrastructure Scrutiny Panel and the Planning Committee from July 2026, as well as a member of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (Jersey Branch) Executive committee. The Fort Regent and Shoreline Management Plan pledges, and the housing-related work referenced in the manifesto, fall within the subject area covered by those recorded posts. The pensioner income tax threshold, the biopharmaceuticals sector pledge, the shipping competition pledge and the government accountability aims all depend on securing an Assembly majority of 25 of 49 members.

62
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“Reasonably specific”

The opening section consists of general statements about past efforts and resolve, and the closing lines are a general appeal about the type of Deputy the candidate will be, neither carrying specific commitments. The government accountability section lists four broad problems without naming a specific mechanism to address any of them. The specific pledges on the pensioner threshold, Fort Regent and the Shoreline Management Plan reduce the overall proportion of general text, but a meaningful share of the manifesto remains at the level of stated intent.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 21 of 46 · Scored by the Jersey States Member Scorecard team