Jersey States Member Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF JERSEY

Visit the Guernsey edition →
04 SeptStamp duty on buy-to-let and second homes regraded from Mixed to Kept after the vote that delivered it was found unlinked; Long-Term Care cap ruling stands, with the December 2025 vote added.— Stephen Ahier04 SeptSustainable finance promise regraded from No recorded vote to Kept after a reader challenge found the amendment that delivered it, which she lodged herself, unlinked.— Hilary Jeune04 SeptTwo further verdict-based promises revised after reader challenges: constituency surgeries regraded Partial to Delivered; Equalities Minister regraded Outstanding to In progress.— Hilary Jeune
← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2026 election manifesto
Rank 36 of 46

Tina Palmer

The manifesto centres on parish stewardship for St Lawrence, with commitments to maintain efficient and financially responsible services, protect the rural character of the parish through 'thoughtful development', improve road safety by working with the Honorary Police and relevant authorities, and support community groups, older parishioners and young families. The manifesto describes, by its own account, more than 35 years working in employment and skills, and notes involvement with the Employment Forum, Skills Board and Highlands College. All commitments are stated in directional terms, without figures, dates or named mechanisms.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
32
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“The art of the possible”

The manifesto is focused on parish-level stewardship: maintaining services, protecting rural character, improving road safety and supporting community groups. These are appropriate concerns for the Connétable role, but the platform does not reach toward island-wide reform or a cross-portfolio programme. The broadest stated aim is ensuring 'our parish voice is heard clearly in island-wide decisions', which is directional rather than transformative.

22
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Mostly directional”

Every commitment is stated in directional or aspirational terms, without figures, timeframes or named mechanisms. Road safety, for example, is addressed by 'working with the Honorary Police and relevant authorities to address traffic concerns', with no specific measure, location or target named. The cost-of-living pledge is similarly framed: keeping services 'compassionate and accessible', but with no defined service, threshold or programme.

58
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The pledges are appropriately scaled to the parish context and do not promise spending without a revenue source or claim untested savings. The commitment to keep services 'financially responsible' reflects an awareness of constraint. Because the commitments are directional, few carry the kind of specific dependency that would expose them to a realism challenge; they are modest enough to be credible within parish governance.

62
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Needs an Assembly majority and a willing Council of Ministers”

The Scorecard records posts as Member of the Children, Education and Home Affairs Scrutiny Panel, Member of the States Employment Board, and Member of Comité de Connétable. The pledges concerning parish services, road safety in collaboration with the Honorary Police, and rural character protection concern parish matters. The pledge to ensure the parish voice is heard in island-wide decisions requires persuading other members of the States Assembly. The Scrutiny Panel and States Employment Board posts touch areas adjacent to the cost-of-living and community support pledges, though no pledge is directly aligned with those posts.

82
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“General in places”

A large proportion of the text consists of statements of values and intent rather than specific commitments: 'leadership should be approachable, practical and transparent', 'I will listen carefully, communicate openly', and 'Parish and Community First' are representative. The priorities listed at the close are phrase-length headings without elaborating detail. Most sentences carry a disposition rather than a commitment.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 36 of 46 · Scored by the Jersey States Member Scorecard team