← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2025 election manifesto
Rank 37 of 39

Andy Sloan

The manifesto identifies public spending growth, unreliable air links, a housing crisis, an education system described as 'in disarray', a shrinking finance sector, and the absence of an economic plan as the central problems facing Guernsey. It organises its response around three objectives: restoring political function, fixing public finances, and kick-starting growth. Specific commitments extend to supporting housing supply increase, backing Chamber of Commerce and G8 priorities, supporting greater risk-taking in the finance sector, advocating for the arts and creative economy, and backing affordable climate action. No figures, dates or mechanisms are attached to any of these commitments.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
42
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“The art of the possible”

The manifesto sets three headline objectives: restoring political function, fixing public finances, and kick-starting economic growth. These are broad in scope but the manifesto does not develop them into a programme; the housing, finance, arts and climate commitments are each stated in a single sentence of support rather than as a worked agenda. The vision is directional rather than constituting a coherent reform package.

18
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Mostly directional”

Almost none of the commitments carry a figure, a date, a named mechanism or a committee reference. Support for housing supply increase is attributed to 'some of the ideas in the Future Guernsey manifesto' without naming them; backing for the Chamber of Commerce and G8 priorities is stated without listing those priorities; climate action is described only as 'affordable'. No fiscal numbers or timelines appear anywhere in the text.

48
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs significant legislative change”

The manifesto identifies spending growth outpacing the economy and the need to fix public finances as problems requiring action, without naming a revenue source, a spending cut, or a structural mechanism to address them. The finance sector, housing, and climate pledges are framed as areas for support without any assessment of cost or constraint. The internal coherence of the manifesto is not undermined by contradiction, but no pledge is costed or sized.

52
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Needs a majority and a willing P&R”

The Scorecard records Sloan as President of the Scrutiny Management Committee. The manifesto's focus on governance, accountability and fixing how politics works is in the same subject area as a scrutiny presidency, which provides a relevant platform. The finance sector, housing, arts, climate, and fiscal pledges fall outside that subject area and depend on other committees and a States majority of 20.

82
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“General in places”

A substantial portion of the text consists of general statements of intent: 'listening more, working with others, challenging lazy thinking', 'I want to help fix what's broken', 'let's not waste it'. The biographical section occupies considerable space. Commitments are stated in short declarative sentences of support rather than in specific terms, and closing lines about staying grounded and delivering for Guernsey add further general language.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 37 of 39 · Scored by the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard team

Stay up to date

Every promise. Every vote. In your feed.

Join the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard group for new data, corrections and analysis as the States term unfolds.

Join the Facebook groupPublic group · free · no advertising