← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2025 election manifesto
Rank 33 of 39

David Goy

The manifesto sets out pledges in four areas: tax fairness, including a Fair Share Tax on HNWIs with Guernsey property ties and a vacant property levy; foreign policy independence, including opting out of certain sanctions and establishing independent trade offices; economic diversification through manufacturing incentives, a startup incubator and airport expansion; and food and energy security through tidal energy investment, agricultural subsidies and strategic reserves. The tax proposals name specific targets and exemptions but provide no yield estimates. Spending commitments across energy, food security and infrastructure carry no cost figures, leaving the revenue and expenditure sides unconnected on the manifesto's own terms.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
72
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“Bold, with conditions”

The manifesto sets out a wide-ranging programme across four distinct policy areas: a new Fair Share Tax and vacant property levy, an independent foreign policy stance including opting out of certain sanctions and establishing overseas trade offices, economic diversification through manufacturing incentives, airport expansion and startup incubators, and a food and energy security framework including tidal energy investment and strategic reserves. The breadth is considerable for a single deputy, and the foreign policy and neutrality pledges represent a genuinely expansive vision for Guernsey's international posture. The ambition is tempered only by the absence of a unifying fiscal or constitutional reform programme that ties the pledges together.

48
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Broad commitments”

Several pledges carry named mechanisms: the Fair Share Tax identifies specific targets such as 'stealth income from entities with Guernsey property ties' and trust distributions to HNWIs with local properties, with explicit carve-outs for inheritances and pensions; the vacant property levy specifies a monthly charge on homes vacant for more than six months; the airport section names cargo flights, direct routes and logistics companies as objectives. However, no levy rate or tax yield is given for either revenue measure, no cost figure accompanies the tidal energy or food reserve proposals, and the trade office and manufacturing incentive pledges carry no budget, timeline or mechanism for delivery. The pledges are more specific in describing who is targeted than in stating what the financial outcome would be.

38
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs significant legislative change”

The Fair Share Tax and vacant property levy are presented as the primary revenue instruments, but neither carries a yield estimate, so it is not possible on the manifesto's own terms to assess whether they are sized to fund the spending commitments elsewhere, including food reserves, tidal energy investment, agricultural subsidies and airport expansion. The foreign policy pledges, including opting out of sanctions and establishing independent trade offices, depend on outcomes outside Guernsey's sole control. The claim that GST should not be considered until the wealthiest pay their fair share does not name a revenue source that would substitute for it if the structural funding position required one. The manifesto does not provide figures to demonstrate internal coherence between the revenue side and the expenditure side.

28
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Depends heavily on other bodies”

The Scorecard records no committee role for this deputy. The Fair Share Tax and vacant property levy would require legislation and a States majority of 20 of 38, with fiscal policy led by P&R. The foreign policy pledges, including opting out of sanctions and establishing independent trade offices, depend on other committees, a States majority and outcomes involving bodies outside Guernsey. The airport expansion, tidal energy investment, agricultural subsidies and strategic reserve pledges each fall within the remit of other committees and also require a States majority. Across the full range of pledges, delivery depends on persuading other committees and assembling majority support in the States.

58
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“Reasonably specific”

The manifesto is structured around four named challenges and four named solution areas, which gives it more direction than a purely values-based document. However, a number of sections set out positions without accompanying mechanisms: the calls to 'explore alternative energy generation', 'attract logistics companies' and provide 'financial incentives for new manufacturers' and 'startup incubators' are directional rather than specific. The Q&A sections add substance to the tax proposals but much of the foreign policy and economic diversification text restates the problem rather than specifying the action. The credential and introductory sections are biographical rather than policy-bearing.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 33 of 39 · Scored by the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard team

Stay up to date

Every promise. Every vote. In your feed.

Join the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard group for new data, corrections and analysis as the States term unfolds.

Join the Facebook groupPublic group · free · no advertising