← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2025 election manifesto
Rank 39 of 39

Garry Collins

The manifesto sets out positions across housing, fiscal policy, education, environment, health and social issues. It opposes GST, calls for document duty to be scrapped, supports Pillar 2 corporate tax changes, advocates a new Island Development Plan with less bureaucracy, pushes for modern school buildings, increased mental health services and investment in the Bridge area and Leales Yard. Most pledges are stated as positions or directions without accompanying figures, dates or mechanisms. A spending review is proposed as the primary fiscal tool but without a target or process.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
48
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“The art of the possible”

The manifesto covers a broad range of policy areas, from housing and education to corporate taxation, environment and social welfare, suggesting a desire to engage across the full States agenda. However, most commitments are stated as directions or positions rather than as a coherent programme: opposing GST, scrapping document duty and supporting Leales Yard are individual stances rather than components of a joined-up fiscal or social plan. The connecting vision, retaining young people and growing the economy, is present but not developed into a structured cross-committee agenda.

28
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Mostly directional”

Very few pledges carry a figure, a date or a named mechanism. The housing section names four groups (first-time buyers, renters, pensioners downsizing, growing families) but offers no policy tool, timeline or funding route. The fiscal section endorses Pillar 2 and a comprehensive spending review without naming a target saving, a committee process or a timeline. Scrapping document duty is a named measure but comes with no replacement revenue source. The remaining pledges, on sport, schools, mental health, environment and LGBTQ+ asks, are stated as positions without accompanying mechanisms.

38
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs significant legislative change”

The manifesto opposes GST while also calling for abolition of document duty, increased mental health services, no cuts to health services, investment in the Bridge area and support for the Leales Yard development. No revenue source or saving is named to fund these commitments beyond a general spending review and the acknowledgement that Pillar 2 'might eliminate the deficit'. The spending review pledge does not name a figure or a line item. Taken together, the combination of ruling out GST, removing a transaction tax and expanding spending, without a costed alternative, creates an internal tension that the manifesto does not resolve.

35
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Relies on other decision-makers”

The Scorecard records a Member role on the Committee for Housing. The housing pledges, covering first-time buyers, renters, pensioners and growing families, and the new Island Development Plan, are in the same subject area as that role. All other pledges, including the GST opposition, scrapping document duty, education, mental health, environment, LGBTQ+ policy and the Leales Yard and Bridge investment, depend on other committees and a States majority of 20 of 38. Several pledges also depend on decisions by bodies outside the States.

72
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“General in places”

A substantial portion of the manifesto text consists of general statements of direction or value rather than specific commitments: 'review every penny spent', 'value for money and growing our economy are the keys to success', 'our culture is important', 'pensioners deserve better'. The biographical section occupies meaningful space. Where specific positions are taken, for example on GST or document duty, they are stated briefly without elaboration, so the text overall carries a higher proportion of directional language than specific commitment.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 39 of 39 · Scored by the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard team

Stay up to date

Every promise. Every vote. In your feed.

Join the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard group for new data, corrections and analysis as the States term unfolds.

Join the Facebook groupPublic group · free · no advertising