← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2025 election manifesto
Rank 30 of 39

John Gollop

The manifesto covers taxation, housing, long-term care, transport, environment, governance reform, health, education, culture and external affairs. Specific figures appear for a proposed 15% income tax rate on earnings below £35,000, a 1% arts grant, a care co-payment trajectory and a proposed motorbike age limit of 16. The fiscal section acknowledges the need for additional revenue and engages with the merits and limits of consumption taxes, income tax increases and Pillar 2 receipts. Most other commitments, including Cabinet-style government, National Parks, Leales Yard, free buses and expanded care facilities, are stated without cost figures, funding sources or delivery timescales.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
62
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“A credible stretch”

The manifesto ranges across taxation, housing, care, environment, governance reform, transport, culture, external affairs and constitutional structure, committing to a Cabinet-style ministerial government, National Parks, a lower 15% income tax rate on earnings below £35,000, free or low-fare bus services, Leales Yard development, and an arts funding scheme. The breadth is genuinely wide and the governance reform vision, including an Auditor General and specialist scrutiny, reaches further than incremental adjustment. The connecting thread is evolutionary rather than transformative, and several sections offer direction rather than a programme, which keeps the score in the credible-stretch range rather than the bold tier.

44
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Broad commitments”

A number of pledges carry specific figures: a 15% tax rate on earnings below £35,000, a 1% Arts and Culture grant, a proposed minimum motorbike age of 16, and a care co-payment described as nearly £26,000 per year by 2029. However, the majority of commitments, including the Cabinet-style government reform, the economic recovery plan, National Parks, planning review, and transport improvements, are stated without named mechanisms, timescales or cost figures. The fiscal section discusses income tax increases and consumption taxes in general terms, and phrases such as 'marginal increases' and 'slightly more tax revenue' describe directions rather than quantities.

50
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The manifesto acknowledges that additional tax revenue is needed, stating 'we also need to have slightly more tax revenue', and identifies restraining senior public sector pay and consumption taxes as partial funding sources. The proposal to introduce a 15% tax band on earnings below £35,000 would reduce income tax revenue, and no figure is offered for the cost of that reduction or for free bus services, a States purchase of Leales Yard, or expanded care facilities, leaving these pledges without a named revenue source or saving. The caution about relying on Pillar 2, described in the manifesto as 'uncertain tax benefits', and the rejection of a unilateral move away from zero-ten, reflect awareness of Guernsey's economic dependencies. The range of spending commitments across housing, health, transport, culture and care, taken together, is not matched by a corresponding revenue arithmetic.

42
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Relies on other decision-makers”

The Scorecard records Gollop as Vice-President of the Committee for Home Affairs. The pledges on community policing, police complaints procedures, domestic violence services, cyber-crime investigation, fire service cooperation, licensing laws and cannabis policy review are in the same subject area as that role. The very large majority of pledges, covering taxation, housing, care funding, transport, planning, education, health, governance reform, environment and economic development, depend on other committees and a States majority of 20 of 38 deputies. The Cabinet-style government reform and the Auditor General proposal would require structural change dependent on a broad States consensus.

65
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“Reasonably specific”

The manifesto is long and covers a wide range of policy areas, and in many sections specific commitments are present. However, a significant portion of the text consists of general statements of intent, values and aspiration: phrases such as 'practical common-sense solutions combined with knowledgeable gut instinct', 'I love politics and the cut and thrust of debate', and the repeated emphasis on personal accessibility and attendance. The summary section and the personal statement add further general characterisation rather than commitment. The balance between directional language and specific pledges keeps the waffle score in the middle of the range rather than at either extreme.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 30 of 39 · Scored by the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard team

Stay up to date

Every promise. Every vote. In your feed.

Join the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard group for new data, corrections and analysis as the States term unfolds.

Join the Facebook groupPublic group · free · no advertising