← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2025 election manifesto
Rank 4 of 39

Lindsay de Sausmarez

The manifesto sets out priorities across housing, health, education, public finances and environment. It is most specific in the housing section, naming approximately 450 homes in the pipeline, a proposed Housing Commission, a Housing Champion, removal of the document duty penalty for buy-to-let, and reform of the off-island key worker rent subsidy. The health and education sections identify clear priorities, including social prescribing, care home capacity, ALN provision and the Sixth Form Centre, but without figures or timetables. The public finances section names no specific tax instrument or saving. The manifesto references the structural fiscal context but does not match new spending commitments to named revenue sources.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“A respectable sketch”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
62
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“A credible stretch”

The manifesto sets out a broad programme spanning housing, health, education, public finances and environment, with named mechanisms such as a Housing Commission, a Housing Champion, and parity between mental and physical health services. The public finances section reaches toward systemic reform, calling for a fairer and more efficient tax system and long-term fiscal sustainability, though it does not commit to a named fiscal instrument or revenue measure. The overall scope is wide, but the vision for each area stops short of a comprehensive reform package with a named path.

45
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Broad commitments”

The housing section is the most specific, naming approximately 450 affordable homes in the pipeline, a proposed Housing Commission delivery body, a Housing Champion, removal of the document duty penalty for buy-to-let, and reform of the off-island key worker rent subsidy. Other sections carry directional language without figures or dates: the health section calls for expanded social prescribing and increased care home capacity but names no scale or timetable; the education section references the Sixth Form Centre and ALN provision without a funding figure; and the public finances section commits only to 'fairer and more efficient' tax with no named measure or timeline.

58
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The manifesto identifies the structural context, noting a growing dependency ratio and an imbalanced tax base, and frames spending commitments as subject to fiscal responsibility, which is consistent with the pressures the public finances face. The housing pipeline figure of approximately 450 homes is grounded in the candidate's own prior work. However, the public finances section does not name a revenue source or saving for any new spending commitment, and the calls for greater investment in Early Years, care home capacity and mental health services are not matched to a funding mechanism. The call to make the tax system 'fairer and more efficient' carries no named instrument.

72
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Achievable this term”

The Scorecard records the candidate as President of the Policy and Resources Committee. The fiscal pledges, including the commitment to long-term sustainability and tax reform, are in the same subject area as that role, as is budget prioritisation. The housing pledges, including the Housing Commission and Housing Champion, are in the same subject area as the candidate's prior role as President of the Committee for the Environment and Infrastructure, though they depend on other committees and a States majority of 20. Health, education and environment pledges similarly depend on other committees and a States majority. The overall programme is broad enough that much of it sits outside the direct subject area of the P&R presidency.

62
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“Reasonably specific”

The housing section is relatively concrete, with named mechanisms and a specific pipeline figure. However, several passages consist of general statements of intent without a specific commitment attached, for example the public finances section's call to 'promote innovation and productivity', the environment section's list of broad goals, and repeated references to 'joined up, long-term thinking' and 'evidence-based decisions'. The closing 'How I work' section is composed almost entirely of character and values statements rather than commitments.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 4 of 39 · Scored by the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard team

Stay up to date

Every promise. Every vote. In your feed.

Join the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard group for new data, corrections and analysis as the States term unfolds.

Join the Facebook groupPublic group · free · no advertising