← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2025 election manifesto
Rank 24 of 39

Ross Le Brun

The manifesto centres on protecting working households from service cuts, delivering a States-run starter homes scheme (supported by a drafted requete), proposing an Island Travel Commission, expanding local food growing, and conditionally supporting GST+ if it includes income protections and no better revenue alternatives emerge. Housing and employment themes connect to the candidate's recorded committee role. Most pledges beyond the starter homes mechanism and the travel commission are directional, without figures, dates or named funding sources. The fiscal position is one of conditional acceptance of additional revenue rather than a specific reform plan.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
55
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“A credible stretch”

The manifesto reaches across housing, travel, food resilience, fiscal policy and community investment, committing to a States-run starter homes scheme, an Island Travel Commission, and conditional support for GST+. The connecting theme is protecting working households from service cuts while investing in public infrastructure, which gives the platform a coherent direction. The vision stops short of a comprehensive fiscal reform package or a cross-committee programme with named investment envelopes, keeping it in the credible-stretch range rather than the transformative.

45
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Broad commitments”

The starter homes pledge is the most developed commitment: the manifesto states a requete has been drafted and names the mechanism of a States-run scheme. The Island Travel Commission proposal names the groups to be convened and includes a commitment that the States 'would commit to debate the commission's findings within this term, with a view to starting delivery.' Most other pledges, including road layout improvements, food growing expansion, green space protection and support for lower incomes, are directional statements without figures, dates or named funding lines. The GST+ position names the protections sought but attaches no revenue figure or legislative reference.

58
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The manifesto acknowledges fiscal pressure and does not offer tax cuts without a revenue source: it frames GST+ as a conditional necessity if 'better alternatives are not found', and pairs spending commitments with a general willingness to raise revenue. No revenue source or saving is named for the spending pledges on community spaces, road improvements or food growing initiatives. The starter homes requete is a realistic procedural step for a deputy. The Island Travel Commission is framed as a scoping body rather than an immediate spending commitment, which is appropriately cautious about what one deputy can deliver.

42
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Relies on other decision-makers”

The Scorecard records Le Brun as a Member of the Committee for Employment and Social Security. The housing and employment themes in the manifesto are in the same subject area as that role. The starter homes requete, as a procedural instrument, is a step any deputy can initiate. The Island Travel Commission, road layout changes, food resilience measures, micromobility law reform and GST+ are all matters that depend on other committees and a States majority of 20 of 38. The manifesto's reliance on coalition-building language ('like minded people within the states', 'I would propose or support') reflects this dependency.

62
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“Reasonably specific”

A significant portion of the text consists of general value statements: 'quality of life is more important than profit', 'a strong island needs opportunity at every level', 'a sustainable Guernsey is safer, greener, and more resilient', and the closing list of 'working households, small businesses, families and children.' These carry intent rather than commitment. The travel and housing sections are more specific, and the GST+ section engages with the substance of the debate, but the overall balance tilts toward directional framing in several sections.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 24 of 39 · Scored by the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard team

Stay up to date

Every promise. Every vote. In your feed.

Join the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard group for new data, corrections and analysis as the States term unfolds.

Join the Facebook groupPublic group · free · no advertising