← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2025 election manifesto
Rank 34 of 39

Sally Rochester

The manifesto sets out four priority areas, fiscal sustainability, housing, health, and education, connected by a call for a cross-sector long-term vision and governance reform. It acknowledges the structural deficit and supports a fiscal strategy covering cost efficiencies and sustainable revenue, but names no figures, dates, or specific mechanisms for any of its commitments. All four policy areas are addressed at a directional level, with delivery explicitly framed as a cross-committee endeavour. The Scorecard records Rochester as Vice-President of the Committee for the Environment and Infrastructure and a Member of the Committee for Health and Social Care.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
55
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“A credible stretch”

The manifesto reaches across four substantial policy areas, fiscal strategy, housing, health, and education, and adds a call for a cross-sector long-term vision integrating population, infrastructure, environment, and workforce. The scope is broad and the connecting theme of integrated, evidence-based leadership gives it coherence. The ambition, however, is framed largely at the level of advocacy and support rather than commitments to specific outcomes, which limits how far the overall vision extends.

28
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Mostly directional”

Across all eight areas of commitment, no figure, date, target or named legislative mechanism appears. The housing section lists four approaches (accelerating affordable homes, shared equity, planning reform, States land) without specifying a number of units, a timeline or a named planning instrument. The fiscal section identifies three elements of a strategy but names no revenue measure, saving or quantum. The education section lists curriculum, resourcing and partnerships without a delivery date or budget line.

52
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The manifesto acknowledges that Guernsey faces a structural deficit requiring action and supports a fiscal strategy covering cost efficiencies, sustainable revenue streams, and economic activity, which reflects the fiscal position without overstating available remedies. The pledges across housing, health, and education all carry a cross-committee dependency that the manifesto itself flags, noting the need to 'work across committees'. No revenue source or saving is named for any of the spending commitments, which leaves the reconciliation between investment aspirations and fiscal constraint unresolved.

45
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Relies on other decision-makers”

The Scorecard records Rochester as Vice-President of the Committee for the Environment and Infrastructure and a Member of the Committee for Health and Social Care, giving proximity to some of the health and infrastructure themes in the manifesto. The housing, education, fiscal, and governance pledges all depend on other committees and require a States majority of 20 of 38 deputies. The manifesto's own framing, repeated references to working across committees and advocating for change, confirms that most delivery runs through collective decision-making rather than through Rochester's recorded roles alone.

75
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“General in places”

A substantial portion of the text consists of statements of values, process commitments, and general intent, for example 'I will work tirelessly to support a fair, inclusive, and prosperous future', 'I will bring professionalism and pragmatism to the States', and repeated formulations about listening, evidence, and collaboration. The four policy sections each open with a factual framing but then resolve into bulleted directional statements rather than specific commitments. The sections on governance and collaborative policy-making are almost entirely process-oriented, with no concrete output described.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 34 of 39 · Scored by the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard team

Stay up to date

Every promise. Every vote. In your feed.

Join the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard group for new data, corrections and analysis as the States term unfolds.

Join the Facebook groupPublic group · free · no advertising