← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2025 election manifesto
Rank 27 of 39

Sarah Hansmann Rouxel

The manifesto organises its commitments under three pillars: fixing public finances and core services, investing in people and skills, and strengthening community cohesion. It addresses the structural deficit directly and conditions any new taxation on prior fiscal reform. The housing section includes specific mechanisms such as partial ownership and rent-to-buy schemes, and the education section provides a detailed critique of the current secondary model. Other areas, including arts, sustainability, connectivity, and civil service reform, are framed as strategic directions. Most pledges do not carry figures, timelines, or named legislative vehicles.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
65
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“A credible stretch”

The manifesto sets out a broad reform programme spanning fiscal governance, housing, education, cost of living, skills, arts, sustainability, and democratic accountability, organised under three named pillars. The conditional approach to taxation, the call for civil service restructuring, and the commitment to align population policy with housing planning give the programme a systemic character. The scope is wide, though several areas, including the Arts Strategy and the Skills Strategy, are framed as directions to pursue rather than outcomes to deliver.

42
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Broad commitments”

A small number of pledges carry specific mechanisms: partial ownership and rent-to-buy schemes in housing, raising tax allowances in line with inflation, and a voluntary parish assignment system with Douzaine surgeries. The majority of commitments, including civil service reform, a Tourism Strategy, an Arts Strategy, and SEND reform, are stated as goals or directions without figures, timelines, or named legislative vehicles. The education section is detailed in its diagnosis but the prescriptions remain at the level of principles rather than dated actions.

55
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The manifesto acknowledges the structural deficit directly and states that any new taxation should follow demonstrated fiscal discipline, which is an internally coherent sequencing. The caution against population-led growth without matching housing supply reflects awareness of interconnected pressures. However, the manifesto proposes raising tax allowances in line with inflation and expanding energy efficiency programmes, childcare support, the Guernsey Institute, and supported living, without naming revenue sources or savings to fund them, leaving the fiscal side of several pledges unresolved on the manifesto's own terms.

42
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Relies on other decision-makers”

The Scorecard records a Member role on the Committee for Education, Sport and Culture, placing the education pledges, including the secondary model, SEND reform, the Primary Review, the Education Law, and the Guernsey Institute, in the same subject area as that role. The remaining pledges, covering housing, fiscal governance, civil service reform, connectivity, arts, sustainability, cost of living, and electoral reform, depend on other committees and a States majority of 20 of 38 deputies. The parish surgery proposal depends on voluntary cooperation from the Douzaines.

68
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“General in places”

Phrases such as strong, fair and resilient community, working together, real results, and keeping Guernsey stronger together recur across multiple sections of the manifesto. The introductory, closing, and section-heading passages contain a high proportion of statements of intent and statements of belief relative to specific commitments. The substantive content is concentrated in the housing and education sections; the economic growth, sustainability, and arts sections consist largely of directional statements without accompanying specifics.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 27 of 39 · Scored by the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard team

Stay up to date

Every promise. Every vote. In your feed.

Join the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard group for new data, corrections and analysis as the States term unfolds.

Join the Facebook groupPublic group · free · no advertising