← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2025 election manifesto
Rank 36 of 39

Simon Vermeulen

The manifesto covers a broad range of policy areas including housing, education, tax reform, air and sea connectivity, infrastructure, and government effectiveness. It cites a previous £27.8m spending reduction proposal as evidence of fiscal intent, opposes GST, and calls for a tax review covering individual tax caps and Pillar 2 revenue. Forward commitments include affordable housing, direct Heathrow links, a Pool Marina and deep-water berth, means-tested bursaries, and a potential Tourism Minister. Most pledges are stated as directions rather than costed plans, and no revenue source or saving is named for the spending commitments.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“Needs a second draft”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
52
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“A credible stretch”

The manifesto spans a wide range of policy areas, from tax reform and housing to air connectivity, education, infrastructure, and government restructuring, offering a cross-cutting agenda rather than a single-issue platform. However, the commitments are largely directional: phrases such as 'targeted support for key sectors', 'a refreshed approach to tourism', and 'a potential Tourism Minister' indicate aspiration rather than a defined reform programme. The manifesto's most concrete prior-term claim, a failed proposal to reduce States spending by £27.8m, is cited as evidence of ambition, but the forward-looking section does not build on it with an equivalent quantified objective.

32
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Broad commitments”

Across the manifesto's forward commitments, very few carry a figure, a date, or a named legislative mechanism. The £27.8m spending reduction proposal is cited retrospectively, but no equivalent figure appears in the forward pledges. The proposal to explore means-tested bursaries, push for direct Heathrow links, and advance Housing Committee work are at least named mechanisms, but 'early next term' is the only temporal marker offered. Tax reform commits to 'a full review of individual tax caps and realistic revenue measures' without specifying what those measures are or in what timeframe.

48
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The manifesto acknowledges fiscal pressure through the proposal to right-size government and review Civil Service costs, and correctly treats Pillar 2 as a revenue opportunity to be understood rather than a settled sum to be spent. However, the manifesto opposes GST, commits to affordable housing, infrastructure investment including a Pool Marina and deep-water berth, direct Heathrow air links, and education reform, without naming a revenue source or saving for any of them. The tax review pledge is framed as a precondition to GST rather than as a costed alternative, leaving the revenue gap those commitments would require unaddressed on the manifesto's own terms.

38
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Relies on other decision-makers”

The Scorecard records a Member role on the Committee for Home Affairs. The manifesto's pledges on housing, education, air connectivity, infrastructure investment, tourism governance, tax reform, and Civil Service review all fall outside that subject area and depend on other committees and a States majority of 20 of 38 deputies. The Home Affairs-adjacent work, such as government culture and effectiveness, is the closest alignment. The breadth of the agenda across many committees without a recorded leadership role in most of those areas means the majority of pledges depend substantially on other decision-makers.

68
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“General in places”

A significant portion of the text is occupied by values statements, for example 'integrity, experience, and vision are at the heart of everything I do', biographical narrative, and closing appeals such as 'let's finish what we started together, making Guernsey the best it can be'. The achievements section is specific and grounded, but the forward-looking section frequently returns to general framing: 'building a resilient, diverse economy', 'political stability', and 'a respectful, constructive environment'. These restate intent rather than commit to a defined action.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 36 of 39 · Scored by the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard team

Stay up to date

Every promise. Every vote. In your feed.

Join the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard group for new data, corrections and analysis as the States term unfolds.

Join the Facebook groupPublic group · free · no advertising