← Leaderboard·Manifesto rating·June 2025 election manifesto
Rank 10 of 39

Yvonne Burford

The manifesto covers education, housing, fiscal discipline, healthcare, the environment, and arts and culture, with a unifying principle of protecting low and middle earners. Its most concrete elements are the Les Varendes Sixth Form proposal, conditional support for income-generating borrowing, and compulsory purchase of undeveloped hotels. The fiscal section acknowledges the revenue challenge without naming a specific tax. Most commitments are directional, without figures or timelines, and delivery of pledges outside fiscal and capital policy depends on other committees and a States majority.

Read the manifesto
020406080100
0
Overall · out of 100
“A respectable sketch”

The five dimensions

Select one to jump to the reasoning behind its score.

Weighted into the overall score
55
/ 100

Ambition

Weight 15%
“A credible stretch”

The manifesto ranges across education, housing, the economy, healthcare, the environment, and arts and culture, with a connecting theme of fiscal discipline and fairness to low and middle earners. Its most distinctive reach is the proposal to relocate the Sixth Form Centre to Les Varendes as a cost-saving measure, the conditional support for borrowing tied to income generation, and the call for a new committee for Arts, Culture and Sport. However, the majority of commitments are directional rather than transformative, and the manifesto does not set out a cross-committee reform programme or a named fiscal package.

38
/ 100

Tangibility

Weight 25%
“Broad commitments”

A small number of commitments carry enough specificity to distinguish them: the Les Varendes Sixth Form proposal names the site and the rationale, compulsory purchase of disused hotels is described with a condition (non-development within a certain time), and borrowing is conditioned on rental income covering costs. The majority of the manifesto's commitments, however, do not carry figures, dates or named mechanisms: the tax section offers principles rather than a named tax, the healthcare section does not name an investment level, and the efficiencies section names no line item or target.

60
/ 100

Realism

Weight 20%
“Needs a tailwind”

The manifesto acknowledges that healthcare, infrastructure, and the rainy-day fund are driving the deficit, and it frames borrowing as conditional on rental income covering costs, which acknowledges the structural position. The tax section identifies the need for revenue while setting conditions on fairness and competitiveness, which is a coherent if unquantified position. The Les Varendes proposal implicitly treats the absence of funding for Les Ozouets as the trigger, which is internally consistent. No revenue source or saving is named for the commitments to preventative healthcare, arts and culture, or lifelong learning, and the corporate tax collaboration with Jersey carries no mechanism or timeline.

70
/ 100

Deliverability

Weight 30%
“Achievable this term”

The Scorecard records Burford as Vice-President of the Policy and Resources Committee, which is the committee responsible for fiscal policy and the Budget. The manifesto's focus on capital project management, tax principles, public sector efficiencies, and borrowing policy sits in the same subject area as that recorded role. The education, housing, and arts commitments depend on other committees and a States majority of 20, and the corporate tax collaboration with Jersey depends on a separate jurisdiction. Within the fiscal and capital management agenda, the recorded role is directly relevant.

62
/ 100

Low waffle

Weight 10%
“Reasonably specific”

Several sections contain general statements of intent or values that do not carry a commitment: the opening paragraphs describe a love for the island and a wish for deputies to work together, and the volunteering and environment sections offer orientation rather than pledges. The phrase 'I want Guernsey to be a place where everyone, especially our children, can see a future for themselves' and the closing appeal to make Guernsey 'the best it can be' are characteristic of this register. The education, housing, and capital spending sections are more grounded, with named sites and conditions, which keeps the overall waffle score from reaching the higher range.

← Back to the leaderboardRank 10 of 39 · Scored by the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard team

Stay up to date

Every promise. Every vote. In your feed.

Join the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard group for new data, corrections and analysis as the States term unfolds.

Join the Facebook groupPublic group · free · no advertising