Candidate signals continued opposition to GST.
“I have never voted for GST which is due to commence in July 2027.”
Recorded votes that test this promise
- 26 Feb 2026Carried✗ Pour · voted against delivering
Motion put to the States: AND (IRRESPECTIVE OF THE STATES’ DECISION ON PROPOSITIONS 1b OR 1c) d. supplies sold by registered charities should be exempt from the Goods and Services Tax and that provision should be made to allow registered charities to reclaim the Goods and Services Tax incurred on supplies purchased as outlined in section 8; AND e. the proposed International Services Entity scheme should incorporate international insurance services and e-gaming activities; AND f. The application of all other exempt and zero-rated supplies should be as outlined in Section 8.
Voting Contre delivers this
This motion sets out exemptions and reliefs within the GST framework, which presupposes GST introduction — voting against it is consistent with the candidate's opposition to GST.
Why this counts against the promise: Deputy Steve Falla, having stated he had never voted for GST and signalling continued opposition to it, voted Pour on 26 February 2026 on a motion setting out the framework for exempt, zero-rated, and other GST supply provisions, a vote that advanced the implementation of GST rather than opposing it.
- 26 Feb 2026Carried✗ Pour · voted against delivering
Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)
- 26 Feb 2026LostContre
Motion put to the States: To suspend Rule 24(2) the Rules of Procedure of the States of Deliberation and their Committees to the extent necessary to permit the sursis set out below to be debated.
This motion to suspend procedural rules to allow a sursis of the GST/tax reform debate is procedurally related to efforts to halt or delay GST, touching on the candidate's opposition to GST.