Tom Rylatt

Motion put to the States: 7. To agree that an excess repairs allowance may be given to a landlord, from 2026, for the cost of repairing, maintaining, insuring and managing a let property based on the expenses incurred in the actual calendar year, rather than it being based on the expenditure incurred in the previous five years (this allowance not to create a loss), with any transitional provisions as deemed necessary when the legislation is drafted.

Voting Pour delivers this

Giving landlords an excess repairs allowance based on actual annual costs eases the tax position of rental property owners, which is part of incentivising rental supply.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To direct the Policy & Resources Committee and the Committee for Housing to take all such steps as are necessary to ensure that the States are provided with the opportunity to consider in the 2028 Budget options to introduce a tax free Guernsey Property Savings Account (GPSA) to incentivise and better enable savings by first-time buyers for the purposes of buying a home in Guernsey or Alderney. (inserted by A55)

Voting Pour delivers this

The proposition directs that options for a tax-free Guernsey Property Savings Account be put to the States in the 2028 Budget, which advances the GPSA commitment but only to the consideration stage.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to take all such steps as are necessary to ensure that the States are provided with the opportunity to consider in the 2028 Budget Report options for an additional lifetime tax allowance (an Additional Earnings Allowance) in respect of otherwise taxable earned income to incentivise younger earners to remain, return, or establish in the island. (inserted by A55)

Voting Pour delivers this

The proposition directs that options for an Additional Earnings Allowance be put forward in the 2028 Budget, advancing the commitment but not enacting it.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To insert an additional proposition as follows: "To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to investigate the financial yield and legal framework required to implement a High-Net-Worth Residency Scheme (HNWRS) for new high-net-worth individuals who, on or after 1 January 2028, use an Open Market (Part A) property as the basis for taking up their own residency in Guernsey, with eligibility based on a minimum global net worth of £5 million, excluding the primary residence, or sustainable annual global income of £750,000; requiring qualifying participants to make a minimum annual personal income tax contribution of £150,000 and the applicable Social Security contribution; and to lay a comprehensive report before the States of Deliberation no later than June 2027 detailing the legislative, administrative and enforcement mechanisms required for its operation, including the maters set out in the Explanatory note."

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment would investigate a High-Net-Worth Residency Scheme to extract fair tax contributions from wealthy new residents.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise was to oppose GST until high net worth individuals and businesses pay their fair share, while the motion only directed an investigation into a residency scheme for new high-net-worth arrivals, so a vote against could reflect a preference for another route or doubts about this scheme rather than abandoning the promise.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: 1A To agree, notwithstanding Proposition 1, the following: i. to implement the package of tax reforms to make Guernsey and Alderney more financially sustainable as set out in sections 9 and 10 with the rates and thresholds as described in Appendix 7 in the first year of implementation SUBJECT TO the rates and thresholds progressing as follows: with effect from 24 months following the implementation of changes to Income Tax and Social Security contributions and the introduction of a GST: o Social Security contributions allowance: £12,600 (provisional*); o Higher rate of Income Tax threshold: £30,500 (provisional*); o Pre-emptive increase in pensions and other benefits: 0.6%; o Essentials Costs Relief Payment: set to reflect the estimated impact of a 4% GST on a basket of essential goods as described in Billet d’État No III of 2026; o GST: 4%; and, with effect from 48 months following the implementation of changes to Income Tax and Social Security contributions and the introduction of a GST: o Social Security contributions allowance: £13,000 (provisional*); o Higher rate of Income Tax threshold: £33,000 (provisional); o Pre-emptive increase in pensions and other benefits: 0.6%; o Essential Costs Relief Payment: set to reflect the estimated impact of a 5% GST on a basket of essential goods as described in Billet d’État No III of 2026; o GST: 5%. *monetary thresholds to be adjusted for inflation prior to implementation ii. with the Committee for Employment & Social Security to recommend to the States of Deliberation annually uprating: o the personal Income Tax allowance; o the Social Security contributions allowance; o the Higher Rate of Income Tax threshold; o the Essentials Cost Relief Payment; and o the rates of the States Pension, Income Support and any other impacted benefits by a minimum of RPIX to ensure that the real value after inflation of the protection incorporated in the package of reform is maintained.”. iii. to include within the Fiscal Policy Framework a fiscal rule that GST shall not exceed 5%.

Voting Contre delivers this

Proposition 1A would implement the GST-containing reform package subject to conditions; opposing it avoids imposing GST, though the added conditions give some mitigation.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: Whether, after consideration of the Policy Letter ''Tax Reform 2026'' dated 8 June 2026, they are of the opinion: 1. To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to implement the package of tax reforms to make Guernsey and Alderney more financially sustainable as set out in sections 9 and 10 with the rates and thresholds as described in Appendix 7, save that, in relation to GST, food produced or grown by small independent suppliers is to be taxed at a rate of 0% and not at 3%, and with the following clarifications, and subject to the following: A) the Policy & Resources Committee, working with the Committee for Employment & Social Security, shall not bring GST into operation unless: i. the associated personal income tax and social security contribution mitigations are in force and operational, and are being applied through the relevant deduction, collection and assessment arrangements, before GST becomes chargeable; ii. the approved GST-related increases in the States Pension, income support and other benefits have taken effect, with payments at the increased rates commencing before GST becomes chargeable; and iii. the Essential Costs Relief Payment arrangements are in force and operational; for the purpose of this Proposition, an intention to apply relief retrospectively, make compensatory payments later or complete the necessary systems after GST has commenced shall not constitute implementation of the Mitigation Measures; b) the Policy & Resources Committee: i. shall defer the commencement of GST where any of the conditions in this Proposition 1(a) cannot be met; ii. shall revise the implementation timetable so that those conditions are met, including any necessary alignment with the commencement of a tax or contribution year; and iii. shall report promptly to the States on the reason for the delay, its financial implications and the revised timetable; c) no authority otherwise given under this item shall permit GST to commence in advance of compliance with those conditions; d) the Policy & Resources Committee and the Committee for Employment & Social Security, before any instrument bringing GST into operation is made or submitted for approval, shall publish a joint implementation assurance report: i. identifying each Mitigation Measure, its commencement date and the date from which its financial effect will be delivered; ii. setting out the evidence that the necessary legislation, staffing, systems, payroll interfaces, assessment arrangements and payment processes are ready to deliver the measures in accordance with this Proposition; and iii. identifying any outstanding implementation risks and explaining how those risks have been addressed, including the arrangements for receiving and determining Essential Costs Relief Payment Claims; e) where compliance depends upon an event occurring after publication of that report, the Committees shall publish confirmation that the event has occurred before GST becomes chargeable, if the conditions cannot be met, the terms under this proposition at 1(b) shall apply notwithstanding any commencement date previously appointed; f) the legislation implementing GST shall give effect to these commencement conditions and shall not confer power to dispense with them by administrative decision; and

Voting Contre delivers this

The main Tax Reform 2026 proposition directs implementation of the package including GST; voting Contre opposes imposing GST.

Why this counts against the promise: Tom Rylatt promised to oppose imposing GST until businesses and high net worth individuals pay their fair share, but on 2 October 2026 he voted "Pour" on the motion directing the Policy & Resources Committee to implement the "Tax Reform 2026" package, which includes GST, so the vote works against delivering that promise.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To insert, in Proposition 1 immediately after the words “Appendix 7” the following: “Subject to the following: a) the Policy & Resources Committee, working with the Committee for Employment & Social Security, shall not to bring GST into operation unless: i. the associated personal income tax and social security contribution mitigations are in force and operational, and are being applied through the relevant deduction, collection and assessment arrangements, before GST becomes chargeable; ii. the approved GST-related increases in the States Pension, income support and other benefits have taken effect, with payments at the increased rates commencing before GST becomes chargeable; and iii. the Essential Costs Relief Payment arrangements are in force and operational. for the purposes of this Proposition, an intention to apply relief retrospectively, make compensatory payments later or complete the necessary systems after GST has commenced shall not constitute implementation of the Mitigation Measures. b) the Policy & Resources Committee: i. shall defer the commencement of GST where any of the conditions in this Proposition 1(a) cannot be met; ii. shall revise the implementation timetable so that those conditions are met, including any necessary alignment with the commencement of a tax or contribution year; and iii. shall report promptly to the States on the reason for the delay, its financial implications and the revised timetable. c) no authority otherwise given under this item shall permit GST to commence in advance of compliance with those conditions. d) the Policy & Resources Committee and the Committee for Employment & Social Security, before any instrument bringing GST into operation is made or submitted for approval, shall publish a joint implementation assurance report: i. identifying each Mitigation Measure, its commencement date and the date from which its financial effect will be delivered; ii. setting out the evidence that the necessary legislation, staffing, systems, payroll interfaces, assessment arrangements and payment processes are ready to deliver the measures in accordance with this Proposition; and iii. identifying any outstanding implementation risks and explaining how those risks have been addressed, including the arrangements for receiving and determining Essential Costs Relief Payment claims. e) where compliance depends upon an event occurring after publication of that report, the Committees shall publish confirmation that the event has occurred before GST becomes chargeable. If the conditions cannot be met, the terms under this Proposition at 1(b) shall apply notwithstanding any commencement date previously appointed. f) the legislation implementing GST shall give effect to these commencement conditions and shall not confer power to dispense with them by administrative decision.”.

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment would prohibit bringing GST into operation unless associated income tax and social security reforms are in place; this conditions GST but does not oppose it outright.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: 1. To substitute in Proposition 1 the word “and” for the full stop and to insert, immediately after Proposition 1, the following additional Proposition: “1A To agree, notwithstanding Proposition 1, the following: i. to implement the package of tax reforms to make Guernsey and Alderney more financially sustainable as set out in sections 9 and 10 with the rates and thresholds as described in Appendix 7 in the first year of implementation SUBJECT TO the rates and thresholds progressing as follows: with effect from 24 months following the implementation of changes to Income Tax and Social Security contributions and the introduction of a GST: o Social Security contributions allowance: £12,600 (provisional*); o Higher rate of Income Tax threshold: £30,500 (provisional*); o Pre-emptive increase in pensions and other benefits: 0.6%; o Essentials Costs Relief Payment: set to reflect the estimated impact of a 4% GST on a basket of essential goods as described in Billet d’État No III of 2026; o GST: 4%; and, with effect from 48 months following the implementation of changes to Income Tax and Social Security contributions and the introduction of a GST: o Social Security contributions allowance: £13,000 (provisional*); o Higher rate of Income Tax threshold: £33,000 (provisional); o Pre-emptive increase in pensions and other benefits: 0.6%; o Essential Costs Relief Payment: set to reflect the estimated impact of a 5% GST on a basket of essential goods as described in Billet d’État No III of 2026; o GST: 5%. *monetary thresholds to be adjusted for inflation prior to implementation ii. with the Committee for Employment & Social Security to recommend to the States of Deliberation annually uprating: o the personal Income Tax allowance; o the Social Security contributions allowance; o the Higher Rate of Income Tax threshold; o the Essentials Cost Relief Payment; and o the rates of the States Pension, Income Support and any other impacted benefits by a minimum of RPIX to ensure that the real value after inflation of the protection incorporated in the package of reform is maintained.”. iii. to include within the Fiscal Policy Framework a fiscal rule that GST shall not exceed 5%. 2. To delete Proposition 3 and replace it with: “To direct that before any increase in the rate of GST from 3% to 4%, or from 4% to 5% shall take effect, the Policy & Resources Committee shall publish an assurance review from the independent Fiscal Policy Panel affirming that in the Panel’s opinion the increase is consistent with the Fiscal Policy Framework and is necessary and appropriate having regard to the island’s fiscal, economic and inflationary environment and the impact of economic conditions and the proposed increase on lower- and middle income households. In the event that the Fiscal Policy Panel’s assurance review concludes that the scheduled increase in the rate of GST does not satisfy the requirements herein, the scheduled increase shall not take effect and shall instead be deferred for at least 12 months until the Panel concludes that the requirements have been met.”. 3. In Proposition 4, to insert after the words “to give effect to the above decisions” the following: “, and to direct that such legislation include provision requiring that any resolution to approve legislation that seeks to vary or repeal the legislative protections referred to in paragraph 10.4, and outlined in Resolution I. 2 of Billet d’État No III of 2026 made on the 26th February 2026, shall be deemed to have carried only if not less than two-thirds of the Members present vote in favour.”. 4. To insert an additional Proposition: “To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to take all such steps as are necessary to ensure that the States are provided with the opportunity to consider in the 2028 Budget Report options for an additional lifetime tax allowance (an Additional Earnings Allowance) in respect of otherwise taxable earned income to incentivise younger earners to remain, return or establish in the island.”. 5. To insert an additional Proposition: “To direct the Policy & Resources Committee and the Committee for Housing to take all such steps as are necessary to ensure that the States are provided with the opportunity to consider in the 2028 Budget Report options to introduce a tax-free Guernsey Property Savings Account (GPSA) to incentivise and better enable saving by first-time buyers for the purposes of buying a home in Guernsey or Alderney.”. 6. To insert an additional Proposition: “To direct the inclusion within the scope of longer-term work (envisaged in Appendix 3 of the Tax Review Sub-committee’s report) an examination of the role of Social Security contributions in Guernsey’s revenue base.”. 7. To replace the additional proposition to be inserted by Amendment 24 with the following: “To direct the Policy & Resources Committee, in consultation with the Committee for Employment & Social Security, as part of the Government Work Plan Super Priority ‘Shape and Strengthen the Focus on Early Years and Families,’ to consider the re-introduction of child tax allowances or credits, alternative tax or Social Security measures, and existing measures including, but not limited to, Family Allowance, charge of child and dependent relative tax provisions, reporting as soon as practical to the States of Deliberation with recommendations which should include costed, targeted measures that most effectively support families with the costs of raising children.”.

Voting Contre delivers this

Amendment 55 inserts a version of the tax reform package with GST, subject to conditions; Contre opposes imposing GST, though the safeguards add caveats.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise was to put business and high-net-worth tax contributions ahead of any GST, but this amendment bundles a staged GST schedule (4% then 5%) with a 5% cap, a Fiscal Policy Panel review before increases, a two-thirds protection requirement, and several requests for future work on allowances and reviews, so the vote cannot be clearly attributed to GST being imposed ahead of fairer taxation of business and high earners.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To insert an additional proposition as follows@ ''To direct the inclusion within the scope of longer-term work envisaged in Appendix 3 of the Tax Review Sub-Committee's report, an examination of wealth and asset-based taxation measures as potential revenue-raising tools, including consideration of their potential contribution to fiscal sustainability, tax equity and the broadening of the Bailiwick's tax base, and the extent to which sure measures could be implemented without materially undermining the competitiveness of Guernsey's economy, including its financial services sector, or its ability to attract investment and economically active residents. Such work shall include the commissioning of independent analysis to understand and quantify the net economic and fiscal contribution made by High-Net-Worth residents and associated relocation programmes.''.

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment would add an examination of wealth and asset-based taxation, which bears on whether high net worth individuals pay their fair share.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To sursis the propositions until such time that the Chief Financial Officer has provided the States with a comprehensive report on the States financial position or 31st July 2028, whichever is earlier and to direct the Policy & Resources Committee to return the States with a tax reform package that does not include a goods and services tax.

Voting Pour delivers this

The sursis would return a tax reform package without GST; Pour delivers opposition to GST.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise was to oppose GST until businesses and high net worth individuals pay their fair share, and the motion would postpone the propositions pending a financial report and direct a tax reform package without GST, but a vote against could reflect objection to the sursis, the timing, or the reporting requirement rather than support for imposing GST, so the breach needs an inference.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To delete all propositions and insert: 1. To agree that consideration of the proposed Goods and Services Tax and the associated Income Tax and Social Security contribution reforms detailed in the Policy Letter shall be deferred until a further review of revenue-generation options has been conducted. 2. To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to investigate the introduction of a tax on insurance premiums. 3. To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to return to the States no later than March 2027 with its findings and proposals for the introduction of a tax on insurance premiums, alongside and as an alternative to the proposals for GST detailed in this Policy Letter.

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment would defer GST until a further review of revenue-generation options, which matches the promise's condition of fairer tax sources before GST.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise was to oppose GST until businesses and high net worth individuals pay their fair share, and the motion deferred GST consideration pending a review of revenue options and an insurance premium tax study. That route does not specifically target business or high net worth contributions, so a vote against it could still be consistent with pursuing the promised aim by other means.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To delete propositions 1, 2 and 3 and to substitute therefor: “1. To agree that the individual standard rate for income tax should be 22% for 2027 and 2028 and at 20% for 2029 and onwards. 2. To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to investigate an increase to the Maximum liability on income for non-Guernsey sources (including Guernsey bank interest and income derived from Guernsey exempt investment schemes, which are non-resident for Guernsey tax purposes) and the maximum liability – worldwide income and to report back to the States via the Annual Budget for 2028.”.

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment would delete the GST package and substitute income tax changes plus an investigation of maximum liability for non-Guernsey source income of wealthier residents, which bears on both GST and wealthy residents paying a fair share.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise was to oppose a consumption tax such as GST until businesses and high net worth individuals pay their fair share, while the motion was an amendment setting the standard income tax rate at 22% for 2027–28 and 20% from 2029 and directing an investigation into raising the maximum liability on non-Guernsey and worldwide income; it did not decide on GST, and a deputy could vote against it because of the rate levels or the investigation-only approach while still pursuing fairer taxation of high net worth individuals.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: In Proposition 1 after “Appendix 7” insert the following: “, subject to replacing the proposed goods and services tax with an increase in the standard rate of income tax from 20 percent to a single rate at 22 percent, which increase is to be done as soon as practicable”.

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment would replace GST with an income tax increase, opposing GST; but it raises tax on individuals rather than on business or high net worth individuals.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise was to oppose GST until businesses and high net worth individuals pay their fair share, and the motion would replace GST with a rise in the standard income tax rate to 22%, which falls on everyone and is not aimed at business or high net worth individuals, so a Contre vote could reflect a view that this was not the fairer system promised.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To substitute in Proposition 1 the word “and” for the full stop and to insert, immediately after Proposition 1, the following additional Proposition: “1A. To direct, notwithstanding Proposition 1, the Policy & Resources Committee: a) not to continue with “the Reserved Measures”, so defined as: i. the introduction of a goods and services tax (“GST”) ii. the proposed International Services Entity arrangements insofar as those arrangements are dependent upon, or form part of, the introduction of GST; and iii. any reductions or restructuring of personal income tax, any associated payments, allowances or mitigations, which are intended to offset or redistribute the effects of GST; b) to continue with the development and implementation of the remainder of the tax reform package provided those measures are capable of proceeding independently of the Reserved Measures; c) to report to the States by October 2027 with regard to: i. the receipts from Pillar Two arrangements and the best available estimate of the recurring annual revenues arising from them; ii. recurring expenditure reductions and efficiencies which have been implemented, including but not limited to progress against the approximate £20 million assumption incorporated within the financial forecasts; iii. an updated assessment of the States’ financial position, including the General Revenue Reserve, investment performance, infrastructure requirements, financing commitments and debt-repayment obligations; iv. updated demographic, workforce and public service demand projections; v. progress in addressing the outstanding operational, staffing, systems and administrative issues within the Revenue Services, together with an assessment of its readiness to implement and administer any additional taxes; vi. updated implementation and administration costs associated with the Reserved Measures, including expenditure already incurred and any avoidable, unavoidable or abortive costs; and that the original propositions of this report shall not seek approval for the Reserved Measures; d) put not before the States any proposals in relations to the Reserved Measures until after the report outlined in 1A(c) has been considered by the States.”.

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment would direct P&R not to continue the 'Reserved Measures', which appear to include the GST introduction; Pour advances opposition to GST.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: At the end of Proposition 1 insert the words “, subject to excluding the following: “a) the introduction of a goods and services tax; b) the changes to social security contributions; c) the introduction of new, and changes to, transport taxes”.

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment would exclude GST, social security changes and transport taxes from the package; Pour delivers opposition to GST.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The amendment would have excluded GST (along with social security and transport tax changes) from Proposition 1, so voting against it bears on GST; however, it bundles three measures and its effect depends on what Proposition 1 does, so the vote does not plainly show support for imposing GST before business and high net worth individuals pay their fair share.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To delete Propositions 1 to 3 and substitute therefor: “1.To agree that neither the proposed Goods and Services Tax nor the associated Income Tax and Social Security contribution reforms detailed in the Policy Letter shall be introduced as part of the Tax Reform Programme. 2.To agree that the proposed Transport Taxes shall proceed as set out in this Policy Letter at Paragraph 9.7 and as more specifically described therein. 3.To agree that the proposed Corporate Tax amendments shall proceed as set out in Paragraph 9.21 of this Policy Letter and as more specifically described therein, excepting that at the third bullet point of paragraph 9.21, the term “ISE” shall be substituted with “Corporate Levy” (and this substitution shall take effect wherever relevant). 4.To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to develop and bring before the States proposals, for implementation on the same timetable as the tax measures proposed in this Policy Letter where reasonably practicable, for the introduction of a Corporate Levy payable by registered Guernsey companies, having regard to the work previously undertaken by the Tax Review Sub-Committee, and including consideration of whether such levy should comprise: a fixed annual levy payable by each registered company; a levy differentiated according to the size or scale of the undertaking, including consideration of whether existing company classifications may provide an appropriate and proportionate basis for differentiation; or such other structure as the Committee considers best achieves the objectives of fairness, administrative simplicity and efficient revenue collection. 5.To direct the Committee for Economic Development, in consultation with the Policy & Resources Committee, to develop and bring before the States, on the same timetable where reasonably practicable, proposals for the introduction of a Visitor Levy in accordance with the extant States Resolution, with all revenues arising from such levy to be paid into the General Revenue Account and not hypothecated for expenditure by any particular Committee or industry sector. 6.To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to revise the implementation programme and associated implementation budget for Tax Reform to reflect the removal of the proposed Goods and Services Tax and associated Income Tax and Social Security contribution reforms, including the consequential reduction in implementation cost, implementation activity, systems development, staffing and administrative requirements. 7. To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to return to the States with: 1. a revised implementation programme; 2. a revised implementation budget; 3. revised estimates of one-off implementation costs; 4. revised estimates of ongoing administration costs; 5. revised estimates of annual recurring revenues; and 6. revised staffing assumptions, reflecting the alternative package approved under this Proposition within a period that results in the States being capable of meeting the proposed implementation timetable as proposed within the Policy Letter. 8.To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to return to the States with an assurance review in 2030 as set out in section 12 of the Policy Letter, the scope of which shall be adjusted, where necessary, to take account of the removal of GST and Social Security measures from the package under these proposals and the application of those measures considered herein.”.

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment would provide that neither GST nor the associated income tax and social security reforms be introduced; Pour delivers opposition to GST.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To agree that: a) the expenditure reductions assumed within the financial modelling supporting this Policy Letter shall be supported by a published Savings and Service Optimisation Programme; b) the Programme shall identify, for each financial year to 2029: i. each individual savings or service optimisation initiative; ii. the Committee responsible for delivery; iii. the expected annual financial benefit; iv. the implementation timetable; v. delivery milestones; vi. the principal delivery risks; and vii. whether the saving is cashable, recurring or non-recurring; c) the Policy & Resources Committee shall report to the States half-yearly on progress against the Programme, including any variance between projected and realised savings and any replacement measures proposed where savings are not achieved; and d) the 2030 Assurance Review (or such other method in the event the 2030 Assurance Review is not approved) shall include an independent assessment of the extent to which the assumed expenditure reductions have been delivered and whether they have proved sustainable. (inserted by A13)

Voting Pour delivers this

The proposition requires a published Savings and Service Optimisation Programme supporting the expenditure reductions assumed to 2029, which supports the promised savings path.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to incorporate into the Funding and Investment Plan, in consultation with all Committees, a structured public service efficiency programme that targets a 1% real-terms annual reduction in baseline public expenditure for the years 2027,2028, and 2029 (with 2026 as the baseline year).

Voting Pour delivers this

The proposition directs a public service efficiency programme targeting a 1% real-terms annual reduction in baseline public expenditure, matching the promised annual 1% cut.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To direct the Policy & Resources Committee, working with Principal Committees, to establish a programme for zero-based budgeting, under which material areas of States’ expenditure are reviewed from first principles rather than by reference to historical baselines; and to require that the scope, methodology (including reporting) and initial findings of this programme be included by no later than in the mid-term Government Work Plan report, with the outcomes of such reviews used to inform Committee Work Plans, future budget proposals, and major policy decisions during the remainder of the term.”

Voting Pour delivers this

Zero-based budgeting reviews expenditure from first principles, a mechanism that supports delivering baseline savings but does not set the 1% target.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: 1. To insert an additional proposition as follows: “ To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to incorporate into the Funding and Investment Plan, in consultation with all Committees, a structured public service efficiency programme that targets a 1% real-terms annual reduction in baseline public expenditure for the years 2027,2028, and 2029 (with 2026 as the baseline year).”

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment inserts a programme targeting a 1% real-terms annual reduction in baseline public expenditure, matching the promise.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To agree that: a) the expenditure reductions assumed within the financial modelling supporting this Policy Letter shall be supported by a published Savings and Service Optimisation Programme; b) the Programme shall identify, for each financial year to 2029: i. each individual savings or service optimisation initiative; ii. the Committee responsible for delivery; iii. the expected annual financial benefit; iv. the implementation timetable; v. delivery milestones; vi. the principal delivery risks; and vii. whether the saving is cashable, recurring or non-recurring; c) the Policy & Resources Committee shall report to the States half-yearly on progress against the Programme, including any variance between projected and realised savings and any replacement measures proposed where savings are not achieved; and d) the 2030 Assurance Review (or such other method in the event the 2030 Assurance Review is not approved) shall include an independent assessment of the extent to which the assumed expenditure reductions have been delivered and whether they have proved sustainable. (inserted by A13)

Voting Pour delivers this

The proposition requires a published savings programme identifying each reduction initiative to 2029, which supports the promised spending cuts.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to incorporate into the Funding and Investment Plan, in consultation with all Committees, a structured public service efficiency programme that targets a 1% real-terms annual reduction in baseline public expenditure for the years 2027,2028, and 2029 (with 2026 as the baseline year).

Voting Pour delivers this

The proposition targets a 1% real-terms annual reduction in baseline public expenditure for 2027 to 2029, matching the promise to cut baseline spending 1% a year.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To direct the Policy & Resources Committee, working with Principal Committees, to establish a programme for zero-based budgeting, under which material areas of States’ expenditure are reviewed from first principles rather than by reference to historical baselines; and to require that the scope, methodology (including reporting) and initial findings of this programme be included by no later than in the mid-term Government Work Plan report, with the outcomes of such reviews used to inform Committee Work Plans, future budget proposals, and major policy decisions during the remainder of the term.”

Voting Pour delivers this

Zero-based budgeting supports delivering baseline spending reductions but does not set the 1% target.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: 1. To insert an additional proposition as follows: “ To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to incorporate into the Funding and Investment Plan, in consultation with all Committees, a structured public service efficiency programme that targets a 1% real-terms annual reduction in baseline public expenditure for the years 2027,2028, and 2029 (with 2026 as the baseline year).”

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment inserts a 1% annual real-terms baseline spending reduction target, matching the promise.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: 1A To agree, notwithstanding Proposition 1, the following: i. to implement the package of tax reforms to make Guernsey and Alderney more financially sustainable as set out in sections 9 and 10 with the rates and thresholds as described in Appendix 7 in the first year of implementation SUBJECT TO the rates and thresholds progressing as follows: with effect from 24 months following the implementation of changes to Income Tax and Social Security contributions and the introduction of a GST: o Social Security contributions allowance: £12,600 (provisional*); o Higher rate of Income Tax threshold: £30,500 (provisional*); o Pre-emptive increase in pensions and other benefits: 0.6%; o Essentials Costs Relief Payment: set to reflect the estimated impact of a 4% GST on a basket of essential goods as described in Billet d’État No III of 2026; o GST: 4%; and, with effect from 48 months following the implementation of changes to Income Tax and Social Security contributions and the introduction of a GST: o Social Security contributions allowance: £13,000 (provisional*); o Higher rate of Income Tax threshold: £33,000 (provisional); o Pre-emptive increase in pensions and other benefits: 0.6%; o Essential Costs Relief Payment: set to reflect the estimated impact of a 5% GST on a basket of essential goods as described in Billet d’État No III of 2026; o GST: 5%. *monetary thresholds to be adjusted for inflation prior to implementation ii. with the Committee for Employment & Social Security to recommend to the States of Deliberation annually uprating: o the personal Income Tax allowance; o the Social Security contributions allowance; o the Higher Rate of Income Tax threshold; o the Essentials Cost Relief Payment; and o the rates of the States Pension, Income Support and any other impacted benefits by a minimum of RPIX to ensure that the real value after inflation of the protection incorporated in the package of reform is maintained.”. iii. to include within the Fiscal Policy Framework a fiscal rule that GST shall not exceed 5%.

Voting Contre delivers this

Proposition 1A implements the GST+ package, with conditions; Contre advances opposition to it.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The deputy promised to oppose GST+ "in its current form" and to pursue wholesale tax reform, but this amendment changes the package by phasing GST at 4% then 5%, capping it at 5% and adding annual uprating protections, so a vote in favour could be read as supporting a modified rather than "current" form.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: Whether, after consideration of the Policy Letter ''Tax Reform 2026'' dated 8 June 2026, they are of the opinion: 1. To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to implement the package of tax reforms to make Guernsey and Alderney more financially sustainable as set out in sections 9 and 10 with the rates and thresholds as described in Appendix 7, save that, in relation to GST, food produced or grown by small independent suppliers is to be taxed at a rate of 0% and not at 3%, and with the following clarifications, and subject to the following: A) the Policy & Resources Committee, working with the Committee for Employment & Social Security, shall not bring GST into operation unless: i. the associated personal income tax and social security contribution mitigations are in force and operational, and are being applied through the relevant deduction, collection and assessment arrangements, before GST becomes chargeable; ii. the approved GST-related increases in the States Pension, income support and other benefits have taken effect, with payments at the increased rates commencing before GST becomes chargeable; and iii. the Essential Costs Relief Payment arrangements are in force and operational; for the purpose of this Proposition, an intention to apply relief retrospectively, make compensatory payments later or complete the necessary systems after GST has commenced shall not constitute implementation of the Mitigation Measures; b) the Policy & Resources Committee: i. shall defer the commencement of GST where any of the conditions in this Proposition 1(a) cannot be met; ii. shall revise the implementation timetable so that those conditions are met, including any necessary alignment with the commencement of a tax or contribution year; and iii. shall report promptly to the States on the reason for the delay, its financial implications and the revised timetable; c) no authority otherwise given under this item shall permit GST to commence in advance of compliance with those conditions; d) the Policy & Resources Committee and the Committee for Employment & Social Security, before any instrument bringing GST into operation is made or submitted for approval, shall publish a joint implementation assurance report: i. identifying each Mitigation Measure, its commencement date and the date from which its financial effect will be delivered; ii. setting out the evidence that the necessary legislation, staffing, systems, payroll interfaces, assessment arrangements and payment processes are ready to deliver the measures in accordance with this Proposition; and iii. identifying any outstanding implementation risks and explaining how those risks have been addressed, including the arrangements for receiving and determining Essential Costs Relief Payment Claims; e) where compliance depends upon an event occurring after publication of that report, the Committees shall publish confirmation that the event has occurred before GST becomes chargeable, if the conditions cannot be met, the terms under this proposition at 1(b) shall apply notwithstanding any commencement date previously appointed; f) the legislation implementing GST shall give effect to these commencement conditions and shall not confer power to dispense with them by administrative decision; and

Voting Contre delivers this

The main Tax Reform 2026 proposition adopts the GST+ package; Contre is consistent with opposing GST+ in its current form.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise opposed GST+ "in its current form" and called for wholesale tax reform, and the motion directed implementation of a tax reform package that includes GST. It also amended that package with a 0% rate for food from small independent suppliers and strict conditions requiring mitigation measures to be in place before GST starts, so whether this is the "current form" the deputy opposed requires a judgement.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: 1. To substitute in Proposition 1 the word “and” for the full stop and to insert, immediately after Proposition 1, the following additional Proposition: “1A To agree, notwithstanding Proposition 1, the following: i. to implement the package of tax reforms to make Guernsey and Alderney more financially sustainable as set out in sections 9 and 10 with the rates and thresholds as described in Appendix 7 in the first year of implementation SUBJECT TO the rates and thresholds progressing as follows: with effect from 24 months following the implementation of changes to Income Tax and Social Security contributions and the introduction of a GST: o Social Security contributions allowance: £12,600 (provisional*); o Higher rate of Income Tax threshold: £30,500 (provisional*); o Pre-emptive increase in pensions and other benefits: 0.6%; o Essentials Costs Relief Payment: set to reflect the estimated impact of a 4% GST on a basket of essential goods as described in Billet d’État No III of 2026; o GST: 4%; and, with effect from 48 months following the implementation of changes to Income Tax and Social Security contributions and the introduction of a GST: o Social Security contributions allowance: £13,000 (provisional*); o Higher rate of Income Tax threshold: £33,000 (provisional); o Pre-emptive increase in pensions and other benefits: 0.6%; o Essential Costs Relief Payment: set to reflect the estimated impact of a 5% GST on a basket of essential goods as described in Billet d’État No III of 2026; o GST: 5%. *monetary thresholds to be adjusted for inflation prior to implementation ii. with the Committee for Employment & Social Security to recommend to the States of Deliberation annually uprating: o the personal Income Tax allowance; o the Social Security contributions allowance; o the Higher Rate of Income Tax threshold; o the Essentials Cost Relief Payment; and o the rates of the States Pension, Income Support and any other impacted benefits by a minimum of RPIX to ensure that the real value after inflation of the protection incorporated in the package of reform is maintained.”. iii. to include within the Fiscal Policy Framework a fiscal rule that GST shall not exceed 5%. 2. To delete Proposition 3 and replace it with: “To direct that before any increase in the rate of GST from 3% to 4%, or from 4% to 5% shall take effect, the Policy & Resources Committee shall publish an assurance review from the independent Fiscal Policy Panel affirming that in the Panel’s opinion the increase is consistent with the Fiscal Policy Framework and is necessary and appropriate having regard to the island’s fiscal, economic and inflationary environment and the impact of economic conditions and the proposed increase on lower- and middle income households. In the event that the Fiscal Policy Panel’s assurance review concludes that the scheduled increase in the rate of GST does not satisfy the requirements herein, the scheduled increase shall not take effect and shall instead be deferred for at least 12 months until the Panel concludes that the requirements have been met.”. 3. In Proposition 4, to insert after the words “to give effect to the above decisions” the following: “, and to direct that such legislation include provision requiring that any resolution to approve legislation that seeks to vary or repeal the legislative protections referred to in paragraph 10.4, and outlined in Resolution I. 2 of Billet d’État No III of 2026 made on the 26th February 2026, shall be deemed to have carried only if not less than two-thirds of the Members present vote in favour.”. 4. To insert an additional Proposition: “To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to take all such steps as are necessary to ensure that the States are provided with the opportunity to consider in the 2028 Budget Report options for an additional lifetime tax allowance (an Additional Earnings Allowance) in respect of otherwise taxable earned income to incentivise younger earners to remain, return or establish in the island.”. 5. To insert an additional Proposition: “To direct the Policy & Resources Committee and the Committee for Housing to take all such steps as are necessary to ensure that the States are provided with the opportunity to consider in the 2028 Budget Report options to introduce a tax-free Guernsey Property Savings Account (GPSA) to incentivise and better enable saving by first-time buyers for the purposes of buying a home in Guernsey or Alderney.”. 6. To insert an additional Proposition: “To direct the inclusion within the scope of longer-term work (envisaged in Appendix 3 of the Tax Review Sub-committee’s report) an examination of the role of Social Security contributions in Guernsey’s revenue base.”. 7. To replace the additional proposition to be inserted by Amendment 24 with the following: “To direct the Policy & Resources Committee, in consultation with the Committee for Employment & Social Security, as part of the Government Work Plan Super Priority ‘Shape and Strengthen the Focus on Early Years and Families,’ to consider the re-introduction of child tax allowances or credits, alternative tax or Social Security measures, and existing measures including, but not limited to, Family Allowance, charge of child and dependent relative tax provisions, reporting as soon as practical to the States of Deliberation with recommendations which should include costed, targeted measures that most effectively support families with the costs of raising children.”.

Voting Contre delivers this

Amendment 55 retains GST+ with added safeguards; opposing it is consistent with opposing GST+ in its current form.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise was to oppose GST+ in its current form and to pursue wholesale tax reform, while this amendment would keep the GST package but add a phased 4% then 5% rate schedule, a 5% cap, Fiscal Policy Panel assurance reviews, a two-thirds voting requirement and several reform-review propositions, so a vote in favour could be read as seeking to change the package from its current form rather than endorsing it unchanged.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To delete propositions 1, 2 and 3 and to substitute therefor: “1. To agree that the individual standard rate for income tax should be 22% for 2027 and 2028 and at 20% for 2029 and onwards. 2. To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to investigate an increase to the Maximum liability on income for non-Guernsey sources (including Guernsey bank interest and income derived from Guernsey exempt investment schemes, which are non-resident for Guernsey tax purposes) and the maximum liability – worldwide income and to report back to the States via the Annual Budget for 2028.”.

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment would delete the GST+ propositions and substitute income-tax-based reform, an alternative to GST.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise was to seek wholesale tax reform and to oppose GST+ in its current form, while the motion was an amendment setting income tax standard rates for 2027 onwards and asking P&R to investigate higher liability caps, so voting against it would breach the promise only by inference about whether this particular route counts as the reform promised.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To delete all propositions and insert: 1. To agree that consideration of the proposed Goods and Services Tax and the associated Income Tax and Social Security contribution reforms detailed in the Policy Letter shall be deferred until a further review of revenue-generation options has been conducted. 2. To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to investigate the introduction of a tax on insurance premiums. 3. To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to return to the States no later than March 2027 with its findings and proposals for the introduction of a tax on insurance premiums, alongside and as an alternative to the proposals for GST detailed in this Policy Letter.

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment defers GST pending wider revenue review, in line with pursuing wholesale reform instead of GST+.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The promise was to oppose GST+ in its current form and pursue wholesale tax reform, and the motion would defer GST and direct work on an insurance premium tax as an alternative; voting against it does not by itself show support for GST+, since the deputy may have rejected this particular alternative or the deferral, or have preferred a different route to reform, or opposed GST+ by other votes.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To sursis the propositions until such time that the Chief Financial Officer has provided the States with a comprehensive report on the States financial position or 31st July 2028, whichever is earlier and to direct the Policy & Resources Committee to return the States with a tax reform package that does not include a goods and services tax.

Voting Pour delivers this

The sursis would require a tax reform package without GST, which opposes GST+ as proposed.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: In Proposition 1 after “Appendix 7” insert the following: “, subject to replacing the proposed goods and services tax with an increase in the standard rate of income tax from 20 percent to a single rate at 22 percent, which increase is to be done as soon as practicable”.

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment would replace GST with an income tax rise, rejecting GST+ in its current form.

Considered and set aside: voting this way is not clearly a breach of the promise. The amendment would have replaced the proposed GST with a rise in the income tax rate to 22 percent, so voting against it keeps GST in the proposals; however, the promise was to oppose GST+ "in its current form" and pursue wholesale tax reform, and a deputy could oppose this specific flat income tax increase as not the reform they meant or as less support for the average islander, so the vote does not plainly contradict the promise.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To substitute in Proposition 1 the word “and” for the full stop and to insert, immediately after Proposition 1, the following additional Proposition: “1A. To direct, notwithstanding Proposition 1, the Policy & Resources Committee: a) not to continue with “the Reserved Measures”, so defined as: i. the introduction of a goods and services tax (“GST”) ii. the proposed International Services Entity arrangements insofar as those arrangements are dependent upon, or form part of, the introduction of GST; and iii. any reductions or restructuring of personal income tax, any associated payments, allowances or mitigations, which are intended to offset or redistribute the effects of GST; b) to continue with the development and implementation of the remainder of the tax reform package provided those measures are capable of proceeding independently of the Reserved Measures; c) to report to the States by October 2027 with regard to: i. the receipts from Pillar Two arrangements and the best available estimate of the recurring annual revenues arising from them; ii. recurring expenditure reductions and efficiencies which have been implemented, including but not limited to progress against the approximate £20 million assumption incorporated within the financial forecasts; iii. an updated assessment of the States’ financial position, including the General Revenue Reserve, investment performance, infrastructure requirements, financing commitments and debt-repayment obligations; iv. updated demographic, workforce and public service demand projections; v. progress in addressing the outstanding operational, staffing, systems and administrative issues within the Revenue Services, together with an assessment of its readiness to implement and administer any additional taxes; vi. updated implementation and administration costs associated with the Reserved Measures, including expenditure already incurred and any avoidable, unavoidable or abortive costs; and that the original propositions of this report shall not seek approval for the Reserved Measures; d) put not before the States any proposals in relations to the Reserved Measures until after the report outlined in 1A(c) has been considered by the States.”.

Voting Pour delivers this

The amendment would stop the Reserved Measures, which appear to include GST, in line with opposing GST+.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: The States are asked to decide: Whether, after consideration of the policy letter entitled 'Major Projects Portfolio' dated 24 March 2026, they are of the opinion: 1. To approve and implement the revised Major Projects Portfolio prioritisation approach, including the three Portfolio stages (Proposal Development, Pipeline and Delivery) and associated transition arrangements.

Voting Pour delivers this

The proposition approves a revised Major Projects Portfolio prioritisation approach, which bears on prioritising capital projects.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: 3. To agree the Assessment Criteria (as detailed in Appendix 2 of the Major Projects Portfolio Report 2026) against which the Policy & Resources Committee will prioritise new schemes into the Pipeline stage of the Portfolio.

Voting Pour delivers this

The proposition agrees the criteria for prioritising new schemes into the portfolio pipeline, which bears on capital programme prioritisation.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to take all such steps as are necessary to ensure that the States are provided with the opportunity to consider in the 2028 Budget Report options for an additional lifetime tax allowance (an Additional Earnings Allowance) in respect of otherwise taxable earned income to incentivise younger earners to remain, return, or establish in the island. (inserted by A55)

Voting Pour delivers this

The proposition directs that options for an Additional Earnings Allowance on earned income be put forward in the 2028 Budget, advancing but not enacting the allowance.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: 4. To amend the definition of a distribution in Section 62AA of the Income Tax (Guernsey) Law, 1975, as amended, so that it would also catch any transfer of the assets of the company for the repayment of, or otherwise, in respect of, an advance of money to the company by a member of the company or by a person connected with a member (whether or not the advance is secured), with an exclusion in respect of the repayment of commercial loans to trading companies.

Voting Pour delivers this

The proposition amends the definition of a distribution to catch asset transfers repaying member or connected-person advances, closing the shareholder-loan route for deferring tax on company profits.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: 2. To delegate authority to the Policy & Resources Committee to approve funding of up to £24 million from the General Revenue Reserve, subject to approval of an appropriately detailed business case for the rehabilitation of the Alderney runway, based on the design outlined in section 5. View this proposition's information page on gov.gg

Voting Pour delivers this

Delegating funding of up to £24m for the Alderney runway rehabilitation invests in air connectivity.

Official voting record →

Motion put to the States: 1. To authorise the Policy & Resources Committee to proceed with the procurement process for the rehabilitation of the Alderney Airport runway, based on the design outlined in section 5, by issuing an invitation to tender with the intent to engage in early contractor involvement. View this proposition's information page on gov.gg

Voting Pour delivers this

Authorising procurement to rehabilitate the Alderney Airport runway invests in air connectivity with another island of the Bailiwick.

Official voting record →