Guernsey Deputy Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF GUERNSEY

PRE-LAUNCH FEEDBACK PHASE — Public launch: Monday 24 August 2026
04 AugCorrected a deputy's Vacant Property Levy verdict — a co-sponsored amendment had been wrongly described as part of their PIT package.04 AugAdded a Deputy's Response field so deputies can add context to a ruling without changing the ruling itself.05 AugCorrected a deputy's GST promise wording ("avoid the worst of GST", not "avoid introducing GST"), and added a chamber-wide attendance flag.05 AugAdded Forward Guernsey's adopted party-manifesto pledges to its members' promise registers.07 AugExcused a deputy's six absences on 25 June (a single half-day illness), correcting their attendance rate.10 AugCorrected several deputies' cannabis promise scores — a near-unanimous procedural vote to withdraw a Requête (its lead sponsor faced an unrelated conduct complaint) had wrongly counted as opposing cannabis reform for every deputy who voted for it. The sponsor's own link stays scored, since it was their own conduct in question.10 AugCorrected a deputy's Notable Achievements — added the 2025 States surplus figure their profile was missing, and rewrote a campaign-group credit to past tense since no current coverage shows it's still active.12 AugAdded Hansard context a deputy supplied to a promise's adverse explanation — her vote set a possible future GST's rate and scope, but didn't itself commit her to introducing GST.12 AugRemoved an unrelated citation from a deputy's airport promise, and refreshed another promise's verdict to reflect a July amendment discarded without debate.12 AugCorrected a deputy's GST promise from mixed to kept — a downstream vote on GST's rate and scope had been wrongly weighted against a genuine vote to rescind GST entirely.12 AugLoaded the 22 divisions from the 15-17 July Tax Reform sitting, which a fault in our reading of the States’ voting record had left out of every deputy’s page, re-tested every promise against them, and put all 77 "voted against their own promise" findings back through editorial review — 41 were withdrawn as too indirect or too debatable to publish.12 AugCorrected two text errors on a deputy's page: an explanation left describing a vote's old, inverted direction, and a procedural vote misdated by a day (Hansard puts it on 16 July).12 AugReviewed a deputy's "mixed" GST reading raised in pre-launch review and confirmed it as an intentional distinction, not a bug - their promise is narrower than a flat anti-GST pledge.13 AugRestored the correct verdict on eleven promises across eleven deputies — after the previous day’s review withdrew a promise’s adverse findings, the recalculation counted votes the page itself marks as too partial to score, pushing verdicts to broken or mixed.13 AugCorrected a deputy's GST promise for the same downstream-vote reason as the day before, and replaced the AI-paraphrased responses shown in that deputy's name with their verbatim wording, after one paraphrase introduced an error of its own.14 AugCorrected a second, missed reference to a procedural vote's date on a deputy's page, which had left one page dating the same vote both 16 and 17 July.14 AugReconsidered that same GST promise two days later - a genuine scoring contradiction between two identically-worded amendments, plus a second look at a rate-setting vote, moved it from mixed to kept.15 AugExcused a deputy's 28 separate "Absent" ballots on 24-25 June - all one surgery-recovery absence, not a pattern of non-attendance.