Guernsey Deputy Scorecard

AN INDEPENDENT RECORD OF EVERY PROMISE MADE IN THE STATES OF GUERNSEY

Join the Facebook groupVisit the Jersey edition →Visit the Isle of Man edition →
← All deputies

Ross Le Brun

Member, Committee for Employment & Social Security

Sitting this term since May 2026

Top-five finishes in the deputy rankings

Email
ross.lebrun@deputies.gov.gg
As listed on the States of Guernsey register
Manifesto rating48 / 100 · Needs a second draftHow scored
Ross Le Brun

Ross Le Brun stood on a platform centred on housing affordability, smarter land use, sustainable public finances, and practical transport reform. He pledged to push for a States-run starter homes scheme, arguing that the private market had failed to deliver genuinely affordable-to-buy housing and that government intervention was necessary to create a new tier of the market. On land use, he called for building upwards and using existing plots more efficiently, while protecting open fields and agricultural land from speculative development.

On transport, Le Brun proposed establishing an Island Travel Commission bringing together government, commuters, parents, logistics businesses, and accessibility groups to develop practical solutions, with a commitment that the States would debate and begin delivering the commission's findings within the term. He also pledged to support road layout improvements, safer school routes, and reform of laws to enable micromobility options, alongside investigating a public service model for buses.

Le Brun expressed conditional support for a GST-plus model, insisting that income protections — including higher tax allowances and support for pensioners and lower-income households — must accompany any such measure. He also supported government-backed expansion of local food growing initiatives and ensuring visiting traders are registered and contributing fairly to public finances.

Sources

1

Amendments tabled

99%

States participation

170

States votes

1

Committee seats

Committee workload

  • Member, Committee for Employment & Social Security

One body, each with its own meeting calendar on top of the States sittings.

Seats as listed on parliament.gg, checked 16 October 2026.

Voted or took a side on 99% of 170 recorded votes on propositions and amendments in the States chamber since the start of this States term — procedural motions count alongside substantive policy votes, and abstaining or being absent both count against the rate. Committee meetings are counted separately, below.

Have your say

Discussion

Readers' comments. Not Ross Le Brun’s own response.

Discussion

Read what other readers make of Le Brun’s record, or add your own view.

Comments run on Disqus, a separate service. Opening them loads Disqus, which sets its own cookies. See the Disqus privacy policy.

Manifesto

Promises, and how they voted

2 of 7 promises kept on States votes, none broken. Of the 5 with no testing vote, 1 is rated in progress on the public record and 4 outstanding.

One row per policy area. Open an area to see each promise, the recorded States votes that test it and whether this deputy voted to deliver. Where no recorded vote bears on a promise, an AI delivery verdict assesses progress against the public record.

Kept / voted to deliverBroken / voted againstNo recorded vote yetAbsent or abstained
Housing & Planning0 of 2 kept · 0 votesNo vote yet: 2 not yet tested
  • No recorded votedirectional

    Candidate will push for smarter building by using plots efficiently, building upwards, and avoiding speculative field developments.

    “Guernsey's open land is precious. We must build smarter: Use plots more efficiently Build up apartments where appropriate Avoid sprawl and speculative field developments”

    Planning And DevelopmentEnvironment And Climate
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Ross Le Brun was elected in the April 2026 by-election and took office around May 2026, leaving only roughly three months in post before this assessment. His publicly reported activity since taking office centred on proposing a States-led starter-home scheme to the Housing Committee in July 2026 (Guernsey Press, 28 July and 3 August 2026), with no recorded action specifically targeting smarter plot use, upward apartment development, or curtailing speculative field developments. The wider Island Development Plan focused review — which does emphasise brownfield sites — was already in progress before he entered the States and is driven by the Development & Planning Authority, with no evidence Le Brun has contributed to it formally.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 22 Oct 2026·Proposition 3 — Pour34-1Carried

      Motion put to the States: SHOULD PROPOSITION 1 AND PROPOSITION 2 CARRY 3 (a) To agree that the Committee for Housing shall have the right of first refusal over the future use of the land at Lukis House, Swissville and Garden Hill for the delivery of Affordable Housing and mixed tenure housing, with such use to be given priority over alternative uses of the sites, subject to the Committee for Housing confirming the suitability and viability of the land for housing development; (b) To direct the Committee for Housing, in consultation with the Policy & Resources Committee, to identify the land required for housing development at these sites and undertake an outline viability assessment in order to identify preferred development strategies; (c) To direct the Committee for Housing to confirm its intentions for the use of such land no later than 31 December 2028 or 18 months before the planned opening of the new Children's Hub, whichever is earlier; (d) To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to reserve the land identified by the Committee for Housing under sub-paragraph 3(b) for housing purposes and, subject to any necessary statutory and property approvals, to make the land available for housing development following its vacation by the existing Health and Social Care users; (e) To direct the Policy & Resources Committee, not to allocate or commit any of the land at Lukis House, Swissville or Garden Hill to alternative uses until the Committee for Housing has had the opportunity to exercise its right of first refusal under sub-paragraph 3(a) unless the Committee for Housing has failed to confirm its intentions within the timeline specified in sub-paragraph 3(c).

      Prioritising existing urban sites for housing is in line with efficient use of plots and avoiding greenfield development.

      Official voting record →

    • 02 Oct 2026·Amendment 42 — Contre10-26Lost

      Motion put to the States: To insert an additional proposition as follows: “To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to investigate the financial yield and legal framework required to implement an Underutilised Property Levy (UPL) applying to underutilised residential and commercial property, based on: (a) residential property being treated as underutilised where it is used as a secondary or holiday home for fewer than 183 days per calendar year, or remains substantially vacant and unused for more than 12 months, subject to defined exemptions; (b)commercial property being treated as underutilised where it remains vacant, unleased or non-operational for more than 12 months, subject to defined exemptions; and (c) liability being calculated by applying a policy-determined multiplier to the property's existing Tax on Real Property (TRP) assessment; with the detailed framework, including exemptions, ant-avoidance safeguards, administrative and enforcement arrangements, and transitional provisions, to be developed in accordance with the details outlined in the Explanatory note; and to lay a comprehensive report before the States of Deliberation no later than June 2027 detailing the financial yield, legislative framework and enforcement mechanisms required for its operation.”

      An underutilised property levy would encourage efficient use of existing land and buildings.

      Shown as context only: the link to this promise is too weak to grade.

      Official voting record →

  • No recorded votespecific

    Candidate will pursue a States-run starter homes scheme to create an affordable-to-buy housing market.

    “I believe we need a new market of starter homes and the states has to step in and develop them because the market has not. Real affordable-to-buy housing... I have drafted a requete on a states run starter home idea id like to work on more with like minded people within the states.”

    HousingPlanning And Development
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedhigh confidence

    As of August 2026, Deputy Le Brun had met the Housing Committee to present his States-led starter homes idea, but the committee indicated it was pursuing 'very similar plans' focused on broader affordable housing delivery rather than a distinct affordable-to-buy starter homes scheme. Le Brun publicly expressed frustration in August 2026 that no 'something bolder' — a States-run starter home scheme using public land for genuinely affordable purchase — had materialised, and no requête on the subject had been formally lodged or debated in the States.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 22 Oct 2026·Amendment 1 — Pour34-0Carried

      Motion put to the States: To insert an additional proposition as follows: “SHOULD PROPOSITION 1 AND PROPOSITION 2 CARRY 3 (a) To agree that the Committee for Housing shall have the right of first refusal over the future use of the land at Lukis House, Swissville and Garden Hill for the delivery of Affordable Housing and mixed tenure housing, with such use to be given priority over alternative uses of the sites, subject to the Committee for Housing confirming the suitability and viability of the land for housing development; (b) To direct the Committee for Housing, in consultation with the Policy & Resources Committee, to identify the land required for housing development at these sites and undertake an outline viability assessment in order to identify preferred development strategies; (c) To direct the Committee for Housing to confirm its intentions for the use of such land no later than 31 December 2028 or 18 months before the planned opening of the new Children's Hub, whichever is earlier; (d) To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to reserve the land identified by the Committee for Housing under sub-paragraph 3(b) for housing purposes and, subject to any necessary statutory and property approvals, to make the land available for housing development following its vacation by the existing Health and Social Care users; (e) To direct the Policy & Resources Committee, not to allocate or commit any of the land at Lukis House, Swissville or Garden Hill to alternative uses until the Committee for Housing has had the opportunity to exercise its right of first refusal under sub-paragraph 3(a) unless the Committee for Housing has failed to confirm its intentions within the timeline specified in sub-paragraph 3(c).”

      The amendment gives Housing first refusal on sites for affordable and mixed-tenure housing, which is indirectly relevant to a starter homes scheme.

      Official voting record →

    • 22 Oct 2026·Proposition 3 — Pour34-1Carried

      Motion put to the States: SHOULD PROPOSITION 1 AND PROPOSITION 2 CARRY 3 (a) To agree that the Committee for Housing shall have the right of first refusal over the future use of the land at Lukis House, Swissville and Garden Hill for the delivery of Affordable Housing and mixed tenure housing, with such use to be given priority over alternative uses of the sites, subject to the Committee for Housing confirming the suitability and viability of the land for housing development; (b) To direct the Committee for Housing, in consultation with the Policy & Resources Committee, to identify the land required for housing development at these sites and undertake an outline viability assessment in order to identify preferred development strategies; (c) To direct the Committee for Housing to confirm its intentions for the use of such land no later than 31 December 2028 or 18 months before the planned opening of the new Children's Hub, whichever is earlier; (d) To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to reserve the land identified by the Committee for Housing under sub-paragraph 3(b) for housing purposes and, subject to any necessary statutory and property approvals, to make the land available for housing development following its vacation by the existing Health and Social Care users; (e) To direct the Policy & Resources Committee, not to allocate or commit any of the land at Lukis House, Swissville or Garden Hill to alternative uses until the Committee for Housing has had the opportunity to exercise its right of first refusal under sub-paragraph 3(a) unless the Committee for Housing has failed to confirm its intentions within the timeline specified in sub-paragraph 3(c).

      The proposition gives the Committee for Housing first refusal on sites for affordable and mixed-tenure housing, which partly bears on a route to affordable-to-buy homes.

      Official voting record →

    • 02 Oct 2026·Schedule for Future States Business — Pour35-2Carried

      Motion put to the States: The States are asked to decide: 1. Whether, in noting the urgency to improve supply of Affordable Housing, to be addressed through proposed increased land allocation as a result of the review of the Island Development Plan, they are of the opinion: a. To vary Rule 30(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the States to the extent necessary to permit a Special Meeting to be held on Tuesday 24th November 2026 to consider P.2026/72 - Review of the Island Development Plan - Development & Planning Authority Recommendations; and b. To insert, in Schedule 1 of the Rules of Procedure of the States of Deliberation and their Committees, immediately after the line item for 3rd November (Tuesday) 2026 the following line item “24th November (Tuesday) Island Development Plan Special Meeting” . 2. Whether, after consideration of the attached Schedule for Future States’ Business, which sets out items for consideration at the Ordinary States Meeting on 21st October 2026, they are of the opinion to approve the Schedule. View this proposition's information page on gov.gg

      The motion notes the urgency of affordable housing supply and expedites related business, which is loosely relevant to a starter homes scheme.

      Official voting record →

Economy, Tax & Cost of Living2 of 3 kept · 16 votesNo vote yet: 1 not yet tested
  • Keptconditional

    Candidate will conditionally support GST+ if it includes income protections and no better revenue alternatives are found.

    “I don't like paying more, but GST+ cannot be ignored. The '+' is critical, it comes with protections like higher income tax allowances, a new social security allowance, support for pensioners and helping lower-income households stay protected. If better alternatives are not found, we face a choice. Raise revenue needed to invest in our island, or see the services we rely on cut.”

    Tax And GstPublic Finances

    14 recorded votes test this promise

    4 Pour · 10 Contre
    • 02 Oct 2026✓Tax Reform 2026 Prop 1 (amended by A16 & A52 & A55 & A58) — Pour, voted to deliver22-17Carried

      Motion put to the States: Whether, after consideration of the Policy Letter ''Tax Reform 2026'' dated 8 June 2026, they are of the opinion: 1. To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to implement the package of tax reforms to make Guernsey and Alderney more financially sustainable as set out in sections 9 and 10 with the rates and thresholds as described in Appendix 7, save that, in relation to GST, food produced or grown by small independent suppliers is to be taxed at a rate of 0% and not at 3%, and with the following clarifications, and subject to the following: A) the Policy & Resources Committee, working with the Committee for Employment & Social Security, shall not bring GST into operation unless: i. the associated personal income tax and social security contribution mitigations are in force and operational, and are being applied through the relevant deduction, collection and assessment arrangements, before GST becomes chargeable; ii. the approved GST-related increases in the States Pension, income support and other benefits have taken effect, with payments at the increased rates commencing before GST becomes chargeable; and iii. the Essential Costs Relief Payment arrangements are in force and operational; for the purpose of this Proposition, an intention to apply relief retrospectively, make compensatory payments later or complete the necessary systems after GST has commenced shall not constitute implementation of the Mitigation Measures; b) the Policy & Resources Committee: i. shall defer the commencement of GST where any of the conditions in this Proposition 1(a) cannot be met; ii. shall revise the implementation timetable so that those conditions are met, including any necessary alignment with the commencement of a tax or contribution year; and iii. shall report promptly to the States on the reason for the delay, its financial implications and the revised timetable; c) no authority otherwise given under this item shall permit GST to commence in advance of compliance with those conditions; d) the Policy & Resources Committee and the Committee for Employment & Social Security, before any instrument bringing GST into operation is made or submitted for approval, shall publish a joint implementation assurance report: i. identifying each Mitigation Measure, its commencement date and the date from which its financial effect will be delivered; ii. setting out the evidence that the necessary legislation, staffing, systems, payroll interfaces, assessment arrangements and payment processes are ready to deliver the measures in accordance with this Proposition; and iii. identifying any outstanding implementation risks and explaining how those risks have been addressed, including the arrangements for receiving and determining Essential Costs Relief Payment Claims; e) where compliance depends upon an event occurring after publication of that report, the Committees shall publish confirmation that the event has occurred before GST becomes chargeable, if the conditions cannot be met, the terms under this proposition at 1(b) shall apply notwithstanding any commencement date previously appointed; f) the legislation implementing GST shall give effect to these commencement conditions and shall not confer power to dispense with them by administrative decision; and

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The substantive Tax Reform 2026 proposition, as amended, directs implementation of the GST+ package with its income-tax and social-security protections, so voting Pour delivers the conditional support.

      Official voting record →

    • 02 Oct 2026✓Tax Reform 2026 Prop 1A (as inserted by A55) — Pour, voted to deliver20-19Carried

      Motion put to the States: 1A To agree, notwithstanding Proposition 1, the following: i. to implement the package of tax reforms to make Guernsey and Alderney more financially sustainable as set out in sections 9 and 10 with the rates and thresholds as described in Appendix 7 in the first year of implementation SUBJECT TO the rates and thresholds progressing as follows: with effect from 24 months following the implementation of changes to Income Tax and Social Security contributions and the introduction of a GST: o Social Security contributions allowance: £12,600 (provisional*); o Higher rate of Income Tax threshold: £30,500 (provisional*); o Pre-emptive increase in pensions and other benefits: 0.6%; o Essentials Costs Relief Payment: set to reflect the estimated impact of a 4% GST on a basket of essential goods as described in Billet d’État No III of 2026; o GST: 4%; and, with effect from 48 months following the implementation of changes to Income Tax and Social Security contributions and the introduction of a GST: o Social Security contributions allowance: £13,000 (provisional*); o Higher rate of Income Tax threshold: £33,000 (provisional); o Pre-emptive increase in pensions and other benefits: 0.6%; o Essential Costs Relief Payment: set to reflect the estimated impact of a 5% GST on a basket of essential goods as described in Billet d’État No III of 2026; o GST: 5%. *monetary thresholds to be adjusted for inflation prior to implementation ii. with the Committee for Employment & Social Security to recommend to the States of Deliberation annually uprating: o the personal Income Tax allowance; o the Social Security contributions allowance; o the Higher Rate of Income Tax threshold; o the Essentials Cost Relief Payment; and o the rates of the States Pension, Income Support and any other impacted benefits by a minimum of RPIX to ensure that the real value after inflation of the protection incorporated in the package of reform is maintained.”. iii. to include within the Fiscal Policy Framework a fiscal rule that GST shall not exceed 5%.

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Proposition 1A, inserted by Amendment 55, confirms implementation of the package subject to conditions, which advances GST+ with its safeguards.

      Official voting record →

    • 01 Oct 2026✓Amendment 52 — Pour, voted to deliver33-4Carried

      Motion put to the States: To insert, in Proposition 1 immediately after the words “Appendix 7” the following: “Subject to the following: a) the Policy & Resources Committee, working with the Committee for Employment & Social Security, shall not to bring GST into operation unless: i. the associated personal income tax and social security contribution mitigations are in force and operational, and are being applied through the relevant deduction, collection and assessment arrangements, before GST becomes chargeable; ii. the approved GST-related increases in the States Pension, income support and other benefits have taken effect, with payments at the increased rates commencing before GST becomes chargeable; and iii. the Essential Costs Relief Payment arrangements are in force and operational. for the purposes of this Proposition, an intention to apply relief retrospectively, make compensatory payments later or complete the necessary systems after GST has commenced shall not constitute implementation of the Mitigation Measures. b) the Policy & Resources Committee: i. shall defer the commencement of GST where any of the conditions in this Proposition 1(a) cannot be met; ii. shall revise the implementation timetable so that those conditions are met, including any necessary alignment with the commencement of a tax or contribution year; and iii. shall report promptly to the States on the reason for the delay, its financial implications and the revised timetable. c) no authority otherwise given under this item shall permit GST to commence in advance of compliance with those conditions. d) the Policy & Resources Committee and the Committee for Employment & Social Security, before any instrument bringing GST into operation is made or submitted for approval, shall publish a joint implementation assurance report: i. identifying each Mitigation Measure, its commencement date and the date from which its financial effect will be delivered; ii. setting out the evidence that the necessary legislation, staffing, systems, payroll interfaces, assessment arrangements and payment processes are ready to deliver the measures in accordance with this Proposition; and iii. identifying any outstanding implementation risks and explaining how those risks have been addressed, including the arrangements for receiving and determining Essential Costs Relief Payment claims. e) where compliance depends upon an event occurring after publication of that report, the Committees shall publish confirmation that the event has occurred before GST becomes chargeable. If the conditions cannot be met, the terms under this Proposition at 1(b) shall apply notwithstanding any commencement date previously appointed. f) the legislation implementing GST shall give effect to these commencement conditions and shall not confer power to dispense with them by administrative decision.”.

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Amendment 52 makes GST operation conditional on the associated income tax and social security protections being in place, which tests the 'the + is critical' condition directly; voting Pour secures it.

      Official voting record →

    • 01 Oct 2026✓Amendment 55 — Pour, voted to deliver21-16Carried

      Motion put to the States: 1. To substitute in Proposition 1 the word “and” for the full stop and to insert, immediately after Proposition 1, the following additional Proposition: “1A To agree, notwithstanding Proposition 1, the following: i. to implement the package of tax reforms to make Guernsey and Alderney more financially sustainable as set out in sections 9 and 10 with the rates and thresholds as described in Appendix 7 in the first year of implementation SUBJECT TO the rates and thresholds progressing as follows: with effect from 24 months following the implementation of changes to Income Tax and Social Security contributions and the introduction of a GST: o Social Security contributions allowance: £12,600 (provisional*); o Higher rate of Income Tax threshold: £30,500 (provisional*); o Pre-emptive increase in pensions and other benefits: 0.6%; o Essentials Costs Relief Payment: set to reflect the estimated impact of a 4% GST on a basket of essential goods as described in Billet d’État No III of 2026; o GST: 4%; and, with effect from 48 months following the implementation of changes to Income Tax and Social Security contributions and the introduction of a GST: o Social Security contributions allowance: £13,000 (provisional*); o Higher rate of Income Tax threshold: £33,000 (provisional); o Pre-emptive increase in pensions and other benefits: 0.6%; o Essential Costs Relief Payment: set to reflect the estimated impact of a 5% GST on a basket of essential goods as described in Billet d’État No III of 2026; o GST: 5%. *monetary thresholds to be adjusted for inflation prior to implementation ii. with the Committee for Employment & Social Security to recommend to the States of Deliberation annually uprating: o the personal Income Tax allowance; o the Social Security contributions allowance; o the Higher Rate of Income Tax threshold; o the Essentials Cost Relief Payment; and o the rates of the States Pension, Income Support and any other impacted benefits by a minimum of RPIX to ensure that the real value after inflation of the protection incorporated in the package of reform is maintained.”. iii. to include within the Fiscal Policy Framework a fiscal rule that GST shall not exceed 5%. 2. To delete Proposition 3 and replace it with: “To direct that before any increase in the rate of GST from 3% to 4%, or from 4% to 5% shall take effect, the Policy & Resources Committee shall publish an assurance review from the independent Fiscal Policy Panel affirming that in the Panel’s opinion the increase is consistent with the Fiscal Policy Framework and is necessary and appropriate having regard to the island’s fiscal, economic and inflationary environment and the impact of economic conditions and the proposed increase on lower- and middle income households. In the event that the Fiscal Policy Panel’s assurance review concludes that the scheduled increase in the rate of GST does not satisfy the requirements herein, the scheduled increase shall not take effect and shall instead be deferred for at least 12 months until the Panel concludes that the requirements have been met.”. 3. In Proposition 4, to insert after the words “to give effect to the above decisions” the following: “, and to direct that such legislation include provision requiring that any resolution to approve legislation that seeks to vary or repeal the legislative protections referred to in paragraph 10.4, and outlined in Resolution I. 2 of Billet d’État No III of 2026 made on the 26th February 2026, shall be deemed to have carried only if not less than two-thirds of the Members present vote in favour.”. 4. To insert an additional Proposition: “To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to take all such steps as are necessary to ensure that the States are provided with the opportunity to consider in the 2028 Budget Report options for an additional lifetime tax allowance (an Additional Earnings Allowance) in respect of otherwise taxable earned income to incentivise younger earners to remain, return or establish in the island.”. 5. To insert an additional Proposition: “To direct the Policy & Resources Committee and the Committee for Housing to take all such steps as are necessary to ensure that the States are provided with the opportunity to consider in the 2028 Budget Report options to introduce a tax-free Guernsey Property Savings Account (GPSA) to incentivise and better enable saving by first-time buyers for the purposes of buying a home in Guernsey or Alderney.”. 6. To insert an additional Proposition: “To direct the inclusion within the scope of longer-term work (envisaged in Appendix 3 of the Tax Review Sub-committee’s report) an examination of the role of Social Security contributions in Guernsey’s revenue base.”. 7. To replace the additional proposition to be inserted by Amendment 24 with the following: “To direct the Policy & Resources Committee, in consultation with the Committee for Employment & Social Security, as part of the Government Work Plan Super Priority ‘Shape and Strengthen the Focus on Early Years and Families,’ to consider the re-introduction of child tax allowances or credits, alternative tax or Social Security measures, and existing measures including, but not limited to, Family Allowance, charge of child and dependent relative tax provisions, reporting as soon as practical to the States of Deliberation with recommendations which should include costed, targeted measures that most effectively support families with the costs of raising children.”.

      Voting Pour delivers this

      Amendment 55 adds a proviso to implement the tax reform package with its rates and thresholds and safeguards, so Pour keeps the package with its protections.

      Official voting record →

    • 01 Oct 2026✓Amendment 29 — Contre, voted to deliver9-29Lost

      Motion put to the States: To substitute in Proposition 1 the word “and” for the full stop and to insert, immediately after Proposition 1, the following additional Proposition: “1A. To agree, notwithstanding Proposition 1, that the Essential Cost Relief Payment shall not form part of the Tax Reform 2026 package and, accordingly: a) to rescind resolution I 1(b)(ii) of Billet d’Etat III of 2026 made on 26th February 2026, insofar as it provides for the implementation, administration, uprating and review of an Essential Cost Relief Payment scheme; b) to rescind that part of Resolution 1 2 of Billet d’Etat III of 2026 made on 26th February 2026 that requires proposals for any future increase in the standard rate of a goods and services tax to include a compensatory adjustment to the level of the Essential Cost Relief Payment; and c) to direct the Policy & Resources Committee and the Committee for Employment & Social Security to make such consequential changes to the implementation of the Tax Reform 2026 package as are necessary to give effect to this resolution.”.

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The amendment removes the Essential Cost Relief Payment from the package, which is a lower-income protection, so Contre preserves the '+'.

      Official voting record →

    • 30 Sept 2026✓Amendment 48 — Contre, voted to deliver5-33Lost

      Motion put to the States: In Proposition 1 after “Appendix 7” insert the following: “, subject to replacing the proposed goods and services tax with an increase in the standard rate of income tax from 20 percent to a single rate at 22 percent, which increase is to be done as soon as practicable”.

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The amendment replaces GST with a 22% income-tax rate, an alternative to GST+, so opposing it delivers the package.

      Official voting record →

    • 30 Sept 2026✓Amendment 57 — Contre, voted to deliver10-27Lost

      Motion put to the States: To delete the propositions and substitute therefor: “1. To direct the States Assembly and Constitution Committee to return to the States at its meeting on 17th March 2027 with arrangements for the holding (under the provisions of the relevant legislation) of a referendum on Tax reform. 2. To direct the Committee to agree that the question to be put to the electorate in the referendum shall be in a binary form along the following lines: “Do you support the introduction of the tax reform package proposed by the Policy & Resources Committee? Yes or No.”.”.

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The amendment replaces the package with a later referendum, delaying GST+, so Contre advances it.

      Official voting record →

    • 30 Sept 2026✓Amendment 54 — Contre, voted to deliver13-27Lost

      Motion put to the States: To delete all propositions and insert: 1. To agree that consideration of the proposed Goods and Services Tax and the associated Income Tax and Social Security contribution reforms detailed in the Policy Letter shall be deferred until a further review of revenue-generation options has been conducted. 2. To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to investigate the introduction of a tax on insurance premiums. 3. To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to return to the States no later than March 2027 with its findings and proposals for the introduction of a tax on insurance premiums, alongside and as an alternative to the proposals for GST detailed in this Policy Letter.

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The amendment defers GST and the associated reforms pending a further review of revenue options, which works against implementing the package now, though the promise itself is conditional on no better alternatives.

      Official voting record →

    • 30 Sept 2026✓Sursis Motive — Contre, voted to deliver16-24Lost

      Motion put to the States: To sursis the propositions until such time that the Chief Financial Officer has provided the States with a comprehensive report on the States financial position or 31st July 2028, whichever is earlier and to direct the Policy & Resources Committee to return the States with a tax reform package that does not include a goods and services tax.

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The sursis would delay the proposals and require a package without GST, so Contre advances GST+.

      Official voting record →

    • 30 Sept 2026✓Amendment 33 — Contre, voted to deliver5-33Lost

      Motion put to the States: To delete propositions 1, 2 and 3 and to substitute therefor: “1. To agree that the individual standard rate for income tax should be 22% for 2027 and 2028 and at 20% for 2029 and onwards. 2. To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to investigate an increase to the Maximum liability on income for non-Guernsey sources (including Guernsey bank interest and income derived from Guernsey exempt investment schemes, which are non-resident for Guernsey tax purposes) and the maximum liability – worldwide income and to report back to the States via the Annual Budget for 2028.”.

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The amendment substitutes a higher income-tax rate for the GST package; it is an alternative to GST+, so Contre delivers the promise.

      Official voting record →

    • 17 Jul 2026✓Amendment 19 — Contre, voted to deliver7-30Lost

      Motion put to the States: At the end of Proposition 1 insert the words “, subject to excluding the following: “a) the introduction of a goods and services tax; b) the changes to social security contributions; c) the introduction of new, and changes to, transport taxes”.

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The amendment would exclude GST, social security changes and transport taxes from the package, undermining GST+, so Contre delivers it.

      Official voting record →

    • 16 Jul 2026✓Amendment 2 — Contre, voted to deliver10-28Lost

      Motion put to the States: To delete all propositions and to substitute therefor: “1.To agree a goods and services tax shall not be introduced, and: (i) to rescind Resolution I. 1B. and Resolution I. 1C. of Billet d’Etat No. XIX dated 14th October, 2024 made on 8th November 2024; and (ii) to direct the Policy & Resources Committee to cease all preparations for the introduction of any goods and services tax.”.

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The amendment would reject GST outright and cease all work on it, so voting Contre is what keeps the GST+ package alive.

      Official voting record →

    • 16 Jul 2026✓Amendment 14 — Contre, voted to deliver15-23Lost

      Motion put to the States: To delete Propositions 1 to 3 and substitute therefor: “1.To agree that neither the proposed Goods and Services Tax nor the associated Income Tax and Social Security contribution reforms detailed in the Policy Letter shall be introduced as part of the Tax Reform Programme. 2.To agree that the proposed Transport Taxes shall proceed as set out in this Policy Letter at Paragraph 9.7 and as more specifically described therein. 3.To agree that the proposed Corporate Tax amendments shall proceed as set out in Paragraph 9.21 of this Policy Letter and as more specifically described therein, excepting that at the third bullet point of paragraph 9.21, the term “ISE” shall be substituted with “Corporate Levy” (and this substitution shall take effect wherever relevant). 4.To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to develop and bring before the States proposals, for implementation on the same timetable as the tax measures proposed in this Policy Letter where reasonably practicable, for the introduction of a Corporate Levy payable by registered Guernsey companies, having regard to the work previously undertaken by the Tax Review Sub-Committee, and including consideration of whether such levy should comprise: a fixed annual levy payable by each registered company; a levy differentiated according to the size or scale of the undertaking, including consideration of whether existing company classifications may provide an appropriate and proportionate basis for differentiation; or such other structure as the Committee considers best achieves the objectives of fairness, administrative simplicity and efficient revenue collection. 5.To direct the Committee for Economic Development, in consultation with the Policy & Resources Committee, to develop and bring before the States, on the same timetable where reasonably practicable, proposals for the introduction of a Visitor Levy in accordance with the extant States Resolution, with all revenues arising from such levy to be paid into the General Revenue Account and not hypothecated for expenditure by any particular Committee or industry sector. 6.To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to revise the implementation programme and associated implementation budget for Tax Reform to reflect the removal of the proposed Goods and Services Tax and associated Income Tax and Social Security contribution reforms, including the consequential reduction in implementation cost, implementation activity, systems development, staffing and administrative requirements. 7. To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to return to the States with: 1. a revised implementation programme; 2. a revised implementation budget; 3. revised estimates of one-off implementation costs; 4. revised estimates of ongoing administration costs; 5. revised estimates of annual recurring revenues; and 6. revised staffing assumptions, reflecting the alternative package approved under this Proposition within a period that results in the States being capable of meeting the proposed implementation timetable as proposed within the Policy Letter. 8.To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to return to the States with an assurance review in 2030 as set out in section 12 of the Policy Letter, the scope of which shall be adjusted, where necessary, to take account of the removal of GST and Social Security measures from the package under these proposals and the application of those measures considered herein.”.

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The amendment would drop both GST and the associated income-tax and social-security reforms, so opposing it delivers GST+.

      Official voting record →

    • 15 Jul 2026✓Amendment 3 — Contre, voted to deliver14-25Lost

      Motion put to the States: To delete the propositions and substitute therefor: 1. To direct the States Assembly and Constitution Committee to return to the States at its meeting on 21st October 2026 with arrangements for the holding (under the provisions of the relevant legislation) of a referendum on Tax reform. 2. To direct the Committee to agree that the question to be put to the electorate in the referendum shall be in a binary form along the following lines: “Do you support the introduction of a GST (goods and services tax)? Yes or No.”.

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The amendment substitutes a referendum on tax reform for the package, delaying or blocking GST+; a Contre vote keeps the package moving, though a referendum could also be read as a public-consent test.

      Official voting record →

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 02 Oct 2026·Tax Reform 2026 Prop 1.6 (as inserted by A58) — Pour37-3Carried

      Motion put to the States: subject to introducing an Alderney Essentials Cost Relief Payment that is calculated based on the estimated annual GST incurred by a household on Income Support, the value of the payment being in line with the minimum income standard as priced for Alderney.

      An Alderney Essentials Cost Relief Payment is a design detail protecting low-income households within the package.

      Official voting record →

    • 02 Oct 2026·Tax Reform 2026 Prop 11 (A24 amended by A55) — Pour36-4Carried

      Motion put to the States: To direct the Policy & Resources Committee, in consultation with the Committee for Employment & Social Security, as part of the Government Work Plan Super Priority 'Shape and Strengthen Focus on Early Years and Families.' to consider the re-introduction of child allowances or credits, alternative tax or Social Security measures, and existing measures including, but not limited to, Family Allowance, charge of child and dependent relative tax provisions, reporting as soon as practical to the States of Deliberation with recommendations which should include costed, targeted measures that most effectively support families with the costs of raising children.(As inserted by A24 and amended by A55)

      The proposition asks for consideration of child allowances or credits as a mitigation within the package.

      Official voting record →

    • 01 Oct 2026·Amendment 7 — Pour15-24Lost

      Motion put to the States: In Proposition 1, immediately after the words “Appendix 7” insert the following words “subject to zero rating food and non-alcoholic drink for any goods and services tax”.

      Zero-rating food is a mitigation detail within the GST design, so it is context only.

      Official voting record →

    • 30 Sept 2026·Amendment 45 — Contre18-21Lost

      Motion put to the States: To substitute in Proposition 1 the word “and” for the full stop and to insert, immediately after Proposition 1, the following additional Proposition: “1A. To direct, notwithstanding Proposition 1, the Policy & Resources Committee: a) not to continue with “the Reserved Measures”, so defined as: i. the introduction of a goods and services tax (“GST”) ii. the proposed International Services Entity arrangements insofar as those arrangements are dependent upon, or form part of, the introduction of GST; and iii. any reductions or restructuring of personal income tax, any associated payments, allowances or mitigations, which are intended to offset or redistribute the effects of GST; b) to continue with the development and implementation of the remainder of the tax reform package provided those measures are capable of proceeding independently of the Reserved Measures; c) to report to the States by October 2027 with regard to: i. the receipts from Pillar Two arrangements and the best available estimate of the recurring annual revenues arising from them; ii. recurring expenditure reductions and efficiencies which have been implemented, including but not limited to progress against the approximate £20 million assumption incorporated within the financial forecasts; iii. an updated assessment of the States’ financial position, including the General Revenue Reserve, investment performance, infrastructure requirements, financing commitments and debt-repayment obligations; iv. updated demographic, workforce and public service demand projections; v. progress in addressing the outstanding operational, staffing, systems and administrative issues within the Revenue Services, together with an assessment of its readiness to implement and administer any additional taxes; vi. updated implementation and administration costs associated with the Reserved Measures, including expenditure already incurred and any avoidable, unavoidable or abortive costs; and that the original propositions of this report shall not seek approval for the Reserved Measures; d) put not before the States any proposals in relations to the Reserved Measures until after the report outlined in 1A(c) has been considered by the States.”.

      The amendment would direct that the 'Reserved Measures' not be continued, which may include GST; opposing it keeps the package intact.

      Official voting record →

    • 17 Jul 2026·Amendment 24 — Pour26-5Carried

      Motion put to the States: To insert two additional propositions as follows: “3A. To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to introduce a Child Responsibility Tax Allowance (as defined in the explanatory memorandum) in respect of each dependent child for the purposes of income tax, with effect from implementation of the wider tax reform package, or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, and 3B. to direct the Policy & Resources Committee, in developing the detailed proposals, to undertake fiscal and distributional analysis using Revenue Service data, including consideration of the interaction of the proposed allowance with existing child-related tax provisions and the overall impact of the measure within the wider tax reform package.”.

      The amendment adds a Child Responsibility Tax Allowance alongside the reform, an additional household protection within the package.

      Official voting record →

    • 15 Jul 2026·Sursis — Contre17-22Lost

      Motion put to the States: To sursis the propositions either until such time that Members of the States have received the following: i) a report from the new Chief Resourcing Officer on the States finances; and ii) evidence that the Revenue Services has resolved its backlog and can demonstrate that it is successfully able to manage its future workflow, or by 19th July 2028, whichever is earlier.

      The sursis would postpone the tax reform propositions until further reports, delaying GST+; Contre keeps them moving.

      Official voting record →

  • Keptdirectional

    Candidate will support protecting lower incomes, investing in public services/infrastructure, and ensuring visiting traders are registered and paying their fair share.

    “I support: Protect lower incomes Invest in public services Invest in public infrastructure Fund community, sports, and arts spaces and events Support local food producers Provide affordable space for start ups and small businesses Ensure visiting traders are registered and contributing their fair share”

    Public FinancesEconomy And BusinessCost Of Living

    2 recorded votes test this promise

    1 Pour · 1 Contre
    • 01 Oct 2026✓Amendment 52 — Pour, voted to deliver33-4Carried

      Motion put to the States: To insert, in Proposition 1 immediately after the words “Appendix 7” the following: “Subject to the following: a) the Policy & Resources Committee, working with the Committee for Employment & Social Security, shall not to bring GST into operation unless: i. the associated personal income tax and social security contribution mitigations are in force and operational, and are being applied through the relevant deduction, collection and assessment arrangements, before GST becomes chargeable; ii. the approved GST-related increases in the States Pension, income support and other benefits have taken effect, with payments at the increased rates commencing before GST becomes chargeable; and iii. the Essential Costs Relief Payment arrangements are in force and operational. for the purposes of this Proposition, an intention to apply relief retrospectively, make compensatory payments later or complete the necessary systems after GST has commenced shall not constitute implementation of the Mitigation Measures. b) the Policy & Resources Committee: i. shall defer the commencement of GST where any of the conditions in this Proposition 1(a) cannot be met; ii. shall revise the implementation timetable so that those conditions are met, including any necessary alignment with the commencement of a tax or contribution year; and iii. shall report promptly to the States on the reason for the delay, its financial implications and the revised timetable. c) no authority otherwise given under this item shall permit GST to commence in advance of compliance with those conditions. d) the Policy & Resources Committee and the Committee for Employment & Social Security, before any instrument bringing GST into operation is made or submitted for approval, shall publish a joint implementation assurance report: i. identifying each Mitigation Measure, its commencement date and the date from which its financial effect will be delivered; ii. setting out the evidence that the necessary legislation, staffing, systems, payroll interfaces, assessment arrangements and payment processes are ready to deliver the measures in accordance with this Proposition; and iii. identifying any outstanding implementation risks and explaining how those risks have been addressed, including the arrangements for receiving and determining Essential Costs Relief Payment claims. e) where compliance depends upon an event occurring after publication of that report, the Committees shall publish confirmation that the event has occurred before GST becomes chargeable. If the conditions cannot be met, the terms under this Proposition at 1(b) shall apply notwithstanding any commencement date previously appointed. f) the legislation implementing GST shall give effect to these commencement conditions and shall not confer power to dispense with them by administrative decision.”.

      Voting Pour delivers this

      The amendment makes GST conditional on income tax and social security protections for lower incomes.

      Official voting record →

    • 01 Oct 2026✓Amendment 29 — Contre, voted to deliver9-29Lost

      Motion put to the States: To substitute in Proposition 1 the word “and” for the full stop and to insert, immediately after Proposition 1, the following additional Proposition: “1A. To agree, notwithstanding Proposition 1, that the Essential Cost Relief Payment shall not form part of the Tax Reform 2026 package and, accordingly: a) to rescind resolution I 1(b)(ii) of Billet d’Etat III of 2026 made on 26th February 2026, insofar as it provides for the implementation, administration, uprating and review of an Essential Cost Relief Payment scheme; b) to rescind that part of Resolution 1 2 of Billet d’Etat III of 2026 made on 26th February 2026 that requires proposals for any future increase in the standard rate of a goods and services tax to include a compensatory adjustment to the level of the Essential Cost Relief Payment; and c) to direct the Policy & Resources Committee and the Committee for Employment & Social Security to make such consequential changes to the implementation of the Tax Reform 2026 package as are necessary to give effect to this resolution.”.

      Voting Contre delivers this

      The amendment would strip the Essential Cost Relief Payment, a lower-income protection, so Contre protects lower incomes.

      Official voting record →

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 02 Oct 2026·Tax Reform 2026 Prop 1 (amended by A16 & A52 & A55 & A58) — Pour22-17Carried

      Motion put to the States: Whether, after consideration of the Policy Letter ''Tax Reform 2026'' dated 8 June 2026, they are of the opinion: 1. To direct the Policy & Resources Committee to implement the package of tax reforms to make Guernsey and Alderney more financially sustainable as set out in sections 9 and 10 with the rates and thresholds as described in Appendix 7, save that, in relation to GST, food produced or grown by small independent suppliers is to be taxed at a rate of 0% and not at 3%, and with the following clarifications, and subject to the following: A) the Policy & Resources Committee, working with the Committee for Employment & Social Security, shall not bring GST into operation unless: i. the associated personal income tax and social security contribution mitigations are in force and operational, and are being applied through the relevant deduction, collection and assessment arrangements, before GST becomes chargeable; ii. the approved GST-related increases in the States Pension, income support and other benefits have taken effect, with payments at the increased rates commencing before GST becomes chargeable; and iii. the Essential Costs Relief Payment arrangements are in force and operational; for the purpose of this Proposition, an intention to apply relief retrospectively, make compensatory payments later or complete the necessary systems after GST has commenced shall not constitute implementation of the Mitigation Measures; b) the Policy & Resources Committee: i. shall defer the commencement of GST where any of the conditions in this Proposition 1(a) cannot be met; ii. shall revise the implementation timetable so that those conditions are met, including any necessary alignment with the commencement of a tax or contribution year; and iii. shall report promptly to the States on the reason for the delay, its financial implications and the revised timetable; c) no authority otherwise given under this item shall permit GST to commence in advance of compliance with those conditions; d) the Policy & Resources Committee and the Committee for Employment & Social Security, before any instrument bringing GST into operation is made or submitted for approval, shall publish a joint implementation assurance report: i. identifying each Mitigation Measure, its commencement date and the date from which its financial effect will be delivered; ii. setting out the evidence that the necessary legislation, staffing, systems, payroll interfaces, assessment arrangements and payment processes are ready to deliver the measures in accordance with this Proposition; and iii. identifying any outstanding implementation risks and explaining how those risks have been addressed, including the arrangements for receiving and determining Essential Costs Relief Payment Claims; e) where compliance depends upon an event occurring after publication of that report, the Committees shall publish confirmation that the event has occurred before GST becomes chargeable, if the conditions cannot be met, the terms under this proposition at 1(b) shall apply notwithstanding any commencement date previously appointed; f) the legislation implementing GST shall give effect to these commencement conditions and shall not confer power to dispense with them by administrative decision; and

      The package includes lower-income protections and funds for public services and infrastructure, so supporting it fits the promise.

      Official voting record →

    • 15 Jul 2026·Amendments to Statutory Minimum Wage Arrangements to come into force on 1 October 2026 — Pour33-3Carried

      Motion put to the States: Whether, after consideration of the Policy Letter entitled ‘Amendments to Statutory Minimum Wage Arrangements to Come into Force on 1st October 2026’, dated 8th June 2026, they are of the opinion: 1. To approve the Minimum Wage (Prescribed Rates and Qualifications) (Guernsey) (Amendment) Regulations, 2026 (as set out in Appendix 1 to this Policy Letter), which, pursuant to sections 1(3) and 3(1) of the Minimum Wage (Guernsey) Law, 2009, prescribe the hourly minimum wage rates set out below with effect from 1st October 2026: a. Adult Minimum Wage Rate: £13.10 per hour (for workers aged 18 and over), and b. Young Persons’ Minimum Wage Rate: £11.80 per hour (for workers aged 16 and 17).

      Approving the minimum wage amendments supports protecting lower earners.

      Official voting record →

  • No recorded votedirectional

    Candidate will support or propose government-backed expansion of local food growing initiatives and protection of agricultural land.

    “I would support or propose government backed expansion of existing inititives like: GROW, the prison growing program, the Soil farm and school projects. Community allotments and local growers. Protecting agricultural land and supporting farmers, fishermen, and food producers.”

    Agriculture And FishingEnvironment And Climate
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    Ross Le Brun was elected in the April 2026 Guernsey by-election and sworn in shortly thereafter, giving him only approximately four months in office as of September 2026. No evidence was found of him proposing, supporting, or initiating any States debate, requête, committee motion, or policy letter related to expanding GROW, the prison growing programme, the Soil Farm, school projects, community allotments, or agricultural land protection. His sole identifiable States contribution found in reporting — at his first States meeting in July 2026, as noted by the Guernsey Press — concerned public service staffing levels, not food growing or agriculture.

    Related votes (shown for context; too partial or indirect to count towards the score)

    • 01 Oct 2026·Amendment 16 — Pour28-11Carried

      Motion put to the States: In Proposition 1, immediately after the words “Appendix 7” insert the following words “save that, in relation to GST, food produced or grown by small independent suppliers is to be taxed at a rate of 0% and not at 3%.

      Zero GST on food from small independent suppliers supports local food growers.

      Official voting record →

Infrastructure & Environment0 of 2 kept · 0 votesNo vote yet: 1 in progress · 1 not yet tested
  • No recorded votedirectional

    Candidate will propose or support road layout improvements, safer school routes, micromobility law reform, and investigation of a public bus model.

    “I would propose or support: Practical improvements to road layouts Safer school routes reducing congestion Sensible investment to ease pressure on roads Modernise laws to enable micromobility options Investigate public service model for buses”

    Infrastructure And TransportChildren And Families
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictIn progresshigh confidence

    Since being elected in April 2026's by-election, Deputy Le Brun has actively pursued his transport manifesto through the States' Rule 14 written questions mechanism, filing eight sets of questions — seven of which concerned road safety, pavement surfing, parking, and bus reliability — as reported by Bailiwick Express (September 1–2, 2026). On the bus investigation strand, he posed formal written questions to the Environment & Infrastructure Committee in September 2026 raising concerns about Stagecoach reliability and driver welfare, and separately questioned the alternative delivery model; however, E&I declined to reassess alternative models given its five-year Stagecoach contract (Guernsey Press, September 14, 2026). No legislation on micromobility or an Island Travel Commission has yet been established, and the committee's responses to his road safety questions have largely pushed back, telling him that stopping pavement surfing was 'not realistic' (Bailiwick Express, August 28, 2026); delivery of any concrete policy change remains outstanding.

  • No recorded votespecificwithin this term

    Candidate will propose an Island Travel Commission whose findings the States would debate and begin delivering within this term.

    “I would propose an Island Travel Commission, bringing together government with everyday road users, parents, commuters, logistics businesses, and accessibility groups to shape practical solutions based on real experience. The States would commit to debate the commission's findings within this term, with a view to starting delivery of agreed improvements with real public backing.”

    Infrastructure And TransportGovernance And Constitution
    No recorded vote - delivery verdictNot yet testedmedium confidence

    As of August 2026, no Island Travel Commission has been proposed, established, or debated in the States of Deliberation. Deputy Le Brun has been active on road safety — filing Rule 14 questions to Environment & Infrastructure about pavement surfing and road user safety (August 2026) and attending a youth active travel event (July 2026) — but this falls short of the formal cross-stakeholder commission he promised. E&I told Le Brun in late August 2026 that it had no plans to develop a new traffic plan, suggesting the institutional environment is not yet receptive to the commission concept.

In the States

Their record in the Assembly

Took a side on 99% of 170 recorded votes and tabled 1 amendment.

What this deputy has proposed, asked and turned up for, separate from the promise scorecard above.

Notable achievements

  1. 01

    Founded the annual Chalk Art Festival at Saumarez Park. Source →

  2. 02

    Originated the "School Street" road-safety scheme at Castel Primary, closing the road to traffic at drop-off/pickup. Source →

  3. 03

    Personally painted large "children crossing" road markings at a Castel junction to slow drivers. Source →

  4. 04

    Organised a road-safety event with Guernsey Sixth Form Centre’s Active Travel Group and 16 deputies, described as the island’s largest-ever youth-led political engagement. Source →

1tabledAmendment1 never reached a vote · most recent lodged 26 Oct 2026
  • 26 Oct 2026

    Amendment 13 · P.2026/82

    The Assembly never reached it, so there is no Hansard record of it being moved. Led by Sally Rochester. Official filing →

    Lodged, not moved

A record of what this deputy proposed, not of how they voted. It does not feed the kept-rate: an amendment the Assembly never reaches never produces a vote on its substance.

99%took a sideVotes in the States170 recorded votes this term. Latest 12, all on 22 Oct 2026: 11 Pour, 1 Contre

  • Open Market Housing Register (Guernsey) (Amendment) Law, 2026

    22 Oct 2026 · carried

    Pour

  • Planning Exemptions for Dower & EV Chargers

    22 Oct 2026 · carried

    Pour

  • Proposition 3

    22 Oct 2026 · carried

    Pour

  • The Extension of the UK's Contracting Party Status to the International Convention for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas to the Bailiwick of Guernsey

    22 Oct 2026 · carried

    Pour

  • States' Register of Contact Details (Guernsey and Alderney) Law (Amendment) Ordinance, 2026

    22 Oct 2026 · carried

    Pour

  • Long-term Care Insurance (Amendment) (Guernsey) Law, 2026

    22 Oct 2026 · carried

    Pour

  • Amendment 1

    22 Oct 2026 · lost

    Pour

  • Legislative Changes to Enable Streamlining the Plan Making and Amendment Process

    22 Oct 2026 · carried

    Pour

  • Rule 26(1) Motion (* P.2026/68 (as amended A1) )

    22 Oct 2026 · lost

    Pour

  • Rule 26(1) Motion (* P.2026/67 )

    22 Oct 2026 · carried

    Contre

  • Schedule for future States' business

    22 Oct 2026 · carried

    Pour

  • Amendment 1

    22 Oct 2026 · carried

    Pour

The 12 most recent votes in the States of Deliberation’s electronic voting record, whether or not they relate to a manifesto promise.

88%lowest of 2Committee meeting attendanceEmployment & Social Security 100% · Employment & Social Security 88%

Guernsey stopped requiring committees to compile and publish member attendance in 2022, reasoning that electronic voting already showed who was present for each vote. These figures are not a published States dataset. Most are attendance records the Guernsey Press obtained from the States on request and published in full; Development & Planning Authority figures were compiled from the Authority’s own minutes at our request, Scrutiny Management Committee figures were supplied by its Clerk, and the Offshore Wind Delivery Board supplied its own record. See References for every source.

5 August to 4 October 2026

Employment & Social Security Committee attendance return, 13 Oct 2026 →
  • Employment & Social Security100%

    Attended 7 of 7 meetings in full, plus a further 0 in part - 7 of 7 counted as attended either way.

    Wendy McHugh, a non-voting member, attended 6 of the 7 meetings in full; her figures are not shown here.

Since 1 January 2026

Guernsey Press, 04 Aug 2026 →
  • Employment & Social Security88%

    Attended in full or in part, as a share of the meetings held while on the committee. The committee met 22 times in this period.

    On the committee from 20 May 2026.

15askedRule 14 written questions15 of 15 answered · most recent asked 07 Oct 2026 to Committee for Home Affairs

Coverage

In the news

30 Bailiwick media mentions since May 2026, peaking at 11 a month in September 2026.

Every Bailiwick media article naming this deputy, month by month. Accented bars mark coverage spikes; hover or focus any month to see the stories behind it.

369May 26Jun 26Jul 26Aug 26Sep 26Oct 26

What drove the spikes

Keep comparing

Deputies ranked nearby

The deputies immediately around this one on the scorecard, ranked by promises kept.

Full rankingsSpeaking activityHow the scorecard works

Stay up to date

Ross Le Brun’s record changes with every States sitting. Join the Facebook group or follow us on LinkedIn and we will tell you when it does.

Join the Facebook groupFollow on LinkedIn

Storyboard

What Guernsey said

Four years of public comment on local politics, in eleven events

Open the storyboard

Stay up to date

This record changes with every States sitting.

Join the Guernsey Deputy Scorecard group and we will post when a promise is tested, a verdict moves or a correction lands.

Join the Facebook groupPublic group · free · no advertising